December 2008 - i18n-bugs - Fedora mailing-lists

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 462412] New: JTextArea & JTextField do not send XIM_SET_IC_FOCUS & XIM_UNSET_IC_FOCUS events to XIM server
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 Feb '15

18 Feb '15

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: JTextArea & JTextField do not send XIM_SET_IC_FOCUS & XIM_UNSET_IC_FOCUS events to XIM server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462412 Summary: JTextArea & JTextField do not send XIM_SET_IC_FOCUS & XIM_UNSET_IC_FOCUS events to XIM server Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: high Priority: high Component: java-1.6.0-openjdk AssignedTo: langel(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: shawn.p.huang(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: mark(a)klomp.org, langel(a)redhat.com, lkundrak(a)v3.sk, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: JTextArea & JTextField do not send XIM_SET_IC_FOCUS & XIM_UNSET_IC_FOCUS to XIM server. When JTextArea & JTextField work with XIM input methods, it do not set or unset ic focus via XIM protocol. So XIM server can not handle focus for Java application properly. I did not try other java widgets, maybe they have this problem too. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): java-1.6.0-openjdk-demo-1.6.0.0-0.20.b11.fc10.i386 java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-0.20.b11.fc10.i386 java-1.6.0-openjdk-plugin-1.6.0.0-0.20.b11.fc10.i386 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: JTextArea & JTextField do not send XIM_SET_IC_FOCUS & XIM_UNSET_IC_FOCUS events to XIM server. Expected results: JTextArea & JTextField send XIM_SET_IC_FOCUS & XIM_UNSET_IC_FOCUS events to XIM server, when they get or lose focus. Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 13

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 473842] New: Add Greek Polytonic support to Liberation fonts
by Red Hat Bugzilla 23 Apr '14

23 Apr '14

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Add Greek Polytonic support to Liberation fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473842 Summary: Add Greek Polytonic support to Liberation fonts Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: medium Component: liberation-fonts AssignedTo: cchance(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: simos.bugzilla(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: cchance(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora The Liberation fonts are missing the Greek Polytonic characters (Greek Extended Unicode group). In practical terms, the Greek Extended Unicode group is made of the Greek characters with a variety of accents (they are precomposed characters). This report is to track the process of adding support. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 21

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477690] New: libchewing multilib conflict
by Red Hat Bugzilla 28 Aug '12

28 Aug '12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: libchewing multilib conflict https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477690 Summary: libchewing multilib conflict Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: libchewing AssignedTo: dchen(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: phil(a)fifi.org QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: dchen(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: yum install libchewing.i386 libchewing.x86_64 yeilds: file /usr/share/chewing/fonetree.dat from install of libchewing-0.3.2-0.fc10.i386 conflicts with file from package libchewing-0.3.2-0.fc10.x86_64 Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): libchewing-0.3.2-0.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 17

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477583] New: add Alt, Esc, Fn, etc to iok
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Dec '10

09 Dec '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: add Alt, Esc, Fn, etc to iok https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477583 Summary: add Alt, Esc, Fn, etc to iok Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: iok AssignedTo: pnemade(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: petersen(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: pnemade(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: iok is currently missing Alt, Esc and Fn function keys: feel it would be good to add them. It could also be configurable if some people feel that not all users need them in India. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 3

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477475] New: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
by Red Hat Bugzilla 21 May '10

21 May '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477475 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: un-extra-fonts AssignedTo: smallvil(a)get9.net ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: smallvil(a)get9.net, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or several font files: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb' -f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e 's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]$.*$src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq Unfortunately the script does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can close this bug report now. Otherwise, you should know that: - Fedora guidelines demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package or subpackage: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_fonts_… - our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_(2… http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts Please make your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide. If your package is not principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed in the correct fontconfig directories. It is preferred to make a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a font family is given on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family The new templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted and can serve as examples: - andika-fonts - apanov-heuristica-fonts - bitstream-vera-fonts - charis-fonts - dejavu-fonts - ecolier-court-fonts - edrip-fonts - gfs-ambrosia-fonts - gfs-artemisia-fonts - gfs-baskerville-fonts - gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts - gfs-bodoni-fonts - gfs-complutum-fonts - gfs-didot-classic-fonts - gfs-didot-fonts - gfs-eustace-fonts - gfs-fleischman-fonts - gfs-garaldus-fonts - gfs-gazis-fonts - gfs-jackson-fonts - gfs-neohellenic-fonts - gfs-nicefore-fonts - gfs-olga-fonts - gfs-porson-fonts - gfs-solomos-fonts - gfs-theokritos-fonts - stix-fonts - yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 20

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477918] New: ibus can't be called in pidgin only if open a QQ protocol chat windows first.
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 May '10

10 May '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: ibus can't be called in pidgin only if open a QQ protocol chat windows first. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477918 Summary: ibus can't be called in pidgin only if open a QQ protocol chat windows first. Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: i686 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: high Priority: medium Component: ibus AssignedTo: phuang(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: hansgong(a)126.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: phuang(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: ibus can't be called in pidgin only if open a QQ protocol chat windows first. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): iBus 0.1.1.20081023 Pidgin 2.5.2-6.fc10 How reproducible: In Gnome. Steps to Reproduce: 1.install ibus, ibus-pinyin 2.open pidgin with a QQ account auto started 3.open a chat window of qq(either Qun or buddy is ok), then focus text box. 4.press key shout cuts for calling ibus pinyin input method. Actual results: ibus will not be callable in pidgin, but if you open a msn or any other protocol chat window first, it works. Expected results: ibus input method will be callable under any chat window start-up sequence. Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 27

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 474522] New: Incorrect cent sign glyph (U+00A2) in Sans and Mono style in Liberation fonts
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 May '10

05 May '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Incorrect cent sign glyph (U+00A2) in Sans and Mono style in Liberation fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474522 Summary: Incorrect cent sign glyph (U+00A2) in Sans and Mono style in Liberation fonts Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: liberation-fonts AssignedTo: cchance(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: watchingman(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: cchance(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Created an attachment (id=325660) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=325660) cent sign incorrect cent sign shoud be a coressed capital "C". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 15

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 468829] New: No icon for im-chooser
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Apr '10

14 Apr '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: No icon for im-chooser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468829 Summary: No icon for im-chooser Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: gcin AssignedTo: candyz0416(a)gmail.com ReportedBy: tagoh(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, candyz0416(a)gmail.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: gcin.conf has ICON definition but the file described there isn't available. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): gcin-1.4.2-4.fc10 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.run im-chooser 2.see ICON in /etc/X11/xinit/xinput.d/gcin.conf 3.rpm -qf $ICON in gcin.conf Actual results: 1. no icon available for gcin 3. error: file /usr/share/icons/gcin/gcin.png: No such file or directory Expected results: the right thing should be set to ICON. Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 5

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 473665] New: scim-python : Unowned directories
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 Jan '10

19 Jan '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: scim-python : Unowned directories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473665 Summary: scim-python : Unowned directories Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: scim-python AssignedTo: phuang(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: bugs.michael(a)gmx.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: phuang(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora One or more directories are not included within this package and/or its sub-packages: => scim-python-pinyin-0.1.13rc1-1.fc10.i386 (rawhide-development-i386) /usr/share/scim-python/data => scim-python-xingma-0.1.13rc1-1.fc10.i386 (rawhide-development-i386) /usr/share/scim-python/engine/XingMa /usr/share/scim-python/engine/XingMa/tables => scim-python-xingma-cangjie-0.1.13rc1-1.fc10.i386 (rawhide-development-i386) /usr/share/scim-python/engine/XingMa /usr/share/scim-python/engine/XingMa/tables => scim-python-xingma-erbi-0.1.13rc1-1.fc10.i386 (rawhide-development-i386) /usr/share/scim-python/engine/XingMa /usr/share/scim-python/engine/XingMa/tables => scim-python-xingma-wubi-0.1.13rc1-1.fc10.i386 (rawhide-development-i386) /usr/share/scim-python/engine/XingMa /usr/share/scim-python/engine/XingMa/tables => scim-python-xingma-zhengma-0.1.13rc1-1.fc10.i386 (rawhide-development-i386) /usr/share/scim-python/engine/XingMa /usr/share/scim-python/engine/XingMa/tables Note: It may be necessary to include directories in multiple packages. [...] Further information: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#FileAndDirectoryOwnersh… https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/UnownedDirectories -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 2

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 465392] New: race condition in XIM handling
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 Dec '09

18 Dec '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: race condition in XIM handling https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465392 Summary: race condition in XIM handling Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: scim AssignedTo: shawn.p.huang(a)gmail.com ReportedBy: tagoh(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, shawn.p.huang(a)gmail.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: if one sends the key event to SCIM too much and too faster, the application, such as emacs and xterm freezes. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): scim-1.4.7-32.fc10 How reproducible: always as long as it's on the above condition Steps to Reproduce: 1.change the keyboard repeat setting to make this easier to see, like gconftool-2 -s -t int /desktop/gnome/peripherals/keyboard/delay 100 and gconftool-2 -s -t int /desktop/gnome/peripherals/keyboard/rate 110 2.open xterm with XMODIFIERS=@im=SCIM 3.keep pressing a key until it freezes Actual results: freeze Expected results: should handles it properly Additional info: What exactly happened on this race condition issue is: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452849#c19 Quote from XIM specification: In on-demand-synchronous method, the IM library always receives XIM_FORWARD_EVENT or XIM_COMMIT message as a synchronous request. Also, the IM Server needs to synchronously process the correspondent reply from the IM library and the following XIM_FORWARD_EVENT message sent from the IM library when any of the event causes the IM Server to send XIM_FORWARD_EVENT or XIM_COMMIT message to the IM library, so that the input service is consistent. If the IM library gets the control back from the application after receiving the synchronous request, the IM library replies for the synchronous request before processing any of the events. In this time, the IM Server blocks XIM_FORWARD_EVENT message which is sent by the IM library, and handles it after receiving the reply. Howerver, the IM Server handles the other protocols /at any time/. So in the case at the above URL, XIM server has to process XIM_SET_IC_VALUES regardless of waiting for XIM_SYNC_REPLY. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 2

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475904] New: no sound in startdict
by Red Hat Bugzilla 17 Dec '09

17 Dec '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: no sound in startdict https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475904 Summary: no sound in startdict Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: i386 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: stardict AssignedTo: cchance(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: jianliang79(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: cchance(a)redhat.com, zhu(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: I have installed WyabdcRealPeopleTTS sound library but stardict can't read words for me. Another abnormal thing about sound is that now I can't even hear the sound when the mouse pointer entering the buttons of stardict. I remember in the previous version I can hear a little sound when the mouse pointer entering one of the button of stardict. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 23

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 471927] New: imsettings causes window manager confusion in Xfce
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 Nov '09

18 Nov '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: imsettings causes window manager confusion in Xfce https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471927 Summary: imsettings causes window manager confusion in Xfce Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: imsettings AssignedTo: tagoh(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: kevin(a)tummy.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: tagoh(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora If the imsettings and imsettings-xfce packages are installed xfwm4 settings are confused and don't think xfwm4 is the window manager. 1. Install imsettings-xfce 2. yum groupinstall XFCE 3. login and choose Xfce as your desktop. 4. right click on the desktop 5. choose settings manager 6. choose either "Window Manager" or "Window Manager Tweaks". 7. You will get a message: "These settings cannot work with your current window manager (imsetting-xim)" The code in xfwm4 hasn't changed in years here. It does: wm_name = gdk_x11_screen_get_window_manager_name (gdk_screen_get_default ()); if (g_ascii_strcasecmp (wm_name, "Xfwm4")) { xfce_err (_("These settings cannot work with your current window manager (%s)"), wm_name); return; } Is imsettings changing the gdk default window manager somehow? Removing imsettings causes everything to work as normal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 35

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 468964] New: scim-python-pinyin db file too big!
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Oct '09

09 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: scim-python-pinyin db file too big! https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468964 Summary: scim-python-pinyin db file too big! Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: scim-python AssignedTo: shawn.p.huang(a)gmail.com ReportedBy: petersen(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: shawn.p.huang(a)gmail.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: The py.db file in scim-python-pinyin is 120MB it seems very big: eg scim-pinyin Steps to Reproduce: 1. du -sh /usr/share/scim-python/engine/PinYin 2. du -sh /usr/share/scim/pinyin Actual results: 1. 121M 2. 4.5M Expected results: 1. similar to scim-pinyin Additional info: This means we can't currently use scim-python-pinyin as default IM on Live images. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 2

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 478503] New: Translated to Brazilian Portuguese
by Red Hat Bugzilla 21 Sep '09

21 Sep '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Translated to Brazilian Portuguese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478503 Summary: Translated to Brazilian Portuguese Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: iok AssignedTo: pnemade(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: taylonsilva(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: pnemade(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Translated to Brazilian Portuguese. The .po file is attached. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 6

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477374] New: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
by Red Hat Bugzilla 15 Sep '09

15 Sep '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477374 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: culmus-fonts AssignedTo: rbhalera(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, rbhalera(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or several font files: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb' -f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e 's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]$.*$src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq Unfortunately the script does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can close this bug report now. Otherwise, you should know that: - Fedora guidelines demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package or subpackage: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_fonts_… - our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_(2… http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts Please make your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide. If your package is not principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed in the correct fontconfig directories. It is preferred to make a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a font family is given on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family The new templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted and can serve as examples: - andika-fonts - apanov-heuristica-fonts - bitstream-vera-fonts - charis-fonts - dejavu-fonts - ecolier-court-fonts - edrip-fonts - gfs-ambrosia-fonts - gfs-artemisia-fonts - gfs-baskerville-fonts - gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts - gfs-bodoni-fonts - gfs-complutum-fonts - gfs-didot-classic-fonts - gfs-didot-fonts - gfs-eustace-fonts - gfs-fleischman-fonts - gfs-garaldus-fonts - gfs-gazis-fonts - gfs-jackson-fonts - gfs-neohellenic-fonts - gfs-nicefore-fonts - gfs-olga-fonts - gfs-porson-fonts - gfs-solomos-fonts - gfs-theokritos-fonts - stix-fonts - yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 15

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477474] New: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
by Red Hat Bugzilla 31 Aug '09

31 Aug '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477474 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: un-core-fonts AssignedTo: smallvil(a)get9.net ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, smallvil(a)get9.net, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or several font files: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb' -f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e 's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]$.*$src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq Unfortunately the script does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can close this bug report now. Otherwise, you should know that: - Fedora guidelines demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package or subpackage: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_fonts_… - our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_(2… http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts Please make your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide. If your package is not principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed in the correct fontconfig directories. It is preferred to make a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a font family is given on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family The new templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted and can serve as examples: - andika-fonts - apanov-heuristica-fonts - bitstream-vera-fonts - charis-fonts - dejavu-fonts - ecolier-court-fonts - edrip-fonts - gfs-ambrosia-fonts - gfs-artemisia-fonts - gfs-baskerville-fonts - gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts - gfs-bodoni-fonts - gfs-complutum-fonts - gfs-didot-classic-fonts - gfs-didot-fonts - gfs-eustace-fonts - gfs-fleischman-fonts - gfs-garaldus-fonts - gfs-gazis-fonts - gfs-jackson-fonts - gfs-neohellenic-fonts - gfs-nicefore-fonts - gfs-olga-fonts - gfs-porson-fonts - gfs-solomos-fonts - gfs-theokritos-fonts - stix-fonts - yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 8

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477419] New: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
by Red Hat Bugzilla 27 Jul '09

27 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477419 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: lklug-fonts AssignedTo: rbhalera(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, rbhalera(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or several font files: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb' -f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e 's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]$.*$src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq Unfortunately the script does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can close this bug report now. Otherwise, you should know that: - Fedora guidelines demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package or subpackage: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_fonts_… - our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_(2… http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts Please make your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide. If your package is not principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed in the correct fontconfig directories. It is preferred to make a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a font family is given on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family The new templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted and can serve as examples: - andika-fonts - apanov-heuristica-fonts - bitstream-vera-fonts - charis-fonts - dejavu-fonts - ecolier-court-fonts - edrip-fonts - gfs-ambrosia-fonts - gfs-artemisia-fonts - gfs-baskerville-fonts - gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts - gfs-bodoni-fonts - gfs-complutum-fonts - gfs-didot-classic-fonts - gfs-didot-fonts - gfs-eustace-fonts - gfs-fleischman-fonts - gfs-garaldus-fonts - gfs-gazis-fonts - gfs-jackson-fonts - gfs-neohellenic-fonts - gfs-nicefore-fonts - gfs-olga-fonts - gfs-porson-fonts - gfs-solomos-fonts - gfs-theokritos-fonts - stix-fonts - yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 8

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 476511] New: scim bad file descriptor
by Red Hat Bugzilla 21 Jul '09

21 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: scim bad file descriptor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476511 Summary: scim bad file descriptor Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: scim-bridge AssignedTo: phuang(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: chanueting(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, phuang(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: "scim-bridge: An exception occurred at selecting the sockets: Bad file descriptor" is shown in the log. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): scim-1.4.7-35.fc10 (i386) scim-bridge-gtk-0.4.15-8.fc10 How reproducible: Every time. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Boot up a machine with scim installed. 2. 3. Actual results: I can see this message in message log: localhost scim-bridge: An exception occurred at selecting the sockets: Bad file descriptor At the same time, there are increasing number of scim-bridge process those obtain many memory. Expected results: There should not be increasing of memory usage. Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 4

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 465214] New: emacs should disable XIM by default
by Red Hat Bugzilla 21 Jul '09

21 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: emacs should disable XIM by default https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465214 Summary: emacs should disable XIM by default Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: emacs AssignedTo: coldwell(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: petersen(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: coldwell(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Blocks: 438944 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: XIM (X Input Method protocol) is pretty intrusive for Emacs users specially for SCIM which defaults to using C-Space as its hotkey, and anyway Emacs provides its own superior builtin input methods designed for native input. I propose that we turn off XIM by default Emacs for fedora. It can still be enabled by users using the X resource useXIM. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Run Emacs with SCIM enabled. 2. Press C-Space Actual results: 2. SCIM is enabled Expected results: 2. mark to be set Additional info: Emacs is capable of input most major Asian languages adequately by itself and also can support has package that support anthy, scim-bridge and uim via elisp, therefore is no need to have XIM enabled by default any longer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 7

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477421] New: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
by Red Hat Bugzilla 16 Jul '09

16 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477421 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: madan-fonts AssignedTo: rbhalera(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, rbhalera(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or several font files: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb' -f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e 's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]$.*$src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq Unfortunately the script does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can close this bug report now. Otherwise, you should know that: - Fedora guidelines demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package or subpackage: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_fonts_… - our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_(2… http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts Please make your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide. If your package is not principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed in the correct fontconfig directories. It is preferred to make a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a font family is given on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family The new templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted and can serve as examples: - andika-fonts - apanov-heuristica-fonts - bitstream-vera-fonts - charis-fonts - dejavu-fonts - ecolier-court-fonts - edrip-fonts - gfs-ambrosia-fonts - gfs-artemisia-fonts - gfs-baskerville-fonts - gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts - gfs-bodoni-fonts - gfs-complutum-fonts - gfs-didot-classic-fonts - gfs-didot-fonts - gfs-eustace-fonts - gfs-fleischman-fonts - gfs-garaldus-fonts - gfs-gazis-fonts - gfs-jackson-fonts - gfs-neohellenic-fonts - gfs-nicefore-fonts - gfs-olga-fonts - gfs-porson-fonts - gfs-solomos-fonts - gfs-theokritos-fonts - stix-fonts - yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 11

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477405] New: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
by Red Hat Bugzilla 13 Jul '09

13 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477405 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: kacst-fonts AssignedTo: rbhalera(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, rbhalera(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or several font files: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb' -f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e 's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]$.*$src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq Unfortunately the script does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can close this bug report now. Otherwise, you should know that: - Fedora guidelines demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package or subpackage: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_fonts_… - our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_(2… http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts Please make your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide. If your package is not principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed in the correct fontconfig directories. It is preferred to make a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a font family is given on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family The new templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted and can serve as examples: - andika-fonts - apanov-heuristica-fonts - bitstream-vera-fonts - charis-fonts - dejavu-fonts - ecolier-court-fonts - edrip-fonts - gfs-ambrosia-fonts - gfs-artemisia-fonts - gfs-baskerville-fonts - gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts - gfs-bodoni-fonts - gfs-complutum-fonts - gfs-didot-classic-fonts - gfs-didot-fonts - gfs-eustace-fonts - gfs-fleischman-fonts - gfs-garaldus-fonts - gfs-gazis-fonts - gfs-jackson-fonts - gfs-neohellenic-fonts - gfs-nicefore-fonts - gfs-olga-fonts - gfs-porson-fonts - gfs-solomos-fonts - gfs-theokritos-fonts - stix-fonts - yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 11

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477437] New: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
by Red Hat Bugzilla 13 Jul '09

13 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477437 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: paktype-fonts AssignedTo: rbhalera(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, rbhalera(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or several font files: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb' -f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e 's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]$.*$src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq Unfortunately the script does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can close this bug report now. Otherwise, you should know that: - Fedora guidelines demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package or subpackage: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_fonts_… - our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_(2… http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts Please make your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide. If your package is not principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed in the correct fontconfig directories. It is preferred to make a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a font family is given on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family The new templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted and can serve as examples: - andika-fonts - apanov-heuristica-fonts - bitstream-vera-fonts - charis-fonts - dejavu-fonts - ecolier-court-fonts - edrip-fonts - gfs-ambrosia-fonts - gfs-artemisia-fonts - gfs-baskerville-fonts - gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts - gfs-bodoni-fonts - gfs-complutum-fonts - gfs-didot-classic-fonts - gfs-didot-fonts - gfs-eustace-fonts - gfs-fleischman-fonts - gfs-garaldus-fonts - gfs-gazis-fonts - gfs-jackson-fonts - gfs-neohellenic-fonts - gfs-nicefore-fonts - gfs-olga-fonts - gfs-porson-fonts - gfs-solomos-fonts - gfs-theokritos-fonts - stix-fonts - yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 10

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477453] New: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 Jul '09

07 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477453 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: sazanami-fonts AssignedTo: tagoh(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: tagoh(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or several font files: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb' -f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e 's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]$.*$src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq Unfortunately the script does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can close this bug report now. Otherwise, you should know that: - Fedora guidelines demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package or subpackage: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_fonts_… - our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_(2… http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts Please make your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide. If your package is not principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed in the correct fontconfig directories. It is preferred to make a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a font family is given on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family The new templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted and can serve as examples: - andika-fonts - apanov-heuristica-fonts - bitstream-vera-fonts - charis-fonts - dejavu-fonts - ecolier-court-fonts - edrip-fonts - gfs-ambrosia-fonts - gfs-artemisia-fonts - gfs-baskerville-fonts - gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts - gfs-bodoni-fonts - gfs-complutum-fonts - gfs-didot-classic-fonts - gfs-didot-fonts - gfs-eustace-fonts - gfs-fleischman-fonts - gfs-garaldus-fonts - gfs-gazis-fonts - gfs-jackson-fonts - gfs-neohellenic-fonts - gfs-nicefore-fonts - gfs-olga-fonts - gfs-porson-fonts - gfs-solomos-fonts - gfs-theokritos-fonts - stix-fonts - yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 8

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 474734] New: Blurriness of Latin letter R (U+0052) in Liberation Regular
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Jul '09

05 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Blurriness of Latin letter R (U+0052) in Liberation Regular https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474734 Summary: Blurriness of Latin letter R (U+0052) in Liberation Regular Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: liberation-fonts AssignedTo: cchance(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: watchingman(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: cchance(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Created an attachment (id=325767) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=325767) test case Package: ttf-liberation Version: HEAD (1.0.04.93) Severity: normal the character R (U+0052, Latin Capital LETTER R) appears ugly when using Liberation Sans in small pixelsize. fork the test case from Holger Levsen in Bug 473481, you can see this bug also exists in Liberation Sans Italic, Liberation Serif, Liberation Serif Italic. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 17

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475938] New: [ALL LANG] Application is not running any languages/locale
by Red Hat Bugzilla 23 Jun '09

23 Jun '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [ALL LANG] Application is not running any languages/locale https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475938 Summary: [ALL LANG] Application is not running any languages/locale Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: medium Priority: low Component: file-roller AssignedTo: caillon(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: aalam(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: caillon(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: While using file-roller in Punjabi (pa_IN.UTF-8), it was not showing translation, while package has Translated file Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): file-roller-2.24.2-1.fc10.i386 How reproducible: Everytime Steps to Reproduce: 1. open termianl 2. export LANG=ja_JP.UTF-8 3.file-roller Actual results: No Translated message in application Expected results: Should have, when rpm has Translated MO files Additional info: Tested lang: kn_IN, ja_JP, zh_TW, --- rpm -ql file-roller --- /usr/share/locale/af/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/am/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/ar/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/as/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/az/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/be/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/be(a)latin/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/bg/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/bn/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/bn_IN/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/br/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/bs/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/ca/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/cs/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/cy/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/da/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/de/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/dz/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/el/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/en_CA/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/en_GB/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/es/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/et/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/eu/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/fa/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/fi/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/fr/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/fur/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/ga/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/gl/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/gu/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/he/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/hi/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/hr/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/hu/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/hy/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/id/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/is/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/it/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/ja/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/ka/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/kn/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/ko/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/ku/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/lt/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/lv/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/mg/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/mk/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/ml/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/mn/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/mr/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/ms/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/nb/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/ne/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/nl/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/nn/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/oc/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/or/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/pa/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/pl/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/ps/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/pt/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/pt_BR/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/ro/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/ru/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/rw/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/si/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/sk/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/sl/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/sq/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/sr/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/sr(a)ije/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/sr(a)latin/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/sv/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/ta/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/te/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/th/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/tk/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/tr/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/uk/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/ur/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/ur_PK/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/vi/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/xh/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/zh_CN/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/zh_HK/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/zh_TW/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo ----- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 4

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 467982] New: anaconda doesn't render glyphs with the proper font
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 Jun '09

18 Jun '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: anaconda doesn't render glyphs with the proper font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467982 Summary: anaconda doesn't render glyphs with the proper font Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: i386 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: Regression Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: anaconda AssignedTo: anaconda-maint-list(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: tagoh(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: anaconda-maint-list(a)redhat.com, dcantrell(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Created an attachment (id=321105) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=321105) Screenshot Description of problem: When I select Japanese on the language selection with today's rawhide tree, it looks like anaconda is rendering some glyphs with Chinese font. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): anaconda-11.4.1.50 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.Select Japanese on the language selection 2.See a notice for beta after pressing Next button twice. 3. Actual results: some glyphs looks like from Chinese font. Expected results: should be from Japanese font. Additional info: This is a regression. it worked before. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 22

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 462041] New: Hotkeys has no response and "Go To" window couldn't be inputted.
by Red Hat Bugzilla 06 Jun '09

06 Jun '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Hotkeys has no response and "Go To" window couldn't be inputted. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462041 Summary: Hotkeys has no response and "Go To" window couldn't be inputted. Product: Fedora Version: 9 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: fontforge AssignedTo: kevin(a)tummy.com ReportedBy: cchance(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, roozbeh(a)gmail.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Depends on: 462038 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #462038 +++ Description of problem: #1: Hotkeys are not responded. #2: "Go To" window couldn't be inputted. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): fontforge-20080828-1.fc10.i386 How reproducible: Always. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Start fontforge from gnome-terminal. 2. Try hotkeys like Alt-F. 3. Observe symptom #1. 4. Select View > Goto from menu. 5. Try to input something in the input field. 6. Observe symptom #2. Actual results: #1. No response. #2. Couldn't be inputted. Expected results: #1. File sub-menu pops up. #2. Data is inputted in field. Additional info: HEAD of F9 has same issue as well. --- Additional comment from cchance(a)redhat.com on 2008-09-12 02:26:49 EDT --- `LANG=C fontforge [FILE]` resolves as workaround. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 5

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 462038] New: Hotkeys has no response and "Go To" window couldn't be inputted.
by Red Hat Bugzilla 06 Jun '09

06 Jun '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Hotkeys has no response and "Go To" window couldn't be inputted. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462038 Summary: Hotkeys has no response and "Go To" window couldn't be inputted. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: fontforge AssignedTo: kevin(a)tummy.com ReportedBy: cchance(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: roozbeh(a)gmail.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: #1: Hotkeys are not responded. #2: "Go To" window couldn't be inputted. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): fontforge-20080828-1.fc10.i386 How reproducible: Always. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Start fontforge from gnome-terminal. 2. Try hotkeys like Alt-F. 3. Observe symptom #1. 4. Select View > Goto from menu. 5. Try to input something in the input field. 6. Observe symptom #2. Actual results: #1. No response. #2. Couldn't be inputted. Expected results: #1. File sub-menu pops up. #2. Data is inputted in field. Additional info: HEAD of F9 has same issue as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 21

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 473946] New: xgettext misinterprets \x escapes in Python Unicode strings
by Red Hat Bugzilla 29 May '09

29 May '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: xgettext misinterprets \x escapes in Python Unicode strings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473946 Summary: xgettext misinterprets \x escapes in Python Unicode strings Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: gettext AssignedTo: petersen(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: mcepl(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: When trying to update po files in gajim, I got this error: [matej@viklef po]$ make update-po make gajim.pot make[1]: Entering directory `/home/matej/redhat/BUILD/gajim/po' INTLTOOL_EXTRACT=/usr/bin/intltool-extract srcdir=. /usr/bin/intltool-update --gettext-package gajim --pot ./../src/common/config.py:180: warning: 'msgid' format string with unnamed arguments cannot be properly localized: The translator cannot reorder the arguments. Please consider using a format string with named arguments, and a mapping instead of a tuple for the arguments. ERROR: xgettext failed to generate PO template file. Please consult error message above if there is any. make[1]: *** [gajim.pot] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/matej/redhat/BUILD/gajim/po' make: *** [update-po] Error 2 [matej@viklef po]$ When I filed my ticket (which was closed as duplicate of http://trac.gajim.org/ticket/4166) I was told that it is actually bug in xgettext which has been already fixed in Debian (bugs.debian.org/433743 and bugs.debian.org/493218) I have no idea, whether they sent patches upstream. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): gettext-0.17-8.fc10.i386 How reproducible: 100% -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 12

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 473209] New: Please add Maithili and Nepali languages to language selection menu in anaconda
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 Apr '09

07 Apr '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please add Maithili and Nepali languages to language selection menu in anaconda https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473209 Summary: Please add Maithili and Nepali languages to language selection menu in anaconda Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: anaconda AssignedTo: anaconda-maint-list(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: pnemade(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, anaconda-maint-list(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Maithili and Nepali languages are not available in the anaconda menu at install time. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): anaconda-11.4.1.62-1.i386.rpm How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Start Fedora installation 2. Proceed to the step that asks you to choose the language to use in the install process Actual results: Maithili and Nepali languages are not in the list Expected results: Maithili and Nepali languages should be in the list Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 27

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 473616] New: gcin : Unowned directories
by Red Hat Bugzilla 31 Mar '09

31 Mar '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: gcin : Unowned directories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473616 Summary: gcin : Unowned directories Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: gcin AssignedTo: candyz0416(a)gmail.com ReportedBy: bugs.michael(a)gmx.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, candyz0416(a)gmail.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora One or more directories are not included within this package and/or its sub-packages: => gcin-1.4.2-4.fc10.i386 (rawhide-development-i386) /usr/lib/menu [...] Further information: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#FileAndDirectoryOwnersh… https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/UnownedDirectories -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 1

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475743] New: Many chinese glyphs on Japanese environment
by Red Hat Bugzilla 16 Mar '09

16 Mar '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Many chinese glyphs on Japanese environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 Summary: Many chinese glyphs on Japanese environment Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: VLGothic-fonts AssignedTo: ryo-dairiki(a)users.sourceforge.net ReportedBy: mtasaka(a)ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: tagoh(a)redhat.com, ryo-dairiki(a)users.sourceforge.net, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Since VLGothic-fonts is upgraded to 20081203, I see many chinese glyphs on Japanese environment. Downloading to 20081029 works good. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): VLGothic-fonts-20081203-2.fc11 (perhaps?) cjkunifonts-ukai-0.2.20080216.1-10.fc11.noarch.rpm cjkunifonts-uming-0.2.20080216.1-10.fc11.noarch.rpm How reproducible: 100% Steps to Reproduce: 1. For example, the following URL: http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/policycoreutils/po/ja.po?root=elvis&r1=… Actual results: See attached -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 54

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477403] New: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
by Red Hat Bugzilla 15 Mar '09

15 Mar '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477403 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: jomolhari-fonts AssignedTo: mgarski(a)post.pl ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: mgarski(a)post.pl, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or several font files: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb' -f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e 's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]$.*$src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq Unfortunately the script does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can close this bug report now. Otherwise, you should know that: - Fedora guidelines demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package or subpackage: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_fonts_… - our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_(2… http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts Please make your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide. If your package is not principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed in the correct fontconfig directories. It is preferred to make a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a font family is given on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family The new templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted and can serve as examples: - andika-fonts - apanov-heuristica-fonts - bitstream-vera-fonts - charis-fonts - dejavu-fonts - ecolier-court-fonts - edrip-fonts - gfs-ambrosia-fonts - gfs-artemisia-fonts - gfs-baskerville-fonts - gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts - gfs-bodoni-fonts - gfs-complutum-fonts - gfs-didot-classic-fonts - gfs-didot-fonts - gfs-eustace-fonts - gfs-fleischman-fonts - gfs-garaldus-fonts - gfs-gazis-fonts - gfs-jackson-fonts - gfs-neohellenic-fonts - gfs-nicefore-fonts - gfs-olga-fonts - gfs-porson-fonts - gfs-solomos-fonts - gfs-theokritos-fonts - stix-fonts - yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 9

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477467] New: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
by Red Hat Bugzilla 15 Mar '09

15 Mar '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477467 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: tibetan-machine-uni-fonts AssignedTo: mgarski(a)post.pl ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: mgarski(a)post.pl, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or several font files: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb' -f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e 's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]$.*$src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq Unfortunately the script does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can close this bug report now. Otherwise, you should know that: - Fedora guidelines demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package or subpackage: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_fonts_… - our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_(2… http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts Please make your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide. If your package is not principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed in the correct fontconfig directories. It is preferred to make a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a font family is given on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family The new templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted and can serve as examples: - andika-fonts - apanov-heuristica-fonts - bitstream-vera-fonts - charis-fonts - dejavu-fonts - ecolier-court-fonts - edrip-fonts - gfs-ambrosia-fonts - gfs-artemisia-fonts - gfs-baskerville-fonts - gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts - gfs-bodoni-fonts - gfs-complutum-fonts - gfs-didot-classic-fonts - gfs-didot-fonts - gfs-eustace-fonts - gfs-fleischman-fonts - gfs-garaldus-fonts - gfs-gazis-fonts - gfs-jackson-fonts - gfs-neohellenic-fonts - gfs-nicefore-fonts - gfs-olga-fonts - gfs-porson-fonts - gfs-solomos-fonts - gfs-theokritos-fonts - stix-fonts - yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 8

