May 2013 - haskell-devel - Fedora mailing-lists

[Bug 880135] New: Compile GHC packages with -O2
by Red Hat Bugzilla 29 Jan '14

29 Jan '14

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880135 Bug ID: 880135 Summary: Compile GHC packages with -O2 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: ghc-rpm-macros Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Reporter: dag.odenhall(a)gmail.com Problem: If you want to compile your Haskell application with -O2, only parts of it will be - most system packages are already built with -O1. All your own code is going to link to those prebuilt binaries. Does it matter? Respectable people in the community claim -O2 really does produce better code: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/11108746/difference-between-ghcs-o-and-o2 Cons: The fedora packages will take longer to build. Counter argument: This shouldn't happen often though, and I guess is done by some build service [koji?]. Users will just install prebuilt packages with no compilation time at all and benefit from optimized binaries. Footnote: This is only about building the fedora packages with -O2. Our cabal-install package should not be changed to default to -O2 for user compilation. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 11

[Bug 911725] New: ghc-ghc-devel not required?
by Red Hat Bugzilla 23 Jan '14

23 Jan '14

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=911725 Bug ID: 911725 Summary: ghc-ghc-devel not required? Product: Fedora Version: 18 Component: ghc Severity: high Priority: unspecified Reporter: vadie.developer(a)gmail.com Created attachment 697959 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=697959&action=edit script used to measure size of the package installed,although one could see it through packagekit Description of problem: I am the culprit for this bloat problem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=750317 ghc-ghc-devel is for hacking on ghc, it is the entir ghc platform(compiler,RTS etc as a library). This pacakge should not be part of base install Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): ghc-7.4.1 this package takes up too much space (~ 240 MB installed) and 34 MB puts considerable strain on bandwidth and diskspace (OK not so much on diskspace,but would be nice to get rid of it) How reproducible: just install ghc, 'yum install ghc' Steps to Reproduce: 1.yum install ghc 2.say yes 3. Actual results: installs static library of entire ghc, which is not required for those Expected results: should not install ghc-ghc-devel package as part of base install. Additional info: This bug, is due to another request by me regarding quickCheck. Bug 750317 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=750317 *note the title changed* This is what Jens wrote : " > Maybe we really want the ghc base package to be a meta package > that pulls in "everything" to make the initial install friendlier > for newcomers. Ok, ghc-7.0.4-36.fc17 should provide a base metapackage which installs all of ghc (ghc-compiler and ghc-devel). So in future if you install ghc you will have a working QuickCheck, etc out of the box. " I should have said no to it at that time itself, but i was not very well-informed (not that I am now, just less ignorant),by adding ghc-ghc-devel, we have internals/implementation of ghc as static library not static/devel packages of quickCheck,parsec etc. {I am pretty sure about this} I think it is correct and OK (infact necessary) to provide, -devel packages by default for libraries of haskell, like ghc-parsec and ghc-parsec-devel, ghc-xml and ghc-xml-devl,ghc-pango and ghc-pango-devel etc. but ghc-ghc-devel is going too far. Only those who hack on ghc need this (specifically who want to hack on this particular version others will track and program for latest git/darcs version). I think, it is possible to make this change. no ghc-ghc-devel in base install,but whenever one installs any other library corresponding -devel packages should also be installed I didn't realize about this space problem, untill I ran out of space on my old Fedora 16 on my root partition, found out that ghc installation took ~530 MB installed space. I am not sure about ghc-compiler package though, anyone more experienced in haskell packaging can chime in. I think this thing, needs better testing and some discussion so no need to hurry out the changes, so that we make sure we do the right thing. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=m5osKIWdlf&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 11

[Bug 902850] New: Lock Screen does not work in xmonad-gnome session
by Red Hat Bugzilla 23 Jan '14

23 Jan '14

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902850 Bug ID: 902850 Summary: Lock Screen does not work in xmonad-gnome session Product: Fedora Version: 18 Component: xmonad Severity: medium Priority: unspecified Reporter: conan(a)irconan.co.uk Description of problem: When "Lock Screen" is selected in the xmonad-gnome session nothing happens. Running "gnome-screensaver-command -l" in terminal produces no output. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Version: 0.10 Release: 17.fc18 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Login to xmonad-gnome session 2. Select "Lock Screen" from the menu in the top right corner. Actual results: Nothing Expected results: Lock screen appears -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=IfYeZBiMZD&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 5

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 639787] New: build darcs for EPEL-6
by Red Hat Bugzilla 02 Jan '14

