March 2011 - haskell-devel - Fedora mailing-lists

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 635581] New: [gold] configure: error: curses library not found, so this package cannot be built
by Red Hat Bugzilla 17 Feb '15

17 Feb '15

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [gold] configure: error: curses library not found, so this package cannot be built https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=635581 Summary: [gold] configure: error: curses library not found, so this package cannot be built Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: ghc AssignedTo: petersen(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: mnowak(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, bos(a)serpentine.com, loupgaroublond(a)gmail.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: ghc-6.12.3-5.fc15.src.rpm rebuild with gold (the alternative linker in binutils) fails because configure script won't find curses: DEBUG: ncurses.x86_64 0:5.7-8.20100703.fc14 DEBUG: ncurses-base.x86_64 0:5.7-8.20100703.fc14 DEBUG: ncurses-libs.x86_64 0:5.7-8.20100703.fc14 DEBUG: ncurses-base.x86_64 0:5.7-8.20100703.fc14 DEBUG: ncurses-libs.x86_64 0:5.7-8.20100703.fc14 DEBUG: /usr/bin/yum --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/ resolvedep ccache 'libffi-devel' 'gmp-devel' 'ghc-rpm-macros >= 0.8.0' 'ncurses-devel' 'python' 'docbook-style-xsl' 'ghc' 'libxslt' 'hscolour' 'happy' DEBUG: Executing command: /usr/bin/yum --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/ resolvedep ccache 'libffi-devel' 'gmp-devel' 'ghc-rpm-macros >= 0.8.0' 'ncurses-devel' 'python' 'docbook-style-xsl' 'ghc' 'libxslt' 'hscolour' 'happy' --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts DEBUG: 0:ncurses-devel-5.7-8.20100703.fc14.x86_64 DEBUG: /usr/bin/yum --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/ install ccache 'libffi-devel' 'gmp-devel' 'ghc-rpm-macros >= 0.8.0' 'ncurses-devel' 'python' 'docbook-style-xsl' 'ghc' 'libxslt' 'hscolour' 'happy' DEBUG: Executing command: /usr/bin/yum --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/ install ccache 'libffi-devel' 'gmp-devel' 'ghc-rpm-macros >= 0.8.0' 'ncurses-devel' 'python' 'docbook-style-xsl' 'ghc' 'libxslt' 'hscolour' 'happy' --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts DEBUG: ncurses-devel x86_64 5.7-8.20100703.fc14 fedora 663 k DEBUG: libxslt.x86_64 0:1.1.26-3.fc14 ncurses-devel.x86_64 0:5.7-8.20100703.fc14 DEBUG: checking ncurses.h usability... yes DEBUG: checking ncurses.h presence... yes DEBUG: checking for ncurses.h... yes DEBUG: checking for setupterm in -lncursesw... no DEBUG: checking for setupterm in -lncurses... no Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): ghc-6.12.3-5.fc15 How reproducible: always (x86_64) Steps to Reproduce: 1. alternatives --config ld 2. set gold 3. rebuild ghc srpm Actual results: Expected results: DEBUG: ncurses.x86_64 0:5.7-8.20100703.fc14 DEBUG: ncurses-base.x86_64 0:5.7-8.20100703.fc14 DEBUG: ncurses-base.x86_64 0:5.7-8.20100703.fc14 DEBUG: ncurses-libs.x86_64 0:5.7-8.20100703.fc14 DEBUG: /usr/bin/yum --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/ resolvedep ccache 'libffi-devel' 'gmp-devel' 'ghc-rpm-macros >= 0.8.0' 'ncurses-devel' 'python' 'docbook-style-xsl' 'ghc' 'libxslt' 'hscolour' 'happy' DEBUG: Executing command: /usr/bin/yum --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/ resolvedep ccache 'libffi-devel' 'gmp-devel' 'ghc-rpm-macros >= 0.8.0' 'ncurses-devel' 'python' 'docbook-style-xsl' 'ghc' 'libxslt' 'hscolour' 'happy' --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts DEBUG: 0:ncurses-devel-5.7-8.20100703.fc14.x86_64 DEBUG: /usr/bin/yum --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/ install ccache 'libffi-devel' 'gmp-devel' 'ghc-rpm-macros >= 0.8.0' 'ncurses-devel' 'python' 'docbook-style-xsl' 'ghc' 'libxslt' 'hscolour' 'happy' DEBUG: Executing command: /usr/bin/yum --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/ install ccache 'libffi-devel' 'gmp-devel' 'ghc-rpm-macros >= 0.8.0' 'ncurses-devel' 'python' 'docbook-style-xsl' 'ghc' 'libxslt' 'hscolour' 'happy' --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts DEBUG: ncurses-devel x86_64 5.7-8.20100703.fc14 fedora 663 k DEBUG: libxslt.x86_64 0:1.1.26-3.fc14 ncurses-devel.x86_64 0:5.7-8.20100703.fc14 DEBUG: checking ncurses.h usability... yes DEBUG: checking ncurses.h presence... yes DEBUG: checking for ncurses.h... yes DEBUG: checking for setupterm in -lncursesw... yes Additional info: Since gold might be the default linker (per http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/GoldLinkerDefault) this problem might be worth fixing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 12