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 471833] New: summary lowercase inputmethod names with a NAME variable
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Mar '09

10 Mar '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: summary lowercase inputmethod names with a NAME variable https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471833 Summary: summary lowercase inputmethod names with a NAME variable Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: FutureFeature, i18n Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: imsettings AssignedTo: tagoh(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: petersen(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: tagoh(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: It would be nice if imsettings used a NAME variable in xinput files to carry a lowercase name of input-methods. Steps to Reproduce: 1. imsettings-list 2. imsettings-start SCIM 3. Actual results: 1. list SHORT_DESC name which is often mixed or uppercase. Expected results: 1. list input-method names in lowercase. 2. able to start scim with "imsettings-start scim", etc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 12

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475907] New: duplicate autostart file
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Mar '09

10 Mar '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: duplicate autostart file https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475907 Summary: duplicate autostart file Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: imsettings AssignedTo: tagoh(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: mclasen(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: tagoh(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora you install both /etc/xdg/autostart/imsettings-applet.desktop and /usr/share/gnome/autostart/gnome-imsettings-applet.desktop Thats one too many... it leads to imsettings applet showing up twice in the list of autostarted session apps. It does not actually cause to be started twice, so the problem is more cosmetic. But still, better to pick one location to avoid problems with the two copies getting out of sync, etc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 3

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 468833] New: nabi can't be activated through imsettings
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Mar '09

10 Mar '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: nabi can't be activated through imsettings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468833 Summary: nabi can't be activated through imsettings Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: imsettings AssignedTo: tagoh(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: petersen(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: tagoh(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Blocks: 438944 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: nabi does not work with imsettings xim. It seems the hotkey event does not reach the xim server. How reproducible: every time Steps to Reproduce: 1. yum install nabi 2. start ko desktop gnome sesssion 3. select nabi in im-chooser 4. try to activate nabi with Shift-Space Actual results: 3. nabi starts running 4. nothing happens Expected results: 4. nabi to go to hangul input Additional info: Works with XMODIDIERS=@im=nabi. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 2

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 464453] New: installing imsettings-libs-0.104.1-1.fc10 gives gconf schema missing error
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Mar '09

10 Mar '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: installing imsettings-libs-0.104.1-1.fc10 gives gconf schema missing error https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464453 Summary: installing imsettings-libs-0.104.1-1.fc10 gives gconf schema missing error Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: imsettings AssignedTo: tagoh(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: petersen(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: tagoh(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Updating current rawhide to the latest imsettings gives a gconf error. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): imsettings-0.104.1-1.fc10 Steps to Reproduce: 1. rpm -Fvh imsettings-*0.104.1-1.fc10.`arch`.rpm Actual results: [root@localhost petersen]# rpm -qa im\*| sort im-chooser-1.2.3-1.fc10.i386 imsettings-0.104.0-1.fc10.i386 imsettings-libs-0.104.0-1.fc10.i386 [root@localhost petersen]# rpm -Fvh imsettings-* 準備中... ########################################### [100%] 1:imsettings-libs ########################################### [ 50%] I/O warning : failed to load external entity "/etc/gconf/schemas/imsettings-applet.schemas" '/etc/gconf/schemas/imsettings-applet.schemas' が開けませんでした: そのようなファイルやディレクトリはありません 2:imsettings ########################################### [100%] Expected results: no error -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 3

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 476427] New: [te_IN] - Consonant+Virama+Consonant+Virama+space renders the second virama as a separate glyph in lohit-telugu font
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Mar '09

05 Mar '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [te_IN] - Consonant+Virama+Consonant+Virama+space renders the second virama as a separate glyph in lohit-telugu font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476427 Summary: [te_IN] - Consonant+Virama+Consonant+Virama+space renders the second virama as a separate glyph in lohit-telugu font Product: Fedora Localization Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Telugu [te] AssignedTo: kkrothap(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: arjunaraoc(a)googlemail.com QAContact: kkrothap(a)redhat.com CC: aalam(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Consonant+Virama+[Consonant+Virama]+space renders the second virama as a separate glyph in lohit-telugu font. With Pothana2000 font, the rendering is correct. More details at this bug report. http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=516947 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 9

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 471778] New: scim-bridge crash when converting ichioku to Kanji
by Red Hat Bugzilla 02 Mar '09

02 Mar '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: scim-bridge crash when converting ichioku to Kanji https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471778 Summary: scim-bridge crash when converting ichioku to Kanji Product: Fedora Version: 9 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: high Priority: medium Component: anthy AssignedTo: tagoh(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: masaki.chikama(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: tagoh(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: The scim-bridge gets segv when conveting kanji from いちおく to 一億. >scim-bridge[2242]: segfault at 31 ip 001a7656 sp bf9644a0 error 4 in libanthydic.so.0.1.0[1a1000+3f000] Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): scim-bridge-0.4.15-8.fc9.i386 anthy-9100e-3.fc9.i386 How reproducible: anlways Steps to Reproduce: 1. Turn on IME 2. input いちおく 3. hit space (convert to kanji) Actual results: scim-bridege died Expected results: get 一億 Additional info: The same problem reported on Debigan. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=505776 There is some analysis about the problem by maintainer(?). (in Japanese) http://www.daionet.gr.jp/~knok/diary/?11161129 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 10

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477458] New: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 Feb '09

18 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477458 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: smc-fonts AssignedTo: psatpute(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com, psatpute(a)redhat.com, rajeeshknambiar(a)gmail.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or several font files: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb' -f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e 's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]$.*$src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq Unfortunately the script does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can close this bug report now. Otherwise, you should know that: - Fedora guidelines demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package or subpackage: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_fonts_… - our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_(2… http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts Please make your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide. If your package is not principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed in the correct fontconfig directories. It is preferred to make a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a font family is given on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family The new templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted and can serve as examples: - andika-fonts - apanov-heuristica-fonts - bitstream-vera-fonts - charis-fonts - dejavu-fonts - ecolier-court-fonts - edrip-fonts - gfs-ambrosia-fonts - gfs-artemisia-fonts - gfs-baskerville-fonts - gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts - gfs-bodoni-fonts - gfs-complutum-fonts - gfs-didot-classic-fonts - gfs-didot-fonts - gfs-eustace-fonts - gfs-fleischman-fonts - gfs-garaldus-fonts - gfs-gazis-fonts - gfs-jackson-fonts - gfs-neohellenic-fonts - gfs-nicefore-fonts - gfs-olga-fonts - gfs-porson-fonts - gfs-solomos-fonts - gfs-theokritos-fonts - stix-fonts - yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 13

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466200] New: empty language list leads to backtrace
by Red Hat Bugzilla 16 Feb '09

16 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: empty language list leads to backtrace https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466200 Summary: empty language list leads to backtrace Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: anaconda AssignedTo: anaconda-maint-list(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: petersen(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: anaconda-maint-list(a)redhat.com, dcantrell(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Anaconda is backtraces with an empty language list. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): anaconda-11.4.1.44-1 How reproducible: every time Steps to Reproduce: 1. boot boot.iso 2. get to GUI Actual results: Language list is empty and then anaconda backtraces. Expected results: Full lang list as usual -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 3

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 462295] New: not displaying Korean glyphs
by Red Hat Bugzilla 16 Feb '09

16 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: not displaying Korean glyphs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462295 Summary: not displaying Korean glyphs Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: anaconda AssignedTo: anaconda-maint-list(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: petersen(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: We changed the default font for Korean in F10 from baekmuk-ttf-fonts to un-core-fonts-dotum. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): anaconda-11.4.1.34-1 Steps to Reproduce: 1. do a Korean install of rawhide Actual results: unicode boxes appear in place of Hangul glyphs. Expected results: Korean to display normally -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 15

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477373] New: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
by Red Hat Bugzilla 16 Feb '09

16 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477373 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: cjkunifonts AssignedTo: cchance(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, cchance(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or several font files: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb' -f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e 's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]$.*$src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq Unfortunately the script does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can close this bug report now. Otherwise, you should know that: - Fedora guidelines demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package or subpackage: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_fonts_… - our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_(2… http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts Please make your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide. If your package is not principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed in the correct fontconfig directories. It is preferred to make a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a font family is given on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family The new templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted and can serve as examples: - andika-fonts - apanov-heuristica-fonts - bitstream-vera-fonts - charis-fonts - dejavu-fonts - ecolier-court-fonts - edrip-fonts - gfs-ambrosia-fonts - gfs-artemisia-fonts - gfs-baskerville-fonts - gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts - gfs-bodoni-fonts - gfs-complutum-fonts - gfs-didot-classic-fonts - gfs-didot-fonts - gfs-eustace-fonts - gfs-fleischman-fonts - gfs-garaldus-fonts - gfs-gazis-fonts - gfs-jackson-fonts - gfs-neohellenic-fonts - gfs-nicefore-fonts - gfs-olga-fonts - gfs-porson-fonts - gfs-solomos-fonts - gfs-theokritos-fonts - stix-fonts - yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 19

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477410] New: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
by Red Hat Bugzilla 15 Feb '09

15 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477410 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: liberation-fonts AssignedTo: cchance(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: cchance(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or several font files: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb' -f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e 's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]$.*$src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq Unfortunately the script does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can close this bug report now. Otherwise, you should know that: - Fedora guidelines demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package or subpackage: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_fonts_… - our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_(2… http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts Please make your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide. If your package is not principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed in the correct fontconfig directories. It is preferred to make a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a font family is given on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family The new templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted and can serve as examples: - andika-fonts - apanov-heuristica-fonts - bitstream-vera-fonts - charis-fonts - dejavu-fonts - ecolier-court-fonts - edrip-fonts - gfs-ambrosia-fonts - gfs-artemisia-fonts - gfs-baskerville-fonts - gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts - gfs-bodoni-fonts - gfs-complutum-fonts - gfs-didot-classic-fonts - gfs-didot-fonts - gfs-eustace-fonts - gfs-fleischman-fonts - gfs-garaldus-fonts - gfs-gazis-fonts - gfs-jackson-fonts - gfs-neohellenic-fonts - gfs-nicefore-fonts - gfs-olga-fonts - gfs-porson-fonts - gfs-solomos-fonts - gfs-theokritos-fonts - stix-fonts - yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 20

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477420] New: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Feb '09

14 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477420 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: lohit-fonts AssignedTo: rbhalera(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, rbhalera(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or several font files: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb' -f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e 's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]$.*$src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq Unfortunately the script does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can close this bug report now. Otherwise, you should know that: - Fedora guidelines demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package or subpackage: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_fonts_… - our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_(2… http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts Please make your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide. If your package is not principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed in the correct fontconfig directories. It is preferred to make a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a font family is given on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family The new templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted and can serve as examples: - andika-fonts - apanov-heuristica-fonts - bitstream-vera-fonts - charis-fonts - dejavu-fonts - ecolier-court-fonts - edrip-fonts - gfs-ambrosia-fonts - gfs-artemisia-fonts - gfs-baskerville-fonts - gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts - gfs-bodoni-fonts - gfs-complutum-fonts - gfs-didot-classic-fonts - gfs-didot-fonts - gfs-eustace-fonts - gfs-fleischman-fonts - gfs-garaldus-fonts - gfs-gazis-fonts - gfs-jackson-fonts - gfs-neohellenic-fonts - gfs-nicefore-fonts - gfs-olga-fonts - gfs-porson-fonts - gfs-solomos-fonts - gfs-theokritos-fonts - stix-fonts - yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 5

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466852] New: [RFE] ibus should provide default IME for language when available
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 Feb '09

11 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [RFE] ibus should provide default IME for language when available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466852 Summary: [RFE] ibus should provide default IME for language when available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: FutureFeature, i18n Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: ibus AssignedTo: shawn.p.huang(a)gmail.com ReportedBy: petersen(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: shawn.p.huang(a)gmail.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: For users coming from SCIM it is confusing not to have a default IME set for their language. ibus should default to an IME for the current locale if available and it should be possible to configure a system default IME per language. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Japanese user starts using ibus and presses Ctrl+Space Actual results: ibus shows bubble asking user to configure Expected results: ibus-anthy to be activated if installed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 4

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466232] New: Candidate window doesn't make candidates in a loop
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 Feb '09

11 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Candidate window doesn't make candidates in a loop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466232 Summary: Candidate window doesn't make candidates in a loop Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: ibus AssignedTo: shawn.p.huang(a)gmail.com ReportedBy: tagoh(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: shawn.p.huang(a)gmail.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: When the last candidate is selected and move to the next one, ibus doesn't go back to the top of candidate. this is a feature regression from scim and also an usability issue. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): ibus-0.1.1.20081006-3.fc10 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.run gedit with LANG=ja_JP.UTF-8 say 2.press ctrl+space and type something and space. 3.continue to press space key until move the selection to the end of candidate and press space once again. Actual results: no change of the position to be selected the candidate Expected results: should goes back to the top of the candidate. Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 3

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477479] New: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Feb '09

10 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477479 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: VLGothic-fonts AssignedTo: ryo-dairiki(a)users.sourceforge.net ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: tagoh(a)redhat.com, ryo-dairiki(a)users.sourceforge.net, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or several font files: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb' -f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e 's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]$.*$src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq Unfortunately the script does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can close this bug report now. Otherwise, you should know that: - Fedora guidelines demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package or subpackage: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_fonts_… - our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_(2… http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts Please make your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide. If your package is not principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed in the correct fontconfig directories. It is preferred to make a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a font family is given on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family The new templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted and can serve as examples: - andika-fonts - apanov-heuristica-fonts - bitstream-vera-fonts - charis-fonts - dejavu-fonts - ecolier-court-fonts - edrip-fonts - gfs-ambrosia-fonts - gfs-artemisia-fonts - gfs-baskerville-fonts - gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts - gfs-bodoni-fonts - gfs-complutum-fonts - gfs-didot-classic-fonts - gfs-didot-fonts - gfs-eustace-fonts - gfs-fleischman-fonts - gfs-garaldus-fonts - gfs-gazis-fonts - gfs-jackson-fonts - gfs-neohellenic-fonts - gfs-nicefore-fonts - gfs-olga-fonts - gfs-porson-fonts - gfs-solomos-fonts - gfs-theokritos-fonts - stix-fonts - yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 15

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466857] New: [rfe] ibus should have config option to allow turning off the toolbar
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Feb '09

09 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [rfe] ibus should have config option to allow turning off the toolbar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466857 Summary: [rfe] ibus should have config option to allow turning off the toolbar Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: FutureFeature, i18n Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: ibus AssignedTo: shawn.p.huang(a)gmail.com ReportedBy: petersen(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: shawn.p.huang(a)gmail.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: ibus normally shows it's toolbar all the time, but it can be hidden when off. It should also be possible to turn off (hide) the toolbar completely. (SCIM supports such a feature though it is not commonly used.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 4

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466871] New: ibus engine setup should merge "started" and "preload" configuration
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Feb '09

09 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: ibus engine setup should merge "started" and "preload" configuration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466871 Summary: ibus engine setup should merge "started" and "preload" configuration Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: ibus AssignedTo: shawn.p.huang(a)gmail.com ReportedBy: petersen(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: shawn.p.huang(a)gmail.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: ibus-setup has checkboxes for started and preload but I think this is too complicated for most used and they should just be merged into one option for simplicity since that is generally what one wants. Maybe a start/stop toggle button could be added instead of started if it is useful - that would make the UI much clearer anyway: then selecting an engine should probably start it automatically and users could stop it temporarily if necessary by clicking on toggle state button. Steps to Reproduce: 1. go to engines setup to choose engines Actual results: two sets of confusing checkboxes Expected results: single checkbox per engine Additional info: Being able to start/stop engines dynamically from the setup is a nice feature. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 3

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 473615] New: ibus-table : Unowned directories
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Feb '09

08 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: ibus-table : Unowned directories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473615 Summary: ibus-table : Unowned directories Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: ibus-table AssignedTo: phuang(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: bugs.michael(a)gmx.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: phuang(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora One or more directories are not included within this package and/or its sub-packages: => ibus-table-0.1.1.20081014-1.fc10.noarch (rawhide-development-i386) /usr/share/ibus-table /usr/share/ibus-table/engine /usr/share/ibus-table/tables /usr/share/ibus-table/icons => ibus-table-additional-0.1.1.20081014-1.fc10.noarch (rawhide-development-i386) /usr/share/ibus-table /usr/share/ibus-table/tables /usr/share/ibus-table/icons => ibus-table-chinese-0.1.1.20081014-1.fc10.noarch (rawhide-development-i386) /usr/share/ibus-table /usr/share/ibus-table/tables /usr/share/ibus-table/icons /usr/share/ibus-table/data Note: It might be necessary to only add them to the main package. [...] Further information: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#FileAndDirectoryOwnersh… https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/UnownedDirectories -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 2

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477581] New: iok should avoid resizing when changing maps
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Feb '09

