[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 507793] New: S-c-tools cleanup: language support is installed check suggestion
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: S-c-tools cleanup: language support is installed check suggestion
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507793
Summary: S-c-tools cleanup: language support is installed check
suggestion
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: system-config-language
AssignedTo: psatpute(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: jreznik(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: psatpute(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---
Description of problem: there's no way for user to check if desired language
support is already installed or it has to be installed (that could be problem
while offline etc.).
system-config-language-1.3.2-5.fc11.noarch
Steps to Reproduce:
1. run s-c-language
Actual results:
No "installed" flag in the list of languages.
Expected results:
"Installed" flag in the list.
Additional info:
This bug report is part of "System Configuration Tools Cleanup Project". Don't
hesitate to ask project maintainers for any kind of help.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
13 years, 8 months
[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 501214] New: light blue ibus icon is not obvious
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: light blue ibus icon is not obvious
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501214
Summary: light blue ibus icon is not obvious
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: ibus
AssignedTo: phuang(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: petersen(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: eukim(a)redhat.com, phuang(a)redhat.com,
fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---
Description of problem:
The ibus icon in the panel is not obvious and hard for first-time users to
understand.
Steps to Reproduce:
1. start fedora desktop with ibus
2. try to find out how to control IM
Actual results:
2. The current icon has no obvious connection with keyboard or input other than
'i'.
Expected results:
Clearer icon which new users can quickly recognise as for inputs.
Additional info:
Actually I would like to change the panel UI so that it more obvious what the
current input method is when ibus is off.
eg It could show a cross over the IME icon to show that IM is off,
a bit like gnome-power-manager's inhibit applet for example.
Or maybe we don't need custom icons for IMEs and just use
a character for each IME to represent it and display that in the applet.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
13 years, 8 months
[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 503430] New: Incorrect Kerning in some applications
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Incorrect Kerning in some applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503430
Summary: Incorrect Kerning in some applications
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: liberation-fonts
AssignedTo: cchance(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: grom358_spamkill(a)yahoo.com.au
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: cchance(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com,
fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem: The kerning is incorrect in some applications.
How reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install the Microsoft Corefonts for comparions (corefonts.sf.net)
2. Load Abiword and type "Test AV fi" on first and second line. Set first line
to Arial and second line to Liberation Sans.
3. Repeat step 2 in Openoffice
Actual results:
The kerning is incorrect in Openoffice
Expected results:
The kerning should match in Openoffice
Additional info:
The same problems occurs when using the Liberation fonts with Apache FOP
(http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
13 years, 8 months
[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 508899] New: Monospace no more
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Monospace no more
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508899
Summary: Monospace no more
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: liberation-fonts
AssignedTo: cchance(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: yaneti(a)declera.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: cchance(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com,
fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Created an attachment (id=349951)
--> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=349951)
buggy monospace
Description of problem:
The new liberaion-mono font from liberation-fonts-1.05.1.20090630-1.fc12 , no
longer appears monospaced in verious applications (firefox, gedit). Attached a
composite of the new and old monospaced font rendering of the same thing in
gedit.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
13 years, 8 months
[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 497090] New: [bn][bn-IN][as] Invalid addition of Yaphala conjuncts are being rendered
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: [bn][bn-IN][as] Invalid addition of Yaphala conjuncts are being rendered
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497090
Summary: [bn][bn-IN][as] Invalid addition of Yaphala conjuncts
are being rendered
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Keywords: i18n
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: fonts-indic
AssignedTo: rbhalera(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: runab(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: rbhalera(a)redhat.com,
fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com,
fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---
Description of problem:
In case of conjuncts with Yaphala (U09CD+U09AF), multiple Yaphala signs can be
typed consecutively giving rise to invalid conjunct combinations.
e.g ক্য্য্য্য (ক+্+য+্+য+্+য+্+য)
This error could be replicated in gedit, kwrite and Openoffice.org Writer
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
fonts-indic: 2.3.8-1.fc11
gedit : 2.26.1-1.fc11
openoffice.org: 3.1.0-9.2.fc11
kdebase : 4.2.2-2.fc11
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Open gedit
2. Type in the following unicode values (for the above example) :
U0995+U09CD+U09AF+U09CD+U09AF+U09CD+U09AF+U09CD+U09AF
Actual results:
The last 3 U09CD+U09AF pairs are allowed as part of the conjunct
Expected results:
The U09CD+U09AF pair should not be allowed to be rendered after another
U09CD+U09AF. i.e. only one U09CD+U09AF pair can be used when combining with
another consonant to form a conjunct.
Additional info:
Please do note that: U09AF+U09CD+U09AF is a valid conjunct combination, where
two U09AF characters combine to form a conjunct (য্য)
Screenshots:
gedit: http://runab.fedorapeople.org/assorted-bugs/gedit-ya.png
kwrite: http://runab.fedorapeople.org/assorted-bugs/kwrite-ya.png
oowrite: http://runab.fedorapeople.org/assorted-bugs/oowrite-ya.png
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
13 years, 9 months
[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 497768] New: [mai_IN] font-match is showing different fonts than language
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: [mai_IN] font-match is showing different fonts than language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497768
Summary: [mai_IN] font-match is showing different fonts than
language
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Keywords: i18n
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: fontconfig
AssignedTo: besfahbo(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: aalam(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: besfahbo(a)redhat.com,
fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com,
fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---
Description of problem:
Machine with Rawhide, having Maithili(mai_IN) language only, while checking
font for language, it is showing "Lohit Hindi", while maithili fonts are
installed on machine.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
fontconfig-2.6.99.behdad.20090318-1.fc11.i586
lohit-maithili-fonts-2.3.8-1.fc11.noarch
How reproducible:
Everytime
Steps to Reproduce:
1. in gnome-terminal run,
2. $fc-match
3.
