-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 02/15/2012 05:44 AM, dag.odenhall@gmail.com wrote:
What's wrong with haskell@? For general discussion of Haskell there's the non-Fedora lists; I think the point of the new haskell@fedora list is human discussions relevant to the SIG / Haskell on Fedora. With that in mind I don't see a problem with this naming.
I'm fine with haskell@ and haskell-bugs@, it's haskell@ and haskell-devel@ that I feel is odd (as compared to fedora@ and fedora-devel@).
Either haskell-discuss@ and haskell-bugs@, or even just haskell@ and haskell-bugs@, would be fine with me :)
Cheers,
- -- Michel Alexandre Salim Fedora Project Contributor: http://fedoraproject.org/
Email: salimma@fedoraproject.org | GPG key ID: A36A937A Jabber: hircus@jabber.ccc.de | IRC: hircus@irc.freenode.net
() ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments