Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=861923
Bug 861923 depends on bug 861922, which changed state.
Bug 861922 Summary: Review Request: bibutils - Bibliography conversion
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=861922
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838775
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> ---
ghc-css-text-0.1.1-1.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634048
Bug 634048 depends on bug 838775, which changed state.
Bug 838775 Summary: Review Request: ghc-css-text - CSS parser and renderer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838775
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838775
Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE
Last Closed| |2012-11-17 18:48:42
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=861923
Lakshmi Narasimhan <lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |ON_DEV
Flags| |fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from Lakshmi Narasimhan <lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com> ---
[+]MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in
the review.
rpmlint -i ghc-hs-bibutils-4.15-1.fc17.src.rpm
ghc-hs-bibutils-4.15-1.fc17.x86_64.rpm
ghc-hs-bibutils-devel-4.15-1.fc17.x86_64.rpm ../ghc-hs-bibutils.spec
3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
[+]MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[+]MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec
[+]MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.
Naming-Yes
Version-release - Matches
License - OK, GPLv2
No prebuilt external bits - OK
Spec legibity - OK
Package template - OK
Arch support - OK
Libexecdir - OK
rpmlint - yes
changelogs - OK
Source url tag - OK, validated.
Build Requires list - OK
Summary and description - OK
API documentation - OK, in devel package
[+]MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet
the Licensing Guidelines.
GPLv2
[+]MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
[+]MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.
LICENSE file is included.
[+]MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
[+]MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
[+]MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source,
as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use sha256sum for this task as it
is used by the sources file once imported into git. If no upstream URL can be
specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to
deal with this.
sha256sum hs-bibutils-4.15.tar.gz
ghc-hs-bibutils-4.15-1.fc17.src/hs-bibutils-4.15.tar.gz
e9a75f9922667e6dd16556433d52b32a12061dc1fbe3b2dde5a9c3ea4dc45bc0
hs-bibutils-4.15.tar.gz
e9a75f9922667e6dd16556433d52b32a12061dc1fbe3b2dde5a9c3ea4dc45bc0
ghc-hs-bibutils-4.15-1.fc17.src/hs-bibutils-4.15.tar.gz
[+]MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at
least one primary architecture.
built on x86_64.
[+]MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch.
[+]MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires.
[+]MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
Checked with rpmquery --list
[+]MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates.
Checked with rpmquery --whatprovides.
[+]MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec
file's %files listings.
[+]MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set
with executable permissions, for example.
[+]MUST: Each package must consistently use macros.
[+]MUST: The package must contain code, or permissible content.
[+]MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage.
[+]MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the
runtime of the application.
[+]MUST: devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned
dependency: Requires: {name} = %{version}-%{release}
[NA]MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop
file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the
%install section
[+]MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other
packages.
[+]MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.
Should items
[+]SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[-]SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should
contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[-]SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[-]SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all
supported architectures.
[+]SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A
package should not segfault instead of running, for example.
Installed the packages. Imported Text.Bibutils into ghci. Loads fine.
[+]SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is
vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity.
cabal2spec-diff is OK.
APPROVED.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855710
Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed| |2012-11-16 03:30:13
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838775
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> ---
ghc-css-text-0.1.1-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838775
Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: ghc-tar-0.3.2.0 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=783755
Summary: ghc-tar-0.3.2.0 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: Unspecified
OS/Version: Unspecified
Status: NEW
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Component: ghc-tar
AssignedTo: mathstuf(a)gmail.com
ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, bos(a)serpentine.com,
mathstuf(a)gmail.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Latest upstream release: 0.3.2.0
Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 0.3.1.0
URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/tar/
Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy
More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.