haskell-devel November 2008

haskell-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

5 participants
66 discussions

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 467893] Yum update cycles between ghc-prof and ghc682-prof
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 Nov '08

19 Nov '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467893 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 469484] Upgrade path: ghc EVR higher in F8 than F9
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 Nov '08

19 Nov '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469484 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2008-11-19 09:49:06 EDT --- ghc-6.8.3-10.fc9, gtk2hs-0.9.13-3.fc9, haddock-2.0.0.0-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 467893] Yum update cycles between ghc-prof and ghc682-prof
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 Nov '08

19 Nov '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467893 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2008-11-19 09:49:04 EDT --- ghc-6.8.3-10.fc9, gtk2hs-0.9.13-3.fc9, haddock-2.0.0.0-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 472106] New: Newer stable version of ghc released (6.10.1)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 Nov '08

19 Nov '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Newer stable version of ghc released (6.10.1) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472106 Summary: Newer stable version of ghc released (6.10.1) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: ghc AssignedTo: bos(a)serpentine.com ReportedBy: konrad(a)tylerc.org QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, bos(a)serpentine.com, loupgaroublond(a)gmail.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Fedora 9 has ghc 6.8.2; rawhide has 6.8.3. Upstream has released 6.10.1. Not a high priority thing (I don't *need* anything explicitly from 6.10.1) but it's good to track upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 2

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library.
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 Nov '08

19 Nov '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(loupgaroublond@gm | |ail.com) --- Comment #22 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2008-11-19 01:24:44 EDT --- Yaakov, when you think you will have time to continue this package review or would you like me to post an updated package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library.
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 Nov '08

19 Nov '08

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 425882] Review Request: ghc-zlib - zlib bindings for ghc
by Red Hat Bugzilla 17 Nov '08

17 Nov '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425882 --- Comment #40 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2008-11-16 23:27:33 EDT --- I mean https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Haskell/LibraryOnlyTemplate -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 425882] Review Request: ghc-zlib - zlib bindings for ghc
by Red Hat Bugzilla 17 Nov '08

17 Nov '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425882 --- Comment #39 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2008-11-16 23:25:21 EDT --- Sounds good Jason: BTW I already added the -devel Provides to PackagingDrafts Haskell templates last week. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 425882] Review Request: ghc-zlib - zlib bindings for ghc
by Red Hat Bugzilla 15 Nov '08

15 Nov '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425882 --- Comment #38 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs(a)math.uh.edu> 2008-11-15 11:21:36 EDT --- OK, I can verify that the package installs into a fresh dist-f11 buildroot with the dependencies as above and the package tweaked to build against ghc-6.10.1. So where are we? Basically, you tell me what you wnat to do. I guess at this point I'd say to just target ghc-6.10.1, drop "Requires(post): haddock09", add the -devel provide and we're good to go. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 425882] Review Request: ghc-zlib - zlib bindings for ghc
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Nov '08

14 Nov '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425882 --- Comment #37 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs(a)math.uh.edu> 2008-11-14 15:18:04 EDT --- That is a bit confusing; I didn't realize that haddock was moving into ghc, and unfortunately "rawhide" won't actually be rawhide for some time and while I can do build testing in koji its tough to do any actual install testing unless I work against static-repos. Unfortunately download speeds from there are so terribly slow that it takes me hours to init a buildroot. Let me see what I can come up with. So if I understand correctly, for ghc-6.10.1 the scriptlet dependencies should just be: Requires(pre): ghc = %{ghc_version} Requires(preun): ghc = %{ghc_version} Requires(post): ghc = %{ghc_version} Requires(postun): ghc = %{ghc_version} And the "Requires(post): haddock09" bit can go. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

haskell-devel November 2008