haskell-devel September 2010

haskell-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

3 participants
456 discussions

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 609528] Review Request: ghc-cairo - Haskell Cairo bindings
by Red Hat Bugzilla 01 Sep '10

01 Sep '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=609528 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2010-09-01 01:47:11 EDT --- Thanks, Ben :) New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: ghc-cairo Short Description: Haskell Cairo bindings Owners: petersen Branches: f14 InitialCC: haskell-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 614024] Review Request: ghc-pango - Haskell pango binding
by Red Hat Bugzilla 01 Sep '10

01 Sep '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614024 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard|notready | --- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2010-09-01 01:44:16 EDT --- Updated: Spec: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/ghc-pango/ghc-pango.spec Srpm: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/ghc-pango/ghc-pango-0.11.2-1.fc13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 609528] Review Request: ghc-cairo - Haskell Cairo bindings
by Red Hat Bugzilla 01 Sep '10

01 Sep '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=609528 Ben Boeckel <mathstuf(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |mathstuf(a)gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |mathstuf(a)gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Ben Boeckel <mathstuf(a)gmail.com> 2010-09-01 01:02:10 EDT --- Taken. +:ok, !:needs attention, -:needs fixing, NA: not applicable MUST Items: [!] MUST: rpmlint output % lintmock fedora-14-x86_64-bb ghc-cairo.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell -> Gaskell, Gaitskell, Skellum ghc-cairo.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Haskell -> Gaskell, Gaitskell, Skellum ghc-cairo.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell -> Gaskell, Gaitskell, Skellum ghc-cairo.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Haskell -> Gaskell, Gaitskell, Skellum ghc-cairo-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell -> Gaskell, Gaitskell, Skellum ghc-cairo-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Haskell -> Gaskell, Gaitskell, Skellum ghc-cairo-prof.x86_64: E: devel-dependency ghc-cairo-devel ghc-cairo-prof.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Haskell -> Gaskell, Gaitskell, Skellum ghc-cairo-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation ghc-cairo-prof.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ghc-6.12.3/cairo-0.11.1/libHScairo-0.11.1_p.a 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 9 warnings. All standard and waived [+] MUST: Package Naming Guidelines [+] MUST: spec file name must match base package %{name} [+] MUST: Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: Licensing Guidelines [+] MUST: License field in the package spec file must match actual license. [+] MUST: include license files in %doc if available in source [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English and be legible. [+] MUST: source md5sum matches upstream release 01056ece6c8872d30cbc0f11eef98e40 cairo-0.11.1.tar.gz [+] MUST: must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on one main arch Requires ghc-glib which isn't in Fedora yet. Builds locally. [+] MUST: if necessary use ExcludeArch for other archs [+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires [NA] MUST: use %find_lang macro for .po translations [NA] MUST: packages which store shared library files in the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [NA] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review [+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. [+] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. [+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [+] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. [+] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [NA] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [NA] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [+] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency [+] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. [+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [+] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. SHOULD Items: [+] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. [+] SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. Yay cabal2spec. Looks good. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 629145] Review Request: cmdargs - Haskell cmdargs
by Red Hat Bugzilla 31 Aug '10

31 Aug '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629145 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-haskell-list@redhat. | |com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 620046] Review Request: ghc-terminfo - Haskell terminfo binding
by Red Hat Bugzilla 31 Aug '10

31 Aug '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=620046 Ben Boeckel <mathstuf(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |mathstuf(a)gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |mathstuf(a)gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Ben Boeckel <mathstuf(a)gmail.com> 2010-09-01 00:42:32 EDT --- I can take this. rpmlint output: % lintmock fedora-14-x86_64-bb ghc-terminfo.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell -> Gaskell, Gaitskell, Skellum ghc-terminfo.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell -> Gaskell, Gaitskell, Skellum ghc-terminfo-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell -> Gaskell, Gaitskell, Skellum ghc-terminfo-prof.x86_64: E: devel-dependency ghc-terminfo-devel ghc-terminfo-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation ghc-terminfo-prof.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ghc-6.12.3/terminfo-0.3.1.3/libHSterminfo-0.3.1.3_p.a 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 5 warnings. Have to test the sed script then (will use yi from cabal against it). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 460974] Review Request: xmobar - status bar for X
by Red Hat Bugzilla 31 Aug '10

31 Aug '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460974 --- Comment #20 from Ben Boeckel <mathstuf(a)gmail.com> 2010-09-01 00:31:36 EDT --- Spec: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/xmobar/xmobar.spec SRPM: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/xmobar/xmobar-0.11.1-2.fc14.src.rpm Update to ship xmonadpropwrite as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 609518] Review Request: ghc-glib - Haskell GLib binding
by Red Hat Bugzilla 31 Aug '10

31 Aug '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=609518 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2010-08-31 23:58:23 EDT --- Thanks for reviewing. :) New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: ghc-glib Short Description: Haskell binding for glib2 Owners: petersen Branches: f14 InitialCC: haskell-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 460974] Review Request: xmobar - status bar for X
by Red Hat Bugzilla 31 Aug '10

31 Aug '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460974 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |petersen(a)redhat.com Status Whiteboard|notready | Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 609518] Review Request: ghc-glib - Haskell GLib binding
by Red Hat Bugzilla 31 Aug '10

31 Aug '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=609518 Ben Boeckel <mathstuf(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Ben Boeckel <mathstuf(a)gmail.com> 2010-08-31 23:35:57 EDT --- And the flag... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 629124] Review Request: ghc-libmpd - Haskell library for mpd communication
by Red Hat Bugzilla 31 Aug '10

31 Aug '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629124 --- Comment #2 from Ben Boeckel <mathstuf(a)gmail.com> 2010-08-31 23:17:53 EDT --- strange-permission warnings are a result of my 027 umask. Koji's results should be free of those (git does 644 and 755 perms only). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

haskell-devel September 2010