i18n-bugs December 2008

i18n-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org

1 participants
220 discussions

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477405] New: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
by Red Hat Bugzilla 13 Jul '09

13 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477405 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: kacst-fonts AssignedTo: rbhalera(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, rbhalera(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or several font files: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb' -f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e 's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]$.*$src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq Unfortunately the script does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can close this bug report now. Otherwise, you should know that: - Fedora guidelines demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package or subpackage: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_fonts_… - our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_(2… http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts Please make your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide. If your package is not principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed in the correct fontconfig directories. It is preferred to make a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a font family is given on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family The new templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted and can serve as examples: - andika-fonts - apanov-heuristica-fonts - bitstream-vera-fonts - charis-fonts - dejavu-fonts - ecolier-court-fonts - edrip-fonts - gfs-ambrosia-fonts - gfs-artemisia-fonts - gfs-baskerville-fonts - gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts - gfs-bodoni-fonts - gfs-complutum-fonts - gfs-didot-classic-fonts - gfs-didot-fonts - gfs-eustace-fonts - gfs-fleischman-fonts - gfs-garaldus-fonts - gfs-gazis-fonts - gfs-jackson-fonts - gfs-neohellenic-fonts - gfs-nicefore-fonts - gfs-olga-fonts - gfs-porson-fonts - gfs-solomos-fonts - gfs-theokritos-fonts - stix-fonts - yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 11

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477437] New: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
by Red Hat Bugzilla 13 Jul '09

13 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477437 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: paktype-fonts AssignedTo: rbhalera(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, rbhalera(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or several font files: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb' -f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e 's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]$.*$src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq Unfortunately the script does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can close this bug report now. Otherwise, you should know that: - Fedora guidelines demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package or subpackage: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_fonts_… - our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_(2… http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts Please make your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide. If your package is not principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed in the correct fontconfig directories. It is preferred to make a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a font family is given on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family The new templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted and can serve as examples: - andika-fonts - apanov-heuristica-fonts - bitstream-vera-fonts - charis-fonts - dejavu-fonts - ecolier-court-fonts - edrip-fonts - gfs-ambrosia-fonts - gfs-artemisia-fonts - gfs-baskerville-fonts - gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts - gfs-bodoni-fonts - gfs-complutum-fonts - gfs-didot-classic-fonts - gfs-didot-fonts - gfs-eustace-fonts - gfs-fleischman-fonts - gfs-garaldus-fonts - gfs-gazis-fonts - gfs-jackson-fonts - gfs-neohellenic-fonts - gfs-nicefore-fonts - gfs-olga-fonts - gfs-porson-fonts - gfs-solomos-fonts - gfs-theokritos-fonts - stix-fonts - yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 10

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477453] New: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 Jul '09

07 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477453 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: sazanami-fonts AssignedTo: tagoh(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: tagoh(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or several font files: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb' -f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e 's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]$.*$src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq Unfortunately the script does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can close this bug report now. Otherwise, you should know that: - Fedora guidelines demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package or subpackage: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_fonts_… - our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_(2… http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts Please make your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide. If your package is not principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed in the correct fontconfig directories. It is preferred to make a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a font family is given on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family The new templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted and can serve as examples: - andika-fonts - apanov-heuristica-fonts - bitstream-vera-fonts - charis-fonts - dejavu-fonts - ecolier-court-fonts - edrip-fonts - gfs-ambrosia-fonts - gfs-artemisia-fonts - gfs-baskerville-fonts - gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts - gfs-bodoni-fonts - gfs-complutum-fonts - gfs-didot-classic-fonts - gfs-didot-fonts - gfs-eustace-fonts - gfs-fleischman-fonts - gfs-garaldus-fonts - gfs-gazis-fonts - gfs-jackson-fonts - gfs-neohellenic-fonts - gfs-nicefore-fonts - gfs-olga-fonts - gfs-porson-fonts - gfs-solomos-fonts - gfs-theokritos-fonts - stix-fonts - yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 8

