February 2012 - haskell-devel - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 787096] Review Request: ghc-netlist - A simplified generic netlist for HDLs

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787096 --- Comment #4 from Shakthi Kannan <shakthimaan(a)gmail.com> 2012-02-04 12:48:02 EST --- Yes, will change the default description and summary before importing it. Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

12 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 787096] Review Request: ghc-netlist - A simplified generic netlist for HDLs

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787096 Lakshmi Narasimhan <lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Lakshmi Narasimhan <lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com> 2012-02-04 08:38:51 EST --- Could you change the default description and summary before importing the package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

12 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 787096] Review Request: ghc-netlist - A simplified generic netlist for HDLs

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787096 Lakshmi Narasimhan <lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Lakshmi Narasimhan <lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com> 2012-02-04 08:38:32 EST --- [+]MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. rpmlint -i ghc-netlist.spec built/ghc-netlist-0.3.1-1.fc15.x86_64.rpm built/ghc-netlist-devel-0.3.1-1.fc15.x86_64.rpm ghc-netlist-0.3.1-1.fc15.src.rpm 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [+]MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [+]MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec [+]MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. Naming-Yes Version-release - Matches No prebuilt external bits - OK Spec legibity - OK Package template - OK Arch support - OK Libexecdir - OK rpmlint - yes changelogs - OK Source url tag - OK, validated. Build Requires list - OK Summary and description - NOT OK. API documentation - OK, in devel package. [+]MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. BSD 3clause license [+]MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [+]MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. LICENSE file is included. [+]MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [+]MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [+]MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source,as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. md5sum ghc-netlist-0.3.1-1.fc15.src/netlist-0.3.1.tar.gz d52ca0981b9fda61b6c29a5130d52c0c ghc-netlist-0.3.1-1.fc15.src/netlist-0.3.1.tar.gz md5sum netlist-0.3.1.tar.gz d52ca0981b9fda61b6c29a5130d52c0c netlist-0.3.1.tar.gz [+]MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. Built on x86_64 [+]MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. [+]MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires. [+]MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries. Checked with rpmquery --list [NA]MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review. [+]MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. Checked with rpmquery --whatprovides [+]MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. [+]MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Checked with ls -lR [+]MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [+]MUST: The package must contain code, or permissible content. [+]MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. [+]MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. [+]MUST: devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: {name} = %{version}-%{release} [NA]MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section [+]MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [+]MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. Should items [+]SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [+]SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. Installed the packages. Works fine. Imported Language.Netlist.AST into ghci. No issues. [+]SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. cabal2spec-diff is OK. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

12 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 787096] Review Request: ghc-netlist - A simplified generic netlist for HDLs

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787096 --- Comment #1 from Shakthi Kannan <shakthimaan(a)gmail.com> 2012-02-03 01:30:33 EST --- Successful Koji builds for F15, F16 and F17: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3758232 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3758233 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3758238 $ rpmlint ghc-netlist.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint ghc-netlist-0.3.1-1.fc15.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint ghc-netlist-0.3.1-1.fc15.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint ghc-netlist-devel-0.3.1-1.fc15.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

12 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 787096] Review Request: ghc-netlist - A simplified generic netlist for HDLs

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787096 Shakthi Kannan <shakthimaan(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-haskell-list@redhat. | |com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

12 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 786071] Review Request: ghc-feldspar-language - Functional Embedded Language for DSP and PARallelism

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786071 --- Comment #3 from Shakthi Kannan <shakthimaan(a)gmail.com> 2012-02-01 04:19:54 EST --- Updated to use cabal2spec-0.25.2: SPEC: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/ghc-feldspar-language.spec SRPM: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/ghc-feldspar-language-0.4.0.2-2... Successful Koji builds for F15, F16, and F17: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3751303 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3751306 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3751309 $ rpmlint ghc-feldspar-language.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint ghc-feldspar-language-0.4.0.2-2.fc15.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint ghc-feldspar-language-0.4.0.2-2.fc15.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint ghc-feldspar-language-devel-0.4.0.2-2.fc15.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

12 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 786071] Review Request: ghc-feldspar-language - Functional Embedded Language for DSP and PARallelism

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786071 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |713359 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

12 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 786071] Review Request: ghc-feldspar-language - Functional Embedded Language for DSP and PARallelism

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786071 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-haskell-list@redhat. | |com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

12 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

haskell-devel February 2012