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 664221] New: Review Request: ghc-cautious-file - Provides ways to write a file cautiously
by Red Hat Bugzilla 12 Nov '14

12 Nov '14

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-cautious-file - Provides ways to write a file cautiously Alias: ghc-cautious-file https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664221 Summary: Review Request: ghc-cautious-file - Provides ways to write a file cautiously Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Blocks: 634048 Classification: Fedora SPEC file link : https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-cautious-file.spec?… SRPM link : https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-cautious-file-0.1.5… rpmlint output: rpmlint -i *.rpm ../ghc-cautious-file.spec ghc-cautious-file.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US posix -> posit, pos ix, pos-ix The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-cautious-file.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US posix -> posit, pos ix, pos-ix The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-cautious-file-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US posix -> posit, pos ix, pos-ix The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-cautious-file-prof.x86_64: E: devel-dependency ghc-cautious-file-devel Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package itself. ghc-cautious-file-prof.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US posix -> posit, pos ix, pos-ix The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-cautious-file-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. ghc-cautious-file-prof.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ghc-7.0.1/cautious-file-0.1.5/libHScautious-file-0.1.5_p.a A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 6 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 26

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 664151] New: Review Request: ghc-Diff - A O(ND) diff algorithm in Haskell
by Red Hat Bugzilla 22 Oct '14

22 Oct '14

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-Diff - A O(ND) diff algorithm in Haskell Alias: ghc-Diff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664151 Summary: Review Request: ghc-Diff - A O(ND) diff algorithm in Haskell Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora SPEC file URL: https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-Diff.spec?attredire… SRPM file URL: https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-Diff-0.1.2-1.fc14.s… rpmlint output: rpmlint -i ghc-Diff.spec ghc-Diff*fc15*.rpm ghc-Diff-prof.i686: E: devel-dependency ghc-Diff-devel Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package itself. ghc-Diff-prof.i686: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. ghc-Diff-prof.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ghc-7.0.1/Diff-0.1.2/libHSDiff-0.1.2_p.a A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 34

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 664205] New: Review Request: ghc-dlist - Haskell package that provides difference lists
by Red Hat Bugzilla 03 Mar '14

03 Mar '14

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-dlist - Haskell package that provides difference lists Alias: ghc-dlist https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664205 Summary: Review Request: ghc-dlist - Haskell package that provides difference lists Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Blocks: 634048 Classification: Fedora SRPM link : https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-dlist-0.5-1.fc14.sr… SPEC file link : https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-dlist.spec?attredir… rpmlint output: rpmlint -i *.rpm ../ghc-dlist.spec ghc-dlist-prof.x86_64: E: devel-dependency ghc-dlist-devel Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package itself. ghc-dlist-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. ghc-dlist-prof.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ghc-7.0.1/dlist-0.5/libHSdlist-0.5_p.a A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 28

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 639787] New: build darcs for EPEL-6
by Red Hat Bugzilla 02 Jan '14

02 Jan '14

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: build darcs for EPEL-6 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639787 Summary: build darcs for EPEL-6 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: darcs AssignedTo: jeremy(a)hinegardner.org ReportedBy: petersen(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, jeremy(a)hinegardner.org, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: SSIA: I think we should have darcs in EPEL-6. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 6

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 547867] New: %{ghc_version} desn't expand properly
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 Aug '13