08 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: iok should avoid resizing when changing maps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477581 Summary: iok should avoid resizing when changing maps Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: iok AssignedTo: pnemade(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: petersen(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: pnemade(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: When one switching keyboard map iok tends to change size a fair bit. It would be better if it allowed for the character size and avoided resizing itself as far as possible. Steps to Reproduce: 1. run iok and switch map Actual results: window resizes each time map is changed Expected results: window size to stay fixed. Additional info: I know some Lohit fonts for example are larger than others, but at least should try to avoid resizing when switching between English and Indic. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 2

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475063] New: UI issues in iok
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Feb '09

08 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: UI issues in iok https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475063 Summary: UI issues in iok Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: iok AssignedTo: pnemade(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: mclasen(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: pnemade(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Some issues I noticed while I briefly looked at iok: - First a general issue: I believe it would be much more useful if iok would appear less like a normal unfocused application window, and more like some special desktop component. Ie, I would remove the window title and menubar, and maybe place the window at some fixed place, e.g. above the bottom panel (compare matchbox-keyboard). - It seems somewhat pointless to have an "Advanced Options" check menuitem with the sole purpose of hiding and showing another menu. Also, I wonder why you think that "Open" is less advanced than "Save". - The buttons are pretty hard to hit on a big screen,since they don't reserve any extra size beyond the dimensions of the character. (compare gnome-calculator, which does ensure that its buttons have reasonable size) - The entries in the combobox should be translatable language names, like "Assamese", not technobabble like "as-inscript". If you use the iso-codes package for this, you get translations of the language names for free. - The "Open" menuitem doesn't give any guidance as to what kind of file you are expected to open. I'd recommend to make that "Open keymap", add a filter to the filechooser that only shows .mim files, and opening the file chooser in the /usr/share/m17n directory. - "Save keymap" would be better if it opened a file chooser in save mode, and proposed a filename like 'modified-as-inscript.mim'. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 6

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477451] New: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Feb '09

05 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477451 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: samyak-fonts AssignedTo: psatpute(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com, psatpute(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or several font files: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb' -f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e 's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]$.*$src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq Unfortunately the script does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can close this bug report now. Otherwise, you should know that: - Fedora guidelines demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package or subpackage: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_fonts_… - our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_(2… http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts Please make your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide. If your package is not principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed in the correct fontconfig directories. It is preferred to make a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a font family is given on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family The new templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted and can serve as examples: - andika-fonts - apanov-heuristica-fonts - bitstream-vera-fonts - charis-fonts - dejavu-fonts - ecolier-court-fonts - edrip-fonts - gfs-ambrosia-fonts - gfs-artemisia-fonts - gfs-baskerville-fonts - gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts - gfs-bodoni-fonts - gfs-complutum-fonts - gfs-didot-classic-fonts - gfs-didot-fonts - gfs-eustace-fonts - gfs-fleischman-fonts - gfs-garaldus-fonts - gfs-gazis-fonts - gfs-jackson-fonts - gfs-neohellenic-fonts - gfs-nicefore-fonts - gfs-olga-fonts - gfs-porson-fonts - gfs-solomos-fonts - gfs-theokritos-fonts - stix-fonts - yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 9

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477465] New: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
by Red Hat Bugzilla 03 Feb '09

03 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477465 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: thaifonts-scalable AssignedTo: petersen(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or several font files: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb' -f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e 's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]$.*$src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq Unfortunately the script does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can close this bug report now. Otherwise, you should know that: - Fedora guidelines demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package or subpackage: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_fonts_… - our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_(2… http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts Please make your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide. If your package is not principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed in the correct fontconfig directories. It is preferred to make a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a font family is given on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family The new templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted and can serve as examples: - andika-fonts - apanov-heuristica-fonts - bitstream-vera-fonts - charis-fonts - dejavu-fonts - ecolier-court-fonts - edrip-fonts - gfs-ambrosia-fonts - gfs-artemisia-fonts - gfs-baskerville-fonts - gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts - gfs-bodoni-fonts - gfs-complutum-fonts - gfs-didot-classic-fonts - gfs-didot-fonts - gfs-eustace-fonts - gfs-fleischman-fonts - gfs-garaldus-fonts - gfs-gazis-fonts - gfs-jackson-fonts - gfs-neohellenic-fonts - gfs-nicefore-fonts - gfs-olga-fonts - gfs-porson-fonts - gfs-solomos-fonts - gfs-theokritos-fonts - stix-fonts - yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 8

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 473664] New: scim : Unowned directories
by Red Hat Bugzilla 29 Jan '09

29 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: scim : Unowned directories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473664 Summary: scim : Unowned directories Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: scim AssignedTo: phuang(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: bugs.michael(a)gmx.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, phuang(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora One or more directories are not included within this package and/or its sub-packages: => scim-libs-1.4.7-35.fc10.i386 (rawhide-development-i386) /usr/lib/scim-1.0 /usr/lib/scim-1.0/1.4.0 /usr/lib/scim-1.0/1.4.0/IMEngine Note: It may be necessary to include directories in multiple packages. [...] Further information: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#FileAndDirectoryOwnersh… https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/UnownedDirectories -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 3

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477332] New: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
by Red Hat Bugzilla 28 Jan '09

28 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477332 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: baekmuk-ttf-fonts AssignedTo: cchance(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, cchance(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Blocks: 477044 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora After more than a month of consultation, feedback and tweaking new font packaging guidelines have been approved by FESCO. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_(2… http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts Package maintainers must now convert their packages in rawhide to the new templates. The following packages have already been converted in rawhide and can serve as examples if the templates published in the fontpackages-devel package are not clear enough: ❄ andika-fonts ❄ apanov-heuristica-fonts ❄ bitstream-vera-fonts ❄ charis-fonts ❄ dejavu-fonts ❄ ecolier-court-fonts ❄ edrip-fonts ❄ gfs-ambrosia-fonts ❄ gfs-artemisia-fonts ❄ gfs-baskerville-fonts ❄ gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts ❄ gfs-bodoni-fonts ❄ gfs-complutum-fonts ❄ gfs-didot-classic-fonts ❄ gfs-didot-fonts ❄ gfs-eustace-fonts ❄ gfs-fleischman-fonts ❄ gfs-garaldus-fonts ❄ gfs-gazis-fonts ❄ gfs-jackson-fonts ❄ gfs-neohellenic-fonts ❄ gfs-nicefore-fonts ❄ gfs-olga-fonts ❄ gfs-porson-fonts ❄ gfs-solomos-fonts ❄ gfs-theokritos-fonts ❄ stix-fonts ❄ yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts FPC and FESCO were not consulted on splitting or renaming packages, nevertheless the new templates make it fare easier to manage subpackages, so you're strongly encouraged to split your packages along font family lines. A mandatory rule about splitting will probably be submitted for approval before the F11 release. Further information on fonts packaging changes will be published on fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 14

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475127] New: Installation of ibus doesn't include installation of ibus-gtk
by Red Hat Bugzilla 21 Jan '09

21 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Installation of ibus doesn't include installation of ibus-gtk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475127 Summary: Installation of ibus doesn't include installation of ibus-gtk Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: medium Priority: low Component: ibus AssignedTo: phuang(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: cchance(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: yshao(a)redhat.com, eng-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com, phuang(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Because installation of ibus doesn't include installation of ibus-gtk, users who are using Gnome could not have it operates. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): ibus-0.1.1.20081023-1.fc10.i386 How reproducible: Always. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Go to gnome-terminal: alt-f2 > input 'gnome-terminal' 2. Login as root: input 'su -' 3. Yum install ibus: input 'yum install ibus' > input 'y' 4. Try to start ibus with im-chooser: input 'im-chooser' 5. Check results. Actual results: ibus is not usable on Gnome. Expected results: ibus is usable on Gnome. Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 4

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477579] New: iok should default to map of current locale
by Red Hat Bugzilla 15 Jan '09

15 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: iok should default to map of current locale https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477579 Summary: iok should default to map of current locale Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: iok AssignedTo: pnemade(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: petersen(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: pnemade(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: iok currently defaults to "English" irrespective of the locale. It should default to the map of the current locale if it exists. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 1.0.9 Steps to Reproduce: 1. LANG=hi_IN.UTF-8 iok Actual results: starts up in English Expected results: should default to Hindi map. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 1

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477452] New: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
by Red Hat Bugzilla 12 Jan '09

12 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477452 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: sarai-fonts AssignedTo: sundaram(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: sundaram(a)redhat.com, pnemade(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or several font files: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb' -f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e 's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]$.*$src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq Unfortunately the script does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can close this bug report now. Otherwise, you should know that: - Fedora guidelines demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package or subpackage: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_fonts_… - our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_(2… http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts Please make your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide. If your package is not principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed in the correct fontconfig directories. It is preferred to make a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a font family is given on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family The new templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted and can serve as examples: - andika-fonts - apanov-heuristica-fonts - bitstream-vera-fonts - charis-fonts - dejavu-fonts - ecolier-court-fonts - edrip-fonts - gfs-ambrosia-fonts - gfs-artemisia-fonts - gfs-baskerville-fonts - gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts - gfs-bodoni-fonts - gfs-complutum-fonts - gfs-didot-classic-fonts - gfs-didot-fonts - gfs-eustace-fonts - gfs-fleischman-fonts - gfs-garaldus-fonts - gfs-gazis-fonts - gfs-jackson-fonts - gfs-neohellenic-fonts - gfs-nicefore-fonts - gfs-olga-fonts - gfs-porson-fonts - gfs-solomos-fonts - gfs-theokritos-fonts - stix-fonts - yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 4

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477968] New: Please enable translation submitting by Transifex
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Jan '09

09 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please enable translation submitting by Transifex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477968 Summary: Please enable translation submitting by Transifex Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: iok AssignedTo: pnemade(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: piotrdrag(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: pnemade(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Using Transifex for translations of iok would be a good idea. Please see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/L10N/FAQ#How_do_I_add_a_module_to_Transifex.3… -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 3

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 468009] New: [gu-IN] : Sorting order for Gujarati needs small correction!
by Red Hat Bugzilla 02 Jan '09

02 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [gu-IN] : Sorting order for Gujarati needs small correction! https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468009 Summary: [gu-IN] : Sorting order for Gujarati needs small correction! Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: glibc AssignedTo: jakub(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: ankit(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: jakub(a)redhat.com, psatpute(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Character "ળ" (0AB3) needs to be sorted after the character "હ" (0AB9) Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Fedora rawhide! How reproducible: Everytime Steps to Reproduce: 1. Create folders with the name starting from the character (0AB3) and (0AB9) 2. Sort them using simple "sort by name" method 3. Check the order of the folders sorted Actual results: Folder names starting with (0AB3) is sorted before folder names starting with (0AB9) Expected results: Folder names starting with (0AB3) should be sorted after folder names starting with (0AB9) Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 7

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466912] [bn_IN] [bn] [as_IN] iswpunct, iswdigit, iswalpha returns wrong values for Bangla (Bengali) characters
by Red Hat Bugzilla 31 Dec '08

31 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466912 --- Comment #27 from Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> 2008-12-31 01:00:24 EDT --- Thanks for making patch upstream. feel free to reopen if any problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466912] [bn_IN] [bn] [as_IN] iswpunct, iswdigit, iswalpha returns wrong values for Bangla (Bengali) characters
by Red Hat Bugzilla 30 Dec '08

30 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466912 --- Comment #26 from Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> 2008-12-31 00:48:57 EDT --- *** Bug 474127 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 474127] [ta_IN] iswpunct, iswdigit, iswalpha returns wrong values for tamil characters
by Red Hat Bugzilla 30 Dec '08

30 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474127 Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #3 from Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> 2008-12-31 00:48:57 EDT --- Felix Thanks for your input This bug was opened for language specific information and testing, all the work and discussion happened on bug 466912, patch is now upstreamed. closing as a duplicate of 466912 feel free to reopen if any problem *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 466912 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466912] [bn_IN] [bn] [as_IN] iswpunct, iswdigit, iswalpha returns wrong values for Bangla (Bengali) characters
by Red Hat Bugzilla 30 Dec '08

30 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466912 --- Comment #25 from Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> 2008-12-31 00:47:31 EDT --- *** Bug 474124 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 474124] [ml_IN] iswpunct, iswdigit, iswalpha returns wrong values for malayalam characters
by Red Hat Bugzilla 30 Dec '08

30 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474124 Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #2 from Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> 2008-12-31 00:47:31 EDT --- Thanks for you input This bug was opened for language specific information and testing, all the work and discussion happened on bug 466912, patch is now upstreamed. closing as a duplicate of 466912 feel free to reopen if any problem *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 466912 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466912] [bn_IN] [bn] [as_IN] iswpunct, iswdigit, iswalpha returns wrong values for Bangla (Bengali) characters
by Red Hat Bugzilla 30 Dec '08

30 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466912 --- Comment #24 from Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> 2008-12-31 00:45:54 EDT --- *** Bug 474119 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 474119] [pa_IN] iswpunct, iswdigit, iswalpha returns wrong values for gurumukhi characters
by Red Hat Bugzilla 30 Dec '08

30 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474119 Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #2 from Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> 2008-12-31 00:45:54 EDT --- This bug was opened for language specific information and testing, all the work and discussion happened on bug 466912, patch is now upstreamed. closing as a duplicate of 466912 *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 466912 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466912] [bn_IN] [bn] [as_IN] iswpunct, iswdigit, iswalpha returns wrong values for Bangla (Bengali) characters
by Red Hat Bugzilla 30 Dec '08

30 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466912 --- Comment #23 from Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> 2008-12-31 00:44:45 EDT --- *** Bug 474117 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466912] [bn_IN] [bn] [as_IN] iswpunct, iswdigit, iswalpha returns wrong values for Bangla (Bengali) characters
by Red Hat Bugzilla 30 Dec '08

30 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466912 --- Comment #22 from Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> 2008-12-31 00:43:47 EDT --- *** Bug 474107 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466912] [bn_IN] [bn] [as_IN] iswpunct, iswdigit, iswalpha returns wrong values for Bangla (Bengali) characters
by Red Hat Bugzilla 30 Dec '08

30 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466912 --- Comment #21 from Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> 2008-12-31 00:43:02 EDT --- *** Bug 474105 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 474105] [or_IN] iswpunct, iswdigit, iswalpha returns wrong values for oriya characters
by Red Hat Bugzilla 30 Dec '08

30 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474105 Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #4 from Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> 2008-12-31 00:43:02 EDT --- This bug was opened for language specific information and testing, all the work and discussion happened on bug 466912, patch is now upstreamed. closing as a duplicate of 466912 *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 466912 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 474105] [or_IN] iswpunct, iswdigit, iswalpha returns wrong values for oriya characters
by Red Hat Bugzilla 30 Dec '08

30 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474105 Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #3 from Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> 2008-12-31 00:41:56 EDT --- Thanks Manoj for your inputs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466912] [bn_IN] [bn] [as_IN] iswpunct, iswdigit, iswalpha returns wrong values for Bangla (Bengali) characters
by Red Hat Bugzilla 30 Dec '08

30 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466912 --- Comment #20 from Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> 2008-12-31 00:41:10 EDT --- *** Bug 473898 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 473898] [kn_IN] iswpunct, iswdigit, iswalpha returns wrong values for Kannada characters
by Red Hat Bugzilla 30 Dec '08

30 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473898 Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> 2008-12-31 00:41:10 EDT --- This bug was opened for language specific information and testing, all the work and discussion happened on bug 466912, patch is now upstreamed. closing as a duplicate of 466912 *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 466912 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466912] [bn_IN] [bn] [as_IN] iswpunct, iswdigit, iswalpha returns wrong values for Bangla (Bengali) characters
by Red Hat Bugzilla 30 Dec '08

30 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466912 Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |psatpute(a)redhat.com --- Comment #19 from Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> 2008-12-31 00:40:07 EDT --- *** Bug 473888 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 473888] [mr_IN] [hi_IN] iswpunct, iswdigit, iswalpha returns wrong values for Devanagari characters
by Red Hat Bugzilla 30 Dec '08

30 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473888 Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #2 from Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> 2008-12-31 00:40:07 EDT --- This bug was opened for language specific information and testing, all the work and discussion happened on bug 466912, patch is now upstreamed. closing as a duplicate of 466912 *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 466912 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466912] [bn_IN] [bn] [as_IN] iswpunct, iswdigit, iswalpha returns wrong values for Bangla (Bengali) characters
by Red Hat Bugzilla 30 Dec '08

30 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466912 Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |UPSTREAM --- Comment #18 from Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> 2008-12-31 00:34:37 EDT --- (In reply to comment #17) > I've applied the patch to the upstream cvs. It'll be in the next rawhide > build. This means all these similar BZs opened can then be closed, right? Yes :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475818] New: iok menu entry does not follow GNOME HIG
by Red Hat Bugzilla 30 Dec '08

30 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: iok menu entry does not follow GNOME HIG https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475818 Summary: iok menu entry does not follow GNOME HIG Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: iok AssignedTo: pnemade(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: jonrob.one(a)googlemail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: pnemade(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Currently the iok menu entry under the Applications > Accessories menu is simply "iok". Not very useful to anyone who doesn't know what this is already. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Fedora 10 Desktop Live CD Expected results: Should probably be something like "iok Onscreen Keyboard" Additional info: see: http://library.gnome.org/devel/hig-book/stable/desktop-application-menu.htm… -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 4

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466912] [bn_IN] [bn] [as_IN] iswpunct, iswdigit, iswalpha returns wrong values for Bangla (Bengali) characters
by Red Hat Bugzilla 30 Dec '08

