[Bug 803812] New: FTBS: build failure on PPC64, `IO' is applied to too many type arguments'
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: FTBS: build failure on PPC64, `IO' is applied to too many type arguments'
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=803812
Summary: FTBS: build failure on PPC64, `IO' is applied to too
many type arguments'
Product: Fedora
Version: 17
Platform: powerpc
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: high
Priority: high
Component: ghc-gio
AssignedTo: petersen(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: karsten(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Description of problem:
[14 of 24] Compiling System.GIO.File.FileInfo (
dist/build/System/GIO/File/FileInfo.hs, dist/build/System/GIO/File/FileInfo.o )
System/GIO/File/FileInfo.chs:269:5:
`IO' is applied to too many type arguments
In the type signature for `fileInfoGetAttributeBool':
fileInfoGetAttributeBool :: FileInfoClass info =>
info -> String -> IO Bool bool
System/GIO/File/FileInfo.chs:278:5:
`IO' is applied to too many type arguments
In the type signature for `fileInfoGetAttributeWord32':
fileInfoGetAttributeWord32 :: FileInfoClass info =>
info -> String -> IO Word32 bool
System/GIO/File/FileInfo.chs:287:5:
`IO' is applied to too many type arguments
In the type signature for `fileInfoGetAttributeInt32':
fileInfoGetAttributeInt32 :: FileInfoClass info =>
info -> String -> IO Int32 bool
System/GIO/File/FileInfo.chs:296:5:
`IO' is applied to too many type arguments
In the type signature for `fileInfoGetAttributeWord64':
fileInfoGetAttributeWord64 :: FileInfoClass info =>
info -> String -> IO Word64 bool
System/GIO/File/FileInfo.chs:305:5:
`IO' is applied to too many type arguments
In the type signature for `fileInfoGetAttributeInt64':
fileInfoGetAttributeInt64 :: FileInfoClass info =>
info -> String -> IO Int64 bool
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.sEL96Y (%build)
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
ghc-gio-0.12.2-1.fc17
How reproducible:
always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.ppc-koji build --scratch f17 ghc-gio-0.12.2-1.fc17.src.rpm
2.
3.
Actual results:
http://ppc.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=439435
Expected results:
Additional info:
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
8 years, 1 month
[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 635581] New: [gold] configure: error: curses library not found, so this package cannot be built
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: [gold] configure: error: curses library not found, so this package cannot be built
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=635581
Summary: [gold] configure: error: curses library not found, so
this package cannot be built
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: ghc
AssignedTo: petersen(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: mnowak(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, bos(a)serpentine.com,
loupgaroublond(a)gmail.com,
fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---
Description of problem:
ghc-6.12.3-5.fc15.src.rpm rebuild with gold (the alternative linker in
binutils) fails because configure script won't find curses:
DEBUG: ncurses.x86_64 0:5.7-8.20100703.fc14
DEBUG: ncurses-base.x86_64 0:5.7-8.20100703.fc14
DEBUG: ncurses-libs.x86_64 0:5.7-8.20100703.fc14
DEBUG: ncurses-base.x86_64 0:5.7-8.20100703.fc14
DEBUG: ncurses-libs.x86_64 0:5.7-8.20100703.fc14
DEBUG: /usr/bin/yum --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/
resolvedep ccache 'libffi-devel' 'gmp-devel' 'ghc-rpm-macros >= 0.8.0'
'ncurses-devel' 'python' 'docbook-style-xsl' 'ghc' 'libxslt' 'hscolour' 'happy'
DEBUG: Executing command: /usr/bin/yum --installroot
/var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/ resolvedep ccache 'libffi-devel'
'gmp-devel' 'ghc-rpm-macros >= 0.8.0' 'ncurses-devel' 'python'
'docbook-style-xsl' 'ghc' 'libxslt' 'hscolour' 'happy'
--setopt=tsflags=nocontexts
DEBUG: 0:ncurses-devel-5.7-8.20100703.fc14.x86_64
DEBUG: /usr/bin/yum --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/
install ccache 'libffi-devel' 'gmp-devel' 'ghc-rpm-macros >= 0.8.0'
'ncurses-devel' 'python' 'docbook-style-xsl' 'ghc' 'libxslt' 'hscolour' 'happy'
DEBUG: Executing command: /usr/bin/yum --installroot
/var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/ install ccache 'libffi-devel'
'gmp-devel' 'ghc-rpm-macros >= 0.8.0' 'ncurses-devel' 'python'
'docbook-style-xsl' 'ghc' 'libxslt' 'hscolour' 'happy'
--setopt=tsflags=nocontexts
DEBUG: ncurses-devel x86_64 5.7-8.20100703.fc14 fedora
663 k
DEBUG: libxslt.x86_64 0:1.1.26-3.fc14 ncurses-devel.x86_64
0:5.7-8.20100703.fc14
DEBUG: checking ncurses.h usability... yes
DEBUG: checking ncurses.h presence... yes
DEBUG: checking for ncurses.h... yes
DEBUG: checking for setupterm in -lncursesw... no
DEBUG: checking for setupterm in -lncurses... no
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
ghc-6.12.3-5.fc15
How reproducible:
always (x86_64)
Steps to Reproduce:
1. alternatives --config ld
2. set gold
3. rebuild ghc srpm
Actual results:
Expected results:
DEBUG: ncurses.x86_64 0:5.7-8.20100703.fc14
DEBUG: ncurses-base.x86_64 0:5.7-8.20100703.fc14
DEBUG: ncurses-base.x86_64 0:5.7-8.20100703.fc14
DEBUG: ncurses-libs.x86_64 0:5.7-8.20100703.fc14
DEBUG: /usr/bin/yum --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/
resolvedep ccache 'libffi-devel' 'gmp-devel' 'ghc-rpm-macros >= 0.8.0'
'ncurses-devel' 'python' 'docbook-style-xsl' 'ghc' 'libxslt' 'hscolour' 'happy'
DEBUG: Executing command: /usr/bin/yum --installroot
/var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/ resolvedep ccache 'libffi-devel'
'gmp-devel' 'ghc-rpm-macros >= 0.8.0' 'ncurses-devel' 'python'
'docbook-style-xsl' 'ghc' 'libxslt' 'hscolour' 'happy'
--setopt=tsflags=nocontexts
DEBUG: 0:ncurses-devel-5.7-8.20100703.fc14.x86_64
DEBUG: /usr/bin/yum --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/
install ccache 'libffi-devel' 'gmp-devel' 'ghc-rpm-macros >= 0.8.0'
'ncurses-devel' 'python' 'docbook-style-xsl' 'ghc' 'libxslt' 'hscolour' 'happy'
DEBUG: Executing command: /usr/bin/yum --installroot
/var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/ install ccache 'libffi-devel'
'gmp-devel' 'ghc-rpm-macros >= 0.8.0' 'ncurses-devel' 'python'
'docbook-style-xsl' 'ghc' 'libxslt' 'hscolour' 'happy'
--setopt=tsflags=nocontexts
DEBUG: ncurses-devel x86_64 5.7-8.20100703.fc14 fedora
663 k
DEBUG: libxslt.x86_64 0:1.1.26-3.fc14 ncurses-devel.x86_64
0:5.7-8.20100703.fc14
