7:05 p.m.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1200612
Bug ID: 1200612
Summary: Package rocksdb binary for Fedora
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: golang-github-influxdb-rocksdb
Assignee: jchaloup(a)redhat.com
Reporter: ggillies(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: golang(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, jchaloup(a)redhat.com,
lsm5(a)redhat.com
Hi,
With influxdb version 0.9 moving to completely utilise rocksdb, we probably
want to look at expanding this package to fully provide a rocksdb compiled
binary.
That is, a rocksdb package that has /usr/bin/rocksdb, as well as the devel
package with the raw go code for deps (which this package currently provides)
Regards,
Graeme
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
1:41 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 1200612] Package rocksdb binary for Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1200612
Honza Horak <hhorak(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |ggillies(a)redhat.com
Flags| |needinfo?(ggillies(a)redhat.c
| |om)
--- Comment #1 from Honza Horak <hhorak(a)redhat.com> ---
(In reply to Graeme Gillies from comment #0)
With influxdb version 0.9 moving to completely utilise rocksdb, we
probably
want to look at expanding this package to fully provide a rocksdb compiled
binary.
That is, a rocksdb package that has /usr/bin/rocksdb, as well as the devel
package with the raw go code for deps (which this package currently provides)
Graeme, what do you expect from /usr/bin/rocksdb? When trying to compile
rocksdb from https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb.git it doesn't include such a
binary.
Imho the packge rocksdb should just include *versioned* shared library (done by
`make shared_lib PLATFORM_SHARED_EXT=so PLATFORM_SHARED_VERSIONED=true`) and
rocksdb-devel package should contain the header files and unversioned library
symlink. No evidence about rocksdb binary.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
6:10 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 1200612] Package rocksdb binary for Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1200612
Graeme Gillies <ggillies(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags|needinfo?(ggillies(a)redhat.c |
|om) |
--- Comment #2 from Graeme Gillies <ggillies(a)redhat.com> ---
Hi,
I am incredibly sorry you are correct. I got confused with influxdb and rocksdb
in this case. You are right, this bug should be renamed/changed to having
rocksdb shared library shipped in fedora so that it can be used by this
packaged and eventually influxdb.
Thanks again,
Regards,
Graeme
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
3:07 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 1200612] Package rocksdb binary for Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1200612
Jan Chaloupka <jchaloup(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags| |needinfo?(mmuzila(a)redhat.co
| |m)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
6:59 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1200612] Package rocksdb binary for Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1200612
Matej Mužila <mmuzila(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags|needinfo?(mmuzila(a)redhat.co |
|m) |
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
8:39 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1200612] Package rocksdb binary for Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1200612
Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client <fedora-admin-xmlrpc(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assignee|jchaloup(a)redhat.com |fpokorny(a)redhat.com
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client <fedora-admin-xmlrpc(a)redhat.com> ---
This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database. Reassigning
to the new owner of this component.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
6:20 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1200612] Package rocksdb binary for Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1200612
Jeremy Eder <jeder(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jeder(a)redhat.com
--- Comment #7 from Jeremy Eder <jeder(a)redhat.com> ---
Hey all -- this is almost a year old, wondering what the current status is?
I have another use case for this: the rocksdb shared library is required to
run IBM's hyperledger implementation "fabric".
https://github.com/hyperledger/fabric
Which we're in the process of getting running on Fedora, and right now we have
to build RocksDB shared_lib from source, which inflates the dependency list to
include the compile chain and a bunch of ruby gems which are useless during
runtime.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
6:29 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1200612] Package rocksdb binary for Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1200612
Jan Chaloupka <jchaloup(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags| |needinfo?(mmuzila(a)redhat.co
| |m)
--- Comment #8 from Jan Chaloupka <jchaloup(a)redhat.com> ---
Matej?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
9:44 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1200612] Package rocksdb binary for Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1200612
--- Comment #9 from Jeremy Eder <jeder(a)redhat.com> ---
https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/1114
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
2908
days inactive
3327
days old
golang@lists.fedoraproject.org
8 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
Red Hat Bugzilla