Actual results:
[aalam@333-333 ~]$ echo $LANG
mai_IN
[aalam@333-333 ~]$ fc-match
lohit_hi.ttf: "Lohit Hindi" "Regular"
Expected results:
"Lohit Maithili"
Additional info:
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
13 years, 9 months
[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 495690] New: not working on the remote machine
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: not working on the remote machine
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495690
Summary: not working on the remote machine
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Keywords: Regression
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: ibus
AssignedTo: phuang(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: tagoh(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: wtogami(a)redhat.com, phuang(a)redhat.com,
fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---
Description of problem:
When going to invoke an application with ibus immodule, I can see an warning
like:
IBUS-WARNING **: Connect to unix:path=/tmp/ibus-tagoh/ibus-localhost-12 failed.
Failed to connect to socket /tmp/ibus-tagoh/ibus-localhost-12: No such file or
directory
and can't activate IM.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
ibus-1.1.0.20090407-3.fc11.x86_64
How reproducible:
always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.log into the remote machine with ssh
2.run application
3.
Actual results:
No ibus working
Expected results:
ibus should works as scim does.
Additional info:
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
13 years, 9 months
[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481240] New: iso-codes updates for Serbian locales
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: iso-codes updates for Serbian locales
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481240
Summary: iso-codes updates for Serbian locales
Product: Fedora
Version: 10
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: iso-codes
AssignedTo: caillon(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: miloskomarcevic(a)netscape.net
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: caillon(a)redhat.com, pnemade(a)redhat.com,
fedora-trans-sr(a)redhat.com,
fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Please update iso-codes information for Serbian locales using the attached po
files which correct numerous mistakes, most importantly pertaining to some
aspects of the related Gnome bug.
Have tried sending these upstream to the relevant people maintaining these at
the Translation Project with no response so far.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
13 years, 9 months
[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 507507] New: ' デスクトップ ' wasn't renamed into 'Desktop' when language was changed from Japanese to English.
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: 'デスクトップ' wasn't renamed into 'Desktop' when language was changed from Japanese to English.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507507
Summary: 'デスクトップ' wasn't renamed into 'Desktop' when language
was changed from Japanese to English.
Product: Fedora
Version: 11
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Keywords: i18n
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: xdg-user-dirs
AssignedTo: tbzatek(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: cchance(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: tbzatek(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---
Description of problem:
When the Gnome language changed from Japanese to any other languages (English
in this case), it is supposed to have all directories under user home directory
asked by system if user wants to rename it according to current languages.
'Desktop' directory, however; has not be renamed after user agreed, while all
other directories renamed smoothly.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
xdg-utils-1.0.2-8.20081121cvs.fc11.noarch
How reproducible:
Always.
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install F11 in Japanese language.
2. Login Japanese once and logout.
3. Login English (US) and click the button for renaming directories to English.
4. Check results.
Actual results:
All directories except 'Desktop' (written in Japanese) were renamed.
Expected results:
Every single directories were renamed.
Additional info:
Unsure if this is caused by typo in sources, or if it is just missing the
directory name in rename list in sources.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
13 years, 10 months
[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477475] New: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477475
Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: un-extra-fonts
AssignedTo: smallvil(a)get9.net
ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: smallvil(a)get9.net, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or
several font files:
repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb'
-f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e
's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]\(.*\)src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq
Unfortunately the script
does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can
close this bug report now.
Otherwise, you should know that:
- Fedora guidelines
demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package or subpackage:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_font...
- our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships
fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel
package.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_...
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts
Please make
your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide.
If your package is not
principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage
is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can
always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed
in the correct fontconfig directories.
It is preferred to make a font package or
subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines
requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a
font family is given on
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family
The new
templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe.
The
following packages have already been converted and can serve as examples: -
andika-fonts - apanov-heuristica-fonts - bitstream-vera-fonts - charis-fonts -
dejavu-fonts - ecolier-court-fonts - edrip-fonts - gfs-ambrosia-fonts -
gfs-artemisia-fonts - gfs-baskerville-fonts - gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts -
gfs-bodoni-fonts - gfs-complutum-fonts - gfs-didot-classic-fonts -
gfs-didot-fonts - gfs-eustace-fonts - gfs-fleischman-fonts - gfs-garaldus-fonts
- gfs-gazis-fonts - gfs-jackson-fonts - gfs-neohellenic-fonts -
gfs-nicefore-fonts - gfs-olga-fonts - gfs-porson-fonts - gfs-solomos-fonts -
gfs-theokritos-fonts - stix-fonts - yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts
If you have any remaining
questions about the new guidelines please ask them on fedora-fonts-list at
redhat.com
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
13 years, 11 months
