https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838799
Bug ID: 838799
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
Severity: unspecified
Version: rawhide
Priority: unspecified
CC: haskell-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
mathstuf(a)gmail.com
Assignee: mathstuf(a)gmail.com
Summary: git-annex-3.20120629 is available
Regression: ---
Story Points: ---
Classification: Fedora
OS: Unspecified
Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org
Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Hardware: Unspecified
Mount Type: ---
Status: NEW
Component: git-annex
Product: Fedora
Latest upstream release: 3.20120629
Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 3.20120615
URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/git-annex/
Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy
More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=925561
Bug ID: 925561
Summary: hugs98: Does not support aarch64 in f19 and rawhide
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: hugs98
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Assignee: petersen(a)redhat.com
Reporter: dennis(a)ausil.us
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: haskell-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
petersen(a)redhat.com
Blocks: 922257 (ARM64)
Support for the ARM 64 bit CPU architecture (aarch64) was introduced in
autoconf 2.69. hugs98 appears to use an earlier version of
autoconf, preventing its being built. This can be fixed in of three ways (In
order of preference):
1. Work with upstream to migrate the package to autoconf 2.69.
2. Rerun autoconf or autoreconf in %prep or %build prior to running
configure.
3. Apply the patch at
http://ausil.fedorapeople.org/aarch64/hugs98/hugs98-aarch64.patch
which updates config.guess and config.sub to recognize aarch64.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=nEHFomSsEb&a=cc_unsubscribe
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: %{ghc_version} desn't expand properly
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547867
Summary: %{ghc_version} desn't expand properly
Product: Fedora
Version: 11
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: high
Component: ghc-rpm-macros
AssignedTo: loupgaroublond(a)gmail.com
ReportedBy: jochen(a)herr-schmitt.de
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, loupgaroublond(a)gmail.com,
fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
I want to tryout ghc-6.12.1 on my system and have installed
ghc-rpm-macros-0.3.0-1 on my system.
Because I have trouble to compile my packages, I have try out the following
command:
$ rpm -q --eval '%{ghc_version}'
and got the following output:
error: Recursion depth(17) greater than max(16)
15< (empty)
14< (empty)
13< (empty)
12< (empty)
11< (empty)
10< (empty)
9< (empty)
8< (empty)
7< (empty)
6< (empty)
5< (empty)
4< (empty)
3< (empty)
2< (empty)
1< (empty)
0< (empty)
If I type
$ ghc --numeric-version
I will get
6.12.1
which I expected for
$ rpm -q --eval '%{ghc_version}'
Best Regards:
Jochen Schmitt
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.