02 Jan '14

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: build darcs for EPEL-6 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639787 Summary: build darcs for EPEL-6 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: darcs AssignedTo: jeremy(a)hinegardner.org ReportedBy: petersen(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, jeremy(a)hinegardner.org, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: SSIA: I think we should have darcs in EPEL-6. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 6

[Bug 957876] New: File 'ifluatex.sty' not found
by Red Hat Bugzilla 24 Dec '13

24 Dec '13

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957876 Bug ID: 957876 Summary: File 'ifluatex.sty' not found Product: Fedora Version: 18 Component: pandoc Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Assignee: petersen(a)redhat.com Reporter: ejacobs(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: haskell-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, petersen(a)redhat.com, shakthimaan(a)gmail.com Depends On: 861300 Category: --- +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #861300 +++ Description of problem: When using pandoc on F18, I get: File 'ifluatex.sty' not found Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 1.9.4.5-2.fc18 How reproducible: Create a simple pandoc input.txt file. Try to convert it into a pdf using: $ pandoc -t beamer input.txt -o input.pdf Actual results: pandoc: Error producing PDF from TeX source. ! LaTeX Error: File `ifluatex.sty' not found. Type X to quit or <RETURN> to proceed, or enter new name. (Default extension: sty) Enter file name: ! Emergency stop. <read *> l.6 \usepackage Expected results: A pdf should be created Additional info: This does not appear to be fixed, even though it says it should be fixed in 861300 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=2bLIE74yM6&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 9

[Bug 907671] New: ghc-base should own /usr/lib64/ghc-7.4.*
by Red Hat Bugzilla 22 Dec '13

22 Dec '13

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=907671 Bug ID: 907671 Summary: ghc-base should own /usr/lib64/ghc-7.4.* Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: ghc Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Reporter: misc(a)zarb.org Created attachment 693053 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=693053&action=edit add the directory to ghc-base file list $ LC_ALL=C rpm -qf /usr/lib64/ghc-7.4.1 file /usr/lib64/ghc-7.4.1 is not owned by any package since all ghc rpm likely requires ghc-base, this is IMHO the rpm that should own this directory. Here is a patch for that. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=xKSqNVCGID&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 6

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 712659] New: Review Request : yi - An extensible text editor written in Haskell
by Red Hat Bugzilla 01 Dec '13

01 Dec '13

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request : yi - An extensible text editor written in Haskell Alias: yi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712659 Summary: Review Request : yi - An extensible text editor written in Haskell Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Depends on: 630221,630302,662273,664150,664151,664208,664221,70315 2,703502,704113,712270,712272,712273,712284,712404 Blocks: 634048 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- SRPM file : http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/yi-0.6.3.0-1.fc14.src.rpm Spec file : http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/yi.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 31

[Bug 892579] New: ghc-Diff-0.2.0 is available
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Nov '13

10 Nov '13

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892579 Bug ID: 892579 Summary: ghc-Diff-0.2.0 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: ghc-Diff Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org Latest upstream release: 0.2.0 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 0.1.3 URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/Diff/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=g2xr7C0ev0&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 15

[Bug 838799] New: git-annex-3.20120629 is available
by Red Hat Bugzilla 23 Sep '13

23 Sep '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838799 Bug ID: 838799 Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org Severity: unspecified Version: rawhide Priority: unspecified CC: haskell-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mathstuf(a)gmail.com Assignee: mathstuf(a)gmail.com Summary: git-annex-3.20120629 is available Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Unspecified Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org Type: --- Documentation: --- Hardware: Unspecified Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: git-annex Product: Fedora Latest upstream release: 3.20120629 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 3.20120615 URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/git-annex/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 68

[Bug 892588] New: ghc-haskeline-0.7.0.3 is available
by Red Hat Bugzilla 12 Sep '13

12 Sep '13

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892588 Bug ID: 892588 Summary: ghc-haskeline-0.7.0.3 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: ghc-haskeline Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org Latest upstream release: 0.7.0.3 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 0.6.4.7 URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/haskeline/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=TyZNnbGaDf&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 4

[Bug 892566] New: ghc-Agda-2.3.2 is available
by Red Hat Bugzilla 12 Sep '13

12 Sep '13

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892566 Bug ID: 892566 Summary: ghc-Agda-2.3.2 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: ghc-Agda Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org Latest upstream release: 2.3.2 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 2.3.0.1 URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/Agda/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=i5dg30r5Iu&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 12

[Bug 909140] New: darcs-2.8.4 is available
by Red Hat Bugzilla 12 Sep '13

12 Sep '13

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=909140 Bug ID: 909140 Summary: darcs-2.8.4 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: darcs Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org Latest upstream release: 2.8.4 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 2.8.3 URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/darcs/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=08aDrBfX11&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 8

