July 2008 - haskell-devel - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library.

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. Alias: ghc-X11 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 ------- Additional Comments From loupgaroublond(a)gmail.com 2008-07-14 06:22 EST ------- Sure. I plan on making this *very* clear to the Packaging Committee tomorrow. There's always this amibguity of upstream vs. downstream. I think it's best we inform them, and then let the people who know best make the final decision. I will make sure they see this conversation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

15 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library.

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. Alias: ghc-X11 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 ------- Additional Comments From petersen(a)redhat.com 2008-07-13 22:21 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > Please discuss this at the next meeting with the Packaging Committee. Yes, I have no objections to discussing there, but at the end of the day of course they know much less about Haskell packaging than the SIG does, so I expect they would accept any recommendation we make either way. I think it makes more sense to discuss it first on fedora-haskell-list and get consensus there. > I've asked them to review the guidelines, and this is one thing I want *them* to > decide. Hmm, but they are still in draft state and we were supposed to finish these package reviews first but the guidelines would be ready... > There is definitely an ambiguity in the Fedora standards, no matter how > many times you say there aren't. I don't remember saying anything about the Fedora name standards - I said that naming of Haskell libraries tends to be pretty consistent (it is not like they use different casing in different places (like lowercase tarball, uppercase directory, mixed case module name or whatever). When there is consistent use of case in a project then that clearly indicates upstream thinks that that cased name is the correct name and there is no good reason for us to change that. X11 is such an example. Exceptions may occur and are indeed allowed by the Fedora Guidelines as you state and that is all ok, but it is not stop us from recommending Haskell libraries should follow the upstream naming as far as possible. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

15 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library.

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. Alias: ghc-X11 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 ------- Additional Comments From loupgaroublond(a)gmail.com 2008-07-11 07:36 EST ------- Please discuss this at the next meeting with the Packaging Committee. I've asked them to review the guidelines, and this is one thing I want *them* to decide. There is definitely an ambiguity in the Fedora standards, no matter how many times you say there aren't. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

15 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library.

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. Alias: ghc-X11 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 ------- Additional Comments From petersen(a)redhat.com 2008-07-07 00:52 EST ------- Sorry but there is no ambiguity and the upstreaming naming of Haskell packages is quite consistent and usable. I urge you strongly to go along with the upstream naming conventions. http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage-scripts/package/X11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

15 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library.

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. Alias: ghc-X11 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 ------- Additional Comments From loupgaroublond(a)gmail.com 2008-07-04 05:25 EST ------- I know, but it tends to lead to rIdiCuLOUS NaMinG schemes, if you ask me. I've commented in the guidelines talk page that there is a controversy over this. Comments have been added that Fedora does not yet have a clear policy on this either (see: python vs. perl). There are reasons for choosing both. Since I've put together the work, and we are still a meritocracy, I've decided to push my personal preference forward. I hope you believe me when I say I am not ignoring your preferences. I've asked the Packaging Committee to comment on this instead of me, and if they prefer mixed case naming schemes, I will be more than happy to switch everything around. But please, don't turn this into a bikeshed discussion. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

15 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library.

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. Alias: ghc-X11 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 ------- Additional Comments From petersen(a)redhat.com 2008-07-04 04:41 EST ------- The spec file must be named the same as the package, ie ghc-X11. I don't agree about downcasing the name when upstream is clearly using X11. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

15 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 440493] FTBFS gtk2hs-0.9.12.1-8.fc9

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: FTBFS gtk2hs-0.9.12.1-8.fc9 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440493 fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |9 matt_domsch(a)dell.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com 2008-05-14 04:38 EST ------- Changing version to '9' as part of upcoming Fedora 9 GA. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping ------- Additional Comments From matt_domsch(a)dell.com 2008-07-03 13:36 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 434005 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

15 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426753] Review Request: xmonad - A tiling window manager

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmonad - A tiling window manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426753 ------- Additional Comments From loupgaroublond(a)gmail.com 2008-07-03 06:18 EST ------- SPEC: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/repo/xmonad.spec SRPM: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/repo/xmonad-0.7-1.fc9.src.rpm This update follows the Draft Guidelines, which are under review. Reviewing this package will help find problems in the guidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

15 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426754] Review Request: ghc-xmonad-contrib - Third party extensions for xmonad

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-xmonad-contrib - Third party extensions for xmonad https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754 ------- Additional Comments From loupgaroublond(a)gmail.com 2008-07-03 06:17 EST ------- SPEC: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/repo/xmonad-contrib.spec SRPM: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/repo/ghc-xmonad-contrib-0.7-1.fc9.src.rpm This update is compliant with the Draft Guidelines, which are under review. Reviewing this will help poke holes in the Guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

15 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library.

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. Alias: ghc-X11 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 ------- Additional Comments From loupgaroublond(a)gmail.com 2008-07-03 06:16 EST ------- SPEC: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/repo/x11.spec SRPM: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/repo/ghc-x11-1.4.1-1.fc9.src.rpm This new version is compliant with the Draft Guidelines. Reviewing will find problems with the draft that is currently under evaluation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

15 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

haskell-devel July 2008