Thanks, Florian, very good point.
On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 7:12 PM Florian Weimer <fweimer(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> I think this will make quite a few packages FTBFS on i686 because they
> require pandoc at build time. It's not that many—I count ~75 that
> build-depend on something pandoc-ish without also build-depending on
> something ghc-ish. The actual number will be lower once we stop
> building noarch packages on i686 (not yet implemented as far as I know).
> And there are probably some packages which build-depend indirectly on
> ghc.
Then I guess it will have to wait then.
It is not that big a deal yet: though a few i686 issues are slowly starting
to creep in for a few Haskell packages.
Jens