30 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466912 --- Comment #17 from Ulrich Drepper <drepper(a)redhat.com> 2008-12-30 11:50:31 EDT --- I've applied the patch to the upstream cvs. It'll be in the next rawhide build. This means all these similar BZs opened can then be closed, right? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466912] [bn_IN] [bn] [as_IN] iswpunct, iswdigit, iswalpha returns wrong values for Bangla (Bengali) characters
by Red Hat Bugzilla 22 Dec '08

22 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466912 Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #327320|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #16 from Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> 2008-12-22 06:55:40 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=327634) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=327634) Patch created against glibc devel branch This patch will modify i18n CTYPE, as i18n CTYPE has Indic matra characters in punct group, it will solve that problem, also it will add outdigit class in all indic locale -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477127] RFE: Disable most language packs by default
by Red Hat Bugzilla 22 Dec '08

22 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477127 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen(a)redhat.com --- Comment #9 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2008-12-22 01:28:17 EDT --- I think and petition again that langpacks be subpackaged and not all installed. There really is no reason why all users are forced to download the full set of langpacks. For F11 I want to make a yum langpacks plugin should take care of getting langpacks installed automatically for a particular language - so then the previous argument against subpackaging that the user's langpack might not get installed would no longer hold. Please do consider this again for F11. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477127] RFE: Disable most language packs by default
by Red Hat Bugzilla 21 Dec '08

21 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477127 Parag <pnemade(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466193] Review Request: alee-fonts - Korean TrueType Fonts
by Red Hat Bugzilla 21 Dec '08

21 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466193 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net> 2008-12-21 16:43:55 EDT --- [This is a simplified version of the message sent to every package maintainer that ships TTF/OTF/Type1 fonts in Fedora.] Our font packaging guidelines have now changed. New font package submissions must now be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package: – http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages – http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template – http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts It is preferred to create a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_… has been submitted for FPC and FESCO approval today. The new templates should make the creation of font packages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted by their packager in fedora-devel and can serve as examples: ❄ abyssinica-fonts ❄ andika-fonts ❄ apanov-heuristica-fonts ❄ bitstream-vera-fonts ❄ charis-fonts ❄ dejavu-fonts ❄ ecolier-court-fonts ❄ edrip-fonts ❄ gfs-ambrosia-fonts ❄ gfs-artemisia-fonts ❄ gfs-baskerville-fonts ❄ gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts ❄ gfs-bodoni-fonts ❄ gfs-complutum-fonts ❄ gfs-didot-classic-fonts ❄ gfs-didot-fonts ❄ gfs-eustace-fonts ❄ gfs-fleischman-fonts ❄ gfs-garaldus-fonts ❄ gfs-gazis-fonts ❄ gfs-jackson-fonts ❄ gfs-neohellenic-fonts ❄ gfs-nicefore-fonts ❄ gfs-olga-fonts ❄ gfs-porson-fonts ❄ gfs-solomos-fonts ❄ gfs-theokritos-fonts ❄ nafees-web-naskh-fonts ❄ stix-fonts ❄ yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts The new spec templates have been designed to be easy to update to from the previous guidelines, and to remove complexity from font packages. To help new package creation the fontpackages-devel package has been made available in Fedora 9 and 10. If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on: fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 462711] Review Request: Mothanna-fonts - Mothanna-fonts from Arabeyes.org
by Red Hat Bugzilla 21 Dec '08

21 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462711 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net> 2008-12-21 16:43:53 EDT --- [This is a simplified version of the message sent to every package maintainer that ships TTF/OTF/Type1 fonts in Fedora.] Our font packaging guidelines have now changed. New font package submissions must now be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package: – http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages – http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template – http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts It is preferred to create a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_… has been submitted for FPC and FESCO approval today. The new templates should make the creation of font packages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted by their packager in fedora-devel and can serve as examples: ❄ abyssinica-fonts ❄ andika-fonts ❄ apanov-heuristica-fonts ❄ bitstream-vera-fonts ❄ charis-fonts ❄ dejavu-fonts ❄ ecolier-court-fonts ❄ edrip-fonts ❄ gfs-ambrosia-fonts ❄ gfs-artemisia-fonts ❄ gfs-baskerville-fonts ❄ gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts ❄ gfs-bodoni-fonts ❄ gfs-complutum-fonts ❄ gfs-didot-classic-fonts ❄ gfs-didot-fonts ❄ gfs-eustace-fonts ❄ gfs-fleischman-fonts ❄ gfs-garaldus-fonts ❄ gfs-gazis-fonts ❄ gfs-jackson-fonts ❄ gfs-neohellenic-fonts ❄ gfs-nicefore-fonts ❄ gfs-olga-fonts ❄ gfs-porson-fonts ❄ gfs-solomos-fonts ❄ gfs-theokritos-fonts ❄ nafees-web-naskh-fonts ❄ stix-fonts ❄ yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts The new spec templates have been designed to be easy to update to from the previous guidelines, and to remove complexity from font packages. To help new package creation the fontpackages-devel package has been made available in Fedora 9 and 10. If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on: fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 461139] Review Request: arabeyes-thabit-fonts
by Red Hat Bugzilla 21 Dec '08

21 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139 --- Comment #34 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net> 2008-12-21 16:43:51 EDT --- [This is a simplified version of the message sent to every package maintainer that ships TTF/OTF/Type1 fonts in Fedora.] Our font packaging guidelines have now changed. New font package submissions must now be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package: – http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages – http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template – http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts It is preferred to create a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_… has been submitted for FPC and FESCO approval today. The new templates should make the creation of font packages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted by their packager in fedora-devel and can serve as examples: ❄ abyssinica-fonts ❄ andika-fonts ❄ apanov-heuristica-fonts ❄ bitstream-vera-fonts ❄ charis-fonts ❄ dejavu-fonts ❄ ecolier-court-fonts ❄ edrip-fonts ❄ gfs-ambrosia-fonts ❄ gfs-artemisia-fonts ❄ gfs-baskerville-fonts ❄ gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts ❄ gfs-bodoni-fonts ❄ gfs-complutum-fonts ❄ gfs-didot-classic-fonts ❄ gfs-didot-fonts ❄ gfs-eustace-fonts ❄ gfs-fleischman-fonts ❄ gfs-garaldus-fonts ❄ gfs-gazis-fonts ❄ gfs-jackson-fonts ❄ gfs-neohellenic-fonts ❄ gfs-nicefore-fonts ❄ gfs-olga-fonts ❄ gfs-porson-fonts ❄ gfs-solomos-fonts ❄ gfs-theokritos-fonts ❄ nafees-web-naskh-fonts ❄ stix-fonts ❄ yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts The new spec templates have been designed to be easy to update to from the previous guidelines, and to remove complexity from font packages. To help new package creation the fontpackages-devel package has been made available in Fedora 9 and 10. If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on: fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 472146] New: ibus-gtk cannot be installed multilib
by Red Hat Bugzilla 21 Dec '08

21 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: ibus-gtk cannot be installed multilib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472146 Summary: ibus-gtk cannot be installed multilib Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: ibus AssignedTo: phuang(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: petersen(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: phuang(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: ibus-gtk requires libibus-gtk.so which is in the main ibus package. ibus.i386 and ibus.x86_64 conflict therefore ibus-gtk.i386 cannot be installed on the x86_64 system and ibus-gtk cannot be used with 32bit applications. How reproducible: every time Steps to Reproduce: 1. Install Fedora on x86_64 2. Try to install ibus-gtk.i386 Actual results: 2. conflict between ibus.i386 and ibus.x86_64 Expected results: 2. libibus-gtk should be packaged in a package which can be installed multilib (e.g. ibus-libs). Additional info: Additional problem is that currently ibus is multilib not ibus-gtk which is wrong. (It seems only ibus-x11 is linked to libibus-gtk.so.0.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 8

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 474989] New: Upgrade Translate Toolkit to latest 1.2.1 release
by Red Hat Bugzilla 21 Dec '08

21 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Upgrade Translate Toolkit to latest 1.2.1 release https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474989 Summary: Upgrade Translate Toolkit to latest 1.2.1 release Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All URL: http://sourceforge.net/project/shownotes.php?release_i d=644820&group_id=91920 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: translate-toolkit AssignedTo: dwayne(a)translate.org.za ReportedBy: dwayne(a)translate.org.za QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: roozbeh(a)gmail.com, dwayne(a)translate.org.za, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: >From the 1.2.1 release notes: Highlights: * A new tool, pretranslate, backported from trunk. Read more here: http://translate.sourceforge.netw/wiki/toolkit/pretranslate * New converter: The first testing releases of odf2xliff and xliff2odf as part of our project to make ODF files translatable with XLIFF files. Make sure you have at least Python 2.4 and an up to date version of lxml. http://translate.sourceforge.netw/wiki/toolkit/odf2xliff Bugfixes: * We now generate correct MO files on 64 bit systems (bug 575) * Properly handle DONT_TRANSLATE comments in Mozilla properties files (bug 619) * Some fixes in the handling of Mozilla DTD files. * An option to optionally not use HTML tidy with po2html * Reliability improvements to statistics that should improve things for Pootle * Some tweaks for certain Indic languages to disable capitalisation checks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 7

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466912] [bn_IN] [bn] [as_IN] iswpunct, iswdigit, iswalpha returns wrong values for Bangla (Bengali) characters
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 Dec '08

19 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466912 --- Comment #15 from Ulrich Drepper <drepper(a)redhat.com> 2008-12-19 11:12:43 EDT --- Oops, it's LC_CTYPE, forget what I wrote. If the changes affect all languages using the values you're changing, then just change the i18n file. There is no reason to assume this file is correct for non-Latin languages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475061] New: bad menu entry
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 Dec '08

19 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: bad menu entry https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475061 Summary: bad menu entry Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: iok AssignedTo: pnemade(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: mclasen(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: pnemade(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora "iok" is not a very helpful menu entry. "Indic Onscreen Keyboard" is much better. A simple way to get there is to pass the --copy-generic-name-to-name option to desktop-file-install. While looking at the desktop file, Icon=iok.png will give you a warning from desktop-file-install. The correct way to specify the icon is to strip the extension: Icon=iok. The comment "Indic onscreen virtual keyboard for Indic Inscript maps." has some flaws: - it ends with a period - it repeats Indic - it repeats the generic name, more or less A better comment might be: "Enter Indic characters with a virtual keyboard" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 2

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475982] New: Perhaps hunspell-ne suffices for np_IN as well as np_NP
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 Dec '08

19 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Perhaps hunspell-ne suffices for np_IN as well as np_NP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475982 Summary: Perhaps hunspell-ne suffices for np_IN as well as np_NP Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: hunspell-ne AssignedTo: pnemade(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: caolanm(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: pnemade(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Created an attachment (id=326610) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=326610) add an alias Description of problem: OpenOffice.org supports some locales not in glibc, one of these is np_IN Assuming that Nepali is spelt the same way in both India and Nepal, then the following patch would enable spellchecking for the Nepali (India) option in OOo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 4

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 476871] GDM uses wrong keyboard layout after switching back
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 Dec '08

19 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476871 --- Comment #8 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2008-12-19 02:05:33 EDT --- This is now reproducible in gdm-2.25.2-2.fc11 too fwiw. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 476871] GDM uses wrong keyboard layout after switching back
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 Dec '08

19 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476871 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|After upgrade fedora 9 -> |GDM uses wrong keyboard |10 via yum GDM uses wrong |layout after switching back |keyboard layout | --- Comment #7 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2008-12-19 01:09:52 EDT --- Here is another example: Steps to Reproduce: 1. boot F10 Live 2. login with default US layout as liveuser 3. set a passwd for liveuser 4. logout 5. input passwd in US layout 6. select Nepal keyboard 7. click on Login 6. input text 7. logout 8. switch to US layout and login again 9. input text 10. logout and login again in US Actual results: 9. input in app is still in Nepali even though US 10. seems no way to bring desktop kbd layout back to US even though gdm itself respects kbd setting for passwd Expected results: 9. should be US ascii input 10. desktop kbd layout to follow gdm setting consistently -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 225764] Merge Review: fonts-ISO8859-2
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 Dec '08

18 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225764 --- Comment #5 from Parag AN(पराग) <panemade(a)gmail.com> 2008-12-19 00:29:05 EDT --- Rahul, Can you apply new spec in rawhide with excluding -f to fc-cache as its not needed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466430] Feature request: Wildcard (*) for key combination on cangjie5.
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 Dec '08

18 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466430 --- Comment #3 from Caius CHANCE <cchance(a)redhat.com> 2008-12-18 18:42:37 EDT --- Two parts might need to be updated: - recognize '*' as special character and avoid its direct input. - sqlite query (or multi queries with regex to filter) for results. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466430] Feature request: Wildcard (*) for key combination on cangjie5.
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 Dec '08

18 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466430 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|phuang(a)redhat.com |cchance(a)redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466912] [bn_IN] [bn] [as_IN] iswpunct, iswdigit, iswalpha returns wrong values for Bangla (Bengali) characters
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 Dec '08

18 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466912 --- Comment #14 from Ulrich Drepper <drepper(a)redhat.com> 2008-12-18 10:03:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > This patch will add modified i18n CTYPE in bn_IN, as i18n CTYPE has Indic matra > characters in punct group, it will solve that problem This is wrong. Don't copy i18n. You'll have to use reorder_after. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466912] [bn_IN] [bn] [as_IN] iswpunct, iswdigit, iswalpha returns wrong values for Bangla (Bengali) characters
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 Dec '08

18 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466912 Runa Bhattacharjee <runab(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |itsjamil(a)gmail.com Summary|[bn_IN] [as_IN] iswpunct, |[bn_IN] [bn] [as_IN] |iswdigit, iswalpha returns |iswpunct, iswdigit, |wrong values for Bangla |iswalpha returns wrong |(Bengali) characters |values for Bangla (Bengali) | |characters --- Comment #13 from Runa Bhattacharjee <runab(a)redhat.com> 2008-12-18 08:11:20 EDT --- Adding Jamil Ahmed, the Fedora bn coordinator to the bug and modified the summary. The bn_BD locale file would also need to be modified in this case. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466912] [bn_IN] [as_IN] iswpunct, iswdigit, iswalpha returns wrong values for Bangla (Bengali) characters
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 Dec '08

18 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466912 --- Comment #12 from Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> 2008-12-18 07:53:06 EDT --- unlike fa_IR , Bengali script doesn't have separate thousands separators and decimal points (uses latin one only) if no issues with this, i will add same 'bn_IN CTYPE' in other indic locale also (with outdigit) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466912] [bn_IN] [as_IN] iswpunct, iswdigit, iswalpha returns wrong values for Bangla (Bengali) characters
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 Dec '08

18 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466912 --- Comment #11 from Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> 2008-12-18 07:47:24 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=327320) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=327320) patch created against glibc devel branch This patch will add modified i18n CTYPE in bn_IN, as i18n CTYPE has Indic matra characters in punct group, it will solve that problem -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 225764] Merge Review: fonts-ISO8859-2
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 Dec '08

18 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225764 --- Comment #4 from Parag AN(पराग) <panemade(a)gmail.com> 2008-12-18 04:27:11 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=327312) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=327312) This is modified spec file for fonts-ISO8859-2.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 225764] Merge Review: fonts-ISO8859-2
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 Dec '08

18 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225764 Parag AN(पराग) <panemade(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #327310|0 |1 is obsolete| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 225764] Merge Review: fonts-ISO8859-2
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 Dec '08

18 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225764 --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(पराग) <panemade(a)gmail.com> 2008-12-18 04:25:42 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=327310) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=327310) This is modified spec file for fonts-ISO8859-2.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 225764] Merge Review: fonts-ISO8859-2
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 Dec '08

18 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225764 Parag AN(पराग) <panemade(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |panemade(a)gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(पराग) <panemade(a)gmail.com> 2008-12-18 04:23:24 EDT --- I am not able to verify upstream source as source URL is not working. Not sure what we can do where upstream is no longer available for older packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 226461] Merge Review: system-config-language
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 Dec '08

18 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226461 Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 226461] Merge Review: system-config-language
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 Dec '08

18 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226461 Parag AN(पराग) <panemade(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade(a)gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |panemade(a)gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #11 from Parag AN(पराग) <panemade(a)gmail.com> 2008-12-18 02:55:44 EDT --- for rawhide build, rpmlint on binary RPM gave system-config-language.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/firstboot/modules/language.py /usr/share/system-config-language/language_gui.py system-config-language.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/system-config-language/language_gui.py 0644 system-config-language.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/system-config-language/yumhelpers.glade system-config-language.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/system-config-language/language_backend.py 0644 system-config-language.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/system-config-language/system-config-language.py 0644 system-config-language.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided locale_config ===> Looks Ok Rest looks as per packaging guidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 465553] Language selection should affect keyboard layout too
by Red Hat Bugzilla 17 Dec '08

17 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465553 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com | |, petersen(a)redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466085] New: ibus-setup isn't GNOME HIG compliance
by Red Hat Bugzilla 17 Dec '08

17 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: ibus-setup isn't GNOME HIG compliance https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466085 Summary: ibus-setup isn't GNOME HIG compliance Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: ibus AssignedTo: shawn.p.huang(a)gmail.com ReportedBy: tagoh(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: shawn.p.huang(a)gmail.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: SSIA. GNOME HIG doesn't recommend the frame for UI say. see GNOME HIG doc for more details. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): ibus-0.1.1.20081006-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 5

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 461905] ibus always sends XIM_FORWARD_EVENT with same_screen = False
by Red Hat Bugzilla 17 Dec '08