19 Aug '13

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: %{ghc_version} desn't expand properly https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547867 Summary: %{ghc_version} desn't expand properly Product: Fedora Version: 11 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: high Component: ghc-rpm-macros AssignedTo: loupgaroublond(a)gmail.com ReportedBy: jochen(a)herr-schmitt.de QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, loupgaroublond(a)gmail.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora I want to tryout ghc-6.12.1 on my system and have installed ghc-rpm-macros-0.3.0-1 on my system. Because I have trouble to compile my packages, I have try out the following command: $ rpm -q --eval '%{ghc_version}' and got the following output: error: Recursion depth(17) greater than max(16) 15< (empty) 14< (empty) 13< (empty) 12< (empty) 11< (empty) 10< (empty) 9< (empty) 8< (empty) 7< (empty) 6< (empty) 5< (empty) 4< (empty) 3< (empty) 2< (empty) 1< (empty) 0< (empty) If I type $ ghc --numeric-version I will get 6.12.1 which I expected for $ rpm -q --eval '%{ghc_version}' Best Regards: Jochen Schmitt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 6

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 655486] New: Review Request: ghc-recaptcha - A Haskell library to use reCAPTCHA service
by Red Hat Bugzilla 24 Jun '13

24 Jun '13

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-recaptcha - A Haskell library to use reCAPTCHA service Alias: ghc-recaptcha https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=655486 Summary: Review Request: ghc-recaptcha - A Haskell library to use reCAPTCHA service Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora SPEC URL : https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-recaptcha.spec?attr… SRPM URL: https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-recaptcha-0.1-1.fc1… rpmlint output: rpmlint -i ghc-recaptcha-0.1-1.fc14.x86_64.rpm ghc-recaptcha-devel-0.1-1.fc14.x86_64.rpm ghc-recaptcha-prof-0.1-1.fc14.x86_64.rpm ../../SRPMS/ghc-recaptcha-0.1-1.fc14.src.rpm ghc-recaptcha.spec ghc-recaptcha.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US hs -> HS, sh, gs The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-recaptcha-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US hs -> HS, sh, gs The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-recaptcha-prof.x86_64: E: devel-dependency ghc-recaptcha-devel Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package itself. ghc-recaptcha-prof.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US hs -> HS, sh, gs The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-recaptcha-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. ghc-recaptcha-prof.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ghc-6.12.3/recaptcha-0.1/libHSrecaptcha-0.1_p.a A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. ghc-recaptcha.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US hs -> HS, sh, gs The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 6 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 7

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 664208] New: Review Request: ghc-fingertree - Haskell package provides generic finger-tree structure
by Red Hat Bugzilla 24 Jun '13

24 Jun '13

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-fingertree - Haskell package provides generic finger-tree structure Alias: ghc-fingertree https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664208 Summary: Review Request: ghc-fingertree - Haskell package provides generic finger-tree structure Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Blocks: 634048 Classification: Fedora SRPM link: https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-fingertree-0.0.1.0-… SPEC file link: https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-fingertree.spec?att… rpmlint output: rpmlint -i *.rpm ../ghc-fingertree.spec ghc-fingertree-prof.x86_64: E: devel-dependency ghc-fingertree-devel Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package itself. ghc-fingertree-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. ghc-fingertree-prof.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ghc-7.0.1/fingertree-0.0.1.0/libHSfingertree-0.0.1.0_p.a A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 13

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 660645] New: Review Request: ghc-monads-tf - A library to provide Monad classes using type families
by Red Hat Bugzilla 24 Jun '13

24 Jun '13

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-monads-tf - A library to provide Monad classes using type families Alias: ghc-monads-tf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=660645 Summary: Review Request: ghc-monads-tf - A library to provide Monad classes using type families Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Blocks: 634048 Classification: Fedora SPEC file URL : https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-monads-tf.spec?attr… SRPM URL : https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-monads-tf-0.1.0.0-1… -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 6

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 664155] New: Review Request: ghc-data-accessor-monads-fd - A package to access state in monads-fd State Monad
by Red Hat Bugzilla 24 Feb '13

24 Feb '13

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-data-accessor-monads-fd - A package to access state in monads-fd State Monad https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664155 Summary: Review Request: ghc-data-accessor-monads-fd - A package to access state in monads-fd State Monad Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora SRPM URL : https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-data-accessor-monad… SPEC file URL : https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-data-accessor-monad… rpmlint output: rpmlint -i ghc-data-accessor-monads-fd*.rpm ghc-data-accessor-monads-fd.spec ghc-data-accessor-monads-fd-prof.i686: E: devel-dependency ghc-data-accessor-monads-fd-devel Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package itself. ghc-data-accessor-monads-fd-prof.i686: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. ghc-data-accessor-monads-fd-prof.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ghc-6.12.3/data-accessor-monads-fd-0.2.0.2/libHSdata-accessor-monads-fd-0.2.0.2_p.a A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 13

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 660656] New: Review Request: ghc-data-binary-ieee754- Haskell parser/serialiser library for IEEE754 floating point values
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 Dec '12

