[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 664151] New: Review Request: ghc-Diff - A O(ND) diff algorithm in Haskell

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Review Request: ghc-Diff -  A O(ND) diff algorithm in Haskell
Alias: ghc-Diff

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664151

Summary: Review Request: ghc-Diff -  A O(ND) diff algorithm in
                    Haskell
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: medium
          Priority: low
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: [e-mail]
        ReportedBy: [e-mail]
         QAContact: [e-mail]
                CC: [e-mail], [e-mail],
                    [e-mail]
    Classification: Fedora

SPEC file URL:
https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-Diff.spec?attredirec...

SRPM file URL:
https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-Diff-0.1.2-1.fc14.sr...

rpmlint output:
rpmlint  -i ghc-Diff.spec ghc-Diff*fc15*.rpm 
ghc-Diff-prof.i686: E: devel-dependency ghc-Diff-devel
Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package
itself.

ghc-Diff-prof.i686: W: no-documentation
The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include
documentation files.

ghc-Diff-prof.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib/ghc-7.0.1/Diff-0.1.2/libHSDiff-0.1.2_p.a
A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If
you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a
development package.

4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings.

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 664151] Review Request: ghc-Diff - A O(ND) diff algorithm in Haskell

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664151

Lakshmi Narasimhan  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Blocks|                            |634048(Haskell-pkg-reviews)

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 664151] Review Request: ghc-Diff - A O(ND) diff algorithm in Haskell

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664151

Jens Petersen  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Blocks|634048(Haskell-pkg-reviews) |

--- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen  2011-01-28 06:07:06 EST ---
As earlier discussed on Fedora haskell-devel list,
dropping libraries for now from the toplevel of Haskell-pkg-reviews,
so we, the Haskell SIG, can focus more on getting Haskell apps into Fedora.

To get you library back under the tracker please submit a bin or binlib
package that depends on this library and make this bug block that package
review.  It is a good idea to submit full stacks of packages and then
to add the toplevel program to the tracker.

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 664151] Review Request: ghc-Diff - A O(ND) diff algorithm in Haskell

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664151

--- Comment #2 from Lakshmi Narasimhan  2011-04-03 01:51:52 EDT ---
http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-Diff-0.1.2-2.fc14.src.rp...

http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-Diff.spec

rpmlint  -i ghc-Diff.spec ~/rpmbuild/SRPMS/ghc-Diff-0.1.2-2.fc14.src.rpm
~/rpmbuild/RPMS/i686/ghc-Diff-*.rpm
ghc-Diff-prof.i686: E: devel-dependency ghc-Diff-devel
Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package
itself.

ghc-Diff-prof.i686: W: no-documentation
The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include
documentation files.

ghc-Diff-prof.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib/ghc-6.12.3/Diff-0.1.2/libHSDiff-0.1.2_p.a
A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If
you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a
development package.

4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings.

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 664151] Review Request: ghc-Diff - A O(ND) diff algorithm in Haskell

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664151

Lakshmi Narasimhan  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Blocks|                            |712659(yi)

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 664151] Review Request: ghc-Diff - A O(ND) diff algorithm in Haskell

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664151

Jens Petersen  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Status Whiteboard|                            |notready

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 664151] Review Request: ghc-Diff - A O(ND) diff algorithm in Haskell

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664151

Lakshmi Narasimhan  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Status Whiteboard|notready                    |Ready

--- Comment #3 from Lakshmi Narasimhan  2012-01-22 00:13:23 EST ---
SRPM file :
http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-Diff-0.1.3-1.fc15.src.rp...
Spec file : http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-Diff.spec

rpmlint output:
rpmlint  -i ghc-Diff-0.1.3-1.fc15.src.rpm  ghc-Diff-0.1.3-1.fc15.x86_64.rpm
ghc-Diff-devel-0.1.3-1.fc15.x86_64.rpm ../ghc-Diff.spec
3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 664151] Review Request: ghc-Diff - A O(ND) diff algorithm in Haskell

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664151

--- Comment #4 from Lakshmi Narasimhan  2012-01-22 00:44:24 EST ---
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3721049

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 664151] Review Request: ghc-Diff - A O(ND) diff algorithm in Haskell

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664151

Kalpa Welivitigoda  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[e-mail]
               Flag|                            |fedora-review?

