[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 703152] New: Review Request: ghc-rosezipper - Generic zipper implementation for Haskell
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: ghc-rosezipper - Generic zipper implementation for Haskell
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=703152
Summary: Review Request: ghc-rosezipper - Generic zipper
implementation for Haskell
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com,
fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
This package is required for yi (a text editor).
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
11 years, 3 months
[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 753661] New: hsc2hs not found error due to update-alternatives not found (missing Requires: chkconfig)
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: hsc2hs not found error due to update-alternatives not found (missing Requires: chkconfig)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753661
Summary: hsc2hs not found error due to update-alternatives not
found (missing Requires: chkconfig)
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: el6
Platform: Unspecified
OS/Version: Unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Component: ghc
AssignedTo: petersen(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: giamteckchoon(a)gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Type: ---
Description of problem:
When try to build other packages that require ghc in mock, a couple of them
can't be compile due to hsc2hs not found error. ghc-6.12.3-5.el6 and
ghc-6.12.3-6.el6 (I think) in %post and %preun sections in spec file as below:
%post
# Alas, GHC, Hugs, and nhc all come with different set of tools in
# addition to a runFOO:
#
# * GHC: hsc2hs
# * Hugs: hsc2hs, cpphs
# * nhc: cpphs
#
# Therefore it is currently not possible to use --slave below to form
# link groups under a single name 'runhaskell'. Either these tools
# should be disentangled from the Haskell implementations, or all
# implementations should have the same set of tools. *sigh*
update-alternatives --install %{_bindir}/runhaskell runhaskell \
%{_bindir}/runghc 500
update-alternatives --install %{_bindir}/hsc2hs hsc2hs \
%{_bindir}/hsc2hs-ghc 500
%preun
if [ "$1" = 0 ]; then
update-alternatives --remove runhaskell %{_bindir}/runghc
update-alternatives --remove hsc2hs %{_bindir}/hsc2hs-ghc
fi
So it needs update-alternatives to do the linking if I am right in fact the
spec file will need to add Requires: chkconfig or else when installing ghc will
have the errors as below:
Non-fatal POSTIN scriptlet failure in rpm package ghc-6.12.3-6.el6.i686
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.E4LKqM: line 13: update-alternatives: command not found
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.E4LKqM: line 15: update-alternatives: command not found
warning: %post(ghc-6.12.3-6.el6.i686) scriptlet failed, exit status 127
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
ghc-6.12.3-5.el6
ghc-6.12.3-6.el6
In fact past versions/release can have the same problem if the %post and %preun
sections are the same and without chkconfig in Requires list.
How reproducible:
When build in mock environment where chkconfig package isn't install by default
will have this issue since update-alternatives is provided by chkconfig rpm
package.
Like when you try to compile/build any of the packages that need hsc2hs in ghc
package where ghc only has /usr/bin/hsc2hs-ghc and during %post section use
update-alternatives to do the linking of /usr/bin/hsc2hs-ghc to hsc2hs-ghc.
i.e Try to build any of the following without chkconfig rpm package install:
xmonad-0.9.1-6.1.el6
ghc-X11-1.5.0.0-5.el6
hscolour-1.16-1.el6
The list goes on... ...
Thanks.
Kindest regards,
Giam Teck Choon
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
11 years, 5 months
[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 753833] New: hscolour is required but not found error
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: hscolour is required but not found error
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753833
Summary: hscolour is required but not found error
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: el6
Platform: Unspecified
OS/Version: Unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Component: ghc-QuickCheck
AssignedTo: petersen(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: giamteckchoon(a)gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Type: ---
Description of problem:
When try to rebuild ghc-QuickCheck-2.1.1.1-1.el6 in mock, it will not compile
successfully if hscolour >= 1.8 package is not install.
Partial log as below:
[11 of 12] Compiling Test.QuickCheck.Monadic ( Test/QuickCheck/Monadic.hs,
dist/build/Test/QuickCheck/Monadic.dyn_o )
[12 of 12] Compiling Test.QuickCheck ( Test/QuickCheck.hs,
dist/build/Test/QuickCheck.dyn_o )
Registering QuickCheck-2.1.1.1...
+ '[' -x Setup ']'
+ ./Setup haddock --hyperlink-source
Running Haddock for QuickCheck-2.1.1.1...
Preprocessing library QuickCheck-2.1.1.1...
Setup: hscolour version >=1.8 is required but it could not be found.
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.42heGW (%build)
RPM build errors:
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.42heGW (%build)
Child return code was: 1
EXCEPTION: Command failed. See logs for output.
# ['bash', '--login', '-c', 'rpmbuild -bb --target i686 --nodeps
builddir/build/SPECS/ghc-QuickCheck-2.1.1.1-1.el6.spec']
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/mockbuild/trace_decorator.py", line
70, in trace
result = func(*args, **kw)
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
ghc-QuickCheck-2.1.1.1-1.el6
Additional info:
I will have to suggest that adding BuildRequires: hscolour >= 1.8 in the spec
file to resolve this issue.
Thanks.
Kindest regards,
Giam Teck Choon
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
11 years, 5 months
[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 753918] New: external.sh test failed when build in mock
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: external.sh test failed when build in mock
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753918
Summary: external.sh test failed when build in mock
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: el6
Platform: Unspecified
OS/Version: Unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Component: darcs
AssignedTo: petersen(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: giamteckchoon(a)gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Type: ---
Description of problem:
Reference:
http://us.generation-nt.com/answer/bug-596606-darcs-fails-build-without-n...
When trying to rebuild darcs in mock, it will fail with the following partial
log:
Running whatsnew-file.sh ... passed.
Running whatsnew.sh ... passed.
Running workingdir.sh ... passed.
Some tests failed:
external.sh
Setup: Tests failed
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.iKljMO (%check)
RPM build errors:
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.iKljMO (%check)
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
darcs-2.4.4-3.el6
Patch attached to disable external.sh test which in result in successful build
of darcs-2.4.4-3.el6.
Thanks.
Kindest regards,
Giam Teck Choon
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
11 years, 6 months