haskell-devel November 2012

haskell-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

2 participants
181 discussions

[Bug 838799] New: git-annex-3.20120629 is available
by Red Hat Bugzilla 23 Sep '13

23 Sep '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838799 Bug ID: 838799 Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org Severity: unspecified Version: rawhide Priority: unspecified CC: haskell-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mathstuf(a)gmail.com Assignee: mathstuf(a)gmail.com Summary: git-annex-3.20120629 is available Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Unspecified Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org Type: --- Documentation: --- Hardware: Unspecified Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: git-annex Product: Fedora Latest upstream release: 3.20120629 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 3.20120615 URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/git-annex/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 68

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 547867] New: %{ghc_version} desn't expand properly
by Red Hat Bugzilla 20 Aug '13

20 Aug '13

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: %{ghc_version} desn't expand properly https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547867 Summary: %{ghc_version} desn't expand properly Product: Fedora Version: 11 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: high Component: ghc-rpm-macros AssignedTo: loupgaroublond(a)gmail.com ReportedBy: jochen(a)herr-schmitt.de QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, loupgaroublond(a)gmail.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora I want to tryout ghc-6.12.1 on my system and have installed ghc-rpm-macros-0.3.0-1 on my system. Because I have trouble to compile my packages, I have try out the following command: $ rpm -q --eval '%{ghc_version}' and got the following output: error: Recursion depth(17) greater than max(16) 15< (empty) 14< (empty) 13< (empty) 12< (empty) 11< (empty) 10< (empty) 9< (empty) 8< (empty) 7< (empty) 6< (empty) 5< (empty) 4< (empty) 3< (empty) 2< (empty) 1< (empty) 0< (empty) If I type $ ghc --numeric-version I will get 6.12.1 which I expected for $ rpm -q --eval '%{ghc_version}' Best Regards: Jochen Schmitt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 6

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 746557] New: Review Request: ghc-tagged - Newtype wrappers for phantom types
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 Jul '13

07 Jul '13

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-tagged - Newtype wrappers for phantom types https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746557 Summary: Review Request: ghc-tagged - Newtype wrappers for phantom types Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Status Whiteboard: Ready Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com, package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Depends on: 648246,737228,742882 Blocks: 648248,713359 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Spec file: http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-tagged.spec SRPM http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-tagged-0.2.3.1-1.fc14.s… -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 21

[Bug 800001] New: Rebuild with ghc-crypto-api
by Red Hat Bugzilla 29 Jun '13

29 Jun '13

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Rebuild with ghc-crypto-api https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=800001 Summary: Rebuild with ghc-crypto-api Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: ghc-cryptohash AssignedTo: petersen(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: mathstuf(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Description of problem: ghc-hashable not using ghc-crypto-api causes when building yesod-static. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 10

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 712404] New: Review Request : ghc-data-accessor-template - A library for accessing and manipulating fields of records
by Red Hat Bugzilla 24 Jun '13

24 Jun '13

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request : ghc-data-accessor-template - A library for accessing and manipulating fields of records https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712404 Summary: Review Request : ghc-data-accessor-template - A library for accessing and manipulating fields of records Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Depends on: 662272 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- SPEC file : http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-data-accessor-template.… SRPM file : http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-data-accessor-template-… rpmlint output: ghc-data-accessor-template-prof.i686: E: devel-dependency ghc-data-accessor-template-devel Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package itself. ghc-data-accessor-template-prof.i686: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. ghc-data-accessor-template-prof.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ghc-6.12.3/data-accessor-template-0.2.1.7/libHSdata-accessor-template-0.2.1.7_p.a A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 10

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 712273] New: Review Request: ghc-pointedlist - A zipper-like comonad
by Red Hat Bugzilla 24 Jun '13

24 Jun '13

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-pointedlist - A zipper-like comonad Alias: ghc-pointedlist https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712273 Summary: Review Request: ghc-pointedlist - A zipper-like comonad Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Depends on: 712270,712271 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Spec file : http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-pointedlist.spec SRPM file : http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-pointedlist-0.4.0.2-1.f… rpmlint output: ghc-pointedlist.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) comonad -> co monad, co-monad, commonage The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-pointedlist.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US comonad -> co monad, co-monad, commonage The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-pointedlist.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) comonad -> co monad, co-monad, commonage The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-pointedlist.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US comonad -> co monad, co-monad, commonage The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-pointedlist-devel.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) comonad -> co monad, co-monad, commonage The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-pointedlist-devel.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US comonad -> co monad, co-monad, commonage The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-pointedlist-prof.i686: E: devel-dependency ghc-pointedlist-devel Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package itself. ghc-pointedlist-prof.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) comonad -> co monad, co-monad, commonage The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-pointedlist-prof.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US comonad -> co monad, co-monad, commonage The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-pointedlist-prof.i686: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. ghc-pointedlist-prof.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ghc-6.12.3/pointedlist-0.4.0.2/libHSpointedlist-0.4.0.2_p.a A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 10 warnings. Required for yi. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 11

