7:04 p.m.
Apologies if you receive this twice; I have forwarded this to the general
list instead of the bugzilla list.
Hello,
The ghc-cryptohash packages builds both ghc-cryptonite and ghc-memory [1].
Why is this the case?
I spent a long time trying to figure out where I was getting ghc-memory
from when it could not be found on packages [2], koji [3], bodhi [4], or
release-monitoring [5]. It's only when I looked for the RPM on koji did I
figure out it's a subpackage, because that's just totally unexpected,
especially because there's an open review request for it [6].
[1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/ghc-cryptohash.git/
tree/ghc-cryptohash.spec#n20
[2] https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/s/ghc-memory
[3] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/search?match=glob&
type=package&terms=ghc-memory
[4] https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?packages=ghc-memory
[5] https://release-monitoring.org/projects/search/?pattern=memory
[6] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=ghc-memory
--
Elliott
--
Elliott
6:28 a.m.
New subject: Why does ghc-cryptohash build ghc-cryptonite and ghc-memory also?
Good question - the subpackaging is just a hack (and yes it is confusing
sorry) to workaround packaging manpower basically.
Package reviews for such subpackages are very welcome and will replace the
subpackages in the long term, assuming the current detailed Package Review
workflow continues.
I didn't understand from your mail what led you to post this question?
Hope that helps,
Jens
On Sun, Jul 23, 2017 at 8:04 AM, Elliott Sales de Andrade <
quantum.analyst(a)gmail.com> wrote:
The ghc-cryptohash packages builds both ghc-cryptonite and ghc-memory
[1].
Why is this the case?
I spent a long time trying to figure out where I was getting ghc-memory
from when it could not be found on packages [2], koji [3], bodhi [4], or
release-monitoring [5]. It's only when I looked for the RPM on koji did I
figure out it's a subpackage, because that's just totally unexpected,
especially because there's an open review request for it [6].
[1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/ghc-cryptohash.git/t
ree/ghc-cryptohash.spec#n20
[2] https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/s/ghc-memory
[3] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/search?match=glob&type=
package&terms=ghc-memory
[4] https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?packages=ghc-memory
[5] https://release-monitoring.org/projects/search/?pattern=memory
[6] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=ghc-memory
1:04 a.m.
New subject: Why does ghc-cryptohash build ghc-cryptonite and ghc-memory also?
Hi Jens,
I am packaging git-annex in a copr [1]. As I'm sure you're aware, it
requires ~100 dependent packages. When one package fails to build, it's
usually because some dependencies are built against some differing versions
of _another_ dependency. Thus I need to figure out where these packages
originate and possibly grab the source to rebuild in the copr. This is made
more difficult by them being "invisible".
I could help with reviews, but cannot approve anything without being
sponsored.
[1] https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/qulogic/git-annex/
On 8 August 2017 at 07:28, Jens-Ulrik Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Good question - the subpackaging is just a hack (and yes it is
confusing
sorry) to workaround packaging manpower basically.
Package reviews for such subpackages are very welcome and will replace the
subpackages in the long term, assuming the current detailed Package Review
workflow continues.
I didn't understand from your mail what led you to post this question?
Hope that helps,
Jens
On Sun, Jul 23, 2017 at 8:04 AM, Elliott Sales de Andrade <
quantum.analyst(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> The ghc-cryptohash packages builds both ghc-cryptonite and ghc-memory
> [1]. Why is this the case?
>
>
> I spent a long time trying to figure out where I was getting ghc-memory
> from when it could not be found on packages [2], koji [3], bodhi [4], or
> release-monitoring [5]. It's only when I looked for the RPM on koji did I
> figure out it's a subpackage, because that's just totally unexpected,
> especially because there's an open review request for it [6].
>
> [1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/ghc-cryptohash.git/t
> ree/ghc-cryptohash.spec#n20
> [2] https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/s/ghc-memory
> [3] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/search?match=glob&type=p
> ackage&terms=ghc-memory
> [4] https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?packages=ghc-memory
> [5] https://release-monitoring.org/projects/search/?pattern=memory
> [6] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=ghc-memory
>
_______________________________________________
haskell mailing list -- haskell(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to haskell-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
--
Elliott
1:20 a.m.
New subject: Why does ghc-cryptohash build ghc-cryptonite and ghc-memory also?
On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 02:04:42AM -0400, Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote:
I could help with reviews, but cannot approve anything without being
sponsored.
Btw. I'm also happy to do some reviewing. The last once I was
interested
in tho were missing updated spec files (the ones posted ended up in a
404).
So if there are specific ones, let me know :)
Kind Regards,
--
Róman Joost
Senior Software Engineer, Products & Technologies Operations (Brisbane)
Red Hat
6:35 a.m.
New subject: Why does ghc-cryptohash build ghc-cryptonite and ghc-memory also?
On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 16:20:59 +1000, Róman Joost wrote:
Btw. I'm also happy to do some reviewing. The last once I was
interested
in tho were missing updated spec files (the ones posted ended up in a
404).
Yeah, sorry about that. My hosting admin hasn't responded about hooking
up the vhost. I also haven't had time for Fedora much at all lately
either :( . I'll try and upload the packages I have reviews for to fp.o
and that have been pinged this weekend (Sunday is probably the earliest
you'll see them).
--Ben
8:05 p.m.
New subject: Why does ghc-cryptohash build ghc-cryptonite and ghc-memory also?
Dear Ben,
On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 07:35:57AM -0400, Ben Boeckel wrote:
On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 16:20:59 +1000, Róman Joost wrote:
> Btw. I'm also happy to do some reviewing. The last once I was interested
> in tho were missing updated spec files (the ones posted ended up in a
> 404).
Yeah, sorry about that. My hosting admin hasn't responded about hooking
up the vhost. I also haven't had time for Fedora much at all lately
either :( . I'll try and upload the packages I have reviews for to fp.o
and that have been pinged this weekend (Sunday is probably the earliest
you'll see them).
No reason to be sorry. I also have sporadic peaks of spare
time I can
spent on some of these, so don't worry. Thank you for filing the reviews
in the first place.
Kind Regards,
--
Róman Joost
Senior Software Engineer, Products & Technologies Operations (Brisbane)
Red Hat
11:30 p.m.
New subject: Why does ghc-cryptohash build ghc-cryptonite and ghc-memory also?
Hi Ben,
On 11 August 2017 at 07:35, Ben Boeckel <mathstuf(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 16:20:59 +1000, Róman Joost wrote:
> Btw. I'm also happy to do some reviewing. The last once I was interested
> in tho were missing updated spec files (the ones posted ended up in a
> 404).
Yeah, sorry about that. My hosting admin hasn't responded about hooking
up the vhost. I also haven't had time for Fedora much at all lately
either :( . I'll try and upload the packages I have reviews for to fp.o
and that have been pinged this weekend (Sunday is probably the earliest
you'll see them).
As I was recently sponsored, I've made a comment on all your review
requests that are 404 and I'd be willing to review. I also added a note if
I know it to be outdated as well.
--Ben
_______________________________________________
haskell mailing list -- haskell(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to haskell-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
--
Elliott
2443
days inactive
2475
days old
haskell@lists.fedoraproject.org
6 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Ben Boeckel -
Elliott Sales de Andrade -
Jens-Ulrik Petersen -
Róman Joost