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 474734] New: Blurriness of Latin letter R (U+0052) in Liberation Regular
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Jul '09

05 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Blurriness of Latin letter R (U+0052) in Liberation Regular https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474734 Summary: Blurriness of Latin letter R (U+0052) in Liberation Regular Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: liberation-fonts AssignedTo: cchance(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: watchingman(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: cchance(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Created an attachment (id=325767) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=325767) test case Package: ttf-liberation Version: HEAD (1.0.04.93) Severity: normal the character R (U+0052, Latin Capital LETTER R) appears ugly when using Liberation Sans in small pixelsize. fork the test case from Holger Levsen in Bug 473481, you can see this bug also exists in Liberation Sans Italic, Liberation Serif, Liberation Serif Italic. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 17

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475938] New: [ALL LANG] Application is not running any languages/locale
by Red Hat Bugzilla 23 Jun '09

23 Jun '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [ALL LANG] Application is not running any languages/locale https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475938 Summary: [ALL LANG] Application is not running any languages/locale Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: medium Priority: low Component: file-roller AssignedTo: caillon(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: aalam(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: caillon(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: While using file-roller in Punjabi (pa_IN.UTF-8), it was not showing translation, while package has Translated file Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): file-roller-2.24.2-1.fc10.i386 How reproducible: Everytime Steps to Reproduce: 1. open termianl 2. export LANG=ja_JP.UTF-8 3.file-roller Actual results: No Translated message in application Expected results: Should have, when rpm has Translated MO files Additional info: Tested lang: kn_IN, ja_JP, zh_TW, --- rpm -ql file-roller --- /usr/share/locale/af/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/am/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/ar/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/as/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/az/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/be/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/be(a)latin/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/bg/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/bn/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/bn_IN/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/br/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/bs/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/ca/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/cs/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/cy/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/da/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/de/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/dz/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/el/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/en_CA/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/en_GB/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/es/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/et/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/eu/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/fa/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/fi/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/fr/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/fur/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/ga/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/gl/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/gu/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/he/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/hi/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/hr/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/hu/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/hy/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/id/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/is/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/it/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/ja/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/ka/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/kn/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/ko/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/ku/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/lt/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/lv/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/mg/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/mk/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/ml/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/mn/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/mr/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/ms/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/nb/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/ne/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/nl/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/nn/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/oc/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/or/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/pa/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/pl/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/ps/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/pt/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/pt_BR/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/ro/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/ru/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/rw/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/si/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/sk/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/sl/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/sq/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/sr/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/sr(a)ije/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/sr(a)latin/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/sv/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/ta/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/te/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/th/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/tk/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/tr/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/uk/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/ur/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/ur_PK/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/vi/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/xh/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/zh_CN/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/zh_HK/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/zh_TW/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo ----- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 4

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 467982] New: anaconda doesn't render glyphs with the proper font
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 Jun '09

18 Jun '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: anaconda doesn't render glyphs with the proper font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467982 Summary: anaconda doesn't render glyphs with the proper font Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: i386 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: Regression Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: anaconda AssignedTo: anaconda-maint-list(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: tagoh(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: anaconda-maint-list(a)redhat.com, dcantrell(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Created an attachment (id=321105) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=321105) Screenshot Description of problem: When I select Japanese on the language selection with today's rawhide tree, it looks like anaconda is rendering some glyphs with Chinese font. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): anaconda-11.4.1.50 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.Select Japanese on the language selection 2.See a notice for beta after pressing Next button twice. 3. Actual results: some glyphs looks like from Chinese font. Expected results: should be from Japanese font. Additional info: This is a regression. it worked before. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 22

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 462041] New: Hotkeys has no response and "Go To" window couldn't be inputted.
by Red Hat Bugzilla 06 Jun '09

