i18n-bugs May 2010

i18n-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org

2 participants
438 discussions

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 225764] Merge Review: fonts-ISO8859-2
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 May '10

14 May '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225764 --- Comment #14 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh(a)redhat.com> 2010-05-14 03:20:20 EDT --- rpmlint reported: ISO8859-2-100dpi-fonts.noarch: E: file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/fonts/ISO8859-2/100dpi/fonts.alias ISO8859-2-75dpi-fonts.noarch: E: file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/fonts/ISO8859-2/75dpi/fonts.alias ISO8859-2-fonts.noarch: E: file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/fonts/ISO8859-2/misc/fonts.alias ISO8859-2-fonts.src:222: W: macro-in-%changelog %{_fontbasedir} ISO8859-2-fonts.src:168: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 168, tab: line 63) Aside from that, please be aware of %{_fontbasedir}%{fontname} nearly equal to %{_fontdir}. so %{_fontdir}%{fontname} in %post script is wrong. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 225764] Merge Review: fonts-ISO8859-2
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 May '10

14 May '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225764 --- Comment #13 from Parag <pnemade(a)redhat.com> 2010-05-14 02:47:40 EDT --- updated package SPEC:- http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/fedora-work/SPECS/ISO8859-2-fonts.spec SRPM:- http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/fedora-work/SRPMS/ISO8859-2-fonts-1.0-23.fc1… Scratch build -> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2186969 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 225764] Merge Review: fonts-ISO8859-2
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 May '10

14 May '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225764 Parag <pnemade(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(pnemade(a)redhat.co | |m) | --- Comment #12 from Parag <pnemade(a)redhat.com> 2010-05-14 02:19:23 EDT --- updated package SPEC:- http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/fedora-work/SPECS/ISO8859-2-fonts.spec SRPM:- http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/fedora-work/SRPMS/ISO8859-2-fonts-1.0-23.fc1… Scratch build -> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2186907 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 225764] Merge Review: fonts-ISO8859-2
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 May '10

14 May '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225764 Akira TAGOH <tagoh(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(pnemade(a)redhat.co | |m) --- Comment #11 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh(a)redhat.com> 2010-05-14 02:08:33 EDT --- You'd better using _fontdir instead of the own fontdir defined in the spec. otherwise it would ends up to put files under the unexpected path such as /usr/share/fontsISO8859-2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 523454] New: [ml_IN] Fontconfig settings for Meera font not working properly
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 May '10

14 May '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [ml_IN] Fontconfig settings for Meera font not working properly https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523454 Summary: [ml_IN] Fontconfig settings for Meera font not working properly Product: Fedora Version: 11 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: smc-fonts AssignedTo: psatpute(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: santhosh.thottingal(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com, psatpute(a)redhat.com, rajeeshknambiar(a)gmail.com, smc-discuss(a)googlegroups.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Meera font has a scaling property defined in /etc/fonts/conf.d/90-smc-fonts.conf file. It has a 1.2 times size scaling. But in Fedora 11 this scaling is not working properly. When Meera font is selected with size say, 12 for the applications, window titles etc, the entire desktop get ugly with expanded and overlapped titlebars or strings in application. How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Open abiword, type two words(english/malayalam), set the font of first word as Meera 12, second as Rachana 12 and compare the size. Meera font is bigger than Rachana font OR 2. System->Preferences->Appearance->Fonts, , select the fonts for all types as Meera 12. Select theme as Clearlooks. See the panel width, window title width, the big close buttons etc. Repeat the same with Rachana 12 and see the difference Actual results: Meera font size is big and takes more spaces in application making the application look bad Expected results: Setting font size 12 should set the size as 12 and the size should be same as other fonts with same size. Additional info: None -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 33

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 586308] New: Improve fontconfig config file
by Red Hat Bugzilla 13 May '10

13 May '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Improve fontconfig config file https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=586308 Summary: Improve fontconfig config file Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: lohit-assamese-fonts AssignedTo: psatpute(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: tagoh(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, psatpute(a)redhat.com, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: According to the testing result of Bug#578029, it needs to be improved to get things working efficiently for Assamese. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): lohit-assamese-fonts-2.4.3-4.fc13.noarch How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.fc-match sans:lang=as-in 2. 3. Actual results: Lohit Bengali is picked up if it's installed. Expected results: should be Lohit Assamese Additional info: See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578029#c4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 5

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 225764] Merge Review: fonts-ISO8859-2
by Red Hat Bugzilla 13 May '10

13 May '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225764 Parag <pnemade(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(pnemade(a)redhat.co | |m) | --- Comment #10 from Parag <pnemade(a)redhat.com> 2010-05-13 23:33:40 EDT --- updated package SPEC:- http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/fedora-work/SPECS/ISO8859-2-fonts.spec SRPM:- http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/fedora-work/SRPMS/ISO8859-2-fonts-1.0-23.fc1… I think there can be many changes happen to spec so I will not bump the release each time. If it looks confusing please tell me and will then provided bumped SPEC and SRPM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 559960] [all Lang]Translation is not available with 3.6 release
by Red Hat Bugzilla 13 May '10

