October 2008 - i18n-bugs - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 462309] Review Request: publican-ovirt - Common documentation files for oVirt

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462309 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |petersen(a)redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2008-10-03 01:15:30 EDT --- Here is the review: +:ok, =:needs attention, -:needs fixing MUST Items: [+] MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. [+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name} [+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. Open Publication [+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [+] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [-] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. please see above comments [+] MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. [+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires [+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. [+] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. [=] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. see above: (-,root,root,-) is preferred [+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. (it wouldn't hurt to add a macro say %publicandir for %{_datadir}/publican though maybe would probably come first in the other publican packages) [+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [+] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. [+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [+] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. SHOULD Items: [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Please fix the earlier mentioned points and I think the package can be approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 462309] Review Request: publican-ovirt - Common documentation files for oVirt

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462309 --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2008-10-03 00:48:21 EDT --- Please bump the upstream version (eg to 0.4.1 or 0.5) when changing the tarball to avoid confusion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 462309] Review Request: publican-ovirt - Common documentation files for oVirt

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462309 Parag AN(पराग) <panemade(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade(a)gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(पराग) <panemade(a)gmail.com> 2008-10-03 00:16:02 EDT --- Suggestions:- 1)Source failed to verify with upstream URL 8e60459257b6ec5d43ad34b5cd330a8f publican-ovirt-0.4.tgz (from upstream URL) 2c02784aa82bb23498d9b8f07654ab1d publican-ovirt-0.4.tgz (from SRPM) Re upload SRPM with correct source tarball. 2) from Packaging Guidelines, consider preserving timestamps http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines#Timestamps 3) good if you use defattr usage as %defattr(-,root,root,-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 461139] Review Request: Thabit-fonts -Thabit-fonts from Arabeyes.org

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139 --- Comment #9 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2008-10-03 00:05:51 EDT --- Nicolas, I feel like this would be a good candidate for naming "arabeyes-Thabit-fonts". Maybe after f10 we should consider revising the fonts packaging naming guidelines? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 462309] Review Request: publican-ovirt - Common documentation files for oVirt

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462309 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com | |, petersen(a)redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 432457] [kn_IN] Translation Error in File

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432457 Patrice Dumas <pertusus(a)free.fr> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus(a)free.fr --- Comment #5 from Patrice Dumas <pertusus(a)free.fr> 2008-10-01 18:20:21 EDT --- Are you sure this is a gtk+ bug and not a gtk2 bug? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 448481] [mr_IN] Gnome Menus Translation showing dotted circle for 'System Tools' string

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448481 Matthias Clasen <mclasen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mclasen(a)redhat.com Blocks| |465130 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 464442] New: gui language selection widget should get focus

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: gui language selection widget should get focus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464442 Summary: gui language selection widget should get focus Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: anaconda AssignedTo: anaconda-maint-list(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: petersen(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: anaconda-maint-list(a)redhat.com, dcantrell(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: When one reaches the first screen in anaconda to select the install language in the GUI, anaconda should give focus to the language list not the Next button, so that one can easily choose another language with the keyboard (same is true for keyboard selection screen). People can easily move quickly through those selection screens with Alt-N if they want to go with the defaults, whereas navigating those long lists with the mouse is awkward. Steps to Reproduce: 1. install rawhide 2. go to language screen and try to select language with typing 3. move to keyboard screen Actual results: 2. language selection widget is unfocused so typing does not work: needs focus to use 3. ditto for keyboard screen Expected results: 2,3. expected list widgets to have focus for easy access. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 6 months

1
4
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 459680] qt/kde: font antialiasing was disabled by uming fontconfig file.

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459680 --- Comment #34 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh(a)redhat.com> 2008-10-01 07:25:53 EDT --- /etc/fonts/fonts.dtd defines that "compare" attribute defaults "eq". <!ATTLIST test qual (any|all|first|not_first) "any" name CDATA #REQUIRED target (pattern|font|default) "default" compare (eq|not_eq|less|less_eq|more|more_eq|contains|not_contains) "eq"> -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 462439] New: [mai_IN] Maithili support is not present in s-c-l

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [mai_IN] Maithili support is not present in s-c-l https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462439 Summary: [mai_IN] Maithili support is not present in s-c-l Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: system-config-language AssignedTo: psatpute(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: psatpute(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: maithili support is not present in s-c-l Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): system-config-language-1.3.1-2 How reproducible: everytime Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 6 months

1
2
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

i18n-bugs October 2008