DEBUG: checking ncurses.h usability... yes
DEBUG: checking ncurses.h presence... yes
DEBUG: checking for ncurses.h... yes
DEBUG: checking for setupterm in -lncursesw... yes
Additional info:
Since gold might be the default linker (per
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/GoldLinkerDefault) this problem might be
worth fixing.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
8 years, 7 months
[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 712270] New: Review Request: derive - A program and library to derive instances for data types
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: derive - A program and library to derive instances for data types
Alias: ghc-derive
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712270
Summary: Review Request: derive - A program and library to
derive instances for data types
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: unspecified
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com,
fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Spec file : http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/derive.spec
SRPM file :
http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/derive-2.5.2-1.fc14.src.rpm
Koji build : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3122647
rpmlint output:
derive.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell -> Gaskell, Gaitskell,
Skellum
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
derive.i686: W: name-repeated-in-summary C derive
The name of the package is repeated in its summary. This is often redundant
information and looks silly in various programs' output. Make the summary
brief and to the point without including redundant information in it.
derive.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary derive
Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page.
derive.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell -> Gaskell, Gaitskell,
Skellum
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
derive.src: W: name-repeated-in-summary C derive
The name of the package is repeated in its summary. This is often redundant
information and looks silly in various programs' output. Make the summary
brief and to the point without including redundant information in it.
ghc-derive-prof.i686: E: devel-dependency ghc-derive-devel
Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package
itself.
ghc-derive-prof.i686: W: no-documentation
The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include
documentation files.
ghc-derive-prof.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib/ghc-7.0.2/derive-2.5.2/libHSderive-2.5.2_p.a
A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If
you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a
development package.
5 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 7 warnings.
Required for yi
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
8 years, 10 months
[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 712280] New: Review Request: ghc-ghc-mtl - A mtl compatible with GHC-API monads and monad-transformers
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: ghc-ghc-mtl - A mtl compatible with GHC-API monads and monad-transformers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712280
Summary: Review Request: ghc-ghc-mtl - A mtl compatible with
GHC-API monads and monad-transformers
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com,
fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Depends on: 710045
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Spec file : http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-ghc-mtl.spec
SRPM link :
http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-ghc-mtl-1.0.1.0-1.fc1...
rpmlint output:
ghc-ghc-mtl-prof.i686: E: devel-dependency ghc-ghc-mtl-devel
Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package
itself.
ghc-ghc-mtl-prof.i686: W: no-documentation
The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include
documentation files.
ghc-ghc-mtl-prof.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib/ghc-6.12.3/ghc-mtl-1.0.1.0/libHSghc-mtl-1.0.1.0_p.a
A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If
you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a
development package.
4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings.
Required for yi.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
8 years, 10 months
[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 664221] New: Review Request: ghc-cautious-file - Provides ways to write a file cautiously
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: ghc-cautious-file - Provides ways to write a file cautiously
Alias: ghc-cautious-file
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664221
Summary: Review Request: ghc-cautious-file - Provides ways to
write a file cautiously
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com,
fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Blocks: 634048
Classification: Fedora
SPEC file link :
https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-cautious-file.spe...
SRPM link :
https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-cautious-file-0.1...
rpmlint output:
rpmlint -i *.rpm ../ghc-cautious-file.spec
ghc-cautious-file.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US posix -> posit,
pos ix, pos-ix
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-cautious-file.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US posix ->
posit, pos ix, pos-ix
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-cautious-file-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US posix
-> posit, pos ix, pos-ix
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-cautious-file-prof.x86_64: E: devel-dependency ghc-cautious-file-devel
Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package
itself.
ghc-cautious-file-prof.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US posix ->
posit, pos ix, pos-ix
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-cautious-file-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation
The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include
documentation files.
ghc-cautious-file-prof.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/ghc-7.0.1/cautious-file-0.1.5/libHScautious-file-0.1.5_p.a
A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If
you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a
development package.
4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 6 warnings.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
8 years, 10 months