17 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461905 Bug Zapper <fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |10 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED CC| |petersen(a)redhat.com Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Bug Zapper <fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com> 2008-11-25 22:02:06 EDT --- This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle. Changing version to '10'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping --- Comment #7 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2008-12-18 00:21:20 EDT --- Looks fine to me now in f10. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 465425] New: ibus-setup window too small to display engines start and preload
by Red Hat Bugzilla 17 Dec '08

17 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: ibus-setup window too small to display engines start and preload https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465425 Summary: ibus-setup window too small to display engines start and preload Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: ibus AssignedTo: shawn.p.huang(a)gmail.com ReportedBy: petersen(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: shawn.p.huang(a)gmail.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: The IBus setup program default window size requires using widget scrollbars to see the whole engines pane selection widget. Steps to Reproduce: 1. run ibus-setup (on Japanese desktop if it matters) 2. select Engines pane Actual results: Window is too narrow to display full width of treeview. Expected results: All of horizontal tree to appear, either by making the window wider by default and/or truncating the length of language name strings if necessary. Additional info: Dhivehi name entry is very wide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 4

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 467048] New: Discarding the key events and same output regardless of the key
by Red Hat Bugzilla 17 Dec '08

17 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Discarding the key events and same output regardless of the key https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467048 Summary: Discarding the key events and same output regardless of the key Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: ibus AssignedTo: shawn.p.huang(a)gmail.com ReportedBy: tagoh(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: shawn.p.huang(a)gmail.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #466657 +++ Description of problem: key input too faster and too much messes up IBus. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): ibus-0.1.1.20081006-3.fc10 Steps to Reproduce: 1.input something too much and too faster 2. 3. Actual results: discarding the key event or return the same key event regardless of what pressing/releasing the key. Expected results: should works expectedly. Additional info: Technically it happens when multiple XIM_FORWARD_EVENT is added to the property when the key event is delivered faster than processing it in IBus. and when it's there more than 4 in the property, it results the same output regardless of what you are pressing/releasing the key. otherwise the key event is discarded. Why it returns the same key event when the property has something more than 4, IMdkit is getting the value from the property wrongly. a quote from man page: int XGetWindowProperty(Display *display, Window w, Atom property, long long_offset, long long_length, Bool delete, Atom reg_type, Atom *actual_type_return, int *actual_format_return, unsigned long *nitems_return, unsigned long *bytes_after_return, unsigned char **prop_return); ... long_length Specifies the length in 32-bit multiples of the data to be retrieved. and XGetWindowProperty won't delete the property value even if "delete" is True, when there are still unread data. To do the right thing, read the data with the proper length to not discard the event. and if there are still the unread data in the property, read next data with "long_offset". --- Additional comment from shawn.p.huang(a)gmail.com on 2008-10-13 23:07:48 EDT --- Could you provide a patch to fix XIM problem? Thanks. --- Additional comment from tagoh(a)redhat.com on 2008-10-14 06:43:58 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=320277) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=320277) test code for discarding the key event issue % gcc scim_discarding.c `pkg-config --cflags --libs gtk+-2.0 gio-2.0` % GTK_IM_MODULE=xim XMODIFIERS=@im=SCIM ./a.out After pressing the button, "ab" should be put on the entry. otherwise SCIM may be discarding the forward event. --- Additional comment from tagoh(a)redhat.com on 2008-10-14 06:47:45 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=320278) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=320278) test code for output the same result regardless of the key % gcc scim_repeat.c `pkg-config --cflags --libs gtk+-2.0 gio-2.0` % GTK_IM_MODULE=xim XMODIFIERS=@im=SCIM ./a.out After pressing the button, "abc" should be put to the entry box. but actual result is "aaaaaa". this testing code is sending KeyPress and KeyRelease events for "a", "b" and "c". and usually GTK+ and other toolkits doesn't take any actions for KeyRelease event. thus, this means SCIM sends back the forward event for "a" with KeyPress 6 times. --- Additional comment from tagoh(a)redhat.com on 2008-10-15 05:05:18 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=320407) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=320407) test code for discarding the key event issue missed one ClientMessage event --- Additional comment from tagoh(a)redhat.com on 2008-10-15 07:18:44 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=320412) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=320412) proposed patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 3

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 465430] New: ibus sends invalid packet with XIM_GET_IC_VALUES_REPLY
by Red Hat Bugzilla 17 Dec '08

17 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: ibus sends invalid packet with XIM_GET_IC_VALUES_REPLY https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465430 Summary: ibus sends invalid packet with XIM_GET_IC_VALUES_REPLY Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: ibus AssignedTo: shawn.p.huang(a)gmail.com ReportedBy: tagoh(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: shawn.p.huang(a)gmail.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Here is the packet dump from libgxim: D[ 1223025108.607584]:[transport/summary] 0x1400009 <- opcode: XIM_GET_IC_VALUES_REPLY(major: 57, minor 0) length: 20 D[ 1223025108.607586]:[transport/dump] 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 A B C D E F 0123456789ABCDEF D[ 1223025108.607587]:[transport/dump] --+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--=---------------- D[ 1223025108.607588]:[transport/dump] 39:00:03:00:05:00:05:00:04:00:00:00:cf:00:00:00 9............... D[ 1223025108.607588]:[transport/dump] 00:00:00:00 .... This means: 1 major-opcode CARD8 0x39 1 minor-opcode CARD8 0 2 length CARD16 3 (* length field specifies the number of 4 bytes elements following the header.) 2 input-method ID CARD16 5 2 input-ctxt ID CARD16 5 2 byte length of ic-attribute n 4 2 unused n LISTofXICATTRIBUTE XICATTRIBUTE is defined as: 2 CARD16 attribute ID 2 n value length n value p unused, p = Pad(n) So: attribute ID CARD16 0xcf value length n 0 There are 2 bad packets here. one is, the value length is 0. on this session, attribute ID 0xcf means filterEvents, which the value type is CARD32. so the value length has to be 4. and another one is, the byte length of ic-attribute is wrong. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): ibus-0.1.1.20081001-1.fc10. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 2

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475008] New: Dead keys are broken in gtk2 apps with gtk2-2.14.5-2.fc10
by Red Hat Bugzilla 17 Dec '08

17 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Dead keys are broken in gtk2 apps with gtk2-2.14.5-2.fc10 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475008 Summary: Dead keys are broken in gtk2 apps with gtk2-2.14.5-2.fc10 Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: gtk2 AssignedTo: mclasen(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: oliva(a)lsd.ic.unicamp.br QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, misek(a)tnet.cz, mclasen(a)redhat.com, xgl-maint(a)redhat.com, oliva(a)lsd.ic.unicamp.br, phuang(a)redhat.com, peter.hutterer(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #467016 +++ Description of problem: gtk2-2.14.5-2.fc10, now in testing, breaks entry of characters with dead key combinations in gnome apps. It works just fine with 2.14.4-3.fc10, as in F-10 GOLD. Instead of the expected characters, you get nothing. It still works on non-gtk2 apps such as GNU Emacs, xterm, and konsole, in the same gnome session. I verified that it's specific to gtk2 by booting up rawhide (where the problem does not occur), sshing into the updated F-10 box, starting gedit there, duplicating the problem, downgrading to the GOLD gtk2, starting gedit again, and then having it all work again. Here's some information snipped from the original bug report: Having cs_CZ locale, I need dead-key working, because some of the letters in the Czech keyboard layout are not on the keyboard directly (e.g., ňóť). Unfortunately when entering these keys in the current Fedora Rawhide I get ˇn´oˇt instead. --- Additional comment from misek(a)tnet.cz on 2008-12-05 01:56:54 EDT --- Too bad I'm hit by the same error, it appeared two days ago. Probably after gnome update????? The system is Fedora 10 with the last updates+updates-testing. I'm adding list what was updated since the last known working state (I'm sure it was working 2008-12-03 at 19:32:10). Dec 03 18:36:42 Updated: libtdb-1.1.1-23.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 18:36:43 Updated: libtalloc-1.2.0-23.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 18:36:47 Updated: 1:qt-4.4.3-6.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 18:37:03 Updated: 1:qt-x11-4.4.3-6.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 18:37:29 Updated: 1:qt-devel-4.4.3-6.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 18:37:29 Updated: 1:qt-mysql-4.4.3-6.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 18:37:29 Updated: 1:xorg-x11-drv-nouveau-0.0.11-1.20081119git65b956f.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 18:37:59 Updated: virt-manager-0.6.0-4.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 18:38:01 Updated: xorg-x11-drv-ati-6.9.0-59.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 18:38:02 Updated: docbook-utils-0.6.14-15.fc10.noarch Dec 03 18:38:04 Installed: spin-kickstarts-0.10.3-1.fc10.noarch Dec 03 18:38:04 Updated: docbook-utils-pdf-0.6.14-15.fc10.noarch Dec 03 18:38:14 Updated: OmegaT-1.7.3_04-2.fc10.noarch Dec 03 18:38:27 Updated: wine-core-1.1.9-2.fc10.i386 Dec 03 18:38:28 Updated: wine-cms-1.1.9-2.fc10.i386 Dec 03 18:38:29 Updated: wine-capi-1.1.9-2.fc10.i386 Dec 03 18:38:29 Updated: wine-ldap-1.1.9-2.fc10.i386 Dec 03 18:38:30 Updated: wine-twain-1.1.9-2.fc10.i386 Dec 03 18:38:31 Updated: wine-nas-1.1.9-2.fc10.i386 Dec 03 18:38:32 Updated: wine-tools-1.1.9-2.fc10.i386 Dec 03 18:38:33 Updated: wine-jack-1.1.9-2.fc10.i386 Dec 03 18:38:34 Updated: wine-esd-1.1.9-2.fc10.i386 Dec 03 18:38:35 Updated: wine-desktop-1.1.9-2.fc10.i386 Dec 03 18:38:35 Updated: wine-1.1.9-2.fc10.i386 Dec 03 18:38:38 Updated: samba-winbind-3.2.5-0.23.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 18:38:43 Updated: samba-common-3.2.5-0.23.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 18:38:45 Updated: revisor-cli-2.1.3-1.fc10.noarch Dec 03 18:38:47 Updated: revisor-gui-2.1.3-1.fc10.noarch Dec 03 18:38:47 Updated: revisor-2.1.3-1.fc10.noarch Dec 03 18:38:49 Updated: libsmbclient-3.2.5-0.23.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 18:38:54 Updated: revisor-comps-2.1.3-1.fc10.noarch Dec 03 18:38:57 Updated: samba-3.2.5-0.23.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:33:10 Updated: gtk2-2.14.5-2.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:33:11 Updated: 2:gimp-libs-2.6.3-2.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:33:41 Updated: libgnome-2.24.1-8.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:33:45 Updated: shared-mime-info-0.51-5.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:33:47 Updated: check-0.9.5-3.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:33:49 Updated: 1:xmms-libs-1.2.11-3.20071117cvs.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:34:30 Updated: 2:gimp-2.6.3-2.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:34:33 Updated: sectool-0.9.2-2.x86_64 Dec 03 23:34:34 Updated: loudmouth-1.4.3-1.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:34:37 Updated: system-config-printer-libs-1.0.12-1.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:34:39 Updated: libdiscid-0.2.2-1.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:34:42 Updated: gtk2-2.14.5-2.fc10.i386 Dec 03 23:35:01 Updated: libgnome-2.24.1-8.fc10.i386 Dec 03 23:35:02 Updated: 2:gimp-help-browser-2.6.3-2.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:35:05 Updated: 1:xmms-1.2.11-3.20071117cvs.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:35:12 Updated: 1:grip-3.2.0-25.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:35:32 Updated: gtk2-devel-2.14.5-2.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:35:44 Updated: freeciv-2.1.7-1.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:35:46 Updated: dcraw-8.89-1.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:35:46 Updated: 2:vim-minimal-7.2.060-1.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:35:48 Updated: openvpn-2.1-0.29.rc15.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:35:55 Updated: 1:nfs-utils-1.1.4-2.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:36:01 Updated: netbeans-ide9-6.1-10.fc10.noarch Dec 03 23:36:05 Updated: yum-3.2.20-4.fc10.noarch Dec 03 23:36:08 Updated: netbeans-java2-6.1-10.fc10.noarch Dec 03 23:36:09 Updated: netbeans-apisupport1-6.1-10.fc10.noarch Dec 03 23:36:10 Updated: kernel-firmware-2.6.27.7-130.fc10.noarch Dec 03 23:36:11 Updated: gnome-doc-utils-stylesheets-0.14.0-2.fc10.noarch Dec 03 23:36:16 Updated: system-config-network-tui-1.5.94-2.fc10.noarch Dec 03 23:36:18 Updated: system-config-network-1.5.94-2.fc10.noarch Dec 03 23:36:20 Updated: gnome-doc-utils-0.14.0-2.fc10.noarch Dec 03 23:36:21 Updated: netbeans-6.1-10.fc10.noarch Dec 03 23:36:24 Updated: system-config-printer-1.0.12-1.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:36:25 Updated: sectool-gui-0.9.2-2.x86_64 Dec 03 23:36:26 Updated: check-devel-0.9.5-3.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:36:27 Updated: libgnome-devel-2.24.1-8.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:36:27 Updated: cdlabelgen-4.1.0-1.fc10.noarch Dec 03 23:36:28 Updated: etherboot-roms-kvm-5.4.4-5.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:36:37 Updated: kernel-headers-2.6.27.7-130.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:36:38 Updated: crontabs-1.10-25.fc10.noarch Dec 03 23:39:15 Installed: kernel-devel-2.6.27.7-130.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:40:07 Installed: kernel-2.6.27.7-130.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:40:07 Updated: kmod-nvidia-177.82-1.fc10.5.x86_64 Dec 03 23:40:08 Installed: kmod-nvidia-2.6.27.7-130.fc10.x86_64-177.82-1.fc10.5.x86_64 Dec 03 23:40:10 Updated: PackageKit-yum-plugin-0.3.11-3.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:40:11 Updated: PackageKit-glib-0.3.11-3.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:40:11 Updated: PackageKit-udev-helper-0.3.11-3.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:40:16 Updated: PackageKit-0.3.11-3.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:40:47 Updated: gnome-packagekit-0.3.11-3.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:40:47 Updated: PackageKit-yum-0.3.11-3.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:41:10 Erased: kmod-nvidia-2.6.27.5-113.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:42:12 Installed: kernel-2.6.27.7-130.fc10.x86_64 --- Additional comment from petersen(a)redhat.com on 2008-12-05 02:28:11 EDT --- Is anyone here using scim? - I don't think this is a scim but happen to be proven otherwise... Peter, do you have any light on this? --- Additional comment from misek(a)tnet.cz on 2008-12-05 02:35:07 EDT --- No, and there are no scim packages installed on my machine. --- Additional comment from oliva(a)lsd.ic.unicamp.br on 2008-12-06 11:21:48 EDT --- Downgrading gtk2 and gtk2-devel to 2.14.4-3.fc10 restored dead keys to me. I'm going to clone this bug for gtk2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 12

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 476871] After upgrade fedora 9 -> 10 via yum GDM uses wrong keyboard layout
by Red Hat Bugzilla 17 Dec '08

17 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476871 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com | |, petersen(a)redhat.com --- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2008-12-17 19:22:17 EDT --- Looks similar to bug 474011. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 474011] Broken keyboard switching in GDM
by Red Hat Bugzilla 17 Dec '08

17 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474011 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com | |, petersen(a)redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466912] [bn_IN] [as_IN] iswpunct, iswdigit, iswalpha returns wrong values for Bangla (Bengali) characters
by Red Hat Bugzilla 17 Dec '08

17 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466912 --- Comment #10 from Ulrich Drepper <drepper(a)redhat.com> 2008-12-17 19:11:50 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > b) outdigit - why is this required and how is it different from > "digit" > > "digit" classifies all digits, while "outdigit" classifies the > values used for outputting. This keyword is needed to determine > the characters used for outputting. Just do it as fa_IR locale does it. It's the correct way: - define the digits usiing outdigits - provide an input mapping using the new map "to_inpunct" - provide additional information like thousands separators and decimal points using the "to_outpunct" map Why that you'll automatically get support for input and output of the additional number format. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 433574] [non-English] ediff chokes on files with no final EOL
by Red Hat Bugzilla 17 Dec '08

17 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433574 --- Comment #5 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2008-12-17 18:44:53 EDT --- Still happens with emacs-22.3 but seems to be fixed upstream in trunk (aka emacs23). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 226506] Merge Review: ttmkfdir
by Red Hat Bugzilla 17 Dec '08

17 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226506 Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466912] [bn_IN] [as_IN] iswpunct, iswdigit, iswalpha returns wrong values for Bangla (Bengali) characters
by Red Hat Bugzilla 17 Dec '08

17 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466912 --- Comment #9 from Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> 2008-12-17 01:32:39 EDT --- % The "digit" class must only contain the BASIC LATIN digits, says ISO C 99 % (sections 7.25.2.1.5 and 5.2.1) because of this we cant add our indic digit in digit class, but we can add indic digits in outdigit category as done in fa_IR http://www2.open-std.org/jtc1/SC22/WG20/docs/n608.txt b) outdigit - why is this required and how is it different from "digit" "digit" classifies all digits, while "outdigit" classifies the values used for outputting. This keyword is needed to determine the characters used for outputting. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466912] [bn_IN] [as_IN] iswpunct, iswdigit, iswalpha returns wrong values for Bangla (Bengali) characters
by Red Hat Bugzilla 16 Dec '08

