Hi,
I think I have now built everything that can currently be built with
ghc-7.10.3 in f25-ghc, ie everything not listed below: see the inline
comments
(the bug links are to URM bugs, not build failures)
So I plan to request Release Engineering to tag the builds into Rawhide
this week.
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 2:50 PM, Jens-Ulrik Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com
wrote:
The following packages fail to build for me:
Agda
(dep bounds)
update bug:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1224825
ghc-IOSpec
0.3 built - though this package could probably be dropped
> ghc-cabal-file-th
Hackage revision fixed this
Dunno if we want to keep it?
> ghc-cautious-file
Hackage revision fixed this.
But do we want to keep it?
> ghc-cmdtheline
bounds + build problem
I think we can drop it
> ghc-concrete-typerep
type problem - I think we can drop it
> ghc-editline
built with base-4.8, but could probably be deprecated too
ghc-glade -> bluetile
does not build (no updates available)
> ghc-gtksourceview2
built with gtk-0.14
> ghc-hakyll
bounds and missing snap
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1096609
ghc-happstack-server
time issue and bounds
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1153948
ghc-hashed-storage -> darcs
does not compile
newer versions of darcs do not use it:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1213187
I think it would be good to keep darcs in Fedora still
ghc-hledger-lib -> hledger
type issues
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202163
ghc-lambdabot-utils
build issues
ghc-monad-unify
Alternative error
ghc-oeis
built with newer HTTP
ghc-shelly
Alternative error
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1080813
ghc-snap-core -> ghc-snap-server
time and bounds
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208326
ghc-warp -> ghc-scotty
type problem
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=976980
> ghc-yesod-routes
built with newer path-pieces and vector
haddock
Can probably be dropped
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=973958
> idris
Appl/Alt types
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=999011
It would be nice to keep idris
> shake
managed to encourage it to build.
> Once I have build most of the other packages it will be easier for people
> to help with these.
> Some can also be dropped I think - anyway those that we are not able to
> fix during the F25 cycle will be retired...
> I hope we can fix some of them anyway: quite a lot can be
fixed by version
> updates that require new deps (ie package reviews).
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_status=__open__&email1=ha...