[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 479800] Review Request: hlint - Provides Haskell Source Code Suggestions
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479800
--- Comment #23 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs(a)math.uh.edu> 2009-11-07 22:45:46 EDT ---
As long as the source itself is unclear, that information needs to be included
within the package.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
14 years, 5 months
- 1
- 0
[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 479800] Review Request: hlint - Provides Haskell Source Code Suggestions
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479800
--- Comment #22 from Conrad Meyer <konrad(a)tylerc.org> 2009-11-05 05:31:25 EDT ---
License response:
"""
Hi,
The intention was GPLv2. The license block in the Cabal says GPL, but
the License file it points at is the GPLv2. I'd rather not annotate
every source code file with a license, but I will try and find what
the Haskell/Cabal approved way is to mark GPL versions in the license
field.
HLint has already been packaged by a couple of other distros, so I'm
curious what they did. I'll have to check.
As someone packaging HLint, is there anything else that would help
you? Some of the other distros asked for a changelog that is now
available at http://community.haskell.org/~ndm/darcs/hlint/CHANGES.txt
.
Thanks, Neil
"""
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
14 years, 6 months
- 1
- 0