haskell-devel September 2010

haskell-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

3 participants
456 discussions

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 614024] Review Request: ghc-pango - Haskell pango binding
by Red Hat Bugzilla 01 Sep '10

01 Sep '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614024 Ben Boeckel <mathstuf(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |mathstuf(a)gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |mathstuf(a)gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Ben Boeckel <mathstuf(a)gmail.com> 2010-09-01 19:27:33 EDT --- Taking. +:ok, !:needs attention, -:needs fixing, NA: not applicable MUST Items: [+] MUST: rpmlint output % lintmock fedora-14-x86_64-bb ghc-pango.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell -> Gaskell, Gaitskell, Skellum ghc-pango.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell -> Gaskell, Gaitskell, Skellum ghc-pango-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell -> Gaskell, Gaitskell, Skellum ghc-pango-prof.x86_64: E: devel-dependency ghc-pango-devel ghc-pango-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation ghc-pango-prof.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ghc-6.12.3/pango-0.11.0/libHSpango-0.11.0_p.a 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 5 warnings. All standard and waived [+] MUST: Package Naming Guidelines [+] MUST: spec file name must match base package %{name} [+] MUST: Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: Licensing Guidelines [+] MUST: License field in the package spec file must match actual license. [+] MUST: include license files in %doc if available in source [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English and be legible. [+] MUST: source md5sum matches upstream release ca461174a78af94b361ad687b651d015 ../SOURCES/pango-0.11.0.tar.gz [+] MUST: must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on one main arch Requires newly reviewed packages. Builds for F14 x86_64 here. [+] MUST: if necessary use ExcludeArch for other archs [+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires [NA] MUST: use %find_lang macro for .po translations [NA] MUST: packages which store shared library files in the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [NA] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review [+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. [+] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. [+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [+] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. [+] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [NA] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [NA] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [+] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency [+] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. [+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [+] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. SHOULD Items: [+] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. [+] SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 595603] Review Request: ghc-hslogger - Haskell logging framework
by Red Hat Bugzilla 01 Sep '10

01 Sep '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595603 Ben Boeckel <mathstuf(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mathstuf(a)gmail.com --- Comment #26 from Ben Boeckel <mathstuf(a)gmail.com> 2010-09-01 19:14:33 EDT --- %doc is magic when just specifying files in the tarball. Also, explicitly mentioning %doc on %{_mandir} or %{_docdir} is unnecessary since it's implicit to RPM. Here's what I'd do: rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %ghc_lib_install mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version} install -p COPYING ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}/COPYING The directory is already owned through %doc commands make the directory owned and everything in it is then brought in through that. It's a little messy :( . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 629145] Review Request: ghc-cmdargs - Haskell command argument parsing
by Red Hat Bugzilla 01 Sep '10

01 Sep '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629145 --- Comment #4 from Ben Boeckel <mathstuf(a)gmail.com> 2010-09-01 19:11:08 EDT --- Spec URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/cmdargs/ghc-cmdargs.spec SRPM URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/cmdargs/ghc-cmdargs-0.2-1.fc14.src.rpm Updated to just do the library. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 629124] Review Request: ghc-libmpd - Haskell library for mpd communication
by Red Hat Bugzilla 01 Sep '10

01 Sep '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629124 Ben Boeckel <mathstuf(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Ben Boeckel <mathstuf(a)gmail.com> 2010-09-01 18:43:14 EDT --- Thanks. Building 0.4.2 locally now. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ghc-libmpd Short Description: Haskell library for mpd communication Owners: mathstuf Branches: F-12 F-13 F-14 InitialCC: haskell-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 609528] Review Request: ghc-cairo - Haskell Cairo bindings
by Red Hat Bugzilla 01 Sep '10

01 Sep '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=609528 --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)tummy.com> 2010-09-01 15:30:06 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 609518] Review Request: ghc-glib - Haskell GLib binding
by Red Hat Bugzilla 01 Sep '10

01 Sep '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=609518 --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)tummy.com> 2010-09-01 15:29:42 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 580480] Review Request: ghc-type-level - A type-level library for Haskell
by Red Hat Bugzilla 01 Sep '10

01 Sep '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=580480 --- Comment #16 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)tummy.com> 2010-09-01 15:28:17 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 595603] Review Request: ghc-hslogger - Haskell logging framework
by Red Hat Bugzilla 01 Sep '10

01 Sep '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595603 --- Comment #25 from Lakshmi Narasimhan <lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com> 2010-09-01 07:04:49 EDT --- This is another approach (going by your first suggestion). Under %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %ghc_lib_install cp COPYING ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version} echo "%doc %{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}/COPYING" >> ghc-hslogger.files Using this approach, I didn't have to explicitly mention COPYRIGHT in the %doc directive. I tried to put only %doc COPYING. But this deleted the doc/ghc-hslogger-1.1.0 directory and COPYRIGHT got deleted as well. My understanding is that cabal install put the COPYRIGHT file into the directory in the first place and the final stage of packaging was unable to find COPYRIGHT. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 595603] Review Request: ghc-hslogger - Haskell logging framework
by Red Hat Bugzilla 01 Sep '10

01 Sep '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595603 Lakshmi Narasimhan <lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(lakshminaras2002@ | |gmail.com) | --- Comment #24 from Lakshmi Narasimhan <lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com> 2010-09-01 07:01:13 EDT --- Ok. Updated spec to include COPYING into the package. Here is the spec file and source rpm. https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-hslogger.spec?attre… https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-hslogger-1.1.0-2.f1… -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 605031] New: happy-1.18.5 is available
by Red Hat Bugzilla 01 Sep '10

01 Sep '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: happy-1.18.5 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=605031 Summary: happy-1.18.5 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: ASSIGNED Keywords: FutureFeature Severity: medium Priority: low Component: happy AssignedTo: bos(a)serpentine.com ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, bos(a)serpentine.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 1.18.5 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 1.18.4 URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/happy/ Please consult the package update guidelines before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_update_guidelines More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_Release_Monitoring -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 4

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

haskell-devel September 2010