18 Dec '12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-data-binary-ieee754- Haskell parser/serialiser library for IEEE754 floating point values https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=660656 Summary: Review Request: ghc-data-binary-ieee754- Haskell parser/serialiser library for IEEE754 floating point values Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Blocks: 634048 Classification: Fedora SPEC file URL : https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-data-binary-ieee754… SRPM URL : https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-data-binary-ieee754… rpmlint output: pmlint -i ghc-data-binary-ieee754*.rpm ghc-data-binary-ieee754.spec ghc-data-binary-ieee754.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell -> Gaskell, Gaitskell, Skellum The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-data-binary-ieee754.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) serialiser -> serialist, serialism, serialize The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-data-binary-ieee754.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell -> Gaskell, Gaitskell, Skellum The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-data-binary-ieee754.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) serialiser -> serialist, serialism, serialize The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-data-binary-ieee754-devel.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell -> Gaskell, Gaitskell, Skellum The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-data-binary-ieee754-devel.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) serialiser -> serialist, serialism, serialize The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-data-binary-ieee754-prof.i686: E: devel-dependency ghc-data-binary-ieee754-devel Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package itself. ghc-data-binary-ieee754-prof.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) serialiser -> serialist, serialism, serialize The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-data-binary-ieee754-prof.i686: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. ghc-data-binary-ieee754-prof.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ghc-6.12.3/data-binary-ieee754-0.4.2.1/libHSdata-binary-ieee754-0.4.2.1_p.a A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 9 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 8

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 670007] New: Review Request: ghc-bloomfilter - A fast, space efficient Bloom filter implementation
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Dec '12

10 Dec '12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-bloomfilter - A fast, space efficient Bloom filter implementation Alias: ghc-bloomfilter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670007 Summary: Review Request: ghc-bloomfilter - A fast, space efficient Bloom filter implementation Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora SPEC file URL : http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/ghc-bloomfilter.spec SRPM URL : http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/ghc-bloomfilter-1.2.6.7-1.f13.src.rpm rpmlint output: rpmlint -i ghc-bloomfilter-*fc14*.rpm ../ghc-bloomfilter.spec ghc-bloomfilter-prof.i686: E: devel-dependency ghc-bloomfilter-devel Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package itself. ghc-bloomfilter-prof.i686: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. ghc-bloomfilter-prof.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ghc-6.12.3/bloomfilter-1.2.6.7/libHSbloomfilter-1.2.6.7_p.a A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 14

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 664214] New: Review Request: ghc-gconf - Binding to the GNOME configuration database system
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 Aug '12

11 Aug '12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-gconf - Binding to the GNOME configuration database system Alias: ghc-gconf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664214 Summary: Review Request: ghc-gconf - Binding to the GNOME configuration database system Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Blocks: 634048 Classification: Fedora SRPM link : https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-gconf-0.11.1-1.fc14… SPEC file link : https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-gconf.spec?attredir… rpmlint output: rpmlint -i *.rpm ghc-gconf.spec ghc-gconf-prof.x86_64: E: devel-dependency ghc-gconf-devel Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package itself. ghc-gconf-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. ghc-gconf-prof.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ghc-6.12.3/gconf-0.11.1/libHSgconf-0.11.1_p.a A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. Will upgrade to 0.12.0 for >f15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 8

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 604592] New: ghc-6.12.3 is available
by Red Hat Bugzilla 28 Jun '12

28 Jun '12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: ghc-6.12.3 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=604592 Summary: ghc-6.12.3 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: ASSIGNED Keywords: FutureFeature Severity: medium Priority: low Component: ghc AssignedTo: petersen(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, bos(a)serpentine.com, loupgaroublond(a)gmail.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 6.12.3 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 6.12.2 URL: http://haskell.org/ghc/ Please consult the package update guidelines before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_update_guidelines More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_Release_Monitoring -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 7

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 684730] New: darcs-2.5.2 is available
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Jun '12

14 Jun '12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: darcs-2.5.2 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=684730 Summary: darcs-2.5.2 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: darcs AssignedTo: jeremy(a)hinegardner.org ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, jeremy(a)hinegardner.org, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 2.5.2 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 2.5.1 URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/darcs/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 11

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 664150] New: Review Request: ghc-monads-fd - Monad classes, using functional dependencies
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Apr '12

