October 2009 - i18n-bugs - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 476871] GDM uses wrong keyboard layout after switching back

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476871 --- Comment #13 from fujiwara <tfujiwar(a)redhat.com> 2009-10-05 21:10:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > You don't want to always send GDM_KEYBOARD_LAYOUT because then the users choice > from within the session (from gnome-keyboard-properties) would get ignored. Is it the implementation for gnome-settings-daemon instead of GDM? My concern is that GDM cannot get the current user's layout without gconfd but if GDM calls user's gconfd to check the user's layout, it would be possible double gconfd, one is from GDM and another is from gnome-session. If GDM always send GDM_KEYBOARD_LAYOUT, gnome-settings-daemon could implement if it uses the enviroment or get the value from gconf value. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

14 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 525035] Selected language is not implemented

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525035 --- Comment #12 from Noriko Mizumoto <noriko(a)redhat.com> 2009-10-05 19:56:32 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > Noriko, > > can you put output of > $cat /etc/sysconfig/i18n > after step 6 Sure, 6. Rebooted manually. 7. Usual login screen came up (language selection was 'English'), and clicked 'Log In'. 8. English was chosen. 9. $cat /etc/sysconfig/i18n LANG="en_US.UTF-8" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

14 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 505100] need xinput conf file for XIM to enable X locale compose maps

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505100 Adam Williamson <awilliam(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |awilliam(a)redhat.com Severity|urgent |medium -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

14 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 476871] GDM uses wrong keyboard layout after switching back

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476871 --- Comment #12 from Ray Strode <rstrode(a)redhat.com> 2009-10-05 12:44:56 EDT --- You don't want to always send GDM_KEYBOARD_LAYOUT because then the users choice from within the session (from gnome-keyboard-properties) would get ignored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

14 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 526633] Review Request: gargi-fonts - A Devanagari font

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526633 Ankur Sinha <sanjay.ankur(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(sanjay.ankur@gmai | |l.com) | --- Comment #7 from Ankur Sinha <sanjay.ankur(a)gmail.com> 2009-10-05 09:11:41 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Anyway, thanks a lot for adding a new font package in the review pipe > > Appart from the CSS classification I can't really help you with, here is some > review: > > 1. non LGC font ⇒ please use a priority ≥ 65 as per fontconfig-priorities.txt > I'll check up the prio for the lohit font and fix this.. > 3. Licensing should be GPLv2+ Fixed. Will upload a new build in a day max. > > 4. (non blocking) please ask upstream to add the standard FSF GPL font > exception to their licensing Contacted upstream, no response yet :( > > 5. (non blocking) description could use some meat I copied whatever I got from the font homepage. There's no readme etc to get more from. > Anyway, this package is mostly fine, except for the classification problem. > > NEEDINFO till this is resolved (In reply to comment #6) > Ankur, please use Sans as classification and I'll approve the package (if you > fixed the other bits. Also, please make sure your fontconfig prio is > Lohit > Devanagari so Lohit stays the default Okay, ill fix up the fontconfig. I cant do much about some of the other bits (stated above) regards, Ankur -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

14 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 526633] Review Request: gargi-fonts - A Devanagari font

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526633 --- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net> 2009-10-05 07:16:03 EDT --- Ankur, please use Sans as classification and I'll approve the package (if you fixed the other bits. Also, please make sure your fontconfig prio is > Lohit Devanagari so Lohit stays the default -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

14 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 526633] Review Request: gargi-fonts - A Devanagari font

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526633 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net> 2009-10-05 07:13:19 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > 2. please ask the lohit people what they think about this font. IMHO it is > > highly likely one of the lohit fonts shares a common ancestry with gargi (and > > in that case they should at least cross-alias each other) > > while comparing lohit devanagari script fonts (marathi, hindi, konkani, nepali, > sindhi and kashmiri) > > There are little bit differences in lohit and Gargi > i.e Gargi fonts shape are little more Bold compare to lohit, > space of gargi is more than lohit > there are also little bit differences in characters shape Ok, that means that they probably were not forked from a common root after all, so no need to cross-alias > but overall as said above yes, they share common style(Sans) and ancestry. > > between how corss-alias will work? cross-alias is when package B tells fontconfig : if app asks for font A, and it is not present, use my font B instead (and the reverse in package A). We do it for DejaVuLGC/DejaVu for example. But this kind of aliasing is only worth it when fonts are very close in style or metrics, typically when two projects took the same origin font and froked it in different ways -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