13 May '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=559960 --- Comment #29 from fujiwara <tfujiwar(a)redhat.com> 2010-05-13 21:47:54 EDT --- I think it's better if zh_HK community could provide /usr/lib64/firefox-3.6/langpacks/langpack-zh-HK(a)firefox.mozilla.org/chrome/zh-HK.jar On the other hand, firefox.spec might provide a symlink while I think a short locale zh could be zh-cn but not zh-tw. ZH_TW_DIR=%_libdir/firefox-3.6/langpacks/langpack-zh-TW(a)firefox.mozilla.org/chrome ZH_HK_DIR=`echo "$ZH_TW_DIR" | sed -e 's|zh-TW|zh-HK|g'` if [ -f $RPM_BUILD_ROOT$ZH_TW_DIR/zh-TW.jar ] && [ ! -f $RPM_BUILD_ROOT$ZH_HK_DIR/zh_HK.jar ] ; then if [ ! -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT$ZH_HK_DIR ] ; then mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT$ZH_HK_DIR fi (cd $RPM_BUILD_ROOT$ZH_HK_DIR; ln -s $ZH_TW_DIR/zh-TW.jar zh_HK.jar) fi To fix other short locale issues, probably it's better to swap the lines of $SHORTMOZLOCALE and $MOZLOCALE in /usr/bin/firefox and then the language community could provide the short locale jar files for the fallback languages. --- /usr/bin/firefox.orig 2010-05-14 10:39:18.000000000 +0900 +++ /usr/bin/firefox 2010-05-14 10:43:58.000000000 +0900 @@ -194,16 +194,7 @@ MOZLOCALE=`echo $CURRENT_LOCALE | sed "s|_$[^.]*$.*|-\1|g"` # Try to link global langpacks to an extension directory - if [ -f $MOZ_LANGPACKS_DIR/langpack-${SHORTMOZLOCALE}(a)firefox.mozilla.org/chrome/$SHORTMOZLOCALE.jar ]; then - if [ -d $MOZ_EXTENSIONS_PROFILE_DIR/langpack-${SHORTMOZLOCALE}(a)firefox.mozilla.org ]; then - rmdir "$MOZ_EXTENSIONS_PROFILE_DIR/langpack-${SHORTMOZLOCALE}(a)firefox.mozilla.org" > /dev/null 2>&1 - fi - if ! [ -e $MOZ_EXTENSIONS_PROFILE_DIR/langpack-${SHORTMOZLOCALE}(a)firefox.mozilla.org ]; then - ln -s $MOZ_LANGPACKS_DIR/langpack-${SHORTMOZLOCALE}(a)firefox.mozilla.org \ - $MOZ_EXTENSIONS_PROFILE_DIR/langpack-${SHORTMOZLOCALE}(a)firefox.mozilla.org - echo "$MOZ_EXTENSIONS_PROFILE_DIR/langpack-${SHORTMOZLOCALE}(a)firefox.mozilla.org" > $FEDORA_LANGPACK_CONFIG - fi - elif [ -f $MOZ_LANGPACKS_DIR/langpack-${MOZLOCALE}(a)firefox.mozilla.org/chrome/$MOZLOCALE.jar ]; then + if [ -f $MOZ_LANGPACKS_DIR/langpack-${MOZLOCALE}(a)firefox.mozilla.org/chrome/$MOZLOCALE.jar ]; then if [ -d $MOZ_EXTENSIONS_PROFILE_DIR/langpack-${MOZLOCALE}(a)firefox.mozilla.org ]; then rmdir "$MOZ_EXTENSIONS_PROFILE_DIR/langpack-${MOZLOCALE}(a)firefox.mozilla.org" > /dev/null 2>&1 fi @@ -212,6 +203,15 @@ $MOZ_EXTENSIONS_PROFILE_DIR/langpack-${MOZLOCALE}(a)firefox.mozilla.org echo "$MOZ_EXTENSIONS_PROFILE_DIR/langpack-${MOZLOCALE}(a)firefox.mozilla.org" > $FEDORA_LANGPACK_CONFIG fi + elif [ -f $MOZ_LANGPACKS_DIR/langpack-${SHORTMOZLOCALE}(a)firefox.mozilla.org/chrome/$SHORTMOZLOCALE.jar ]; then + if [ -d $MOZ_EXTENSIONS_PROFILE_DIR/langpack-${SHORTMOZLOCALE}(a)firefox.mozilla.org ]; then + rmdir "$MOZ_EXTENSIONS_PROFILE_DIR/langpack-${SHORTMOZLOCALE}(a)firefox.mozilla.org" > /dev/null 2>&1 + fi + if ! [ -e $MOZ_EXTENSIONS_PROFILE_DIR/langpack-${SHORTMOZLOCALE}(a)firefox.mozilla.org ]; then + ln -s $MOZ_LANGPACKS_DIR/langpack-${SHORTMOZLOCALE}(a)firefox.mozilla.org \ + $MOZ_EXTENSIONS_PROFILE_DIR/langpack-${SHORTMOZLOCALE}(a)firefox.mozilla.org + echo "$MOZ_EXTENSIONS_PROFILE_DIR/langpack-${SHORTMOZLOCALE}(a)firefox.mozilla.org" > $FEDORA_LANGPACK_CONFIG + fi fi # And set it up for mozilla -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 586877] New: Improve fontconfig config file
by Red Hat Bugzilla 13 May '10

13 May '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Improve fontconfig config file https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=586877 Summary: Improve fontconfig config file Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: un-core-fonts AssignedTo: dueno(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: tagoh(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, smallvil(a)get9.net, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, dueno(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: Since the config file contains the simple priority lists rule[*1] that would be good to get rid of it and add the locale-specific overrides rule[*1] to avoid applying this font for non-targeted languages. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): un-core-fonts-1.0.2-0.10.080608.fc12.noarch Additional info: *1: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fontconfig_packaging_tips -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 12

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 225764] Merge Review: fonts-ISO8859-2
by Red Hat Bugzilla 13 May '10

13 May '10

1 0

← Newer
1
...
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
...
44
Older →

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

i18n-bugs May 2010