10 Apr '12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-monads-fd - Monad classes, using functional dependencies Alias: ghc-monads-fd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664150 Summary: Review Request: ghc-monads-fd - Monad classes, using functional dependencies Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora SRPM URL : https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-monads-fd-0.1.0.4-1… SPEC file URL : https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-monads-fd.spec?attr… rpmlint output rpmlint -i ghc-monads-fd*fc15*.rpm ghc-monads-fd.spec ghc-monads-fd.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US http -> HTTP The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monads-fd.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cecs -> ceca, cess, secs The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monads-fd.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US pdx -> pd, pix, pax The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monads-fd.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US edu -> ed, educ, due The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monads-fd.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mpj -> mph, mp, mpg The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monads-fd.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US springschool -> spring school, spring-school, Springsteen The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monads-fd.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US html -> HTML, ht ml, ht-ml The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monads-fd.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mtl -> mt, ml, mel The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monads-fd.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US http -> HTTP The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monads-fd.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cecs -> ceca, cess, secs The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monads-fd.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US pdx -> pd, pix, pax The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monads-fd.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US edu -> ed, educ, due The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monads-fd.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mpj -> mph, mp, mpg The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monads-fd.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US springschool -> spring school, spring-school, Springsteen The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monads-fd.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US html -> HTML, ht ml, ht-ml The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monads-fd.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mtl -> mt, ml, mel The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monads-fd-devel.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US http -> HTTP The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monads-fd-devel.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cecs -> ceca, cess, secs The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monads-fd-devel.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US pdx -> pd, pix, pax The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monads-fd-devel.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US edu -> ed, educ, due The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monads-fd-devel.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mpj -> mph, mp, mpg The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monads-fd-devel.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US springschool -> spring school, spring-school, Springsteen The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monads-fd-devel.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mtl -> mt, ml, mel The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monads-fd-prof.i686: E: devel-dependency ghc-monads-fd-devel Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package itself. ghc-monads-fd-prof.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US http -> HTTP The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monads-fd-prof.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cecs -> ceca, cess, secs The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monads-fd-prof.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US pdx -> pd, pix, pax The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monads-fd-prof.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US edu -> ed, educ, due The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monads-fd-prof.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mpj -> mph, mp, mpg The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monads-fd-prof.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US springschool -> spring school, spring-school, Springsteen The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monads-fd-prof.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US html -> HTML, ht ml, ht-ml The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monads-fd-prof.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mtl -> mt, ml, mel The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monads-fd-prof.i686: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. ghc-monads-fd-prof.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ghc-7.0.1/monads-fd-0.1.0.4/libHSmonads-fd-0.1.0.4_p.a A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 33 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 19

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 662481] New: ghc-neither-0.2.0 is available
by Red Hat Bugzilla 28 Nov '11

28 Nov '11

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: ghc-neither-0.2.0 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=662481 Summary: ghc-neither-0.2.0 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: ASSIGNED Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Severity: medium Priority: low Component: ghc-neither AssignedTo: mathstuf(a)gmail.com ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: mathstuf(a)gmail.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 0.2.0 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 0.1.0 URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/neither/ Please consult the package update guidelines before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_update_guidelines More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 10

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 673776] New: Review Request: leksah - An IDE for Haskell
by Red Hat Bugzilla 01 Aug '11

01 Aug '11

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: leksah - An IDE for Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673776 Summary: Review Request: leksah - An IDE for Haskell Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: high Priority: high Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora SPEC file URL: http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/leksah.spec SRPM URL: http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/leksah-0.8.0.8-1.fc14.src.rpm leksah package does not build with ghc-7.0.1. The plan is to have leksah for Fedora 14 (and 13) initially. Once a upstream package that builds with 7.0.1 is available, that will be used for F15 and later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 36

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 677253] New: ghc-hamlet-0.7.0.2 is available
by Red Hat Bugzilla 21 Jul '11

21 Jul '11

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: ghc-hamlet-0.7.0.2 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=677253 Summary: ghc-hamlet-0.7.0.2 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: ghc-hamlet AssignedTo: mathstuf(a)gmail.com ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: mathstuf(a)gmail.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 0.7.0.2 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 0.6.1.2 URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/hamlet/ Please consult the package update guidelines before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_update_guidelines More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 19

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 664140] New: Review Request: leksah-server - Package that provides the interface to GHC-API for leksah
by Red Hat Bugzilla 23 Jun '11