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 664151] Review Request: ghc-Diff - A O(ND) diff algorithm in Haskell

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664151

Jens Petersen  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|[e-mail]    |[e-mail]

--- Comment #5 from Jens Petersen  2012-02-07 05:12:14 EST ---
http://packdeps.haskellers.com/reverse/Diff

[Bug 664151] Review Request: ghc-Diff - A O(ND) diff algorithm in Haskell

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664151

Jens Petersen  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|                            |needinfo?(callkalpa@gmail.c
                   |                            |om)

--- Comment #7 from Jens Petersen  2012-05-08 00:54:42 EDT ---
Kalpa, do you have time to review this or should
we look for another reviewer?

[Bug 664151] Review Request: ghc-Diff - A O(ND) diff algorithm in Haskell

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664151

Kalpa Welivitigoda  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|needinfo?(callkalpa@gmail.c |
                   |om)                         |

--- Comment #8 from Kalpa Welivitigoda  2012-05-08 02:49:22 EDT ---
Hi Jens,

Extremely sorry for not being touch with the review, I almost forgot this. I'm
busy with my exams at the uni right now, and the exam will continue for another
one weeks time. If you can wait till then I'm happy to review or else you may
find another reviewer, no worries.

[Bug 664151] Review Request: ghc-Diff - A O(ND) diff algorithm in Haskell

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664151

--- Comment #9 from Jens Petersen  2012-05-08 03:30:32 EDT ---
No worries - just wanted to check in to see if you were still
interested in this review.  I guess we can wait a little more, thanks.

[Bug 664151] Review Request: ghc-Diff - A O(ND) diff algorithm in Haskell

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664151

Jens Petersen  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Assignee|[e-mail]         |[e-mail]
         Whiteboard|Ready                       |
              Flags|fedora-review?              |

--- Comment #10 from Jens Petersen  ---
Okay I resetting the reviewer, but Kalpa feel free to pick up the review
again when you have time.

I think the package needs to be updated to 0.25.5 anyway to build in rawhide.

[Bug 664151] Review Request: ghc-Diff - A O(ND) diff algorithm in Haskell

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664151

Lakshmi Narasimhan  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Whiteboard|                            |Ready

--- Comment #11 from Lakshmi Narasimhan  ---
http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-Diff.spec

http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-Diff-0.1.3-1.fc18.src.rp...

rpmlint  -i ghc-Diff-0.1.3-1.fc18.src.rpm
ghc-Diff-devel-0.1.3-1.fc18.x86_64.rpm ghc-Diff-0.1.3-1.fc18.x86_64.rpm
../ghc-Diff.spec
ghc-Diff-devel.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided ghc-Diff-doc
If a package is obsoleted by a compatible replacement, the obsoleted package
should also be provided in order to not cause unnecessary dependency breakage.
If the obsoleting package is not a compatible replacement for the old one,
leave out the Provides.

3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.

[Bug 664151] Review Request: ghc-Diff - A O(ND) diff algorithm in Haskell

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664151

Jens Petersen  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
           Assignee|[e-mail]    |[e-mail]
              Flags|                            |fedora-review?

[Bug 664151] Review Request: ghc-Diff - A O(ND) diff algorithm in Haskell

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664151

--- Comment #12 from Jens Petersen  ---
fedora-review output:

Package Review
==============

Key:
- = N/A
x = Pass
! = Fail
? = Not evaluated

==== C/C++ ====
[x]: MUST Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[ ]: MUST Package does not contain kernel modules.
[ ]: MUST Package contains no static executables.
[ ]: MUST Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
[ ]: MUST Package is not relocatable.
[!]: MUST Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if
     present.
     Note: ghc-Diff-0.1.3-1.fc18.i686.rpm :
     /usr/lib/ghc-7.4.1/Diff-0.1.3/libHSDiff-0.1.3-ghc7.4.1.so
[-]: MUST Static libraries in -static subpackage, if present.

