[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 715482] New: support volume plugin via alsa-mixer?
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: support volume plugin via alsa-mixer?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=715482
Summary: support volume plugin via alsa-mixer?
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: Unspecified
OS/Version: Unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Component: xmobar
AssignedTo: mathstuf(a)gmail.com
ReportedBy: petersen(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: mathstuf(a)gmail.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Description of problem:
xmobar-0.13 seems to support display the volume level using alsa-mixer:
I haven't actually tested it yet...
This is just a rfe to consider adding that support to the fedora package.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
10 years, 5 months
[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 707569] New: xmonad GNOME session fails to start properly
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: xmonad GNOME session fails to start properly
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707569
Summary: xmonad GNOME session fails to start properly
Product: Fedora
Version: 15
Platform: x86_64
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: high
Priority: unspecified
Component: xmonad
AssignedTo: mathstuf(a)gmail.com
ReportedBy: conan(a)irconan.co.uk
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, mathstuf(a)gmail.com,
fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Description of problem:
Using the xmonad GNOME session using default configuration of Fedora 15 fails
to start up.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
0.9.2-7.fc15.x86_64
How reproducible:
Always occurs.
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install xmonad
2. Log out
3. Log in using "xmonad GNOME" session
Actual results:
Window saying "Oh no!" appears with a button to logout.
Expected results:
GNOME starts up using xmonad as the window manager
Additional info:
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
10 years, 9 months
[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 664155] New: Review Request: ghc-data-accessor-monads-fd - A package to access state in monads-fd State Monad
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: ghc-data-accessor-monads-fd - A package to access state in monads-fd State Monad
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664155
Summary: Review Request: ghc-data-accessor-monads-fd - A
package to access state in monads-fd State Monad
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com,
fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
SRPM URL :
https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-data-accessor-mon...
SPEC file URL :
https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-data-accessor-mon...
rpmlint output:
rpmlint -i ghc-data-accessor-monads-fd*.rpm ghc-data-accessor-monads-fd.spec
ghc-data-accessor-monads-fd-prof.i686: E: devel-dependency
ghc-data-accessor-monads-fd-devel
Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package
itself.
ghc-data-accessor-monads-fd-prof.i686: W: no-documentation
The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include
documentation files.
ghc-data-accessor-monads-fd-prof.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib/ghc-6.12.3/data-accessor-monads-fd-0.2.0.2/libHSdata-accessor-monads-fd-0.2.0.2_p.a
A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If
you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a
development package.
4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
10 years, 9 months
[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 660656] New: Review Request: ghc-data-binary-ieee754- Haskell parser/serialiser library for IEEE754 floating point values
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: ghc-data-binary-ieee754- Haskell parser/serialiser library for IEEE754 floating point values
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=660656
Summary: Review Request: ghc-data-binary-ieee754- Haskell
parser/serialiser library for IEEE754 floating point
values
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com,
fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Blocks: 634048
Classification: Fedora
SPEC file URL :
https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-data-binary-ieee7...
SRPM URL :
https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-data-binary-ieee7...
rpmlint output:
pmlint -i ghc-data-binary-ieee754*.rpm ghc-data-binary-ieee754.spec
ghc-data-binary-ieee754.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell ->
Gaskell, Gaitskell, Skellum
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-data-binary-ieee754.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) serialiser ->
serialist, serialism, serialize
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-data-binary-ieee754.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell ->
Gaskell, Gaitskell, Skellum
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-data-binary-ieee754.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) serialiser ->
serialist, serialism, serialize
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-data-binary-ieee754-devel.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell ->
Gaskell, Gaitskell, Skellum
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-data-binary-ieee754-devel.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) serialiser
-> serialist, serialism, serialize
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-data-binary-ieee754-prof.i686: E: devel-dependency
ghc-data-binary-ieee754-devel
Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package
itself.
ghc-data-binary-ieee754-prof.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) serialiser
-> serialist, serialism, serialize
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-data-binary-ieee754-prof.i686: W: no-documentation
The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include
documentation files.
ghc-data-binary-ieee754-prof.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib/ghc-6.12.3/data-binary-ieee754-0.4.2.1/libHSdata-binary-ieee754-0.4.2.1_p.a
A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If
you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a
development package.
