Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595603
Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Blocks|595697 |
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595697
Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Depends on|595603(ghc-hslogger) |
--- Comment #10 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2010-09-19 22:56:09 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> I am sponsoring Lakshmi in bug 595603, so making that bug
> block this for now instead.
ghc-hslogger review is done so dropping this dependency again.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595603
Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alias| |ghc-hslogger
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=615692
--- Comment #7 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2010-09-19 22:02:33 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Graphics/UI/Gtk/Signals.chs:105:46:
> Module `System.Glib.UTFString' does not export `maybePeekUTFString'
> error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.Yb9rcw (%build)
I think you need to build glib with newer gtk2hs-buildtools.
The F14 packages might be a little behind F15.
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2476536
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595603
--- Comment #32 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2010-09-19 20:52:00 EDT ---
Thanks I see you comments on ghc-colour, ghc-tagsoup, and ghc-gtk.
Please apply for membership of the packager group in FAS.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630208
Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |petersen(a)redhat.com
--- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2010-09-19 20:25:36 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> I am utterly unfamiliar with Haskell. I'm happy to negotiate on any point,
> given my ignorance.
Thanks for your good comments and input.
> Since ghc-csv-prof is a profiling package, I assume that its errors and
> warnings are irrelevant. A comment to this effect in the .spec would be nice.
Good point: we should document that in the fedora wiki
and add a link to our spec files.
> [-] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
>
> There is apparently some pretty good voodoo in ghc-rpm-macros. I'd like to see
> some comments describing that this is the reason for common_summary being
> defined buy only appearing once and the outright lack of %files and %doc - at
> least, I'm assuming that that's the reason. As-is, I'd say that this .spec
> file is not legible to someone without an existing ghc background.
Agreed - ditto as above.
> I'm assuming that ghc-rpm-macros enforces this, but I have no easy way of
> knowing. Legibility is not there.
Not obvious again but you can see the filelists on the src build dir.
> ghc-csv-devel contains /usr/lib64/ghc-6.12.3/csv-0.1.1/libHScsv-0.1.1.a; I'm
> unsure if this is qualifies as a static library.
It does unfortunately but ghc still assumes static libs by
default so they can't be subpackaged yet.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=620046
Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alias| |ghc-terminfo
--- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2010-09-19 20:15:01 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Have to test the sed script then (will use yi from cabal against it).
Sure, I think it is sufficient to test building with vty
or haskeline, which I noticed has an optional dep on this package.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630221
Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alias| |ghc-vty
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555653
Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alias| |ghc-haskeline
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.