23 Jun '11

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: leksah-server - Package that provides the interface to GHC-API for leksah https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664140 Summary: Review Request: leksah-server - Package that provides the interface to GHC-API for leksah Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora SPEC file URL: https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/leksah-server.spec?attr… SRPM URL: https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/leksah-server-0.8.0.8-1… rpmlint -i leksah*.rpm ghc-leksah-server-*.rpm leksah-server.spec leksah-server.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary leksahecho Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page. leksah-server.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary leksah-server Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page. ghc-leksah-server-prof.x86_64: E: devel-dependency ghc-leksah-server-devel Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package itself. ghc-leksah-server-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. ghc-leksah-server-prof.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ghc-6.12.3/leksah-server-0.8.0.8/libHSleksah-server-0.8.0.8_p.a A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. 5 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 4 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 28

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 674731] New: xmobar desktop file should not appear in Gnome menu
by Red Hat Bugzilla 23 Jun '11

23 Jun '11

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: xmobar desktop file should not appear in Gnome menu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674731 Summary: xmobar desktop file should not appear in Gnome menu Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: xmobar AssignedTo: mathstuf(a)gmail.com ReportedBy: petersen(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: mathstuf(a)gmail.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Description of problem: I think xmobar doesn't need to be listed in the desktop menu. So the desktop file should be marked as "hidden". Steps to Reproduce: 1. start gnome desktop 2. yum install xmobar 3. check Accessories menu Actual results: "XMobar status bar" listed Expected results: xmobar not to be listed, since it is not an application. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 6

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 691036] New: ghc-enumerator-0.4.8 is available
by Red Hat Bugzilla 20 Jun '11

20 Jun '11

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: ghc-enumerator-0.4.8 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=691036 Summary: ghc-enumerator-0.4.8 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: ghc-enumerator AssignedTo: mathstuf(a)gmail.com ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: mathstuf(a)gmail.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Latest upstream release: 0.4.8 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 0.4.7 URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/enumerator/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 3

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 691348] New: ghc-7.0.3 is available
by Red Hat Bugzilla 16 Jun '11

16 Jun '11

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: ghc-7.0.3 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=691348 Summary: ghc-7.0.3 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: ghc AssignedTo: petersen(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, bos(a)serpentine.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Latest upstream release: 7.0.3 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 7.0.2 URL: http://haskell.org/ghc/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 6

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 635965] New: [gold] ld.gold does not work with ncurses linker script
by Red Hat Bugzilla 28 May '11

28 May '11

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [gold] ld.gold does not work with ncurses linker script https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=635965 Summary: [gold] ld.gold does not work with ncurses linker script Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: binutils AssignedTo: nickc(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: petersen(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: jakub(a)redhat.com, petersen(a)redhat.com, bos(a)serpentine.com, nickc(a)redhat.com, mnowak(a)redhat.com, loupgaroublond(a)gmail.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com, dvlasenk(a)redhat.com Depends on: 635581,635935 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Clone Of: 635581 The ncurses link script in Fedora for a long time now seems not to work with ld.gold. $ cat /usr/lib64/libncursesw.so INPUT(libncursesw.so.5 -ltinfo) >From building less with ld.gold: configure:3697: checking for initscr in -lncursesw configure:3722: gcc -o conftest -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic conftest.c -lncursesw >&5 /usr/bin/ld: error: cannot open : No such file or directory /usr/bin/ld: /tmp/ccVkMvCS.o: in function main:conftest.c:20: error: undefined reference to 'initscr' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status configure:3722: $? = 1 configure: failed program was: | /* confdefs.h */ | #define PACKAGE_NAME "less" | #define PACKAGE_TARNAME "less" | #define PACKAGE_VERSION "1" | #define PACKAGE_STRING "less 1" | #define PACKAGE_BUGREPORT "" | #define PACKAGE_URL "" | /* end confdefs.h. */ | | /* Override any GCC internal prototype to avoid an error. | Use char because int might match the return type of a GCC | builtin and then its argument prototype would still apply. */ | #ifdef __cplusplus | extern "C" | #endif | char initscr (); | int | main () | { | return initscr (); | ; | return 0; | } +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #635581 +++ --- Additional comment from petersen(a)redhat.com on 2010-09-21 13:21:28 EST --- Ah I reproduced the ncurses problem with binutils-2.20.51.0.11-1.fc15. Interesting that binutils-2.20.51.0.7-5.fc14 is ok. That is known issue with the libncurses*.so link script "hacks" in Fedora. I already have a workaround patch for ghc-terminfo (in package review) which could be applied to ghc's internal copy of terminfo too. --- Additional comment from petersen(a)redhat.com on 2010-09-21 17:20:39 EST --- Note that the ncurses issue is not ghc specific: I tested less and w3m for example and they also fail to configure ncurses. less builds with ncurses, but w3m fails to link. I guess ld.gold is not compatible with current ld.scripts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 3