[Bug 948699] New: ghc-shakespeare-1.0.4 is available
by Red Hat Bugzilla 06 Sep '13

06 Sep '13

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948699 Bug ID: 948699 Summary: ghc-shakespeare-1.0.4 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: ghc-shakespeare Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Assignee: petersen(a)redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: haskell-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, petersen(a)redhat.com Category: --- Latest upstream release: 1.0.4 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 1.0.3.1 URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/shakespeare/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=2bDeGmECHl&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 11

[Bug 892562] New: ghc-7.6.1 is available
by Red Hat Bugzilla 30 Aug '13

30 Aug '13

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892562 Bug ID: 892562 Summary: ghc-7.6.1 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: ghc Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org Latest upstream release: 7.6.1 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 7.4.2 URL: http://haskell.org/ghc/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=N1mvCv8e4R&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 15

[Bug 925561] New: hugs98: Does not support aarch64 in f19 and rawhide
by Red Hat Bugzilla 20 Aug '13

20 Aug '13

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=925561 Bug ID: 925561 Summary: hugs98: Does not support aarch64 in f19 and rawhide Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: hugs98 Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Assignee: petersen(a)redhat.com Reporter: dennis(a)ausil.us QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: haskell-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, petersen(a)redhat.com Blocks: 922257 (ARM64) Support for the ARM 64 bit CPU architecture (aarch64) was introduced in autoconf 2.69. hugs98 appears to use an earlier version of autoconf, preventing its being built. This can be fixed in of three ways (In order of preference): 1. Work with upstream to migrate the package to autoconf 2.69. 2. Rerun autoconf or autoreconf in %prep or %build prior to running configure. 3. Apply the patch at http://ausil.fedorapeople.org/aarch64/hugs98/hugs98-aarch64.patch which updates config.guess and config.sub to recognize aarch64. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=nEHFomSsEb&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 4

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 547867] New: %{ghc_version} desn't expand properly
by Red Hat Bugzilla 20 Aug '13

20 Aug '13

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: %{ghc_version} desn't expand properly https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547867 Summary: %{ghc_version} desn't expand properly Product: Fedora Version: 11 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: high Component: ghc-rpm-macros AssignedTo: loupgaroublond(a)gmail.com ReportedBy: jochen(a)herr-schmitt.de QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, loupgaroublond(a)gmail.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora I want to tryout ghc-6.12.1 on my system and have installed ghc-rpm-macros-0.3.0-1 on my system. Because I have trouble to compile my packages, I have try out the following command: $ rpm -q --eval '%{ghc_version}' and got the following output: error: Recursion depth(17) greater than max(16) 15< (empty) 14< (empty) 13< (empty) 12< (empty) 11< (empty) 10< (empty) 9< (empty) 8< (empty) 7< (empty) 6< (empty) 5< (empty) 4< (empty) 3< (empty) 2< (empty) 1< (empty) 0< (empty) If I type $ ghc --numeric-version I will get 6.12.1 which I expected for $ rpm -q --eval '%{ghc_version}' Best Regards: Jochen Schmitt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 6

[Bug 915209] New: ghc-X11-1.6.1.1 is available
by Red Hat Bugzilla 06 Aug '13

06 Aug '13

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=915209 Bug ID: 915209 Summary: ghc-X11-1.6.1.1 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: ghc-X11 Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org Latest upstream release: 1.6.1.1 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 1.6.0.2 URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/X11/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=XDBuIRFpiO&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 5

[Bug 959963] New: xmobar-0.17 is available
by Red Hat Bugzilla 06 Aug '13

06 Aug '13

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=959963 Bug ID: 959963 Summary: xmobar-0.17 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: xmobar Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Assignee: mathstuf(a)gmail.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: haskell-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mathstuf(a)gmail.com Category: --- Latest upstream release: 0.17 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 0.16 URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/xmobar/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=nF2AX4e4rQ&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 7

[Bug 882902] New: xmobar-0.16 is available
by Red Hat Bugzilla 06 Aug '13

06 Aug '13

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882902 Bug ID: 882902 Summary: xmobar-0.16 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: xmobar Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org Latest upstream release: 0.16 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 0.15 URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/xmobar/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 10

[Bug 909150] New: ghc-snap-core-0.9.3.1 is available
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Jul '13

08 Jul '13

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=909150 Bug ID: 909150 Summary: ghc-snap-core-0.9.3.1 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: ghc-snap-core Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org Latest upstream release: 0.9.3.1 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 0.9.2.2 URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/snap-core/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=0ihRbXGIrO&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 6

