January 2010 - haskell-devel - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 547867] New: %{ghc_version} desn't expand properly

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: %{ghc_version} desn't expand properly https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547867 Summary: %{ghc_version} desn't expand properly Product: Fedora Version: 11 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: high Component: ghc-rpm-macros AssignedTo: loupgaroublond(a)gmail.com ReportedBy: jochen(a)herr-schmitt.de QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, loupgaroublond(a)gmail.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora I want to tryout ghc-6.12.1 on my system and have installed ghc-rpm-macros-0.3.0-1 on my system. Because I have trouble to compile my packages, I have try out the following command: $ rpm -q --eval '%{ghc_version}' and got the following output: error: Recursion depth(17) greater than max(16) 15< (empty) 14< (empty) 13< (empty) 12< (empty) 11< (empty) 10< (empty) 9< (empty) 8< (empty) 7< (empty) 6< (empty) 5< (empty) 4< (empty) 3< (empty) 2< (empty) 1< (empty) 0< (empty) If I type $ ghc --numeric-version I will get 6.12.1 which I expected for $ rpm -q --eval '%{ghc_version}' Best Regards: Jochen Schmitt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

10 years, 1 month

1
6
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 517197] New: Review Request: ghc-GLUT - bindings to the C GLUT library

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-GLUT - bindings to the C GLUT library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517197 Summary: Review Request: ghc-GLUT - bindings to the C GLUT library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bos(a)serpentine.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Depends on: 517155 Classification: Fedora Bryan O'Sullivan <bos(a)serpentine.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? Spec: http://www.serpentine.com/bos/files/ghc-GLUT.spec SRPM: http://www.serpentine.com/bos/files/ghc-GLUT-2.1.1.2-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This package provides the Haskell GLUT library for ghc. This is a set of bindings to the C freeglut library. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

12 years, 11 months

1
13
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 503250] New: Review Request: ghc-utf8-string - Support reading and writing UTF8 Strings

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-utf8-string - Support reading and writing UTF8 Strings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503250 Summary: Review Request: ghc-utf8-string - Support reading and writing UTF8 Strings Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Status Whiteboard: NotReady Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Clone Of: 426750 Spec URL: http://zoglesby.fedorapeople.org/ghc-hinotify.spec SRPM URL: http://zoglesby.fedorapeople.org/ghc-utf8-string-0.3.4-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This library provides a wrapper to the Linux Kernel's inotify feature,allowing applications to subscribe to notifications when a file is accessed or modified. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

13 years

1
36
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 509699] New: ~/.cabal/bin should be appended to PATH if available

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: ~/.cabal/bin should be appended to PATH if available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509699 Summary: ~/.cabal/bin should be appended to PATH if available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: cabal-install AssignedTo: petersen(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: petersen(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: After installing cabal programs, it is annoying that they are not in PATH and one has to type the fully-qualified or relative path explicitly: eg ~/.cabal/bin/progname I think we can append ~/.cabal/bin to user's PATH if it exists. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

13 years, 4 months

1
6
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 522953] New: update to darcs-2.3.0 stable cabal release

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: update to darcs-2.3.0 stable cabal release https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522953 Summary: update to darcs-2.3.0 stable cabal release Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: darcs AssignedTo: petersen(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: petersen(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, jeremy(a)hinegardner.org, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: darcs should be updated to 2.3.0 stable. Unfortunately this requires hashed-storage and haskeline to be added to fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

13 years, 6 months

1
24
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 537979] Review Request: ghc-hashed-storage - Hashed file storage support

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537979 --- Comment #17 from Christoph Wickert <cwickert(a)fedoraproject.org> 2010-01-30 12:00:21 EST --- OK, Iguess 0.4.5 is not supposed to build, but is the whole haskell stack broken in rawhide? I can't build 0.3.9 ether. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

13 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 537979] Review Request: ghc-hashed-storage - Hashed file storage support

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537979 Christoph Wickert <cwickert(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cwickert(a)fedoraproject.org --- Comment #16 from Christoph Wickert <cwickert(a)fedoraproject.org> 2010-01-30 11:54:44 EST --- I'm not familiar with haskell, but looking at the spec I wonder what's the use of using globals for name, summary and description and depends? Using globals only makes sense if - the their contents is changing a lot - if the conditionals are used in the spec several times. Nether is the case and it makes the spec hard to read and rpmlint. BTW: Was this package ever rpmlint'ed during review? $ rpmlint ~/Desktop/ghc-hashed-storage-0.3.9-2.fc12.src.rpm ghc-hashed-storage.src: W: strange-permission hashed-storage-0.3.9.tar.gz 0600 ghc-hashed-storage.src: W: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install ghc-hashed-storage.src: W: no-buildroot-tag 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. The missing "rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT" is not in the %cabal_install macro ether: $ rpm --eval %cabal_install /usr/bin/runghc Setup copy --destdir=${RPM_BUILD_ROOT} -v $ rpmlint ghc-hashed-storage*0.3.9-2.fc13.i686.rpm ghc-hashed-storage.i686: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/ghc-6.12.1/hashed-storage-0.3.9/libHShashed-storage-0.3.9-ghc6.12.1.so ghc-hashed-storage.i686: W: executable-stack /usr/lib/ghc-6.12.1/hashed-storage-0.3.9/libHShashed-storage-0.3.9-ghc6.12.1.so ghc-hashed-storage-devel.i686: W: no-documentation ghc-hashed-storage-prof.i686: E: devel-dependency ghc-hashed-storage-devel ghc-hashed-storage-prof.i686: W: no-documentation ghc-hashed-storage-prof.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ghc-6.12.1/hashed-storage-0.3.9/libHShashed-storage-0.3.9_p.a 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 5 warnings. I was trying to build this in mock, but it fails: F-12: + %cabal_configure --ghc -p /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.sYV5fI: line 29: fg: no job control F-13: Configuring hashed-storage-0.4.5... Setup: At least the following dependencies are missing: binary -any, dataenc -any -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

13 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 479800] Review Request: hlint - Provides Haskell Source Code Suggestions

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479800 --- Comment #40 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2010-01-29 01:41:39 EST --- Created an attachment (id=387508) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=387508) hlint.spec for ghc-6.12.1 This worksforme. Not sure if %attr(755,root,root) is needed - maybe not? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

13 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 479800] Review Request: hlint - Provides Haskell Source Code Suggestions

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479800 --- Comment #39 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2010-01-29 01:29:13 EST --- Ok hlint-1.6.14 should be good now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

13 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 479800] Review Request: hlint - Provides Haskell Source Code Suggestions

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479800 --- Comment #38 from Conrad Meyer <konrad(a)tylerc.org> 2010-01-27 23:57:00 EST --- Ahhhh. Hm. Let's do this, so this review can finally be closed ;). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

13 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

haskell-devel January 2010