14 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 526633] Review Request: gargi-fonts - A Devanagari font

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526633 --- Comment #4 from Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> 2009-10-05 06:55:16 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > 2. please ask the lohit people what they think about this font. IMHO it is > highly likely one of the lohit fonts shares a common ancestry with gargi (and > in that case they should at least cross-alias each other) while comparing lohit devanagari script fonts (marathi, hindi, konkani, nepali, sindhi and kashmiri) There are little bit differences in lohit and Gargi i.e Gargi fonts shape are little more Bold compare to lohit, space of gargi is more than lohit there are also little bit differences in characters shape but overall as said above yes, they share common style(Sans) and ancestry. between how corss-alias will work? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

14 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 504270] New: [Fonts-Indic][te_IN] - GSUB shape with SSA and HA are wrong.

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [Fonts-Indic][te_IN] - GSUB shape with SSA and HA are wrong. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504270 Summary: [Fonts-Indic][te_IN] - GSUB shape with SSA and HA are wrong. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: medium Priority: low Component: fonts-indic AssignedTo: rbhalera(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: smaitra(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: smaitra(a)redhat.com, rbhalera(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: GSUB shape with SSA (0C37) and HA (0C39) is showing wrong in the font. Its positioning for the lower part of the composed character, should be below-right aligned which is now aligned as below-middle. As of now The Image that is given to our Internal web page, is hand drawn and partly wrong also. But, the lower part alignment is Perfect there which is showing right-aligned. These specific Combinations are given below : 68. U+0C24 U+0C4D U+0C37 త్ష TA + HALANT + SSA => In image main character must be corrected as in font and in font the position of sub character(which is at the bottom) should be corrected as in image. 70. U+0C24 U+0C4D U+0C39 త్హ TA + HALANT + HA => In image main character must be corrected as in font and in font the position of sub character(which is at the bottom) should be corrected as in image. 103. U+0C28 U+0C4D U+0C37 న్ష NA + HALANT + SSA => In image main character must be corrected as in font and in font the position of sub character(which is at the bottom) should be corrected as in image. 105. U+0C28 U+0C4D U+0C39 న్హ NA + HALANT + HA => In image main character must be corrected as in font and in font the position of sub character(which is at the bottom) should be corrected as in image. 140. U+0C2E U+0C4D U+0C39 మ్హ MA + HALANT + HA => In image main character must be corrected as in font and in font the position of sub character(which is at the bottom) should be corrected as in image. 175. U+0C2F U+0C4D U+0C39 య్హ YA + HALANT + HA => In image main character must be corrected as in font and in font the position of sub character(which is at the bottom) should be corrected as in image. 208. U+0C30 U+0C4D U+0C37 ర్ష RA + HALANT + SSA => In image main character must be corrected as in font and in font the position of sub character(which is at the bottom) should be corrected as in image. 210. U+0C30 U+0C4D U+0C39 ర్హ RA + HALANT + HA => In image main character must be corrected as in font and in font the position of sub character(which is at the bottom) should be corrected as in image. 243. U+0C32 U+0C4D U+0C37 ల్ష LA + HALANT + SSA => In image main character must be corrected as in font and in font the position of sub character(which is at the bottom) should be corrected as in image. 245. U+0C32 U+0C4D U+0C39 ల్హ LA + HALANT + HA => In image main character must be corrected as in font and in font the position of sub character(which is at the bottom) should be corrected as in image. 278. U+0C35 U+0C4D U+0C37 వ్ష VA + HALANT + SSA => In image main character must be corrected as in font and in font the position of sub character(which is at the bottom) should be corrected as in image. 280. U+0C35 U+0C4D U+0C39 వ్హ VA + HALANT + HA => In image main character must be corrected as in font and in font the position of sub character(which is at the bottom) should be corrected as in image. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): lohit-telugu-fonts-2.3.8-1.fc11 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Start system with FC11 or Latest 2. Change the ibus with RAWCODE 3. Open Gedit 4. Type the combination's Unicode as given above. 5. Observe the lower part of the composed character. Actual results: Its showing below-middle alignment. Expected results: It should be below-right alignment. Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

14 years, 6 months

1
13
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481068] bitmap-fonts needs updating to revised packaging guidelines

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481068 Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED --- Comment #15 from Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> 2009-10-05 05:20:59 EDT --- bitmap-fonts-0.3-9.fc12 successfully moved from dist-f12-updates-candidate into dist-f12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

14 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

i18n-bugs October 2009