16 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466912 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen(a)redhat.com Version|8 |rawhide --- Comment #8 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2008-12-16 23:49:59 EDT --- moving to rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 459451] Changes in glyph point settings window could not be applied.
by Red Hat Bugzilla 16 Dec '08

16 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459451 Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Flag|needinfo?(cchance(a)redhat.co | |m) | --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)tummy.com> 2008-12-16 18:18:59 EDT --- This seems already applied upstream, I am gonna go ahead and close this now. If you spot any problems with it, feel free to reopen or file a new bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 433574] [non-English] ediff chokes on files with no final EOL
by Red Hat Bugzilla 16 Dec '08

16 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433574 Jesse Keating <jkeating(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|jkeating(a)redhat.com |dnovotny(a)redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466117] [ro] system-config-language should set correct default entry in /etc/sysconfig/keyboard
by Red Hat Bugzilla 16 Dec '08

16 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466117 Răzvan Sandu <razvan.sandu(a)mobexpert.ro> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(razvan.sandu@mobe | |xpert.ro) | --- Comment #22 from Răzvan Sandu <razvan.sandu(a)mobexpert.ro> 2008-12-16 14:12:26 EDT --- Hello, Chris, Let's be systematic: ;-) 1. For issues in comment #6, they seem to be solved in Fedora 10; they are still present on all my CentOS 5.2 machines, so I've opened bug #472176 on RHEL. IMHO, this should not be treated as a RFE for RHEL 5.2, but as a fix for a bug affecting Romanian language support. Particularily annoying is the absence of *at least one font* with correct Romanian UTF-8 characters in the *default* install of RHEL/CentOS 5.2 - such as the pair terminus-font-console/terminus-font-x11 .rpm packages. These should be automatically installed and used when Romanian language support is requested, at any time. 2. For issues in comment #19: I've hit them during upgrading some of my machines via preupgrade. Since these upgrades ended, I have to prepare a purposely crafted test machine to reproduce this - I'll do that voluntarily. But since the crash occurs in a transitional phase, followed by a forced reboot, please let me know where exactly these events are logged (the screen output is pretty quick and I cannot copy the error message by hand or cut&paste it in a regular text file). Thanks a lot, Răzvan -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466117] [ro] system-config-language should set correct default entry in /etc/sysconfig/keyboard
by Red Hat Bugzilla 16 Dec '08

16 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466117 Chris Lumens <clumens(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(razvan.sandu@mobe | |xpert.ro) --- Comment #21 from Chris Lumens <clumens(a)redhat.com> 2008-12-16 12:06:17 EDT --- Răzvan - can you please attach the error you are seeing in comment #19, point (7)? It's hard to tell what's going on or what needs fixing without that piece of information. I'd also like to note that I took care of the keymap problem from way back in comment #6 as well as verified the /etc/sysconfig/keyboard setting that anaconda writes out. If there are now additional bugs you're running into, I'd really like to close this one out and start with a new bug that describes the new issues. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 225617] Merge Review: bitmap-fonts
by Red Hat Bugzilla 15 Dec '08

15 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225617 Parag AN(पराग) <panemade(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com | |, panemade(a)gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 225766] Merge Review: fonts-KOI8-R
by Red Hat Bugzilla 15 Dec '08

15 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225766 Parag AN(पराग) <panemade(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com | |, panemade(a)gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 225764] Merge Review: fonts-ISO8859-2
by Red Hat Bugzilla 15 Dec '08

15 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225764 Parag AN(पराग) <panemade(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com | |, panemade(a)gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 467016] Dead keys are not rcognized as such
by Red Hat Bugzilla 15 Dec '08

15 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467016 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|VERIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 467016] Dead keys are not rcognized as such
by Red Hat Bugzilla 15 Dec '08

15 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467016 Matej Cepl <mcepl(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |VERIFIED --- Comment #33 from Matej Cepl <mcepl(a)redhat.com> 2008-12-15 09:30:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #31) > Matej, you still see this post F10 GA? No, I don't. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 433574] [non-English] ediff chokes on files with no final EOL
by Red Hat Bugzilla 15 Dec '08

15 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433574 Daniel Novotny <dnovotny(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|dnovotny(a)redhat.com |jkeating(a)redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 226506] Merge Review: ttmkfdir
by Red Hat Bugzilla 15 Dec '08

15 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226506 Parag AN(पराग) <panemade(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Parag AN(पराग) <panemade(a)gmail.com> 2008-12-15 08:14:33 EDT --- Thanks for building package. APPROVED This Merge-Review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 226506] Merge Review: ttmkfdir
by Red Hat Bugzilla 15 Dec '08

15 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226506 --- Comment #8 from Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> 2008-12-15 06:39:57 EDT --- Done built it for rawhide http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=999184 Thanks for completing merge review of ttmkfdir -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 226506] Merge Review: ttmkfdir
by Red Hat Bugzilla 15 Dec '08

15 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226506 --- Comment #7 from Parag AN(पराग) <panemade(a)gmail.com> 2008-12-15 06:16:50 EDT --- package built successfully http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=999153 rpmlint only complained ttmkfdir.src: W: no-url-tag But I see that there is already comment as per http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#We_are_Upstream Can you build this package in rawhide now? Once its built I will approve review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 226506] Merge Review: ttmkfdir
by Red Hat Bugzilla 15 Dec '08

15 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226506 --- Comment #6 from Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> 2008-12-15 06:05:31 EDT --- updated spec file http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/ttmkfdir/ttmkfdir.spec updated srpm http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/ttmkfdir/ttmkfdir-3.0.9-28.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 226506] Merge Review: ttmkfdir
by Red Hat Bugzilla 15 Dec '08

15 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226506 --- Comment #5 from Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> 2008-12-15 05:39:05 EDT --- modified as per comments updated spec file http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/ttmkfdir/ttmkfdir.spec updated srpm http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/ttmkfdir/ttmkfdir-3.0.9-28.fc10.src.rpm rpmlint on srpm gives ttmkfdir.src: W: no-url-tag -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 226506] Merge Review: ttmkfdir
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Dec '08

14 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226506 --- Comment #4 from Parag AN(पराग) <panemade(a)gmail.com> 2008-12-15 00:38:31 EDT --- 1) Buildroot should be from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines#BuildRoot_tag 2) defattr usage should be %defattr(-,root,root, -) 3) according to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines#Why_the_.25makeinstall_ma… use make DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT install 4) Also, in Changelog use %%post instead of %post -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 458428] [Indic] Firefox displays garbage Indic characters on parts of some English webpages
by Red Hat Bugzilla 12 Dec '08

12 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458428 --- Comment #12 from Martin Stransky <stransky(a)redhat.com> 2008-12-12 06:12:28 EDT --- *** Bug 460865 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 460865] [Indic] garbage Indic characters appearing instead of ascii
by Red Hat Bugzilla 12 Dec '08

12 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460865 Bug Zapper <fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |10 Martin Stransky <stransky(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #14 from Bug Zapper <fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com> 2008-11-25 21:56:26 EDT --- This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle. Changing version to '10'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping --- Comment #15 from Martin Stransky <stransky(a)redhat.com> 2008-12-12 06:12:28 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 458428 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 226506] Merge Review: ttmkfdir
by Red Hat Bugzilla 12 Dec '08

12 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226506 Parag AN(पराग) <panemade(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade(a)gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |panemade(a)gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(पराग) <panemade(a)gmail.com> 2008-12-12 03:49:52 EDT --- will review this. Assigning review to me for now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 424701] [ml_IN] words are shown joined (very low space shown on screen)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 Dec '08

11 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=424701 A S Alam <aalam(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|VERIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 424701] [ml_IN] words are shown joined (very low space shown on screen)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 Dec '08

11 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=424701 A S Alam <aalam(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |VERIFIED --- Comment #8 from A S Alam <aalam(a)redhat.com> 2008-12-12 00:40:16 EDT --- fixed with following package: pango-1.20.4-1.fc9 lohit-fonts-malayalam-2.2.1-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 228455] [gu_IN] Dependent Vowel is treated as Independent vowel (0AE2/0AE3)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 Dec '08

11 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=228455 --- Comment #10 from A S Alam <aalam(a)redhat.com> 2008-12-12 00:31:22 EDT --- Bug still exist with following package: pango-1.20.4-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 467016] Dead keys are not rcognized as such
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 Dec '08

11 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467016 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED --- Comment #32 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2008-12-11 19:17:13 EDT --- Given comment 21 and the new gtk2 bug 475008, I reckon this can be closed now, no? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 467016] Dead keys are not rcognized as such
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 Dec '08

11 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467016 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #31 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2008-12-11 19:14:42 EDT --- Matej, you still see this post F10 GA? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 427944] firefox3 ja langpack seems broken
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 Dec '08

11 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427944 Martin Stransky <stransky(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #11 from Martin Stransky <stransky(a)redhat.com> 2008-12-11 07:25:13 EDT --- Works for me with the latest package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 228491] [hi_IN] Dependent Vowel (0952/0953/0954) are Render as Independenet vowel
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 Dec '08

11 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=228491 --- Comment #13 from A S Alam <aalam(a)redhat.com> 2008-12-11 06:14:03 EDT --- it is not fixed yet with following package: pango-1.20.4-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 234280] [pa_IN] Enlarge size for asterik(*)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 Dec '08

11 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234280 A S Alam <aalam(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|VERIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 234280] [pa_IN] Enlarge size for asterik(*)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 Dec '08

11 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234280 A S Alam <aalam(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |VERIFIED --- Comment #12 from A S Alam <aalam(a)redhat.com> 2008-12-11 06:06:06 EDT --- it is fixed with following package: lohit-fonts-punjabi-2.2.1-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 253978] [bn_IN] [pango] - backspace changes independent indic characters
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 Dec '08

11 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253978 A S Alam <aalam(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #5 from A S Alam <aalam(a)redhat.com> 2008-12-11 06:04:04 EDT --- it is not yet fixed pango-1.20.4-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 429526] [ml_IN]: Removal of a glyph from font file
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 Dec '08

11 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429526 A S Alam <aalam(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|VERIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 429526] [ml_IN]: Removal of a glyph from font file
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 Dec '08

11 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429526 A S Alam <aalam(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |VERIFIED --- Comment #8 from A S Alam <aalam(a)redhat.com> 2008-12-11 04:53:05 EDT --- Bug is fixed, verified with following pacakge: lohit-fonts-malayalam-2.2.1-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 431988] [as_IN] Error in Translated file
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 Dec '08

11 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431988 A S Alam <aalam(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NOTABUG |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 431988] [as_IN] Error in Translated file
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 Dec '08

11 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431988 A S Alam <aalam(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|VERIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 431988] [as_IN] Error in Translated file
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 Dec '08

11 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431988 A S Alam <aalam(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |VERIFIED --- Comment #5 from A S Alam <aalam(a)redhat.com> 2008-12-11 04:41:38 EDT --- Issue is fixed in following package: gtk2-2.12.12-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 431989] [as_IN] low Translation stats
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 Dec '08

11 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431989 A S Alam <aalam(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|VERIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 431989] [as_IN] low Translation stats
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 Dec '08

11 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431989 A S Alam <aalam(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |VERIFIED --- Comment #5 from A S Alam <aalam(a)redhat.com> 2008-12-11 02:16:37 EDT --- package has good Translation status (all menu/most dialog) with following pacakge: gedit-2.22.3-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 431990] [mr_IN] File menu Translation need to re-check
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 Dec '08

11 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431990 A S Alam <aalam(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|VERIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 431990] [mr_IN] File menu Translation need to re-check
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 Dec '08

11 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431990 A S Alam <aalam(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |VERIFIED --- Comment #13 from A S Alam <aalam(a)redhat.com> 2008-12-11 02:15:02 EDT --- Bug is fixed in following package: gedit-2.22.3-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 432457] [kn_IN] Translation Error in File
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 Dec '08

11 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432457 A S Alam <aalam(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|VERIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 432457] [kn_IN] Translation Error in File
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 Dec '08

11 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432457 A S Alam <aalam(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |VERIFIED CC| |mclasen(a)redhat.com Component|gtk+ |gtk2 AssignedTo|eng-l10n-bugs(a)redhat.com |mclasen(a)redhat.com --- Comment #7 from A S Alam <aalam(a)redhat.com> 2008-12-11 01:59:42 EDT --- yes, it was gtk2 only bug and it is fixed already. Thanks gtk2-2.21.12-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 432606] [kn_IN] No Translation for Application
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 Dec '08

11 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432606 --- Comment #4 from A S Alam <aalam(a)redhat.com> 2008-12-11 01:54:46 EDT --- Bug Still exist in following package system-config-display-1.0.51-9.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 423191] [ml_IN] combination is INCorrect with 0d30 [consonant+0d4d+0d30]
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 Dec '08

11 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=423191 A S Alam <aalam(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|VERIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 423191] [ml_IN] combination is INCorrect with 0d30 [consonant+0d4d+0d30]
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 Dec '08

11 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=423191 A S Alam <aalam(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |VERIFIED --- Comment #5 from A S Alam <aalam(a)redhat.com> 2008-12-11 01:50:47 EDT --- it is fixed and working fine with following package: pango-1.20.4-1.fc9 lohit-fonts-malayalam-2.2.1-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 431991] [ml_IN] Shortcut keys are not in English
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 Dec '08

11 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431991 --- Comment #9 from A S Alam <aalam(a)redhat.com> 2008-12-11 01:48:48 EDT --- Bug Still present with following package: gedit-2.22.3-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 288901] [ta_IN] - Codepoint 0B83 showing wrong shape in Gtk applications
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 Dec '08

11 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=288901 --- Comment #7 from A S Alam <aalam(a)redhat.com> 2008-12-11 01:34:44 EDT --- Bug Still exist in latest package: pango-1.20.4-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 431992] [ta_IN] Shortcut keys are not in English
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 Dec '08

11 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431992 --- Comment #8 from A S Alam <aalam(a)redhat.com> 2008-12-11 01:04:54 EDT --- Issue still present in following package: gedit-2.22.3-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 432605] [si_LK] No Translation for Applicaton
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Dec '08

10 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432605 --- Comment #4 from A S Alam <aalam(a)redhat.com> 2008-12-11 00:39:08 EDT --- It is not yet fixed with current release package! system-config-display-1.0.51-9.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 432460] [si_LK] Wrong Translation in Branch 2-12
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Dec '08

10 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432460 --- Comment #5 from A S Alam <aalam(a)redhat.com> 2008-12-11 00:38:12 EDT --- It is not yet fixed with current release package! gtk2-2.12.12-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 432458] [si_LK] Translation Error in File (2-12)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Dec '08

10 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432458 --- Comment #5 from A S Alam <aalam(a)redhat.com> 2008-12-11 00:37:17 EDT --- It is not yet fixed with current release package! gtk2-2.12.12-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 432459] [te_IN] Wrong Translation in Branch 2-12
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Dec '08

10 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432459 A S Alam <aalam(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|VERIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 432459] [te_IN] Wrong Translation in Branch 2-12
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Dec '08

10 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432459 A S Alam <aalam(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |VERIFIED --- Comment #10 from A S Alam <aalam(a)redhat.com> 2008-12-11 00:31:25 EDT --- it is fixed and working! gtk2-2.12.12-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466117] [ro] system-config-language should set correct default entry in /etc/sysconfig/keyboard
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Dec '08

10 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466117 Andy Lindeberg <alindebe(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 432887] Make anaconda set locale from the map
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Dec '08

10 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432887 Bug Zapper <fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |10 Andy Lindeberg <alindebe(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW --- Comment #23 from Bug Zapper <fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com> 2008-11-25 21:06:55 EDT --- This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle. Changing version to '10'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 474779] Very confusing Japanese translation
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Dec '08

10 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474779 --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka(a)ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2008-12-10 13:43:41 EDT --- policycoreutils-2.0.60-5.fc11 seems good. I cannot test policycoreutils-2_0_57-14_fc10 for now (I no longer have F-10 machine and policycoreutils-2_0_57-14_fc10 cannot be installed because F-10 uses python 2.5) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 474779] Very confusing Japanese translation
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Dec '08

10 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474779 Daniel Walsh <dwalsh(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Comment #2 from Daniel Walsh <dwalsh(a)redhat.com> 2008-12-10 09:50:36 EDT --- Fixed in policycoreutils-2_0_57-14_fc10 and policycoreutils-2.0.60-5.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 429480] translate-toolkit has broken deps in epel5 testing
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Dec '08

10 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429480 Dwayne Bailey <dwayne(a)translate.org.za> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #7 from Dwayne Bailey <dwayne(a)translate.org.za> 2008-12-10 08:46:57 EDT --- Build has been released which doesn't need python-enchant -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 474779] Very confusing Japanese translation
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Dec '08

09 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474779 Noriko Mizumoto <noriko(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|khashida(a)redhat.com |dwalsh(a)redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 474779] Very confusing Japanese translation
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Dec '08

09 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474779 Noriko Mizumoto <noriko(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-trans-ja(a)redhat.com, | |noriko(a)redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Noriko Mizumoto <noriko(a)redhat.com> 2008-12-09 21:33:45 EDT --- This gives a critical impact on our end-user, since setting 'Disabled' mode actually shows up 'Permissive' and setting 'Enforcing' mode shows 'Disabled' with current release. With the latest commit on 3-Dec, these translation has been corrected. http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/policycoreutils/po/ja.po?root=elvis&r1=… Could you please pick up revision 1.25 ja.po file and rebuild for next update? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 473481] New: ugly greek letter m (U+03BC) in liberation sans regular
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Dec '08