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 746557] New: Review Request: ghc-tagged - Newtype wrappers for phantom types
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Jul '13

08 Jul '13

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-tagged - Newtype wrappers for phantom types https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746557 Summary: Review Request: ghc-tagged - Newtype wrappers for phantom types Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Status Whiteboard: Ready Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com, package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Depends on: 648246,737228,742882 Blocks: 648248,713359 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Spec file: http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-tagged.spec SRPM http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-tagged-0.2.3.1-1.fc14.s… -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 21

[Bug 800001] New: Rebuild with ghc-crypto-api
by Red Hat Bugzilla 30 Jun '13

30 Jun '13

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Rebuild with ghc-crypto-api https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=800001 Summary: Rebuild with ghc-crypto-api Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: ghc-cryptohash AssignedTo: petersen(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: mathstuf(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Description of problem: ghc-hashable not using ghc-crypto-api causes when building yesod-static. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 10

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 712404] New: Review Request : ghc-data-accessor-template - A library for accessing and manipulating fields of records
by Red Hat Bugzilla 24 Jun '13

24 Jun '13

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request : ghc-data-accessor-template - A library for accessing and manipulating fields of records https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712404 Summary: Review Request : ghc-data-accessor-template - A library for accessing and manipulating fields of records Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Depends on: 662272 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- SPEC file : http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-data-accessor-template.… SRPM file : http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-data-accessor-template-… rpmlint output: ghc-data-accessor-template-prof.i686: E: devel-dependency ghc-data-accessor-template-devel Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package itself. ghc-data-accessor-template-prof.i686: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. ghc-data-accessor-template-prof.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ghc-6.12.3/data-accessor-template-0.2.1.7/libHSdata-accessor-template-0.2.1.7_p.a A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 10

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 712273] New: Review Request: ghc-pointedlist - A zipper-like comonad
by Red Hat Bugzilla 24 Jun '13

24 Jun '13

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-pointedlist - A zipper-like comonad Alias: ghc-pointedlist https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712273 Summary: Review Request: ghc-pointedlist - A zipper-like comonad Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Depends on: 712270,712271 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Spec file : http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-pointedlist.spec SRPM file : http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-pointedlist-0.4.0.2-1.f… rpmlint output: ghc-pointedlist.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) comonad -> co monad, co-monad, commonage The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-pointedlist.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US comonad -> co monad, co-monad, commonage The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-pointedlist.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) comonad -> co monad, co-monad, commonage The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-pointedlist.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US comonad -> co monad, co-monad, commonage The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-pointedlist-devel.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) comonad -> co monad, co-monad, commonage The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-pointedlist-devel.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US comonad -> co monad, co-monad, commonage The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-pointedlist-prof.i686: E: devel-dependency ghc-pointedlist-devel Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package itself. ghc-pointedlist-prof.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) comonad -> co monad, co-monad, commonage The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-pointedlist-prof.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US comonad -> co monad, co-monad, commonage The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-pointedlist-prof.i686: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. ghc-pointedlist-prof.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ghc-6.12.3/pointedlist-0.4.0.2/libHSpointedlist-0.4.0.2_p.a A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 10 warnings. Required for yi. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 11

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 655486] New: Review Request: ghc-recaptcha - A Haskell library to use reCAPTCHA service
by Red Hat Bugzilla 24 Jun '13

24 Jun '13

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-recaptcha - A Haskell library to use reCAPTCHA service Alias: ghc-recaptcha https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=655486 Summary: Review Request: ghc-recaptcha - A Haskell library to use reCAPTCHA service Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora SPEC URL : https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-recaptcha.spec?attr… SRPM URL: https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-recaptcha-0.1-1.fc1… rpmlint output: rpmlint -i ghc-recaptcha-0.1-1.fc14.x86_64.rpm ghc-recaptcha-devel-0.1-1.fc14.x86_64.rpm ghc-recaptcha-prof-0.1-1.fc14.x86_64.rpm ../../SRPMS/ghc-recaptcha-0.1-1.fc14.src.rpm ghc-recaptcha.spec ghc-recaptcha.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US hs -> HS, sh, gs The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-recaptcha-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US hs -> HS, sh, gs The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-recaptcha-prof.x86_64: E: devel-dependency ghc-recaptcha-devel Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package itself. ghc-recaptcha-prof.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US hs -> HS, sh, gs The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-recaptcha-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. ghc-recaptcha-prof.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ghc-6.12.3/recaptcha-0.1/libHSrecaptcha-0.1_p.a A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. ghc-recaptcha.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US hs -> HS, sh, gs The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 6 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 7

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

haskell-devel May 2013