haskell-devel September 2009

haskell-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

6 participants
108 discussions

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 523883] Review Request: haskell-platform - Standard Haskell distribution
by Red Hat Bugzilla 27 Sep '09

27 Sep '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523883 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(petersen(a)redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2009-09-27 22:41:47 EDT --- Thanks for testing. Now that we have all the haskell-platform packages in dist-f12 I rebuilt HTTP and cgi for the new network package. Spec: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/haskell-platform/haskell-platform.spec SRPM: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/haskell-platform/haskell-platform-2009.2.0… * Mon Sep 28 2009 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> - 2009.2.0.2-2 - add all the buildrequires (#523883) - create ghcpkgdir since metapackage - nothing in bindir Built for me in koji just now: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1712315 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 523883] Review Request: haskell-platform - Standard Haskell distribution
by Red Hat Bugzilla 27 Sep '09

27 Sep '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523883 Bug 523883 depends on bug 523886, which changed state. Bug 523886 Summary: Review Request: ghc-time - Haskell time library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523886 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 523886] Review Request: ghc-time - Haskell time library
by Red Hat Bugzilla 27 Sep '09

27 Sep '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523886 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2009-09-27 20:25:47 EDT --- Thanks - imported and building in koji. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 523883] Review Request: haskell-platform - Standard Haskell distribution
by Red Hat Bugzilla 26 Sep '09

26 Sep '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523883 --- Comment #3 from Bryan O'Sullivan <bos(a)serpentine.com> 2009-09-26 12:43:22 EDT --- We have until the 29th to get this in for the F-12 beta freeze. Let's go! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 523886] Review Request: ghc-time - Haskell time library
by Red Hat Bugzilla 25 Sep '09

25 Sep '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523886 Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)tummy.com> 2009-09-25 12:12:37 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 523886] Review Request: ghc-time - Haskell time library
by Red Hat Bugzilla 25 Sep '09

25 Sep '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523886 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |bos(a)serpentine.com Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2009-09-25 03:51:37 EDT --- Thanks! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ghc-time Short Description: Haskell time library Owners: petersen Branches: devel InitialCC: haskell-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426754] Review Request: ghc-xmonad-contrib - Third party extensions for xmonad
by Red Hat Bugzilla 24 Sep '09

24 Sep '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 523883] Review Request: haskell-platform - Standard Haskell distribution
by Red Hat Bugzilla 24 Sep '09

24 Sep '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523883 Bryan O'Sullivan <bos(a)serpentine.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bos(a)serpentine.com Flag| |needinfo?(petersen(a)redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #2 from Bryan O'Sullivan <bos(a)serpentine.com> 2009-09-24 18:32:58 EDT --- The BuildRequires for this package are incorrect. It should fail before the %build stage due to unmet dependencies, but instead I get a build-time failure: Configuring haskell-platform-2009.2.0.2... Setup: At least the following dependencies are missing: HTTP ==4000.0.6, cgi ==3001.1.7.1, editline ==0.2.1.0, fgl ==5.4.2.2, network ==2.2.1.4, zlib ==0.5.0.0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426754] Review Request: ghc-xmonad-contrib - Third party extensions for xmonad
by Red Hat Bugzilla 24 Sep '09

24 Sep '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754 --- Comment #33 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2009-09-24 18:00:01 EDT --- ghc-xmonad-contrib-0.8.1-8.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-xmonad-contrib-0.8.1-8.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 523886] Review Request: ghc-time - Haskell time library
by Red Hat Bugzilla 24 Sep '09

24 Sep '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523886 Bryan O'Sullivan <bos(a)serpentine.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bos(a)serpentine.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Bryan O'Sullivan <bos(a)serpentine.com> 2009-09-24 13:15:00 EDT --- # MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. $ rpmlint ghc-time-1.1.2.4-2.fc11.src.rpm ghc-time.src: W: strange-permission time-1.1.2.4.tar.gz 0600 Normal, expected errors: $ rpmlint ghc-time-prof-1.1.2.4-2.fc11.x86_64.rpm ghc-time-prof.x86_64: E: devel-dependency ghc-time-devel ghc-time-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation ghc-time-prof.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ghc-6.10.3/time-1.1.2.4/libHStime-1.1.2.4_p.a Other generated RPMs are fine. # MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . Yes. # MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. Yes. # MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . Yes. # MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . Yes. # MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. Yes. # MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. Yes. # MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. Yes. # MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. Yes. # MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. Yes. # MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. Yes. # MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. N/A. # MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. Yes. # MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. N/A. # MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. N/A. # MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries. Yes. # MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. N/A. # MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. Yes. # MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. Yes. # MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. Yes. # MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). Yes. # MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. Yes. # MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. Yes. # MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). Yes. # MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. Yes. # MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. Yes. # MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A. # MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). N/A. # MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. N/A. # MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} N/A. # MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. Yes. # MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. N/A. # MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. Yes. # MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). Yes. # MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. Yes. This package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

haskell-devel September 2009