[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 550711] New: ghc-GLUT-debuginfo contains no sources

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: ghc-GLUT-debuginfo contains no sources

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550711

           Summary: ghc-GLUT-debuginfo contains no sources
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: medium
          Priority: low
         Component: ghc-GLUT
        AssignedTo: bos(a)serpentine.com
        ReportedBy: ville.skytta(a)iki.fi
         QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
                CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, bos(a)serpentine.com,
                    loupgaroublond(a)gmail.com,
                    fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
            Blocks: 496968
    Classification: Fedora


ghc-GLUT-debuginfo 2.1.1.2-3.fc13 contains no sources, which might be an
indication of $RPM_OPT_FLAGS (specifically -g) not being honored or binaries
being stripped too early.  Is this expected behavior with ghc-* packages?  See
bug 496968.

Same thing apparently with recent ghc-OpenGL, ghc-tar, and ghc-zlib Rawhide
builds.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 550711] ghc-GLUT-debuginfo contains no sources

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550711


Bryan O'Sullivan <bos(a)serpentine.com&gt; changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |NOTABUG




--- Comment #1 from Bryan O'Sullivan <bos(a)serpentine.com&gt;  2009-12-27 14:21:52
EDT ---
Hmm, none of the ghc-* packages should be emitting debuginfo packages:

# ghc does not emit debug information
%global debug_package %{nil}

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 550711] ghc-GLUT-debuginfo contains no sources

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550711


Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta(a)iki.fi&gt; changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |Reopened
             Status|CLOSED                      |ASSIGNED
         Resolution|NOTABUG                     |




--- Comment #2 from Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta(a)iki.fi&gt;  2009-12-28 15:11:02 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
>  Hmm, none of the ghc-* packages should be emitting debuginfo
> packages:
>  
>  # ghc does not emit debug information
>  %global debug_package %{nil}   
Sorry to be blunt, but would you mind actually checking things before closing
bugs?  All of the packages mentioned in the initial comment *do* emit debuginfo
packages.  They have the line you cited commented out.

http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/devel/ghc-GLUT/ghc-GLUT.spec?revision...
http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/devel/ghc-OpenGL/ghc-OpenGL.spec?revi...
http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/devel/ghc-tar/ghc-tar.spec?revision=1...
http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/devel/ghc-zlib/ghc-zlib.spec?revision...

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 550711] ghc-GLUT-debuginfo contains no sources

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550711





--- Comment #3 from Bryan O'Sullivan <bos(a)serpentine.com&gt;  2009-12-28 17:30:31
EDT ---
It's perfectly fine to be blunt, but I did actually check, but I looked at the
F-12 branch rather than the devel branch.  It might be a good policy not to
make accusations about what someone did or didn't do when you don't actually
know. That could easily be misinterpreted as rudeness, which would not be so
perfectly fine.

Jens, what's the story with the debuginfo generation being re-enabled?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 550711] ghc-GLUT-debuginfo contains no sources

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550711





--- Comment #4 from Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta(a)iki.fi&gt;  2009-12-28 18:01:46 EDT ---
This bug is reported against rawhide, the initial comment specifically mentions
a NEVR containing f13, there's no way I could tell that you checked F-12, and I
think it's quite fair to assume that if rawhide had been actually checked, this
bug would have not been closed as NOTABUG along with the text in comment 1. 
But nevermind, mistakes do happen, I'll shut up now and let you find out the
cause and what to do about it.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 550711] ghc-GLUT-debuginfo contains no sources

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550711


Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com&gt; changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|bos(a)serpentine.com          |petersen(a)redhat.com




--- Comment #5 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com&gt;  2010-01-06 19:55:00 EDT
---
That's me sorry.

I reenabled debuginfo in rawhide for a few libraries as an experiment
since it strips the new shared libraries, but if that is stepping on
sanity script's I better do it right I guess.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 550711] ghc-GLUT-debuginfo contains no sources

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550711





--- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com&gt;  2010-01-06 19:55:53 EDT
---
bos: BTW feel free to reassign bugs relating to my changes to me. :)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 550711] ghc-GLUT-debuginfo contains no sources

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550711





--- Comment #7 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com&gt;  2010-01-06 21:54:10 EDT
---
eg Compare 
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/fileinfo?rpmID=1732945&filename=/u...
(118745 bytes) vs
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/fileinfo?rpmID=1743252&filename=/u...
(78372 bytes)

So creating debuginfo strips the .so more than brp-strip?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.