haskell-devel March 2013

haskell-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

1 participants
270 discussions

[Bug 892576] New: ghc-conduit-0.5.6 is available
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Jun '14

09 Jun '14

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892576 Bug ID: 892576 Summary: ghc-conduit-0.5.6 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: ghc-conduit Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org Latest upstream release: 0.5.6 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 0.5.2.7 URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/conduit/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=3uGGnwAymE&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 39

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 712284] New: Review Request: ghc-hint - Library that provides interpreter monad
by Red Hat Bugzilla 25 Apr '14

25 Apr '14

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-hint - Library that provides interpreter monad Alias: ghc-hint https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712284 Summary: Review Request: ghc-hint - Library that provides interpreter monad Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Depends on: 712280 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Spec file : http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-hint.spec SRPM file : http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-hint-0.3.3.2-1.fc14.src… rpmlint output: ghc-hint-prof.i686: E: devel-dependency ghc-hint-devel Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package itself. ghc-hint-prof.i686: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. ghc-hint-prof.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ghc-6.12.3/hint-0.3.3.2/libHShint-0.3.3.2_p.a A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. Required for yi. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 20

[Bug 907515] New: ghc 7.4.1 and 7.4.2 compile a correct gtk2hs program such that it crashes with a segmentation fault
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 Mar '14

19 Mar '14

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=907515 Bug ID: 907515 Summary: ghc 7.4.1 and 7.4.2 compile a correct gtk2hs program such that it crashes with a segmentation fault Product: Fedora Version: 18 Component: ghc Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Reporter: garrett.mitchener(a)gmail.com Description of problem: I wrote a Haskell program using gtk2hs. It works fine on Fedora 17 under ghc 7.0.4. However it crashes with a segmentation fault when compiled on Fedora 18 or rawhide(19). The crash occurs the first time an action added to the gtk loop with timeoutAddFull runs. I wrote a minimal test case that triggers the problem and posted it here: http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/7629 It seems to be a compiler or run-time-system bug in ghc 7.4.1 and 7.4.2 or possibly gtk2hs, because the binary built on F18 or rawhide crashes when run on F17, and the binary built on F17 runs without a problem on F18. Furthermore, if I disable selinux on the kernel command line at boot time, the crash vanishes in F18 and rawhide. I don't know why-- the crash doesn't trigger any selinux error messages, just a segmentation fault. Jens Petersen reported to me that the crash does not occur on 64 bit test machines on Fedora 18, but he confirmed that it does occur on 32 bit test machines. I've run into pointer alignment problems with ghc before, where alignment pragmas in C modules are somehow broken when the C module is linked with a ghc program, so that may be the case here? Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): ghc 7.4.1 and 7.4.2. How reproducible: Every time Steps to Reproduce: Compile and run the test program posted in the haskell.org trac bug report http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/7629 I'm also posting the bug here in case someone else runs into it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=VZ6WAcNDc9&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 16

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 664205] New: Review Request: ghc-dlist - Haskell package that provides difference lists
by Red Hat Bugzilla 03 Mar '14

03 Mar '14

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-dlist - Haskell package that provides difference lists Alias: ghc-dlist https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664205 Summary: Review Request: ghc-dlist - Haskell package that provides difference lists Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Blocks: 634048 Classification: Fedora SRPM link : https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-dlist-0.5-1.fc14.sr… SPEC file link : https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-dlist.spec?attredir… rpmlint output: rpmlint -i *.rpm ../ghc-dlist.spec ghc-dlist-prof.x86_64: E: devel-dependency ghc-dlist-devel Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package itself. ghc-dlist-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. ghc-dlist-prof.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ghc-7.0.1/dlist-0.5/libHSdlist-0.5_p.a A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 28

[Bug 880135] New: Compile GHC packages with -O2
by Red Hat Bugzilla 29 Jan '14

29 Jan '14

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880135 Bug ID: 880135 Summary: Compile GHC packages with -O2 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: ghc-rpm-macros Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Reporter: dag.odenhall(a)gmail.com Problem: If you want to compile your Haskell application with -O2, only parts of it will be - most system packages are already built with -O1. All your own code is going to link to those prebuilt binaries. Does it matter? Respectable people in the community claim -O2 really does produce better code: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/11108746/difference-between-ghcs-o-and-o2 Cons: The fedora packages will take longer to build. Counter argument: This shouldn't happen often though, and I guess is done by some build service [koji?]. Users will just install prebuilt packages with no compilation time at all and benefit from optimized binaries. Footnote: This is only about building the fedora packages with -O2. Our cabal-install package should not be changed to default to -O2 for user compilation. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 11

