Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Separate Japanese font configuration files for ghostscript
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507262
Summary: Separate Japanese font configuration files for
ghostscript
Product: Fedora
Version: 11
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: japanese-bitmap-fonts
AssignedTo: tagoh(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: t.matsuu(a)gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: tagoh(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
I'm not sure which component should be assigned for this bug. So I initially
assign this bug to japanese-bitmap-fonts because the files for discussion is
now owned by japanese-bitmap-fonts package.
Description of problem:
Now
/usr/share/ghostscript/conf.d/CIDFnmap.ja
/usr/share/ghostscript/conf.d/FAPIcidfmap.ja
/usr/share/ghostscript/conf.d/cidfmap.ja
are owned by japanese-bitmap-fonts. But they never use fonts which are bundled
in japanese-bitmap-fonts.
Moreover, fonts which are set in the config files are dispersed among some
packages.
So we need to separate ghostscript contig files from japanese-bitmap-fonts and
they should be provided by another package (or included in ghostscript or
ghostscript-fonts package).
I suggest the following idea.
1. Universal
/usr/share/ghostscript/conf.d/{CIDFnmap.ja,FAPIcidfmap.ja,cidfmap.ja} is owned
by new (eg. ghostscript-fonts-japanese), ghostscript, or ghostscript-fonts
package.
2. Each Japanese fonts have their own CIDFnmap.ja, FAPIcidfmap.ja, and
cidfmap.ja files i their common package.
Discussion required:
* fonts priority
* file owner for ghostscript config files
* package structure of IPA fonts are not ready for generate common subpackage
now (bug 507261)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Need additional runtime detecting in ibus.conf for Kimpanel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=583716
Summary: Need additional runtime detecting in ibus.conf for
Kimpanel
Product: Fedora
Version: 13
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: ibus
AssignedTo: phuang(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: cheeseli(a)hotmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: phuang(a)redhat.com, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Classification: Fedora
Created an attachment (id=407608)
--> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=407608)
Additional runtime detecting in ibus.conf for Kimpanel
Have Kimpanel be the default IBus frontend IF AND ONLY IF the user is running
KDE and Kimpanel is installed.
The attachment is a patch for this purpose.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: [indic] yum showing content in indic languages, those are broken for terminal
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525046
Summary: [indic] yum showing content in indic languages, those
are broken for terminal
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Keywords: i18n
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: yum
AssignedTo: skvidal(a)sethdot.org
ReportedBy: aalam(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: james.antill(a)redhat.com, pmatilai(a)redhat.com,
tim.lauridsen(a)googlemail.com, ffesti(a)redhat.com,
maxamillion(a)gmail.com, skvidal(a)sethdot.org,
fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---
Description of problem:
while running yum command in Punjabi Desktop (pa_IN) locale, there was some
output, which is broken, failed to read from terminal. When using Group
command,then all things are broken.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
yum-3.2.24-5.fc12
How reproducible:
100%
Steps to Reproduce:
1. in gnome-terminal set locale as 'export LANG=pa_IN.UTF-8'
2. yum grouplist
3.
Actual results:
output contains Punjabi (pa_IN) language, which is not shown properly
Expected results:
as Indic (all) languages are not render properly on Terminal, so output
should be in English for better use.
Additional info:
1) Other affected locales are *_IN (as_IN,bn_IN,gu_IN,hi_IN,ml_IN,mr_IN...)
2) for GUI front-end (gpk-application) locales are working fine
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: [gcin] [Feature request] Please pack the voice data.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511197
Summary: [gcin] [Feature request] Please pack the voice data.
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: low
Priority: low
Component: gcin
AssignedTo: candyz0416(a)gmail.com
ReportedBy: dchen(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, candyz0416(a)gmail.com,
fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---
Description of problem:
One of nice gcin features is gcin prounces the character you type, thus lower
typo rate. However, the voice data is not packed in fedora.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
1.4.5-2.fc11
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Right click on gcin for gcin setup menu.
2. Click on "Default input method & Enable/disable".
3. Enable "Speak as you type".
Actual results:
Due to lack of voice data, this function is not functional.
Expected results:
gcin speaks as you type.
Additional info:
Voice data can be downloaded at:
http://cle.linux.org.tw/trac/wiki/GcinTextToSpeech
How about make a gcin-voice sub-package?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: JTextArea & JTextField do not send XIM_SET_IC_FOCUS & XIM_UNSET_IC_FOCUS events to XIM server
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462412
Summary: JTextArea & JTextField do not send XIM_SET_IC_FOCUS &
XIM_UNSET_IC_FOCUS events to XIM server
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: high
Priority: high
Component: java-1.6.0-openjdk
AssignedTo: langel(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: shawn.p.huang(a)gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: mark(a)klomp.org, langel(a)redhat.com, lkundrak(a)v3.sk,
fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
JTextArea & JTextField do not send XIM_SET_IC_FOCUS & XIM_UNSET_IC_FOCUS to XIM
server.