06 Jun '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Hotkeys has no response and "Go To" window couldn't be inputted. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462041 Summary: Hotkeys has no response and "Go To" window couldn't be inputted. Product: Fedora Version: 9 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: fontforge AssignedTo: kevin(a)tummy.com ReportedBy: cchance(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, roozbeh(a)gmail.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Depends on: 462038 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #462038 +++ Description of problem: #1: Hotkeys are not responded. #2: "Go To" window couldn't be inputted. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): fontforge-20080828-1.fc10.i386 How reproducible: Always. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Start fontforge from gnome-terminal. 2. Try hotkeys like Alt-F. 3. Observe symptom #1. 4. Select View > Goto from menu. 5. Try to input something in the input field. 6. Observe symptom #2. Actual results: #1. No response. #2. Couldn't be inputted. Expected results: #1. File sub-menu pops up. #2. Data is inputted in field. Additional info: HEAD of F9 has same issue as well. --- Additional comment from cchance(a)redhat.com on 2008-09-12 02:26:49 EDT --- `LANG=C fontforge [FILE]` resolves as workaround. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 5

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 462038] New: Hotkeys has no response and "Go To" window couldn't be inputted.
by Red Hat Bugzilla 06 Jun '09

06 Jun '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Hotkeys has no response and "Go To" window couldn't be inputted. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462038 Summary: Hotkeys has no response and "Go To" window couldn't be inputted. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: fontforge AssignedTo: kevin(a)tummy.com ReportedBy: cchance(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: roozbeh(a)gmail.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: #1: Hotkeys are not responded. #2: "Go To" window couldn't be inputted. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): fontforge-20080828-1.fc10.i386 How reproducible: Always. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Start fontforge from gnome-terminal. 2. Try hotkeys like Alt-F. 3. Observe symptom #1. 4. Select View > Goto from menu. 5. Try to input something in the input field. 6. Observe symptom #2. Actual results: #1. No response. #2. Couldn't be inputted. Expected results: #1. File sub-menu pops up. #2. Data is inputted in field. Additional info: HEAD of F9 has same issue as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 21

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 473946] New: xgettext misinterprets \x escapes in Python Unicode strings
by Red Hat Bugzilla 29 May '09

29 May '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: xgettext misinterprets \x escapes in Python Unicode strings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473946 Summary: xgettext misinterprets \x escapes in Python Unicode strings Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: gettext AssignedTo: petersen(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: mcepl(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: When trying to update po files in gajim, I got this error: [matej@viklef po]$ make update-po make gajim.pot make[1]: Entering directory `/home/matej/redhat/BUILD/gajim/po' INTLTOOL_EXTRACT=/usr/bin/intltool-extract srcdir=. /usr/bin/intltool-update --gettext-package gajim --pot ./../src/common/config.py:180: warning: 'msgid' format string with unnamed arguments cannot be properly localized: The translator cannot reorder the arguments. Please consider using a format string with named arguments, and a mapping instead of a tuple for the arguments. ERROR: xgettext failed to generate PO template file. Please consult error message above if there is any. make[1]: *** [gajim.pot] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/matej/redhat/BUILD/gajim/po' make: *** [update-po] Error 2 [matej@viklef po]$ When I filed my ticket (which was closed as duplicate of http://trac.gajim.org/ticket/4166) I was told that it is actually bug in xgettext which has been already fixed in Debian (bugs.debian.org/433743 and bugs.debian.org/493218) I have no idea, whether they sent patches upstream. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): gettext-0.17-8.fc10.i386 How reproducible: 100% -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 12

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 473209] New: Please add Maithili and Nepali languages to language selection menu in anaconda
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 Apr '09

07 Apr '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please add Maithili and Nepali languages to language selection menu in anaconda https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473209 Summary: Please add Maithili and Nepali languages to language selection menu in anaconda Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: anaconda AssignedTo: anaconda-maint-list(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: pnemade(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, anaconda-maint-list(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Maithili and Nepali languages are not available in the anaconda menu at install time. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): anaconda-11.4.1.62-1.i386.rpm How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Start Fedora installation 2. Proceed to the step that asks you to choose the language to use in the install process Actual results: Maithili and Nepali languages are not in the list Expected results: Maithili and Nepali languages should be in the list Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 27

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

i18n-bugs December 2008