i18n-bugs June 2009

i18n-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org

1 participants
382 discussions

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 489523] New: ibus oddities with F11 alpha
by Red Hat Bugzilla 06 Sep '09

06 Sep '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: ibus oddities with F11 alpha https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489523 Summary: ibus oddities with F11 alpha Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: ibus AssignedTo: phuang(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: jason(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: phuang(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: When I logged on to the F11 alpha live CD, there was a floating tab on my desktop which seemed to be for selecting the iBus engine. yum update ibus made it go away, but I got an error "GLib version too old (micro mismatch)"; apparently 2.19.5 isn't enough for ibus-gtk. Updating glib2 to 2.19.10 seemed to fix that issue. But now the input method chooser seems to be confused; enabling the input method feature with Preferences/Personal/Input Method doesn't stick, if I open the dialog again the checkbox is still off. Updating im-chooser didn't affect this issue; the applet in the notification error pops up an error about "mismatch the version of im-settings-daemon, no detailed information" I haven't updated the whole system, as I don't think I have enough room on the USB stick and yum is failing to update glibc at the moment. And I don't really care about iBus, just wanted that floater to go away. Feel free to close this bug if it doesn't have any useful information for you. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 6

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 501650] New: Add Help (Documentation) for ibus-setup UI
by Red Hat Bugzilla 02 Sep '09

02 Sep '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Add Help (Documentation) for ibus-setup UI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501650 Summary: Add Help (Documentation) for ibus-setup UI Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: ibus AssignedTo: phuang(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: pnemade(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: phuang(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: In iBus Preferences like "Use custom font", "Candidates orientation" and "Previous input method:" (which is disabled always). Can we have some help/documentation for end users about such unclear options? Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): ibus-1.1.0.20090508-3.fc11.x86_64 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: no documentation or tool-tips on usage/information of "Use custom font", "Candidates orientation" and "Previous input method:" Expected results: Should add documentation Additional info: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Days:IBus#cite_ref-18 Either Help button can be added with help on using ibus-setup or tooltip can be provided for widgets used in ibus-setup UI. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 4

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 499880] New: tomoe-gtk not built with $RPM_OPT_FLAGS
by Red Hat Bugzilla 01 Sep '09

01 Sep '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: tomoe-gtk not built with $RPM_OPT_FLAGS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499880 Summary: tomoe-gtk not built with $RPM_OPT_FLAGS Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: Patch Severity: medium Priority: low Component: tomoe-gtk AssignedTo: dchen(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: ville.skytta(a)iki.fi QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: ryo-dairiki(a)users.sourceforge.net, dchen(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Blocks: 496968 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Created an attachment (id=343135) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=343135) Build with $RPM_OPT_FLAGS Fix attached, see bug 496968 for more info. I think this is quite obviously an upstream bug; a corresponding patch to macros/python.m4 should be submitted there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 25

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477474] New: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
by Red Hat Bugzilla 31 Aug '09

31 Aug '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477474 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: un-core-fonts AssignedTo: smallvil(a)get9.net ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, smallvil(a)get9.net, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or several font files: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb' -f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e 's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]$.*$src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq Unfortunately the script does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can close this bug report now. Otherwise, you should know that: - Fedora guidelines demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package or subpackage: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_fonts_… - our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_(2… http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts Please make your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide. If your package is not principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed in the correct fontconfig directories. It is preferred to make a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a font family is given on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family The new templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted and can serve as examples: - andika-fonts - apanov-heuristica-fonts - bitstream-vera-fonts - charis-fonts - dejavu-fonts - ecolier-court-fonts - edrip-fonts - gfs-ambrosia-fonts - gfs-artemisia-fonts - gfs-baskerville-fonts - gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts - gfs-bodoni-fonts - gfs-complutum-fonts - gfs-didot-classic-fonts - gfs-didot-fonts - gfs-eustace-fonts - gfs-fleischman-fonts - gfs-garaldus-fonts - gfs-gazis-fonts - gfs-jackson-fonts - gfs-neohellenic-fonts - gfs-nicefore-fonts - gfs-olga-fonts - gfs-porson-fonts - gfs-solomos-fonts - gfs-theokritos-fonts - stix-fonts - yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 8

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 508358] New: ANTHY_HISTORY_FILE record only a single word
by Red Hat Bugzilla 29 Aug '09

29 Aug '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: ANTHY_HISTORY_FILE record only a single word https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508358 Summary: ANTHY_HISTORY_FILE record only a single word Product: Fedora Version: 11 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: anthy AssignedTo: tagoh(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: masanari_iida(a)hp.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: tagoh(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: If one set ANTHY_HISTORY_FILE, anthy should record all inputs. But currently anthy record only if I input a single word. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): anthy-9100h-4.fc11.i586 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Set following into .bash_profile. export ANTHY_HISTORY_FILE=~/.anthy_history 2. login to the account 3. Input Japanese words and convert. 3a. Watashi no namae ha nakano desu. (My name is nakano) 3b. nakano Actual results: 3a. Nothing recorded into .anthy_history 3b. A word nakano is recorded into .anthy_history Expected results: Both 3a and 3b cases should be recorded. Additional info: In order to record corpus when I input Japanese, this function should be work as expected. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 18

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 501920] New: [ibus][Indic] - ibus Malfunctioning when conflict with keyboard-indicator
by Red Hat Bugzilla 17 Aug '09