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 655486] New: Review Request: ghc-recaptcha - A Haskell library to use reCAPTCHA service
by Red Hat Bugzilla 24 Jun '13

24 Jun '13

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-recaptcha - A Haskell library to use reCAPTCHA service Alias: ghc-recaptcha https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=655486 Summary: Review Request: ghc-recaptcha - A Haskell library to use reCAPTCHA service Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora SPEC URL : https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-recaptcha.spec?attr… SRPM URL: https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-recaptcha-0.1-1.fc1… rpmlint output: rpmlint -i ghc-recaptcha-0.1-1.fc14.x86_64.rpm ghc-recaptcha-devel-0.1-1.fc14.x86_64.rpm ghc-recaptcha-prof-0.1-1.fc14.x86_64.rpm ../../SRPMS/ghc-recaptcha-0.1-1.fc14.src.rpm ghc-recaptcha.spec ghc-recaptcha.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US hs -> HS, sh, gs The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-recaptcha-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US hs -> HS, sh, gs The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-recaptcha-prof.x86_64: E: devel-dependency ghc-recaptcha-devel Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package itself. ghc-recaptcha-prof.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US hs -> HS, sh, gs The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-recaptcha-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. ghc-recaptcha-prof.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ghc-6.12.3/recaptcha-0.1/libHSrecaptcha-0.1_p.a A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. ghc-recaptcha.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US hs -> HS, sh, gs The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 6 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 7

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 713359] New: build feldspar-language-0.4 for ghc7
by Red Hat Bugzilla 24 Jun '13

24 Jun '13

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: build feldspar-language-0.4 for ghc7 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=713359 Summary: build feldspar-language-0.4 for ghc7 Product: Fedora Version: 15 Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: ghc-feldspar-language AssignedTo: shakthimaan(a)gmail.com ReportedBy: petersen(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com, shakthimaan(a)gmail.com Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Description of problem: feldspar-language was blocked from f15 since 0.3 didn't build with ghc7. 0.4 is now available which builds, though it requires a couple of new dependencies. Opening this bug to track. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 10

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 664208] New: Review Request: ghc-fingertree - Haskell package provides generic finger-tree structure
by Red Hat Bugzilla 24 Jun '13

24 Jun '13

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-fingertree - Haskell package provides generic finger-tree structure Alias: ghc-fingertree https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664208 Summary: Review Request: ghc-fingertree - Haskell package provides generic finger-tree structure Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Blocks: 634048 Classification: Fedora SRPM link: https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-fingertree-0.0.1.0-… SPEC file link: https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-fingertree.spec?att… rpmlint output: rpmlint -i *.rpm ../ghc-fingertree.spec ghc-fingertree-prof.x86_64: E: devel-dependency ghc-fingertree-devel Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package itself. ghc-fingertree-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. ghc-fingertree-prof.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ghc-7.0.1/fingertree-0.0.1.0/libHSfingertree-0.0.1.0_p.a A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 13

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 712271] New: Review Request: ghc-fclabels - A package that provides first class accessor labels
by Red Hat Bugzilla 24 Jun '13

24 Jun '13

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-fclabels - A package that provides first class accessor labels Alias: ghc-fclabels https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712271 Summary: Review Request: ghc-fclabels - A package that provides first class accessor labels Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Spec file : http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-fclabels.spec SRPM file : http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-fclabels-0.11.1.1-1.fc1… Koji build : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3122646 rpmlint output: ghc-fclabels.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) accessor -> accessory, access or, access-or The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-fclabels.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US composable -> com posable, com-posable, compo sable The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-fclabels.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) accessor -> accessory, access or, access-or The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-fclabels.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US composable -> com posable, com-posable, compo sable The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-fclabels-devel.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) accessor -> accessory, access or, access-or The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-fclabels-devel.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US composable -> com posable, com-posable, compo sable The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-fclabels-prof.i686: E: devel-dependency ghc-fclabels-devel Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package itself. ghc-fclabels-prof.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) accessor -> accessory, access or, access-or The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-fclabels-prof.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US composable -> com posable, com-posable, compo sable The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-fclabels-prof.i686: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. ghc-fclabels-prof.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ghc-7.0.2/fclabels-0.11.1.1/libHSfclabels-0.11.1.1_p.a A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 10 warnings. Required for yi. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 7

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

haskell-devel November 2012