Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477452
Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: sarai-fonts
AssignedTo: sundaram(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: sundaram(a)redhat.com, pnemade(a)redhat.com,
fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or
several font files:
repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb'
-f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e
's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]\(.*\)src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq
Unfortunately the script
does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can
close this bug report now.
Otherwise, you should know that:
- Fedora guidelines
demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package or subpackage:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_fonts_…
- our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships
fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel
package.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_(2…http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_packagehttp://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_templatehttp://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts
Please make
your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide.
If your package is not
principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage
is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can
always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed
in the correct fontconfig directories.
It is preferred to make a font package or
subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines
requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a
font family is given on
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family
The new
templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe.
The
following packages have already been converted and can serve as examples: -
andika-fonts - apanov-heuristica-fonts - bitstream-vera-fonts - charis-fonts -
dejavu-fonts - ecolier-court-fonts - edrip-fonts - gfs-ambrosia-fonts -
gfs-artemisia-fonts - gfs-baskerville-fonts - gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts -
gfs-bodoni-fonts - gfs-complutum-fonts - gfs-didot-classic-fonts -
gfs-didot-fonts - gfs-eustace-fonts - gfs-fleischman-fonts - gfs-garaldus-fonts
- gfs-gazis-fonts - gfs-jackson-fonts - gfs-neohellenic-fonts -
gfs-nicefore-fonts - gfs-olga-fonts - gfs-porson-fonts - gfs-solomos-fonts -
gfs-theokritos-fonts - stix-fonts - yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts
If you have any remaining
questions about the new guidelines please ask them on fedora-fonts-list at
redhat.com
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Please enable translation submitting by Transifex
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477968
Summary: Please enable translation submitting by Transifex
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: iok
AssignedTo: pnemade(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: piotrdrag(a)gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: pnemade(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Using Transifex for translations of iok would be a good idea.
Please see:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/L10N/FAQ#How_do_I_add_a_module_to_Transifex.3…
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: [gu-IN] : Sorting order for Gujarati needs small correction!
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468009
Summary: [gu-IN] : Sorting order for Gujarati needs small
correction!
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Keywords: i18n
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: glibc
AssignedTo: jakub(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: ankit(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: jakub(a)redhat.com, psatpute(a)redhat.com,
fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
Character "ળ" (0AB3) needs to be sorted after the character "હ" (0AB9)
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Fedora rawhide!
How reproducible:
Everytime
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Create folders with the name starting from the character (0AB3) and (0AB9)
2. Sort them using simple "sort by name" method
3. Check the order of the folders sorted
Actual results:
Folder names starting with (0AB3) is sorted before folder names starting with
(0AB9)
Expected results:
Folder names starting with (0AB3) should be sorted after folder names starting
with (0AB9)
Additional info:
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466912
--- Comment #27 from Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> 2008-12-31 01:00:24 EDT ---
Thanks for making patch upstream.
feel free to reopen if any problem.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466912
--- Comment #26 from Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> 2008-12-31 00:48:57 EDT ---
*** Bug 474127 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474127
Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution| |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #3 from Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> 2008-12-31 00:48:57 EDT ---
Felix Thanks for your input
This bug was opened for language specific information and testing, all the work
and discussion happened on bug 466912, patch is now upstreamed.
closing as a duplicate of 466912
feel free to reopen if any problem
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 466912 ***
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466912
--- Comment #25 from Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> 2008-12-31 00:47:31 EDT ---
*** Bug 474124 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474124
Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution| |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #2 from Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> 2008-12-31 00:47:31 EDT ---
Thanks for you input
This bug was opened for language specific information and testing, all the work
and discussion happened on bug 466912, patch is now upstreamed.
closing as a duplicate of 466912
feel free to reopen if any problem
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 466912 ***
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466912
--- Comment #24 from Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> 2008-12-31 00:45:54 EDT ---
*** Bug 474119 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474119
Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution| |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #2 from Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> 2008-12-31 00:45:54 EDT ---
This bug was opened for language specific information and testing, all the work
and discussion happened on bug 466912, patch is now upstreamed.
closing as a duplicate of 466912
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 466912 ***
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.