17 Aug '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [ibus][Indic] - ibus Malfunctioning when conflict with keyboard-indicator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501920 Summary: [ibus][Indic] - ibus Malfunctioning when conflict with keyboard-indicator Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: medium Priority: low Component: ibus AssignedTo: phuang(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: smaitra(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: smaitra(a)redhat.com, phuang(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: When Keyboard Indicator is enabled with any locale other than USA, at that time if you select ibus for any layout, it will not work with ibus, it works with keyboard-indicator at that time. Moreover that, when any other layout engine is enabled in the system, if at that time user enable ibus, the application should show Warning message indicating that other engine is enable which may restrict ibus to work properly. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): ibus-1.1.0.20090423-1.fc11.i586 ibus-gtk-1.1.0.20090423-1.fc11.i586 keyboard indicator 2.26.1 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Switch on keyboard Indicator with any layout except USA 2. Switch on ibus with any layout. 3. Open any editor, gedit 4. Try to type according to ibus's layout. 5. Observe the result. Actual results: It will always follow the layout enabled in keyboard Indicator, and when enable ibus, it will not show any warning message that other engine is already enabled. Expected results: ibus should always detect if any other same engine is already enabled in the system and behave accordingly. Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 5

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 503869] New: need ibus-qt immodule again
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 Aug '09

11 Aug '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: need ibus-qt immodule again https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503869 Summary: need ibus-qt immodule again Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: ibus AssignedTo: phuang(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: petersen(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: phuang(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: KDE really needs a qt immodule for a better experience with ibus. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 9

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 483391] New: [te_IN] New Telugu codepoints/glyphs in Unicode 5.1
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 Aug '09

11 Aug '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [te_IN] New Telugu codepoints/glyphs in Unicode 5.1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483391 Summary: [te_IN] New Telugu codepoints/glyphs in Unicode 5.1 Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: lohit-fonts AssignedTo: rbhalera(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: bugzillas+padREMOVETHISdu(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, rbhalera(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #202400 +++ Description of problem: following glyphs are not present in Lohit Telugu U+0C3D ఽ TELUGU SIGN AVAGRAHA U+0C58 ౘ TELUGU LETTER TSA U+0C59 ౙ TELUGU LETTER DZA U+0C62 ౢ TELUGU VOWEL SIGN VOCALIC L U+0C63 ౣ TELUGU VOWEL SIGN VOCALIC LL U+0C78 ౸ TELUGU FRACTION DIGIT ZERO FOR ODD POWERS OF FOUR U+0C79 ౹ TELUGU FRACTION DIGIT ONE FOR ODD POWERS OF FOUR U+0C7A ౺ TELUGU FRACTION DIGIT TWO FOR ODD POWERS OF FOUR U+0C7B ౻ TELUGU FRACTION DIGIT THREE FOR ODD POWERS OF FOUR U+0C7C ౼ TELUGU FRACTION DIGIT ONE FOR EVEN POWERS OF FOUR U+0C7D ౽ TELUGU FRACTION DIGIT TWO FOR EVEN POWERS OF FOUR U+0C7E ౾ TELUGU FRACTION DIGIT THREE FOR EVEN POWERS OF FOUR U+0C7F ౿ TELUGU SIGN TUUMU Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): lohit-fonts-2.3.1-1.fc10 Additional info: 1) http://www.unicode.org/charts/PDF/Unicode-5.1/U51-0C00.pdf (chart showing new characters) 2) http://std.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc2/wg2/docs/n3116.pdf (proposal for adding these characters among others, that details the use of these characters) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 5

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 493858] New: S-c-tools cleanup: bad spacings, alignment, layout
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 Aug '09

11 Aug '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: S-c-tools cleanup: bad spacings, alignment, layout https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493858 Summary: S-c-tools cleanup: bad spacings, alignment, layout Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: system-config-language AssignedTo: psatpute(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: rrakus(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: psatpute(a)redhat.com, jreznik(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem A clean, logical dialog layout helps the user to quickly understand what information is required from them. It's very important to have proper spacing between window borders, controls and separators (if used), controls alignment etc. How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce 1. invoke any dialog Actual results Incorrect controls spacing and alignment. Expected results Correct window/dialog layout. Additional info Look at GNOME Human Interface Guidelines 2.2 [1] [2] [3] [1] http://library.gnome.org/devel/hig-book/stable/design-window.html.en [2] http://library.gnome.org/devel/hig-book/stable/windows-dialog.html.en [3] http://library.gnome.org/devel/hig-book/stable/windows-alert.html.en#alert-… -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 7

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 493888] New: S-c-tools cleanup: make OK button insensitive when no action has been taken.
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 Aug '09

11 Aug '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: S-c-tools cleanup: make OK button insensitive when no action has been taken. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493888 Summary: S-c-tools cleanup: make OK button insensitive when no action has been taken. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: system-config-language AssignedTo: psatpute(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: rrakus(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: psatpute(a)redhat.com, jreznik(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: "OK" button is sensitive even no changes were done but it should be insensitive when "Cancel" button available. How reproducible: /*places*/ Steps to Reproduce: 1. invoke some dialog 2. check if "OK" button is sensitive Actual results: "OK" button is sensitive. Expected results: "OK" should not be sensitive. Additional info: This bug report is part of "System Configuration Tools Cleanup Project". Don't hesitate to ask project maintainers for any kind of help. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 8

← Newer
1
...
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
...
39
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

i18n-bugs June 2009