==== Generic ====
[ ]: MUST Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at
     least one supported primary architecture.
[ ]: MUST %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: MUST All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
     that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Buildroot is not present
     Note: Unless packager wants to package for EPEL5 this is fine
[ ]: MUST Package contains no bundled libraries.
[ ]: MUST Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: MUST Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
     Note: Clean would be needed if support for EPEL is required
[ ]: MUST Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: MUST Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4
     Note: Note: defattr macros not found. They would be needed for EPEL5
[ ]: MUST Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[ ]: MUST Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[ ]: MUST Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[ ]: MUST Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x]: MUST Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: MUST Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: MUST Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags.
[x]: MUST Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
     Note: rm -rf would be needed if support for EPEL5 is required
[ ]: MUST Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
[!]: MUST If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
     license(s) for the package is included in %doc.
[ ]: MUST License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[ ]: MUST Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: MUST Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[ ]: MUST Package does not generate any conflict.
[ ]: MUST Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[ ]: MUST Package must own all directories that it creates.
[ ]: MUST Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[ ]: MUST Package installs properly.
[ ]: MUST Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[!]: MUST Rpmlint output is silent.

rpmlint ghc-Diff-0.1.3-1.fc18.i686.rpm

1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

rpmlint ghc-Diff-0.1.3-1.fc18.src.rpm

1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

rpmlint ghc-Diff-devel-0.1.3-1.fc18.i686.rpm

ghc-Diff-devel.i686: W: obsolete-not-provided ghc-Diff-doc
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.

[x]: MUST Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
/home/petersen/pkgreview/ghc-Diff/664151/Diff-0.1.3.tar.gz :
  MD5SUM this package     : 6a8a47315001717780b3dd025f59da85
  MD5SUM upstream package : 6a8a47315001717780b3dd025f59da85

[ ]: MUST Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: MUST Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[ ]: MUST Package contains a SysV-style init script if in need of one.
[x]: MUST File names are valid UTF-8.
[ ]: MUST Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: SHOULD Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[ ]: SHOULD If the source package does not include license text(s) as a
     separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to
     include it.
[x]: SHOULD Dist tag is present.
[ ]: SHOULD No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin,
     /usr/sbin.
[ ]: SHOULD Final provides and requires are sane (rpm -q --provides and rpm -q
     --requires).
[ ]: SHOULD Package functions as described.
[ ]: SHOULD Latest version is packaged.
[ ]: SHOULD Package does not include license text files separate from
     upstream.
[x]: SHOULD SourceX is a working URL.
[ ]: SHOULD Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
     translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[ ]: SHOULD Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[ ]: SHOULD %check is present and all tests pass.
[ ]: SHOULD Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[x]: SHOULD Spec use %global instead of %define.

Issues:
[!]: MUST If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
     license(s) for the package is included in %doc.
See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License_Text

*>> Included with %ghc_files

[!]: MUST Rpmlint output is silent.

rpmlint ghc-Diff-0.1.3-1.fc18.i686.rpm

1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

rpmlint ghc-Diff-0.1.3-1.fc18.src.rpm

1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

rpmlint ghc-Diff-devel-0.1.3-1.fc18.i686.rpm

ghc-Diff-devel.i686: W: obsolete-not-provided ghc-Diff-doc
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.

*>> This is ok and from ghc-rpm-macros.

See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#rpmlint
[!]: MUST Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if
     present.
     Note: ghc-Diff-0.1.3-1.fc18.i686.rpm :
     /usr/lib/ghc-7.4.1/Diff-0.1.3/libHSDiff-0.1.3-ghc7.4.1.so
See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#DevelPackages

*>> Ok for Haskell packages.

Generated by fedora-review 0.1.3
External plugins:

[Bug 664151] Review Request: ghc-Diff - A O(ND) diff algorithm in Haskell

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664151

Jens Petersen  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+

--- Comment #13 from Jens Petersen  ---
Here is my review:

+:ok, NA: not applicable

MUST Items:
[+] MUST: rpmlint output [1]
[+] MUST: package named according to Package Naming Guidelines
[+] MUST: spec file name must match base package %{name} [2]
[+] MUST: meet Packaging Guidelines
[+] MUST: Fedora approved license and Licensing Guidelines
[+] MUST: License field in the package spec file must match actual license. [3]
[+] MUST: include license files in %doc if available in source [4]
[+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English [5] and legible.
[6]
[+] MUST: source md5sum matches upstream release (from upstream URL)
[+] MUST: successfully compile and build into binary rpms on a primary arch [7]
[NA] MUST: if necessary use ExcludeArch for other archs [8]
[+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires
[NA] MUST: use %find_lang macro for .po translations [9]
[NA] MUST: packages which store shared library files in the dynamic linker's
default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [10]
[+] MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries. [11]
[NA] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must
state this fact in the request for review [12]
[+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. [13]
[+] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing.
[14]
[+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. [15]
[+] MUST: consistently use macros [16]
[+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [17]
[NA] MUST: Large documentation files should go in a doc subpackage. [18]
[+] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the
runtime of the application. [18]
[NA] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [19]
[+] MUST: Development files must be in a -devel package. [20]
[NA] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g.
libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in
a -devel package. [19]
[+] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base
package using a fully versioned dependency [21]
[+] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be
removed in the spec. [20]
[NA] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop
file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the
%install section. [22]
[+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other
packages. [23]
[+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [24]

SHOULD Items:
[+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [27]
[+] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. [29]

Looks good to me.

