August 2010 - haskell-devel - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 547867] New: %{ghc_version} desn't expand properly

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: %{ghc_version} desn't expand properly https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547867 Summary: %{ghc_version} desn't expand properly Product: Fedora Version: 11 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: high Component: ghc-rpm-macros AssignedTo: loupgaroublond(a)gmail.com ReportedBy: jochen(a)herr-schmitt.de QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, loupgaroublond(a)gmail.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora I want to tryout ghc-6.12.1 on my system and have installed ghc-rpm-macros-0.3.0-1 on my system. Because I have trouble to compile my packages, I have try out the following command: $ rpm -q --eval '%{ghc_version}' and got the following output: error: Recursion depth(17) greater than max(16) 15< (empty) 14< (empty) 13< (empty) 12< (empty) 11< (empty) 10< (empty) 9< (empty) 8< (empty) 7< (empty) 6< (empty) 5< (empty) 4< (empty) 3< (empty) 2< (empty) 1< (empty) 0< (empty) If I type $ ghc --numeric-version I will get 6.12.1 which I expected for $ rpm -q --eval '%{ghc_version}' Best Regards: Jochen Schmitt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

10 years, 1 month

1
6
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 604592] New: ghc-6.12.3 is available

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: ghc-6.12.3 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=604592 Summary: ghc-6.12.3 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: ASSIGNED Keywords: FutureFeature Severity: medium Priority: low Component: ghc AssignedTo: petersen(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, bos(a)serpentine.com, loupgaroublond(a)gmail.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 6.12.3 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 6.12.2 URL: http://haskell.org/ghc/ Please consult the package update guidelines before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_update_guidelines More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_Release_Monitoring -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

11 years, 3 months

1
7
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 517197] New: Review Request: ghc-GLUT - bindings to the C GLUT library

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-GLUT - bindings to the C GLUT library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517197 Summary: Review Request: ghc-GLUT - bindings to the C GLUT library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bos(a)serpentine.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Depends on: 517155 Classification: Fedora Bryan O'Sullivan <bos(a)serpentine.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? Spec: http://www.serpentine.com/bos/files/ghc-GLUT.spec SRPM: http://www.serpentine.com/bos/files/ghc-GLUT-2.1.1.2-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This package provides the Haskell GLUT library for ghc. This is a set of bindings to the C freeglut library. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

12 years, 12 months

1
13
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 503250] New: Review Request: ghc-utf8-string - Support reading and writing UTF8 Strings

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-utf8-string - Support reading and writing UTF8 Strings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503250 Summary: Review Request: ghc-utf8-string - Support reading and writing UTF8 Strings Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Status Whiteboard: NotReady Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Clone Of: 426750 Spec URL: http://zoglesby.fedorapeople.org/ghc-hinotify.spec SRPM URL: http://zoglesby.fedorapeople.org/ghc-utf8-string-0.3.4-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This library provides a wrapper to the Linux Kernel's inotify feature,allowing applications to subscribe to notifications when a file is accessed or modified. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

13 years

1
36
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 605031] New: happy-1.18.5 is available

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: happy-1.18.5 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=605031 Summary: happy-1.18.5 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: ASSIGNED Keywords: FutureFeature Severity: medium Priority: low Component: happy AssignedTo: bos(a)serpentine.com ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, bos(a)serpentine.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 1.18.5 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 1.18.4 URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/happy/ Please consult the package update guidelines before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_update_guidelines More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_Release_Monitoring -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

13 years, 1 month

1
4
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 580480] Review Request: ghc-type-level - A type-level library for Haskell

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=580480 Shakthi Kannan <shakthimaan(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #15 from Shakthi Kannan <shakthimaan(a)gmail.com> 2010-08-31 12:26:59 EDT --- New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: ghc-type-level Short Description: Haskell type-level library Owners: shakthimaan chitlesh Branches: F-13 F-14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

13 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 619991] Review Request: ghc-text - Haskell efficient packed Unicode text type

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=619991 Shakthi Kannan <shakthimaan(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |shakthimaan(a)gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |shakthimaan(a)gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

13 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 612076] Review Request: ghc-feldspar-language - Functional Embedded Language for DSP and PARallelism

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=612076 --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2010-08-31 03:40:52 EDT --- I could review this if you able to review one of my pending submissions (ghc-text is probably highest priority since it will block darcs-2.5 otherwise ghc-glib.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

13 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 595697] Review Request: ghc-regex-tdfa - Haskell "tagged" DFA regex engine

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595697 --- Comment #8 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2010-08-31 03:35:43 EDT --- Feel free to continue this review when you are ready. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

13 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 580480] Review Request: ghc-type-level - A type-level library for Haskell

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=580480 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #14 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2010-08-31 03:33:41 EDT --- Thanks, here is the final review: +:ok, =:needs attention, -:needs fixing, NA: not applicable MUST Items: [] MUST: rpmlint output ghc-type-level.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell -> Gaskell, Gaitskell, Skellum 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. ghc-type-level.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell -> Gaskell, Gaitskell, Skellum ghc-type-level.x86_64: W: executable-stack /usr/lib64/ghc-6.12.1/type-level-0.2.4/libHStype-level-0.2.4-ghc6.12.1.so 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. ghc-type-level-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell -> Gaskell, Gaitskell, Skellum 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. ghc-type-level-prof.x86_64: E: devel-dependency ghc-type-level-devel ghc-type-level-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation ghc-type-level-prof.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ghc-6.12.1/type-level-0.2.4/libHStype-level-0.2.4_p.a 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. All standard and waived [+] MUST: Package Naming Guidelines [+] MUST: spec file name must match base package %{name} [+] MUST: Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: Licensing Guidelines [+] MUST: License field in the package spec file must match actual license. [+] MUST: include license files in %doc if available in source [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English and be legible. [+] MUST: source md5sum matches upstream release 4aca3b4fd0a56377ffa79464cf491509 type-level-0.2.4.tar.gz [+] MUST: must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on one main arch http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2436860 [+] MUST: if necessary use ExcludeArch for other archs [+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires [NA] MUST: packages which store shared library files in the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. [+] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. [+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. [+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. Only minimal differences to cabal2spec template. [+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [+] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. [+] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [NA] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [NA] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [+] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [+] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. [+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. SHOULD Items: [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [+] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. [+] SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. Package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

13 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

haskell-devel August 2010