[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 479793] Review Request: cpphs - A liberalised re-implementation of cpp, the C pre-processor

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479793

--- Comment #5 from Conrad Meyer   2009-01-14 02:29:12 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> ...
> I think better to move it to ghc-cpphs where it actually applies

Done. (Or I guess, your patch does this.) Although rpmbuild complains as I told
you on IRC.
> ...
> [=] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates.
>
> Hmm, /usr/share/doc/ghc/libraries is owned by ghc-doc but not required by
> ghc-cpphs - looks like a oversight of the guidelines.
>
> Wondering whether we should subpackage haddock docs for this or do something
> else.

Well, at any rate ghc-cpphs must depend on ghc-doc (or ghc-doc if we create a
subpackage for the docs).
> ...
> I sent a message to the maintainer asking for the GPL license file to be added
> in the future.

Thanks.