Package is APPROVED.

[Bug 664151] Review Request: ghc-Diff - A O(ND) diff algorithm in Haskell

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664151

Jens Petersen  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Whiteboard|Ready                       |

[Bug 664151] Review Request: ghc-Diff - A O(ND) diff algorithm in Haskell

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664151

--- Comment #14 from Lakshmi Narasimhan  ---
Thanks for the review.

New Package SCM Request
=======================
Package Name: ghc-Diff
Short Description: A O(ND) diff algorithm in Haskell
Owners: narasim
Branches: f17 f16 el6
InitialCC: haskell-sig

[Bug 664151] Review Request: ghc-Diff - A O(ND) diff algorithm in Haskell

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664151

Lakshmi Narasimhan  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|                            |fedora-cvs?

[Bug 664151] Review Request: ghc-Diff - A O(ND) diff algorithm in Haskell

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664151

--- Comment #15 from Jon Ciesla  ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

[Bug 664151] Review Request: ghc-Diff - A O(ND) diff algorithm in Haskell

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664151

Fedora Update System  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |MODIFIED

[Bug 664151] Review Request: ghc-Diff - A O(ND) diff algorithm in Haskell

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664151

--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System  ---
ghc-Diff-0.1.3-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-Diff-0.1.3-1.fc17

[Bug 664151] Review Request: ghc-Diff - A O(ND) diff algorithm in Haskell

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664151

--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System  ---
ghc-Diff-0.1.3-1.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-Diff-0.1.3-1.fc16

[Bug 664151] Review Request: ghc-Diff - A O(ND) diff algorithm in Haskell

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664151

--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System  ---
ghc-Diff-0.1.3-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-Diff-0.1.3-1.el6

[Bug 664151] Review Request: ghc-Diff - A O(ND) diff algorithm in Haskell

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664151

Fedora Update System  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|MODIFIED                    |ON_QA

--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System  ---
ghc-Diff-0.1.3-1.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 testing repository.

[Bug 664151] Review Request: ghc-Diff - A O(ND) diff algorithm in Haskell

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664151

Fedora Update System  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ON_QA                       |CLOSED
         Resolution|---                         |ERRATA
        Last Closed|                            |2012-07-12 14:58:58

--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System  ---
ghc-Diff-0.1.3-1.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository.

[Bug 664151] Review Request: ghc-Diff - A O(ND) diff algorithm in Haskell

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664151

--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System  ---
ghc-Diff-0.1.3-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository.

[Bug 664151] Review Request: ghc-Diff - A O(ND) diff algorithm in Haskell

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664151

--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System  ---
ghc-Diff-0.1.3-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository.

[Bug 664151] Review Request: ghc-Diff - A O(ND) diff algorithm in Haskell

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664151

Jens Petersen  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|fedora-cvs+                 |fedora-cvs?

--- Comment #23 from Jens Petersen  ---
Package Change Request
======================
Package Name: ghc-Diff
New Branches: epel7
Owners: petersen
InitialCC: haskell-sig

[Bug 664151] Review Request: ghc-Diff - A O(ND) diff algorithm in Haskell

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664151

Jon Ciesla  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|fedora-cvs?                 |fedora-cvs+

[Bug 664151] Review Request: ghc-Diff - A O(ND) diff algorithm in Haskell

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664151

--- Comment #24 from Jon Ciesla  ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

[Bug 664151] Review Request: ghc-Diff - A O(ND) diff algorithm in Haskell

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664151

--- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System  ---
ghc-Diff-0.3.0-1.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 7.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-Diff-0.3.0-1.el7

[Bug 664151] Review Request: ghc-Diff - A O(ND) diff algorithm in Haskell

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664151

Fedora Update System  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Fixed In Version|                            |ghc-Diff-0.3.0-1.el7

--- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System  ---
ghc-Diff-0.3.0-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository.