haskell-devel February 2009

haskell-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

3 participants
49 discussions

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 471003] Review Request: cabal-install - Haskell package utility
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Feb '09

09 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471003 --- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2009-02-09 08:56:23 EDT --- I rebuilt (updated) ghc-zlib - so that it installs correctly and this should actually build again now on rawhide (oops!): http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1115148 As soon as ghc-6.10.1 has been pushed to f10-updates I will build ghc-zlib and ghc-HTTP there too. Spec URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/cabal-install/cabal-install.spec SRPM URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/cabal-install/cabal-install-0.6.0-3.fc10.s… (just fixed the URL field) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 479803] Review Request: cabal2spec - generates spec files for Haskell packages
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Feb '09

09 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479803 --- Comment #9 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2009-02-09 07:54:22 EDT --- This is the changelog: * Mon Feb 9 2009 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> - 0.5-1 - add cabal2spec-diff script to diff current spec against current template - add ghc-doc BR to binlib and lib templates -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 479803] Review Request: cabal2spec - generates spec files for Haskell packages
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Feb '09

09 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479803 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: cabal2spec |Review Request: cabal2spec |- generates spec files for |- generates spec files for |Haskell packages (was: |Haskell packages |haskell-packaging) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 479803] Review Request: cabal2spec - generates spec files for Haskell packages (was: haskell-packaging)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Feb '09

09 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479803 --- Comment #8 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2009-02-09 07:52:52 EDT --- Spec URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/cabal2spec/cabal2spec.spec SRPM URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/cabal2spec/cabal2spec-0.5-1.fc10.src.rpm Noarch: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/cabal2spec/cabal2spec-0.5-1.fc10.noarch.rpm I dunno how long it will be before FPC revisits the Haskell Guidelines. (I guess I need to submit it formally after the initial RFC.) Maybe we can just complete this review and then make any updates later as appropriate? It would be good to have this included in F11 anyway IMHO. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 471003] Review Request: cabal-install - Haskell package utility
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Feb '09

09 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471003 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |446451 --- Comment #5 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2009-02-09 06:58:57 EDT --- ping anyone? :) It would be really good to get this into F11 - it is the "rubygems" of the Haskell world. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 250767] ghc-gtk2hs won't install with only 256MB RAM
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 Feb '09

07 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250767 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |ASSIGNED --- Comment #16 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2009-02-07 19:32:31 EDT --- Actually I forgot to remove the --auto-ghci-libs from ghc-pkg update in %post so this build will not actually fix the problem. :-( It should be fixed already in ghc-gtk2hs-0.10.0-0.1.fc11 in rawhide though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 250767] ghc-gtk2hs won't install with only 256MB RAM
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 Feb '09

07 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250767 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2009-02-07 17:18:58 EDT --- ghc-6.10.1-7.fc10, ghc-paths-0.1.0.5-2.fc10, haddock-2.4.1-2.fc10, ghc-gtk2hs-0.9.13-8.20081108.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update ghc ghc-paths haddock ghc-gtk2hs'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1442 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 481252] New: libedit-devel should require ncurses-devel
by Red Hat Bugzilla 04 Feb '09

04 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: libedit-devel should require ncurses-devel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481252 Summary: libedit-devel should require ncurses-devel Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: libedit AssignedTo: debarshi.ray(a)gmail.com ReportedBy: petersen(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: jeff(a)ocjtech.us, debarshi.ray(a)gmail.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: libedit requires ncurses and reflecting that libedit-devel should require ncurses-devel. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): libedit-2.11-1.20080712cvs.fc10 Steps to Reproduce: This is causing a problem for ghc (Haskell compiler) when trying to link its editline library which is linked to libedit. Actual results: $ rpm -q --requires libedit | grep ncurses libncurses.so.5()(64bit) $ rpm -q --requires libedit-devel | grep ncurses $ Expected results: libedit to require ncurses-devel. Additional info: I note that libedit-20090111-3.0 was also released upstream. I am happy to fix and update the package if you don't have time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 8

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426752] Review Request: ghc-X11-xft - Haskell binding to Xft
by Red Hat Bugzilla 02 Feb '09

02 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426752 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: ghc-X11-xft |Review Request: ghc-X11-xft |- Haskell bindings to the |- Haskell binding to Xft |Xft, X Free Type interface | |library, and some Xrender | |parts | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

haskell-devel February 2009