haskell-devel September 2010

haskell-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

3 participants
456 discussions

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 614024] Review Request: ghc-pango - Haskell pango binding
by Red Hat Bugzilla 02 Sep '10

02 Sep '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614024 --- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2010-09-02 23:29:16 EDT --- Build failure http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2444251 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 614024] Review Request: ghc-pango - Haskell pango binding
by Red Hat Bugzilla 02 Sep '10

02 Sep '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614024 --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)tummy.com> 2010-09-02 17:32:35 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 580480] Review Request: ghc-type-level - A type-level library for Haskell
by Red Hat Bugzilla 02 Sep '10

02 Sep '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=580480 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2010-09-02 16:50:01 EDT --- ghc-type-level-0.2.4-2.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update ghc-type-level'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-type-level-0.2.4-2.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 580480] Review Request: ghc-type-level - A type-level library for Haskell
by Red Hat Bugzilla 02 Sep '10

02 Sep '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=580480 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2010-09-02 12:16:22 EDT --- ghc-type-level-0.2.4-4.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-type-level-0.2.4-4.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 580480] Review Request: ghc-type-level - A type-level library for Haskell
by Red Hat Bugzilla 02 Sep '10

02 Sep '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=580480 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2010-09-02 12:16:17 EDT --- ghc-type-level-0.2.4-2.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-type-level-0.2.4-2.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 580480] Review Request: ghc-type-level - A type-level library for Haskell
by Red Hat Bugzilla 02 Sep '10

02 Sep '10

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 460974] Review Request: xmobar - status bar for X
by Red Hat Bugzilla 02 Sep '10

02 Sep '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460974 --- Comment #21 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2010-09-02 06:25:24 EDT --- Ok thanks. Here is the review: +:ok, !:needs attention, NA: not applicable MUST Items: [+] MUST: rpmlint output xmobar.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) minimalistic -> Minimalist, minimalist, minimalism xmobar.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US plugins -> plug ins, plug-ins, plugging xmobar.src: W: strange-permission xmobar-0.11.1.tar.gz 0640L xmobar.src: W: strange-permission xmobar.spec 0640L xmobar.src: W: no-buildroot-tag 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings. xmobar.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) minimalistic -> Minimalist, minimalist, minimalism xmobar.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US plugins -> plug ins, plug-ins, plugging xmobar.x86_64: W: executable-stack /usr/bin/xmobar xmobar.x86_64: W: executable-stack /usr/bin/xmonadpropwrite xmobar.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary xmonadpropwrite xmobar.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary xmobar 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings. Ok [+] MUST: Package Naming Guidelines [+] MUST: spec file name must match base package %{name} [+] MUST: Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: Licensing Guidelines [+] MUST: License field in the package spec file must match actual license. [+] MUST: include license files in %doc if available in source [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English and be legible. [+] MUST: source md5sum matches upstream release 766fe504909384628321fb7472fdb621 xmobar-0.11.1.tar.gz [+] MUST: must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on one main arch http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2442474 [+] MUST: if necessary use ExcludeArch for other archs [+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires [NA] MUST: use %find_lang macro for .po translations [NA] MUST: packages which store shared library files in the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [NA] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review [+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. [+] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. [+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. [+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [NA] MUST: Large documentation files should go in a doc subpackage. [+] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. [NA] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [NA] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [NA] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [!] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. It would be best to add a desktop file. [+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [+] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. Please also include the useful README file. Basically all fine but since this is a GUI program I think it needs a desktop file. You could probably take the one we added for xmonad as a starting point. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 629551] Review Request: ghc-gio - Haskell binding to glib's gio
by Red Hat Bugzilla 02 Sep '10

02 Sep '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629551 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-haskell-list@redhat. | |com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 614024] Review Request: ghc-pango - Haskell pango binding
by Red Hat Bugzilla 01 Sep '10

01 Sep '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614024 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2010-09-01 22:55:02 EDT --- Thanks New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: ghc-pango Short Description: Haskell pango binding Owners: petersen Branches: f14 InitialCC: haskell-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 595603] Review Request: ghc-hslogger - Haskell logging framework
by Red Hat Bugzilla 01 Sep '10

01 Sep '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595603 --- Comment #27 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2010-09-01 22:51:05 EDT --- Right the echo command is redundant and unnecessary if you install the file, which is the cleaner approach here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

← Newer
1
...
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
Older →

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

haskell-devel September 2010