4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 9 warnings.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
10 years, 11 months
[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 670007] New: Review Request: ghc-bloomfilter - A fast, space efficient Bloom filter implementation
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: ghc-bloomfilter - A fast, space efficient Bloom filter implementation
Alias: ghc-bloomfilter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670007
Summary: Review Request: ghc-bloomfilter - A fast, space
efficient Bloom filter implementation
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com,
fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
SPEC file URL : http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/ghc-bloomfilter.spec
SRPM URL :
http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/ghc-bloomfilter-1.2.6.7-1.f13.src.rpm
rpmlint output:
rpmlint -i ghc-bloomfilter-*fc14*.rpm ../ghc-bloomfilter.spec
ghc-bloomfilter-prof.i686: E: devel-dependency ghc-bloomfilter-devel
Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package
itself.
ghc-bloomfilter-prof.i686: W: no-documentation
The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include
documentation files.
ghc-bloomfilter-prof.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib/ghc-6.12.3/bloomfilter-1.2.6.7/libHSbloomfilter-1.2.6.7_p.a
A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If
you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a
development package.
4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
10 years, 11 months
[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 752621] New: markdown2pdf fails with .sty file problems
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: markdown2pdf fails with .sty file problems
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=752621
Summary: markdown2pdf fails with .sty file problems
Product: Fedora
Version: 16
Platform: Unspecified
OS/Version: Unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: unspecified
Component: pandoc
AssignedTo: petersen(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: luis(a)tieguy.org
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Type: ---
Description of problem:
markdown2pdf fails to create pdfs, apparently failing to find some .sty files
(though I am not an expert). Error message below:
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
F16, 1.8.2.1
How reproducible:
100%
Steps to Reproduce:
1. markdown2pdf foo.txt
2. boom
Actual results:
Error message below:
Expected results:
Create a pdf :)
Additional info:
========
[louie@towel RC2 Source Files]$ markdown2pdf Working\ Documents/MPL-RC2.txt
markdown2pdf: ! LaTeX Error: File `ifluatex.sty' not found.
Type X to quit or <RETURN> to proceed,
or enter new name. (Default extension: sty)
Enter file name:
! Emergency stop.
<read *>
l.4 \ifxetex
^^M
Here is how much of TeX's memory you used:
1069 strings out of 256216
11518 string characters out of 1917072
58404 words of memory out of 1500000
4417 multiletter control sequences out of 10000+200000
3640 words of font info for 14 fonts, out of 1200000 for 2000
645 hyphenation exceptions out of 8191
27i,0n,24p,240b,36s stack positions out of 5000i,500n,6000p,200000b,15000s
! ==> Fatal error occurred, no output PDF file produced!
===============
The error above occurred after a similar error from ifxetex.sty, which I
remedied by installing texlive-texmf-xetex.noarch.
This may actually be a texlive bug, but filing it here because I'm not expert
enough with either pandoc or tex to diagnose further. :(
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
11 years
[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 722689] New: leksah-server doesn't need to require haddock
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: leksah-server doesn't need to require haddock
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=722689
Summary: leksah-server doesn't need to require haddock
Product: Fedora
Version: 15
Platform: Unspecified
OS/Version: Unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Component: leksah-server
AssignedTo: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com
ReportedBy: petersen(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com,
lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Description of problem:
ghc7 already provides new enough haddock so I don't
think the leksah-server binary needs to require haddock
explicitly (or perhaps it should require ghc instead?)
Not sure if F14 leksah-server may need Requires haddock
since the haddock version of haddock in ghc6 is older
than that required for building leksah-server?
Steps to Reproduce:
1. yum install leksah-server
Actual results:
pull in haddock
Expected results:
just to use the haddock in ghc.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
11 years, 1 month
[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 664214] New: Review Request: ghc-gconf - Binding to the GNOME configuration database system
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: ghc-gconf - Binding to the GNOME configuration database system
Alias: ghc-gconf
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664214
Summary: Review Request: ghc-gconf - Binding to the GNOME
configuration database system
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com,
fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Blocks: 634048
Classification: Fedora
SRPM link :
https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-gconf-0.11.1-1.fc...
SPEC file link :
https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-gconf.spec?attred...
rpmlint output:
rpmlint -i *.rpm ghc-gconf.spec
ghc-gconf-prof.x86_64: E: devel-dependency ghc-gconf-devel
Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package
itself.
ghc-gconf-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation
The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include
documentation files.
ghc-gconf-prof.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/ghc-6.12.3/gconf-0.11.1/libHSgconf-0.11.1_p.a
A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If
you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a
development package.
4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings.
Will upgrade to 0.12.0 for >f15
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
11 years, 3 months