08 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: ugly greek letter m (U+03BC) in liberation sans regular https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473481 Summary: ugly greek letter m (U+03BC) in liberation sans regular Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://bugs.debian.org/506469 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: liberation-fonts AssignedTo: cchance(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: holger(a)layer-acht.org QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: cchance(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora From: "Nikos Asimakis" <nikos.asimakis(a)gmail.com> To: submit(a)bugs.debian.org Subject: ugly greek letter m (U+03BC) in liberation sans regular Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 20:54:11 +0200 Package: ttf-liberation Version: 1.04.92-1 Severity: normal After updating to version 1.04.92-1 the character μ (U+03BC, GREEK SMALL LETTER MU) appears ugly when using Liberation Sans. When using Liberation Sans Bold, Italic and all the variants of Liberation Serif and Mono, μ appears OK. You can see the problem in GNOME Character Map, when using Liberation Sans as GNOME's default application font and in Firefox. I am attaching a small html to demonstrate the problem: <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en"> <head> <meta http-equiv="Content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" /> <title>Liberation Fonts Test</title> </head> <body> Liberation Sans μμμ Liberation Sans Bold μμμ Liberation Sans Italic μμμ Liberation Sans Bold Italic μμμ <hr /> Liberation Serif μμμ Liberation Serif Bold μμμ Liberation Serif Italic μμμ Liberation Serif Bold Italic μμμ <hr /> Liberation Mono μμμ Liberation Mono Bold μμμ Liberation Mono Italic μμμ Liberation Mono Bold Italic μμμ </body> </html> -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-1-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=el_GR.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages ttf-liberation depends on: ii defoma 0.11.10-0.2 Debian Font Manager -- automatic f ttf-liberation recommends no packages. ttf-liberation suggests no packages. -- no debconf information -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 10

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 474526] New: [hne_IN] Chhattisgarhi language locale not available
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Dec '08

08 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [hne_IN] Chhattisgarhi language locale not available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474526 Summary: [hne_IN] Chhattisgarhi language locale not available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: medium Priority: low Component: glibc AssignedTo: psatpute(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: psatpute(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: drepper(a)redhat.com, jakub(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Chhattisgarhi language locale not available Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): glibc-2.9-2 How reproducible: everytime Steps to Reproduce: 1.check /usr/share/i18n/locale/ 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chhattisgarhi_language -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 13

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 474916] New: Locale not set to en_IN even after selecting "English (India)"
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Dec '08

08 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Locale not set to en_IN even after selecting "English (India)" https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474916 Summary: Locale not set to en_IN even after selecting "English (India)" Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: i386 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: high Priority: low Component: system-config-language AssignedTo: psatpute(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: rohandhruva(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: psatpute(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: I installed Fedora 10 using the gnome livecd. While installation I selected the time zone as "Asia/Calcutta", and keyboard layout as US English. The installed system shows the output of locale as en_US.UTF8. Thinking that it must be some quirk, I used system-config-language and set the system language to "English (India)". However, even after rebooting, the output of locale remains en_US.UTF8. s-c-l shows the language set to "English (India)" even after reboot, but "locale" does not concur. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): system-config-language-1.3.2-3.fc10.noarch How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Open s-c-l 2. Set language to "English (India)" Actual results: After reboot, all fields of locale still show en_US Expected results: They should show en_IN Additional info: Here is the output of locale: [rohan@fedora sysconfig]$ locale LANG=en_US.UTF-8 LC_CTYPE="en_US.UTF-8" LC_NUMERIC="en_US.UTF-8" LC_TIME="en_US.UTF-8" LC_COLLATE="en_US.UTF-8" LC_MONETARY="en_US.UTF-8" LC_MESSAGES="en_US.UTF-8" LC_PAPER="en_US.UTF-8" LC_NAME="en_US.UTF-8" LC_ADDRESS="en_US.UTF-8" LC_TELEPHONE="en_US.UTF-8" LC_MEASUREMENT="en_US.UTF-8" LC_IDENTIFICATION="en_US.UTF-8" LC_ALL= and some more useful output: [rohan@fedora ~]$ cat /etc/sysconfig/i18n LANG="en_IN.UTF-8" SYSFONT="latarcyrheb-sun16" [rohan@fedora ~]$ cat /etc/environment [rohan@fedora ~]$ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 3

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 467016] Dead keys are not rcognized as such
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 Dec '08

07 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467016 Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #30 from Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer(a)redhat.com> 2008-12-07 20:07:31 EDT --- I don't know what the issue is, but Comment #17 indicates that it's neither driver nor server (mind you, dead keys are processed in the client anyway). So one of you who sees the bug needs to be able to narrow down what causes the issue. If you experience the bug create a new user and test this user to ensure there's no stale settings that may trigger it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 467016] Dead keys are not rcognized as such
by Red Hat Bugzilla 06 Dec '08

06 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467016 Alexandre Oliva <oliva(a)lsd.ic.unicamp.br> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|DUPLICATE | --- Comment #29 from Alexandre Oliva <oliva(a)lsd.ic.unicamp.br> 2008-12-06 16:35:47 EDT --- It doesn't make sense to assume that a bug filed two months ago is in any way related with the new bug that appeared 72 hours ago, that happens to display similar symptoms under completely different circumstances. That's why I created a separate bug, rather than reassign or close this one. I know very little about the original bug reported here; all I know is that it can't be the same bug as the one I and Vaclav ran into. So I'm reopening this, unless you, as the original reporter of this bug, can verify that it somehow is the same bug, or that it is fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466608] Update translate-toolkit to the latest release 1.2
by Red Hat Bugzilla 06 Dec '08

06 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466608 Bug Zapper <fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |10 Dwayne Bailey <dwayne(a)translate.org.za> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords|Reopened | Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #12 from Bug Zapper <fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com> 2008-11-25 22:46:57 EDT --- This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle. Changing version to '10'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping --- Comment #13 from Dwayne Bailey <dwayne(a)translate.org.za> 2008-12-06 15:56:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > Error: Missing Dependency: python-Levenshtein is needed by package > translate-toolkit-1.2.0-3.fc10.noarch (updates) python-Levenshtein has been pushed to f10 so this dependency is now solved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 467016] Dead keys are not rcognized as such
by Red Hat Bugzilla 06 Dec '08

06 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467016 Matej Cepl <mcepl(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE Flag|needinfo?(peter.hutterer@re | |dhat.com) | --- Comment #28 from Matej Cepl <mcepl(a)redhat.com> 2008-12-06 12:01:30 EDT --- This doesn't make sense to clone this bug -- if you blame Gtk, then let's go there, but don't make us unnecessary bugs. Closing this as duplicate of bug 475008. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 475008 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 467016] Dead keys are not rcognized as such
by Red Hat Bugzilla 06 Dec '08

06 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467016 Alexandre Oliva <oliva(a)lsd.ic.unicamp.br> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |oliva(a)lsd.ic.unicamp.br --- Comment #27 from Alexandre Oliva <oliva(a)lsd.ic.unicamp.br> 2008-12-06 11:21:48 EDT --- Downgrading gtk2 and gtk2-devel to 2.14.4-3.fc10 restored dead keys to me. I'm going to clone this bug for gtk2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 474779] Very confusing Japanese translation
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Dec '08

05 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474779 Daniel Walsh <dwalsh(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|dwalsh(a)redhat.com |khashida(a)redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 474779] Very confusing Japanese translation
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Dec '08

05 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474779 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka(a)ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 467016] Dead keys are not rcognized as such
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Dec '08

05 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467016 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|phuang(a)redhat.com |peter.hutterer(a)redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 467016] Dead keys are not rcognized as such
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Dec '08

05 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467016 --- Comment #26 from Vaclav "sHINOBI" Misek <misek(a)tnet.cz> 2008-12-05 02:35:07 EDT --- No, and there are no scim packages installed on my machine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 467016] Dead keys are not rcognized as such
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Dec '08

05 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467016 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |10 Flag| |needinfo?(peter.hutterer@re | |dhat.com) --- Comment #25 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2008-12-05 02:28:11 EDT --- Is anyone here using scim? - I don't think this is a scim but happen to be proven otherwise... Peter, do you have any light on this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 467016] Dead keys are not rcognized as such
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Dec '08

05 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467016 Vaclav "sHINOBI" Misek <misek(a)tnet.cz> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED CC| |misek(a)tnet.cz Resolution|INSUFFICIENT_DATA | --- Comment #24 from Vaclav "sHINOBI" Misek <misek(a)tnet.cz> 2008-12-05 01:56:54 EDT --- Too bad I'm hit by the same error, it appeared two days ago. Probably after gnome update????? The system is Fedora 10 with the last updates+updates-testing. I'm adding list what was updated since the last known working state (I'm sure it was working 2008-12-03 at 19:32:10). Dec 03 18:36:42 Updated: libtdb-1.1.1-23.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 18:36:43 Updated: libtalloc-1.2.0-23.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 18:36:47 Updated: 1:qt-4.4.3-6.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 18:37:03 Updated: 1:qt-x11-4.4.3-6.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 18:37:29 Updated: 1:qt-devel-4.4.3-6.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 18:37:29 Updated: 1:qt-mysql-4.4.3-6.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 18:37:29 Updated: 1:xorg-x11-drv-nouveau-0.0.11-1.20081119git65b956f.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 18:37:59 Updated: virt-manager-0.6.0-4.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 18:38:01 Updated: xorg-x11-drv-ati-6.9.0-59.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 18:38:02 Updated: docbook-utils-0.6.14-15.fc10.noarch Dec 03 18:38:04 Installed: spin-kickstarts-0.10.3-1.fc10.noarch Dec 03 18:38:04 Updated: docbook-utils-pdf-0.6.14-15.fc10.noarch Dec 03 18:38:14 Updated: OmegaT-1.7.3_04-2.fc10.noarch Dec 03 18:38:27 Updated: wine-core-1.1.9-2.fc10.i386 Dec 03 18:38:28 Updated: wine-cms-1.1.9-2.fc10.i386 Dec 03 18:38:29 Updated: wine-capi-1.1.9-2.fc10.i386 Dec 03 18:38:29 Updated: wine-ldap-1.1.9-2.fc10.i386 Dec 03 18:38:30 Updated: wine-twain-1.1.9-2.fc10.i386 Dec 03 18:38:31 Updated: wine-nas-1.1.9-2.fc10.i386 Dec 03 18:38:32 Updated: wine-tools-1.1.9-2.fc10.i386 Dec 03 18:38:33 Updated: wine-jack-1.1.9-2.fc10.i386 Dec 03 18:38:34 Updated: wine-esd-1.1.9-2.fc10.i386 Dec 03 18:38:35 Updated: wine-desktop-1.1.9-2.fc10.i386 Dec 03 18:38:35 Updated: wine-1.1.9-2.fc10.i386 Dec 03 18:38:38 Updated: samba-winbind-3.2.5-0.23.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 18:38:43 Updated: samba-common-3.2.5-0.23.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 18:38:45 Updated: revisor-cli-2.1.3-1.fc10.noarch Dec 03 18:38:47 Updated: revisor-gui-2.1.3-1.fc10.noarch Dec 03 18:38:47 Updated: revisor-2.1.3-1.fc10.noarch Dec 03 18:38:49 Updated: libsmbclient-3.2.5-0.23.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 18:38:54 Updated: revisor-comps-2.1.3-1.fc10.noarch Dec 03 18:38:57 Updated: samba-3.2.5-0.23.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:33:10 Updated: gtk2-2.14.5-2.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:33:11 Updated: 2:gimp-libs-2.6.3-2.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:33:41 Updated: libgnome-2.24.1-8.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:33:45 Updated: shared-mime-info-0.51-5.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:33:47 Updated: check-0.9.5-3.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:33:49 Updated: 1:xmms-libs-1.2.11-3.20071117cvs.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:34:30 Updated: 2:gimp-2.6.3-2.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:34:33 Updated: sectool-0.9.2-2.x86_64 Dec 03 23:34:34 Updated: loudmouth-1.4.3-1.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:34:37 Updated: system-config-printer-libs-1.0.12-1.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:34:39 Updated: libdiscid-0.2.2-1.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:34:42 Updated: gtk2-2.14.5-2.fc10.i386 Dec 03 23:35:01 Updated: libgnome-2.24.1-8.fc10.i386 Dec 03 23:35:02 Updated: 2:gimp-help-browser-2.6.3-2.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:35:05 Updated: 1:xmms-1.2.11-3.20071117cvs.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:35:12 Updated: 1:grip-3.2.0-25.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:35:32 Updated: gtk2-devel-2.14.5-2.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:35:44 Updated: freeciv-2.1.7-1.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:35:46 Updated: dcraw-8.89-1.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:35:46 Updated: 2:vim-minimal-7.2.060-1.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:35:48 Updated: openvpn-2.1-0.29.rc15.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:35:55 Updated: 1:nfs-utils-1.1.4-2.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:36:01 Updated: netbeans-ide9-6.1-10.fc10.noarch Dec 03 23:36:05 Updated: yum-3.2.20-4.fc10.noarch Dec 03 23:36:08 Updated: netbeans-java2-6.1-10.fc10.noarch Dec 03 23:36:09 Updated: netbeans-apisupport1-6.1-10.fc10.noarch Dec 03 23:36:10 Updated: kernel-firmware-2.6.27.7-130.fc10.noarch Dec 03 23:36:11 Updated: gnome-doc-utils-stylesheets-0.14.0-2.fc10.noarch Dec 03 23:36:16 Updated: system-config-network-tui-1.5.94-2.fc10.noarch Dec 03 23:36:18 Updated: system-config-network-1.5.94-2.fc10.noarch Dec 03 23:36:20 Updated: gnome-doc-utils-0.14.0-2.fc10.noarch Dec 03 23:36:21 Updated: netbeans-6.1-10.fc10.noarch Dec 03 23:36:24 Updated: system-config-printer-1.0.12-1.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:36:25 Updated: sectool-gui-0.9.2-2.x86_64 Dec 03 23:36:26 Updated: check-devel-0.9.5-3.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:36:27 Updated: libgnome-devel-2.24.1-8.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:36:27 Updated: cdlabelgen-4.1.0-1.fc10.noarch Dec 03 23:36:28 Updated: etherboot-roms-kvm-5.4.4-5.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:36:37 Updated: kernel-headers-2.6.27.7-130.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:36:38 Updated: crontabs-1.10-25.fc10.noarch Dec 03 23:39:15 Installed: kernel-devel-2.6.27.7-130.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:40:07 Installed: kernel-2.6.27.7-130.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:40:07 Updated: kmod-nvidia-177.82-1.fc10.5.x86_64 Dec 03 23:40:08 Installed: kmod-nvidia-2.6.27.7-130.fc10.x86_64-177.82-1.fc10.5.x86_64 Dec 03 23:40:10 Updated: PackageKit-yum-plugin-0.3.11-3.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:40:11 Updated: PackageKit-glib-0.3.11-3.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:40:11 Updated: PackageKit-udev-helper-0.3.11-3.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:40:16 Updated: PackageKit-0.3.11-3.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:40:47 Updated: gnome-packagekit-0.3.11-3.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:40:47 Updated: PackageKit-yum-0.3.11-3.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:41:10 Erased: kmod-nvidia-2.6.27.5-113.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:42:12 Installed: kernel-2.6.27.7-130.fc10.x86_64 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 448411] XFCE should require imsettings-xfce
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Dec '08

05 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448411 --- Comment #40 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2008-12-05 01:28:57 EDT --- I think the langpack extension to yum that I am envisaging for F11 might be able to help with these input method package issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 448411] XFCE should require imsettings-xfce
by Red Hat Bugzilla 04 Dec '08

04 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448411 --- Comment #39 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)tummy.com> 2008-12-04 23:58:55 EDT --- Sorry for the delay here. This bug slipped off my radar. ;( >that should works originally by the condition in comps. my understanding is, >xfce needs to have a dependency of imsettings-xfce because yum doesn't pull in >imsettings-xfce on upgrading now. ok, so for new installs this works ok now, but for old installs where the user has upgraded it does not, as it doesn't pull in imsettings-xfce, as there is no dependency in place there. I guess that makes sense... >Actually in the above test case, imsettings-xfce was pulled in by yum >groupinstall japanese-support and the packages in japanese-support group is >available in the media. but not imsettings-xfce as well as xfce packages isn't >available. If xfce doesn't have a dependency of imsettings-xfce, one needs to >do yum groupinstall japanese-support anyway, which should be finished in the >usual upgrading already. that doesn't make sense. ok. I see what you are saying. I guess I will look at adding that dependency, but I am not entirely sure what Xfce package it should be on. ;( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 473839] layout switcher doesn't work
by Red Hat Bugzilla 04 Dec '08

04 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473839 A S Alam <aalam(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |aalam(a)redhat.com, | |fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 473837] couldn't switch layout
by Red Hat Bugzilla 04 Dec '08

04 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473837 A S Alam <aalam(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 474124] [ml_IN] iswpunct, iswdigit, iswalpha returns wrong values for malayalam characters
by Red Hat Bugzilla 04 Dec '08

04 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474124 A S Alam <aalam(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |aalam(a)redhat.com, | |fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 474127] [ta_IN] iswpunct, iswdigit, iswalpha returns wrong values for tamil characters
by Red Hat Bugzilla 04 Dec '08

04 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474127 A S Alam <aalam(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |aalam(a)redhat.com, | |fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

i18n-bugs December 2008