i18n-bugs December 2008

i18n-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org

1 participants
220 discussions

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 473616] New: gcin : Unowned directories
by Red Hat Bugzilla 31 Mar '09

31 Mar '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: gcin : Unowned directories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473616 Summary: gcin : Unowned directories Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: gcin AssignedTo: candyz0416(a)gmail.com ReportedBy: bugs.michael(a)gmx.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, candyz0416(a)gmail.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora One or more directories are not included within this package and/or its sub-packages: => gcin-1.4.2-4.fc10.i386 (rawhide-development-i386) /usr/lib/menu [...] Further information: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#FileAndDirectoryOwnersh… https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/UnownedDirectories -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 1

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475743] New: Many chinese glyphs on Japanese environment
by Red Hat Bugzilla 16 Mar '09

16 Mar '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Many chinese glyphs on Japanese environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 Summary: Many chinese glyphs on Japanese environment Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: VLGothic-fonts AssignedTo: ryo-dairiki(a)users.sourceforge.net ReportedBy: mtasaka(a)ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: tagoh(a)redhat.com, ryo-dairiki(a)users.sourceforge.net, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Since VLGothic-fonts is upgraded to 20081203, I see many chinese glyphs on Japanese environment. Downloading to 20081029 works good. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): VLGothic-fonts-20081203-2.fc11 (perhaps?) cjkunifonts-ukai-0.2.20080216.1-10.fc11.noarch.rpm cjkunifonts-uming-0.2.20080216.1-10.fc11.noarch.rpm How reproducible: 100% Steps to Reproduce: 1. For example, the following URL: http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/policycoreutils/po/ja.po?root=elvis&r1=… Actual results: See attached -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 54

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477403] New: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
by Red Hat Bugzilla 15 Mar '09

15 Mar '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477403 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: jomolhari-fonts AssignedTo: mgarski(a)post.pl ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: mgarski(a)post.pl, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or several font files: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb' -f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e 's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]\(.*\)src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq Unfortunately the script does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can close this bug report now. Otherwise, you should know that: - Fedora guidelines demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package or subpackage: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_fonts_… - our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_(2… http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts Please make your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide. If your package is not principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed in the correct fontconfig directories. It is preferred to make a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a font family is given on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family The new templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted and can serve as examples: - andika-fonts - apanov-heuristica-fonts - bitstream-vera-fonts - charis-fonts - dejavu-fonts - ecolier-court-fonts - edrip-fonts - gfs-ambrosia-fonts - gfs-artemisia-fonts - gfs-baskerville-fonts - gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts - gfs-bodoni-fonts - gfs-complutum-fonts - gfs-didot-classic-fonts - gfs-didot-fonts - gfs-eustace-fonts - gfs-fleischman-fonts - gfs-garaldus-fonts - gfs-gazis-fonts - gfs-jackson-fonts - gfs-neohellenic-fonts - gfs-nicefore-fonts - gfs-olga-fonts - gfs-porson-fonts - gfs-solomos-fonts - gfs-theokritos-fonts - stix-fonts - yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 9

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477467] New: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
by Red Hat Bugzilla 15 Mar '09

15 Mar '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477467 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: tibetan-machine-uni-fonts AssignedTo: mgarski(a)post.pl ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: mgarski(a)post.pl, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or several font files: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb' -f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e 's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]\(.*\)src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq Unfortunately the script does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can close this bug report now. Otherwise, you should know that: - Fedora guidelines demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package or subpackage: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_fonts_… - our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_(2… http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts Please make your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide. If your package is not principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed in the correct fontconfig directories. It is preferred to make a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a font family is given on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family The new templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted and can serve as examples: - andika-fonts - apanov-heuristica-fonts - bitstream-vera-fonts - charis-fonts - dejavu-fonts - ecolier-court-fonts - edrip-fonts - gfs-ambrosia-fonts - gfs-artemisia-fonts - gfs-baskerville-fonts - gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts - gfs-bodoni-fonts - gfs-complutum-fonts - gfs-didot-classic-fonts - gfs-didot-fonts - gfs-eustace-fonts - gfs-fleischman-fonts - gfs-garaldus-fonts - gfs-gazis-fonts - gfs-jackson-fonts - gfs-neohellenic-fonts - gfs-nicefore-fonts - gfs-olga-fonts - gfs-porson-fonts - gfs-solomos-fonts - gfs-theokritos-fonts - stix-fonts - yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 8

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 471833] New: summary lowercase inputmethod names with a NAME variable
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Mar '09

10 Mar '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: summary lowercase inputmethod names with a NAME variable https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471833 Summary: summary lowercase inputmethod names with a NAME variable Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: FutureFeature, i18n Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: imsettings AssignedTo: tagoh(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: petersen(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: tagoh(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: It would be nice if imsettings used a NAME variable in xinput files to carry a lowercase name of input-methods. Steps to Reproduce: 1. imsettings-list 2. imsettings-start SCIM 3. Actual results: 1. list SHORT_DESC name which is often mixed or uppercase. Expected results: 1. list input-method names in lowercase. 2. able to start scim with "imsettings-start scim", etc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 12

