haskell-devel August 2014

haskell-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

1 participants
271 discussions

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 712270] New: Review Request: derive - A program and library to derive instances for data types
by Red Hat Bugzilla 12 Nov '14

12 Nov '14

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: derive - A program and library to derive instances for data types Alias: ghc-derive https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712270 Summary: Review Request: derive - A program and library to derive instances for data types Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Spec file : http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/derive.spec SRPM file : http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/derive-2.5.2-1.fc14.src.rpm Koji build : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3122647 rpmlint output: derive.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell -> Gaskell, Gaitskell, Skellum The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. derive.i686: W: name-repeated-in-summary C derive The name of the package is repeated in its summary. This is often redundant information and looks silly in various programs' output. Make the summary brief and to the point without including redundant information in it. derive.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary derive Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page. derive.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell -> Gaskell, Gaitskell, Skellum The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. derive.src: W: name-repeated-in-summary C derive The name of the package is repeated in its summary. This is often redundant information and looks silly in various programs' output. Make the summary brief and to the point without including redundant information in it. ghc-derive-prof.i686: E: devel-dependency ghc-derive-devel Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package itself. ghc-derive-prof.i686: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. ghc-derive-prof.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ghc-7.0.2/derive-2.5.2/libHSderive-2.5.2_p.a A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. 5 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 7 warnings. Required for yi -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 20

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 712280] New: Review Request: ghc-ghc-mtl - A mtl compatible with GHC-API monads and monad-transformers
by Red Hat Bugzilla 12 Nov '14

12 Nov '14

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-ghc-mtl - A mtl compatible with GHC-API monads and monad-transformers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712280 Summary: Review Request: ghc-ghc-mtl - A mtl compatible with GHC-API monads and monad-transformers Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Depends on: 710045 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Spec file : http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-ghc-mtl.spec SRPM link : http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-ghc-mtl-1.0.1.0-1.fc14.… rpmlint output: ghc-ghc-mtl-prof.i686: E: devel-dependency ghc-ghc-mtl-devel Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package itself. ghc-ghc-mtl-prof.i686: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. ghc-ghc-mtl-prof.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ghc-6.12.3/ghc-mtl-1.0.1.0/libHSghc-mtl-1.0.1.0_p.a A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. Required for yi. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 26

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 664221] New: Review Request: ghc-cautious-file - Provides ways to write a file cautiously
by Red Hat Bugzilla 12 Nov '14

12 Nov '14

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-cautious-file - Provides ways to write a file cautiously Alias: ghc-cautious-file https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664221 Summary: Review Request: ghc-cautious-file - Provides ways to write a file cautiously Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Blocks: 634048 Classification: Fedora SPEC file link : https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-cautious-file.spec?… SRPM link : https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-cautious-file-0.1.5… rpmlint output: rpmlint -i *.rpm ../ghc-cautious-file.spec ghc-cautious-file.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US posix -> posit, pos ix, pos-ix The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-cautious-file.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US posix -> posit, pos ix, pos-ix The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-cautious-file-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US posix -> posit, pos ix, pos-ix The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-cautious-file-prof.x86_64: E: devel-dependency ghc-cautious-file-devel Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package itself. ghc-cautious-file-prof.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US posix -> posit, pos ix, pos-ix The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-cautious-file-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. ghc-cautious-file-prof.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ghc-7.0.1/cautious-file-0.1.5/libHScautious-file-0.1.5_p.a A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 6 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 26

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 703503] New: Review Request: ghc-xdg-basedir - Haskell library implementing XDG base directory spec
by Red Hat Bugzilla 12 Nov '14

12 Nov '14

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-xdg-basedir - Haskell library implementing XDG base directory spec Alias: ghc-xdg-basedir https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=703503 Summary: Review Request: ghc-xdg-basedir - Haskell library implementing XDG base directory spec Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Spec file: http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-xdg-basedir.spec SRPM link: http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-xdg-basedir-0.2-1.fc14.… -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 11

[Bug 1118619] New: ghc-hjsmin-0.1.4.7 is available
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 Nov '14

11 Nov '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1118619 Bug ID: 1118619 Summary: ghc-hjsmin-0.1.4.7 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: ghc-hjsmin Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: relrod(a)redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: haskell-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, petersen(a)redhat.com, relrod(a)redhat.com Latest upstream release: 0.1.4.7 Current version/release in Fedora Rawhide: 0.1.4.6-4.fc21 URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/package/hjsmin Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=zIKwkYgnJE&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 5

