haskell-devel August 2012

haskell-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

1 participants
106 discussions

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 712280] New: Review Request: ghc-ghc-mtl - A mtl compatible with GHC-API monads and monad-transformers
by Red Hat Bugzilla 12 Nov '14

12 Nov '14

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-ghc-mtl - A mtl compatible with GHC-API monads and monad-transformers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712280 Summary: Review Request: ghc-ghc-mtl - A mtl compatible with GHC-API monads and monad-transformers Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Depends on: 710045 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Spec file : http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-ghc-mtl.spec SRPM link : http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-ghc-mtl-1.0.1.0-1.fc14.… rpmlint output: ghc-ghc-mtl-prof.i686: E: devel-dependency ghc-ghc-mtl-devel Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package itself. ghc-ghc-mtl-prof.i686: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. ghc-ghc-mtl-prof.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ghc-6.12.3/ghc-mtl-1.0.1.0/libHSghc-mtl-1.0.1.0_p.a A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. Required for yi. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 26

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 664221] New: Review Request: ghc-cautious-file - Provides ways to write a file cautiously
by Red Hat Bugzilla 12 Nov '14

12 Nov '14

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-cautious-file - Provides ways to write a file cautiously Alias: ghc-cautious-file https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664221 Summary: Review Request: ghc-cautious-file - Provides ways to write a file cautiously Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Blocks: 634048 Classification: Fedora SPEC file link : https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-cautious-file.spec?… SRPM link : https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-cautious-file-0.1.5… rpmlint output: rpmlint -i *.rpm ../ghc-cautious-file.spec ghc-cautious-file.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US posix -> posit, pos ix, pos-ix The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-cautious-file.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US posix -> posit, pos ix, pos-ix The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-cautious-file-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US posix -> posit, pos ix, pos-ix The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-cautious-file-prof.x86_64: E: devel-dependency ghc-cautious-file-devel Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package itself. ghc-cautious-file-prof.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US posix -> posit, pos ix, pos-ix The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-cautious-file-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. ghc-cautious-file-prof.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ghc-7.0.1/cautious-file-0.1.5/libHScautious-file-0.1.5_p.a A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 6 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 26

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 703503] New: Review Request: ghc-xdg-basedir - Haskell library implementing XDG base directory spec
by Red Hat Bugzilla 12 Nov '14

12 Nov '14

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-xdg-basedir - Haskell library implementing XDG base directory spec Alias: ghc-xdg-basedir https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=703503 Summary: Review Request: ghc-xdg-basedir - Haskell library implementing XDG base directory spec Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Spec file: http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-xdg-basedir.spec SRPM link: http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-xdg-basedir-0.2-1.fc14.… -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 11

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 664151] New: Review Request: ghc-Diff - A O(ND) diff algorithm in Haskell
by Red Hat Bugzilla 22 Oct '14

22 Oct '14

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-Diff - A O(ND) diff algorithm in Haskell Alias: ghc-Diff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664151 Summary: Review Request: ghc-Diff - A O(ND) diff algorithm in Haskell Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora SPEC file URL: https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-Diff.spec?attredire… SRPM file URL: https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-Diff-0.1.2-1.fc14.s… rpmlint output: rpmlint -i ghc-Diff.spec ghc-Diff*fc15*.rpm ghc-Diff-prof.i686: E: devel-dependency ghc-Diff-devel Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package itself. ghc-Diff-prof.i686: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. ghc-Diff-prof.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ghc-7.0.1/Diff-0.1.2/libHSDiff-0.1.2_p.a A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 34

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 712284] New: Review Request: ghc-hint - Library that provides interpreter monad
by Red Hat Bugzilla 25 Apr '14