[Bug 911725] New: ghc-ghc-devel not required?
by Red Hat Bugzilla 22 Jan '14

22 Jan '14

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=911725 Bug ID: 911725 Summary: ghc-ghc-devel not required? Product: Fedora Version: 18 Component: ghc Severity: high Priority: unspecified Reporter: vadie.developer(a)gmail.com Created attachment 697959 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=697959&action=edit script used to measure size of the package installed,although one could see it through packagekit Description of problem: I am the culprit for this bloat problem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=750317 ghc-ghc-devel is for hacking on ghc, it is the entir ghc platform(compiler,RTS etc as a library). This pacakge should not be part of base install Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): ghc-7.4.1 this package takes up too much space (~ 240 MB installed) and 34 MB puts considerable strain on bandwidth and diskspace (OK not so much on diskspace,but would be nice to get rid of it) How reproducible: just install ghc, 'yum install ghc' Steps to Reproduce: 1.yum install ghc 2.say yes 3. Actual results: installs static library of entire ghc, which is not required for those Expected results: should not install ghc-ghc-devel package as part of base install. Additional info: This bug, is due to another request by me regarding quickCheck. Bug 750317 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=750317 *note the title changed* This is what Jens wrote : " > Maybe we really want the ghc base package to be a meta package > that pulls in "everything" to make the initial install friendlier > for newcomers. Ok, ghc-7.0.4-36.fc17 should provide a base metapackage which installs all of ghc (ghc-compiler and ghc-devel). So in future if you install ghc you will have a working QuickCheck, etc out of the box. " I should have said no to it at that time itself, but i was not very well-informed (not that I am now, just less ignorant),by adding ghc-ghc-devel, we have internals/implementation of ghc as static library not static/devel packages of quickCheck,parsec etc. {I am pretty sure about this} I think it is correct and OK (infact necessary) to provide, -devel packages by default for libraries of haskell, like ghc-parsec and ghc-parsec-devel, ghc-xml and ghc-xml-devl,ghc-pango and ghc-pango-devel etc. but ghc-ghc-devel is going too far. Only those who hack on ghc need this (specifically who want to hack on this particular version others will track and program for latest git/darcs version). I think, it is possible to make this change. no ghc-ghc-devel in base install,but whenever one installs any other library corresponding -devel packages should also be installed I didn't realize about this space problem, untill I ran out of space on my old Fedora 16 on my root partition, found out that ghc installation took ~530 MB installed space. I am not sure about ghc-compiler package though, anyone more experienced in haskell packaging can chime in. I think this thing, needs better testing and some discussion so no need to hurry out the changes, so that we make sure we do the right thing. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=m5osKIWdlf&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 11

[Bug 902850] New: Lock Screen does not work in xmonad-gnome session
by Red Hat Bugzilla 22 Jan '14

22 Jan '14

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902850 Bug ID: 902850 Summary: Lock Screen does not work in xmonad-gnome session Product: Fedora Version: 18 Component: xmonad Severity: medium Priority: unspecified Reporter: conan(a)irconan.co.uk Description of problem: When "Lock Screen" is selected in the xmonad-gnome session nothing happens. Running "gnome-screensaver-command -l" in terminal produces no output. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Version: 0.10 Release: 17.fc18 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Login to xmonad-gnome session 2. Select "Lock Screen" from the menu in the top right corner. Actual results: Nothing Expected results: Lock screen appears -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=IfYeZBiMZD&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 5

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 639787] New: build darcs for EPEL-6
by Red Hat Bugzilla 02 Jan '14

02 Jan '14

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: build darcs for EPEL-6 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639787 Summary: build darcs for EPEL-6 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: darcs AssignedTo: jeremy(a)hinegardner.org ReportedBy: petersen(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, jeremy(a)hinegardner.org, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: SSIA: I think we should have darcs in EPEL-6. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 6

[Bug 907671] New: ghc-base should own /usr/lib64/ghc-7.4.*
by Red Hat Bugzilla 22 Dec '13

22 Dec '13

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=907671 Bug ID: 907671 Summary: ghc-base should own /usr/lib64/ghc-7.4.* Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: ghc Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Reporter: misc(a)zarb.org Created attachment 693053 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=693053&action=edit add the directory to ghc-base file list $ LC_ALL=C rpm -qf /usr/lib64/ghc-7.4.1 file /usr/lib64/ghc-7.4.1 is not owned by any package since all ghc rpm likely requires ghc-base, this is IMHO the rpm that should own this directory. Here is a patch for that. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=xKSqNVCGID&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 6

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 712659] New: Review Request : yi - An extensible text editor written in Haskell
by Red Hat Bugzilla 01 Dec '13

01 Dec '13

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request : yi - An extensible text editor written in Haskell Alias: yi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712659 Summary: Review Request : yi - An extensible text editor written in Haskell Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Depends on: 630221,630302,662273,664150,664151,664208,664221,70315 2,703502,704113,712270,712272,712273,712284,712404 Blocks: 634048 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- SRPM file : http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/yi-0.6.3.0-1.fc14.src.rpm Spec file : http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/yi.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 31

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

haskell-devel March 2013