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475907] New: duplicate autostart file
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Mar '09

10 Mar '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: duplicate autostart file https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475907 Summary: duplicate autostart file Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: imsettings AssignedTo: tagoh(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: mclasen(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: tagoh(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora you install both /etc/xdg/autostart/imsettings-applet.desktop and /usr/share/gnome/autostart/gnome-imsettings-applet.desktop Thats one too many... it leads to imsettings applet showing up twice in the list of autostarted session apps. It does not actually cause to be started twice, so the problem is more cosmetic. But still, better to pick one location to avoid problems with the two copies getting out of sync, etc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 3

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 468833] New: nabi can't be activated through imsettings
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Mar '09

10 Mar '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: nabi can't be activated through imsettings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468833 Summary: nabi can't be activated through imsettings Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: imsettings AssignedTo: tagoh(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: petersen(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: tagoh(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Blocks: 438944 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: nabi does not work with imsettings xim. It seems the hotkey event does not reach the xim server. How reproducible: every time Steps to Reproduce: 1. yum install nabi 2. start ko desktop gnome sesssion 3. select nabi in im-chooser 4. try to activate nabi with Shift-Space Actual results: 3. nabi starts running 4. nothing happens Expected results: 4. nabi to go to hangul input Additional info: Works with XMODIDIERS=@im=nabi. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 2

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 464453] New: installing imsettings-libs-0.104.1-1.fc10 gives gconf schema missing error
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Mar '09

10 Mar '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: installing imsettings-libs-0.104.1-1.fc10 gives gconf schema missing error https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464453 Summary: installing imsettings-libs-0.104.1-1.fc10 gives gconf schema missing error Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: imsettings AssignedTo: tagoh(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: petersen(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: tagoh(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Updating current rawhide to the latest imsettings gives a gconf error. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): imsettings-0.104.1-1.fc10 Steps to Reproduce: 1. rpm -Fvh imsettings-*0.104.1-1.fc10.`arch`.rpm Actual results: [root@localhost petersen]# rpm -qa im\*| sort im-chooser-1.2.3-1.fc10.i386 imsettings-0.104.0-1.fc10.i386 imsettings-libs-0.104.0-1.fc10.i386 [root@localhost petersen]# rpm -Fvh imsettings-* 準備中... ########################################### [100%] 1:imsettings-libs ########################################### [ 50%] I/O warning : failed to load external entity "/etc/gconf/schemas/imsettings-applet.schemas" '/etc/gconf/schemas/imsettings-applet.schemas' が開けませんでした: そのようなファイルやディレクトリはありません 2:imsettings ########################################### [100%] Expected results: no error -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 3

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 476427] New: [te_IN] - Consonant+Virama+Consonant+Virama+space renders the second virama as a separate glyph in lohit-telugu font
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Mar '09

05 Mar '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [te_IN] - Consonant+Virama+Consonant+Virama+space renders the second virama as a separate glyph in lohit-telugu font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476427 Summary: [te_IN] - Consonant+Virama+Consonant+Virama+space renders the second virama as a separate glyph in lohit-telugu font Product: Fedora Localization Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Telugu [te] AssignedTo: kkrothap(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: arjunaraoc(a)googlemail.com QAContact: kkrothap(a)redhat.com CC: aalam(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Consonant+Virama+[Consonant+Virama]+space renders the second virama as a separate glyph in lohit-telugu font. With Pothana2000 font, the rendering is correct. More details at this bug report. http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=516947 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 9

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 471778] New: scim-bridge crash when converting ichioku to Kanji
by Red Hat Bugzilla 02 Mar '09

02 Mar '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: scim-bridge crash when converting ichioku to Kanji https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471778 Summary: scim-bridge crash when converting ichioku to Kanji Product: Fedora Version: 9 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: high Priority: medium Component: anthy AssignedTo: tagoh(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: masaki.chikama(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: tagoh(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: The scim-bridge gets segv when conveting kanji from いちおく to 一億. >scim-bridge[2242]: segfault at 31 ip 001a7656 sp bf9644a0 error 4 in libanthydic.so.0.1.0[1a1000+3f000] Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): scim-bridge-0.4.15-8.fc9.i386 anthy-9100e-3.fc9.i386 How reproducible: anlways Steps to Reproduce: 1. Turn on IME 2. input いちおく 3. hit space (convert to kanji) Actual results: scim-bridege died Expected results: get 一億 Additional info: The same problem reported on Debigan. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=505776 There is some analysis about the problem by maintainer(?). (in Japanese) http://www.daionet.gr.jp/~knok/diary/?11161129 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 10

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
...
22
Older →

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

i18n-bugs December 2008