25 Apr '14

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-hint - Library that provides interpreter monad Alias: ghc-hint https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712284 Summary: Review Request: ghc-hint - Library that provides interpreter monad Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Depends on: 712280 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Spec file : http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-hint.spec SRPM file : http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-hint-0.3.3.2-1.fc14.src… rpmlint output: ghc-hint-prof.i686: E: devel-dependency ghc-hint-devel Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package itself. ghc-hint-prof.i686: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. ghc-hint-prof.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ghc-6.12.3/hint-0.3.3.2/libHShint-0.3.3.2_p.a A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. Required for yi. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 20

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 664205] New: Review Request: ghc-dlist - Haskell package that provides difference lists
by Red Hat Bugzilla 03 Mar '14

03 Mar '14

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-dlist - Haskell package that provides difference lists Alias: ghc-dlist https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664205 Summary: Review Request: ghc-dlist - Haskell package that provides difference lists Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Blocks: 634048 Classification: Fedora SRPM link : https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-dlist-0.5-1.fc14.sr… SPEC file link : https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-dlist.spec?attredir… rpmlint output: rpmlint -i *.rpm ../ghc-dlist.spec ghc-dlist-prof.x86_64: E: devel-dependency ghc-dlist-devel Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package itself. ghc-dlist-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. ghc-dlist-prof.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ghc-7.0.1/dlist-0.5/libHSdlist-0.5_p.a A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 28

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 639787] New: build darcs for EPEL-6
by Red Hat Bugzilla 02 Jan '14

02 Jan '14

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: build darcs for EPEL-6 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639787 Summary: build darcs for EPEL-6 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: darcs AssignedTo: jeremy(a)hinegardner.org ReportedBy: petersen(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, jeremy(a)hinegardner.org, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: SSIA: I think we should have darcs in EPEL-6. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 6

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 712659] New: Review Request : yi - An extensible text editor written in Haskell
by Red Hat Bugzilla 01 Dec '13

01 Dec '13

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request : yi - An extensible text editor written in Haskell Alias: yi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712659 Summary: Review Request : yi - An extensible text editor written in Haskell Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Depends on: 630221,630302,662273,664150,664151,664208,664221,70315 2,703502,704113,712270,712272,712273,712284,712404 Blocks: 634048 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- SRPM file : http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/yi-0.6.3.0-1.fc14.src.rpm Spec file : http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/yi.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 31

[Bug 838799] New: git-annex-3.20120629 is available
by Red Hat Bugzilla 23 Sep '13

23 Sep '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838799 Bug ID: 838799 Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org Severity: unspecified Version: rawhide Priority: unspecified CC: haskell-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mathstuf(a)gmail.com Assignee: mathstuf(a)gmail.com Summary: git-annex-3.20120629 is available Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Unspecified Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org Type: --- Documentation: --- Hardware: Unspecified Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: git-annex Product: Fedora Latest upstream release: 3.20120629 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 3.20120615 URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/git-annex/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 68

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 547867] New: %{ghc_version} desn't expand properly
by Red Hat Bugzilla 20 Aug '13

20 Aug '13

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: %{ghc_version} desn't expand properly https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547867 Summary: %{ghc_version} desn't expand properly Product: Fedora Version: 11 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: high Component: ghc-rpm-macros AssignedTo: loupgaroublond(a)gmail.com ReportedBy: jochen(a)herr-schmitt.de QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, loupgaroublond(a)gmail.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora I want to tryout ghc-6.12.1 on my system and have installed ghc-rpm-macros-0.3.0-1 on my system. Because I have trouble to compile my packages, I have try out the following command: $ rpm -q --eval '%{ghc_version}' and got the following output: error: Recursion depth(17) greater than max(16) 15< (empty) 14< (empty) 13< (empty) 12< (empty) 11< (empty) 10< (empty) 9< (empty) 8< (empty) 7< (empty) 6< (empty) 5< (empty) 4< (empty) 3< (empty) 2< (empty) 1< (empty) 0< (empty) If I type $ ghc --numeric-version I will get 6.12.1 which I expected for $ rpm -q --eval '%{ghc_version}' Best Regards: Jochen Schmitt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 6

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

haskell-devel August 2012