When JTextArea & JTextField work with XIM input methods, it do not set or unset
ic focus via XIM protocol. So XIM server can not handle focus for Java
application properly. I did not try other java widgets, maybe they have this
problem too.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
java-1.6.0-openjdk-demo-1.6.0.0-0.20.b11.fc10.i386
java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-0.20.b11.fc10.i386
java-1.6.0-openjdk-plugin-1.6.0.0-0.20.b11.fc10.i386
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Actual results:
JTextArea & JTextField do not send XIM_SET_IC_FOCUS & XIM_UNSET_IC_FOCUS events
to XIM server.
Expected results:
JTextArea & JTextField send XIM_SET_IC_FOCUS & XIM_UNSET_IC_FOCUS events to XIM
server, when they get or lose focus.
Additional info:
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: fop does support fontsets properly
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506646
Summary: fop does support fontsets properly
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: fop
AssignedTo: langel(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: petersen(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: langel(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com,
fitzsim(a)fitzsim.org
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---
Description of problem:
It is a long-standing problem that publican books can be generated correctly
for Indic since Indic (Indian) fonts do not include ASCII glyphs.
If fop was able to fallback to fonts or better use pango or some similar font
abstraction to isolate the hardcoding of fonts from fop itself then this would
just work. This requires some work upstream I guess but I would like to track
this here in the open for fedora.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: knm-new-fixed-fonts isn't usable
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=586214
Summary: knm-new-fixed-fonts isn't usable
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: knm-new-fixed-fonts
AssignedTo: tagoh(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: tagoh(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: tagoh(a)redhat.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---
Description of problem:
knm-new-fixed-fonts is capable for Japanese font though, it doesn't have enough
glyph coverage for Japanese.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
knm-new-fixed-fonts-1.1-11.fc13
How reproducible:
always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.fc-match -v Fixed|grep -E " lang"|grep ja
2.
3.
Actual results:
No output
Expected results:
the lang spec should contains ja.
Additional info:
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Japanese fonts changed to less readable after update
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487061
Summary: Japanese fonts changed to less readable after update
Product: Fedora
Version: 10
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: low
Priority: low
Component: vlgothic-fonts
AssignedTo: ryo-dairiki(a)users.sourceforge.net
ReportedBy: mcmonster(a)o2.pl
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: tagoh(a)redhat.com, ryo-dairiki(a)users.sourceforge.net,
fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com,
fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; pl-PL; rv:1.9.0.6)
Gecko/2009020410 Fedora/3.0.6-1.fc10 Firefox/3.0.6
I'm using irssi on gnome-terminal (Monospace font), after update Japanese fonts
changed, they're now much smaller (compared to latin), harder to read (some
ideograms are completely unreadable). It is very annoying, because I use
Japanese and sit on Japanese channel a lot. The change occured only in
terminal, in gEdit and other applications old fonts are still used for typing
(SCIM + Anthy) and displaying.
The change didn't affect everyone, some Fedora 10 still got old, simple and
readable fonts.
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
Just try displaying any Japanese text.
This is the update, that probably changed fonts:
Feb 14 02:31:53 Installed: vlgothic-fonts-common-20090204-2.fc10.noarch
Feb 14 02:32:39 Installed: vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10.noarch
Feb 14 02:32:42 Installed: vlgothic-p-fonts-20090204-2.fc10.noarch
Feb 14 02:33:28 Erased: VLGothic-fonts
Feb 14 02:33:30 Erased: VLGothic-fonts-proportional
]# LANG=C yum list vlgothic\*
Loaded plugins: refresh-packagekit
Installed Packages
vlgothic-fonts.noarch 20090204-2.fc10
installed
vlgothic-fonts-common.noarch 20090204-2.fc10
installed
Available Packages
VLGothic-fonts.noarch 20081029-1.fc10 updates
VLGothic-fonts-proportional.noarch 20081029-1.fc10 updates
vlgothic-p-fonts.noarch 20090204-2.fc10 updates
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Tracker: System Configuration Tools Cleanup Project
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493604
Summary: Tracker: System Configuration Tools Cleanup Project
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: system-config-language
AssignedTo: psatpute(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: jreznik(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: psatpute(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---
Description:
This is "System Configuration Tools Cleanup Project" tracker for this
component.
Additional information:
Look at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/480902 for more information.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: S-c-tools cleanup: port to PolicyKit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493912
Summary: S-c-tools cleanup: port to PolicyKit
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: system-config-language
AssignedTo: psatpute(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: rrakus(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: psatpute(a)redhat.com, jreznik(a)redhat.com,
fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---
Description of problem:
It's not a good approach to let system config tool runn
under superuser account - it's a security risk. Instead
each tools which needs users privileges should be divided
to two parts - one which serves as privileged backend
running on demand and user interface that can ask for
privileged action over message bus (and ask password if
needed). Once action is approved by PolicyKit, it can be
processed.
Every tool should be ported to use PolicyKit.
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce
Actual results:
System config tool has to be run under superuser account.
Expected results
System config tool is not runned under superuser account
and asks for privileged access.
Additional info
Look at https://fedorahosted.org/python-slip/
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.