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 635935] New: [gold] ld.script with relative paths breaks with ld.gold linker
by Red Hat Bugzilla 28 May '11

28 May '11

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [gold] ld.script with relative paths breaks with ld.gold linker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=635935 Summary: [gold] ld.script with relative paths breaks with ld.gold linker Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: binutils AssignedTo: nickc(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: petersen(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: jakub(a)redhat.com, petersen(a)redhat.com, bos(a)serpentine.com, nickc(a)redhat.com, mnowak(a)redhat.com, loupgaroublond(a)gmail.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com, dvlasenk(a)redhat.com Depends on: 635581 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Clone Of: 635581 ld.gold seems to not like relative paths in link scripts: [ghc-6.12.3]$ /usr/bin/gcc -nostdlib -nodefaultlibs -Wl,-r -Wl,-x -o libraries/ghc-prim/dist-install/build/GHC/Generics.o libraries/ghc-prim/dist-install/build/GHC/Generics_o_split/ld.script /usr/bin/ld: error: cannot find libraries/ghc-prim/dist-install/build/GHC/Generics_o_split/Generics__1.o /usr/bin/ld: error: cannot find libraries/ghc-prim/dist-install/build/GHC/Generics_o_split/.o::Generics(void) /usr/bin/ld: error: cannot find libraries/ghc-prim/dist-install/build/GHC/Generics_o_split/Generics__3.o : /usr/bin/ld: error: cannot find libraries/ghc-prim/dist-install/build/GHC/Generics_o_split/Generics__16.o collect2: ld returned 1 exit status [ghc-6.12.3]$ cat libraries/ghc-prim/dist-install/build/GHC/Generics_o_split/ld.script INPUT(libraries/ghc-prim/dist-install/build/GHC/Generics_o_split/Generics__1.o libraries/ghc-prim/dist-install/build/GHC/Generics_o_split/Generics__2.o libraries/ghc-prim/dist-install/build/GHC/Generics_o_split/Generics__3.o : libraries/ghc-prim/dist-install/build/GHC/Generics_o_split/Generics__16.o) It links ok with ld.bfd Here is how I ran into this in bug 635581: "inplace/bin/ghc-stage1" -H32m -O -package-name ghc-prim-0.2.0.0 -hide-all-packages -i -ilibraries/ghc-prim/. -ilibraries/ghc-prim/dist-install/build -ilibraries/ghc-prim/dist-install/build/autogen -Ilibraries/ghc-prim/dist-install/build -Ilibraries/ghc-prim/dist-install/build/autogen -Ilibraries/ghc-prim/. -optP-include -optPlibraries/ghc-prim/dist-install/build/autogen/cabal_macros.h -package rts-1.0 -split-objs -package-name ghc-prim -XCPP -XMagicHash -XForeignFunctionInterface -XUnliftedFFITypes -XUnboxedTuples -XEmptyDataDecls -XNoImplicitPrelude -O2 -XGenerics -fno-warn-deprecated-flags -odir libraries/ghc-prim/dist-install/build -hidir libraries/ghc-prim/dist-install/build -stubdir libraries/ghc-prim/dist-install/build -hisuf hi -osuf o -hcsuf hc -c libraries/ghc-prim/./GHC/Generics.hs -o libraries/ghc-prim/dist-install/build/GHC/Generics.o /usr/bin/ld: error: cannot find libraries/ghc-prim/dist-install/build/GHC/Generics_o_split/Generics__1.o /usr/bin/ld: error: cannot find libraries/ghc-prim/dist-install/build/GHC/Generics_o_split/.o::Generics(void) /usr/bin/ld: error: cannot find libraries/ghc-prim/dist-install/build/GHC/Generics_o_split/Generics__3.o /usr/bin/ld: error: cannot find libraries/ghc-prim/dist-install/build/GHC/Generics_o_split/Generics__4.o /usr/bin/ld: error: cannot find libraries/ghc-prim/dist-install/build/GHC/Generics_o_split/Generics__5.o /usr/bin/ld: error: cannot find libraries/ghc-prim/dist-install/build/GHC/Generics_o_split/Generics__6.o /usr/bin/ld: error: cannot find libraries/ghc-prim/dist-install/build/GHC/Generics_o_split/Generics__7.o /usr/bin/ld: error: cannot find libraries/ghc-prim/dist-install/build/GHC/Generics_o_split/Generics__8.o /usr/bin/ld: error: cannot find