[Bug 1052117] New: ShellCheck source dir is named shellcheck-version/ not ShellCheck-version/
by Red Hat Bugzilla 06 Nov '14

06 Nov '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1052117 Bug ID: 1052117 Summary: ShellCheck source dir is named shellcheck-version/ not ShellCheck-version/ Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: ShellCheck Assignee: dridi.boukelmoune(a)gmail.com Reporter: petersen(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: dridi.boukelmoune(a)gmail.com, haskell-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Description of problem: It is unfortunate the current source code dir of ShellCheck is named in lowercase while the package name is CamelCase. I assume this comes about because the project is called shellcheck on github... I think it would be good to point this out to the author. I think it might also be problematic if/when he ever wants to publish the package on Hackage. Version: 0.2.0 Steps to Reproduce: 1. fedpkg prep 2. ls Actual results: ShellCheck/shellcheck-0.2.0 ShellCheck/shellcheck-0.2.0/ShellCheck.cabal Expected results: ShellCheck/ShellCheck-0.2.0 ShellCheck/ShellCheck-0.2.0/ShellCheck.cabal Additional info: A simple temporary workaround would be to rename the dir in the spec file: %prep %setup -q -n shellcheck-%{version} mv {shellcheck,ShellCheck}-%{version} Then at least the Fedora Haskell "toolchain" scripts will be break when they hit ShellCheck. I don't think there is any offer Haskell cabal-based package in Fedora which has this problem. Alternatively the upstream cabal package could be renamed to shellcheck but then the Fedora package should really be renamed accordingly. So easiest would be to make the upstream project/tarball name consistent with the package name. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=CWMlRzShMU&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 21

[Bug 1063010] New: ghc-cairo-0.12.5.1 is available
by Red Hat Bugzilla 28 Oct '14

28 Oct '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063010 Bug ID: 1063010 Summary: ghc-cairo-0.12.5.1 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: ghc-cairo Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: petersen(a)redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: haskell-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, petersen(a)redhat.com Latest upstream release: 0.12.5.1 Current version/release in Fedora Rawhide: 0.12.5.0-1.fc21 URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/package/cairo Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ShpxoJ7loQ&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 8

[Bug 1044390] New: ghc-ansi-terminal-0.6.1 is available
by Red Hat Bugzilla 28 Oct '14

28 Oct '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1044390 Bug ID: 1044390 Summary: ghc-ansi-terminal-0.6.1 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: ghc-ansi-terminal Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: shakthimaan(a)gmail.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: chitlesh(a)gmail.com, haskell-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, shakthimaan(a)gmail.com Latest upstream release: 0.6.1 Current version/release in Fedora Rawhide: 0.6-3.fc20 URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/package/ansi-terminal Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=2HBuPsRMj9&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 7

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 664151] New: Review Request: ghc-Diff - A O(ND) diff algorithm in Haskell
by Red Hat Bugzilla 22 Oct '14

22 Oct '14

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-Diff - A O(ND) diff algorithm in Haskell Alias: ghc-Diff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664151 Summary: Review Request: ghc-Diff - A O(ND) diff algorithm in Haskell Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora SPEC file URL: https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-Diff.spec?attredire… SRPM file URL: https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-Diff-0.1.2-1.fc14.s… rpmlint output: rpmlint -i ghc-Diff.spec ghc-Diff*fc15*.rpm ghc-Diff-prof.i686: E: devel-dependency ghc-Diff-devel Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package itself. ghc-Diff-prof.i686: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. ghc-Diff-prof.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ghc-7.0.1/Diff-0.1.2/libHSDiff-0.1.2_p.a A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 34

[Bug 1051291] New: cabal-rpm should detect executable name when fixing rpath
by Red Hat Bugzilla 17 Oct '14

17 Oct '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051291 Bug ID: 1051291 Summary: cabal-rpm should detect executable name when fixing rpath Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: cabal-rpm Assignee: petersen(a)redhat.com Reporter: petersen(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: haskell-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, petersen(a)redhat.com Description of problem: cabal-rpm currently assuming the executable name is the same as the package name for BinLib packages with self-linked executables. It should really extract the names of executables which are self-linked from the cabal metadata. (This is already in the todo list upstream.) Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): cabal-rpm-0.8.7 Steps to Reproduce: 1. cblrpm -l spec highlighting-kate Actual results: %ghc_fix_dynamic_rpath %{name} Expected results: %ghc_fix_dynamic_rpath Highlight -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=hPqECOgZCI&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 10

← Newer
1
...
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
...
28
Older →

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

haskell-devel August 2014