libraries/ghc-prim/dist-install/build/GHC/Generics_o_split/Generics__9.o /usr/bin/ld: error: cannot find libraries/ghc-prim/dist-install/build/GHC/Generics_o_split/Generics__10.o /usr/bin/ld: error: cannot find libraries/ghc-prim/dist-install/build/GHC/Generics_o_split/Generics__11.o /usr/bin/ld: error: cannot find libraries/ghc-prim/dist-install/build/GHC/Generics_o_split/Generics__12.o /usr/bin/ld: error: cannot find libraries/ghc-prim/dist-install/build/GHC/Generics_o_split/Generics__13.o /usr/bin/ld: error: cannot find libraries/ghc-prim/dist-install/build/GHC/Generics_o_split/Generics__14.o /usr/bin/ld: error: cannot find libraries/ghc-prim/dist-install/build/GHC/Generics_o_split/Generics__15.o /usr/bin/ld: error: cannot find libraries/ghc-prim/dist-install/build/GHC/Generics_o_split/Generics__16.o collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[1]: *** [libraries/ghc-prim/dist-install/build/GHC/Generics.o] Error 1 make: *** [all] Error 2 I see a link script: [ghc-6.12.3]$ ls libraries/ghc-prim/dist-install/build/GHC/Generics_o_split/ Generics__1.o Generics__12.o Generics__15.o Generics__3.o Generics__6.o Generics__9.o Generics__10.o Generics__13.o Generics__16.o Generics__4.o Generics__7.o ld.script Generics__11.o Generics__14.o Generics__2.o Generics__5.o Generics__8.o [petersen@localhost ghc-6.12.3]$ cat libraries/ghc-prim/dist-install/build/GHC/Generics_o_split/ld.script INPUT(libraries/ghc-prim/dist-install/build/GHC/Generics_o_split/Generics__1.o libraries/ghc-prim/dist-install/build/GHC/Generics_o_split/Generics__2.o libraries/ghc-prim/dist-install/build/GHC/Generics_o_split/Generics__3.o libraries/ghc-prim/dist-install/build/GHC/Generics_o_split/Generics__4.o libraries/ghc-prim/dist-install/build/GHC/Generics_o_split/Generics__5.o libraries/ghc-prim/dist-install/build/GHC/Generics_o_split/Generics__6.o libraries/ghc-prim/dist-install/build/GHC/Generics_o_split/Generics__7.o libraries/ghc-prim/dist-install/build/GHC/Generics_o_split/Generics__8.o libraries/ghc-prim/dist-install/build/GHC/Generics_o_split/Generics__9.o libraries/ghc-prim/dist-install/build/GHC/Generics_o_split/Generics__10.o libraries/ghc-prim/dist-install/build/GHC/Generics_o_split/Generics__11.o libraries/ghc-prim/dist-install/build/GHC/Generics_o_split/Generics__12.o libraries/ghc-prim/dist-install/build/GHC/Generics_o_split/Generics__13.o libraries/ghc-prim/dist-install/build/GHC/Generics_o_split/Generics__14.o libraries/ghc-prim/dist-install/build/GHC/Generics_o_split/Generics__15.o libraries/ghc-prim/dist-install/build/GHC/Generics_o_split/Generics__16.o) Checking the verbose ghc output the problem occurs here with : /usr/bin/gcc -nostdlib -nodefaultlibs -Wl,-r -Wl,-x -o libraries/ghc-prim/dist-install/build/GHC/Generics.o libraries/ghc-prim/dist-install/build/GHC/Generics_o_split/ld.script Editing the linking script generated by ghc-split: [ghc-6.12.3]$ sed -i.orig -e "s%libraries/ghc-prim/dist-install/build/GHC/Generics_o_split/%%g" libraries/ghc-prim/dist-install/build/GHC/Generics_o_split/ld.script [ghc-6.12.3]$ /usr/bin/gcc -nostdlib -nodefaultlibs -Wl,-r -Wl,-x -o libraries/ghc-prim/dist-install/build/GHC/Generics.o libraries/ghc-prim/dist-install/build/GHC/Generics_o_split/ld.script [ghc-6.12.3]$ So question that arises is should ld.gold support relative paths in link scripts or should ghc be changes to just like the local objects? --- Additional comment from petersen(a)redhat.com on 2010-09-21 12:51:14 EST --- The above sed change only works with ld.gold not ld.bfd. So it seems to be a ld.gold change of behaviour or regression compared to ld.bfd. I would be willing to patch ghc for Fedora if ld.gold and ld.bfd can agree on at least one of the versions of link scripts working. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 4

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

haskell-devel March 2011