Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=594799
Ani Peter <apeter(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |apeter(a)redhat.com
--- Comment #3 from Ani Peter <apeter(a)redhat.com> 2010-05-24 05:23:15 EDT ---
In this case, kindly advise a solution how an user can get Indian language on
the terminal?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=594799
A S Alam <aalam(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC|eng-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com |i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproje
| |ct.org
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=589974
--- Comment #5 from Peng Wu <pwu(a)redhat.com> 2010-05-24 02:14:37 EDT ---
In Simplified Chinese (SC for short) and Traditional Chinese (TC for short),
many characters has different writing styles, so it has better use different
fonts for SC and TC.
In order to provides better fonts for SC and TC users, UMing will be the
default font for TC, and ZenHei will be the default font for SC.
The purpose of this change is:
1. When use Simplified Chinese locale to login Fedora gdm, all default
desktop fonts will use WenQuanYi;
2. When use Traditional Chinese locale to login Fedora gdm, all default
desktop fonts will use UMing.
For cjkuni-fonts-uming:
The needed changes for cjkuni-fonts-uming is:
1. Please remove the following fontconfig files from cjkuni-fonts-uming:
35-ttf-arphic-uming-aliases.conf 41-ttf-arphic-uming.conf
64-ttf-arphic-uming.conf.
2. And add the 65-0-ttf-arphic-uming.conf to UMing fontconfig file.
For cjkuni-fonts-ukai:
The needed changes for cjkuni-fonts-ukai is:
1. Please remove the following fontconfig files from cjkuni-fonts-ukai:
35-ttf-arphic-ukai-aliases.conf 41-ttf-arphic-ukai.conf
75-ttf-arphic-ukai-select.conf.
I think most files removed is kept for legacy reason, if there are no explicit
reason to keep them, will clean up these fontconfig files.
For more details and reasons, please see also README.en on
http://pwu.fedorapeople.org/fonts-conf.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=589974
--- Comment #4 from Peng Wu <pwu(a)redhat.com> 2010-05-24 01:59:51 EDT ---
Hi Akira TAGOH,
I will push the updates for UMing/UKai and WQY soon. Thanks for the review.
The next comment will describes the changes to UMing/UKai.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=587927
Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|petersen(a)redhat.com |pnemade(a)redhat.com
--- Comment #17 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2010-05-23 23:02:33 EDT ---
But I guess we should remove ispell.mim anyway in line with m17n-lib.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=587927
--- Comment #16 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2010-05-23 22:55:55 EDT ---
Hmm I think uim-m17n may handle missing .mim files less
gracefully than other IMs. (In F14 we are dropping nearly all
the m17n-db subpackages FWIW so that might help.)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=569368
Daiki Ueno <dueno(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #6 from Daiki Ueno <dueno(a)redhat.com> 2010-05-23 22:13:24 EDT ---
It looks ok with me.
BTW, is the priority setting (65-2-) really necessary or chosen for consistency
with ipa-ex-gothic-fonts? Asking because I'm just curious about the
relationship between this font and other mincho fonts (they are all assigned
priority 66-).
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=569366
--- Comment #8 from Daiki Ueno <dueno(a)redhat.com> 2010-05-23 21:16:30 EDT ---
Now it looks ok with me. I already set fedora-cvs+ for the previous version so
please go ahead :)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477475
Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: un-extra-fonts
AssignedTo: smallvil(a)get9.net
ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: smallvil(a)get9.net, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or
several font files:
repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb'
-f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e
's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]\(.*\)src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq
Unfortunately the script
does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can
close this bug report now.
Otherwise, you should know that:
- Fedora guidelines
demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package or subpackage:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_fonts_…
- our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships
fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel
package.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_(2…http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_packagehttp://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_templatehttp://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts
Please make
your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide.
If your package is not
principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage
is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can
always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed
in the correct fontconfig directories.
It is preferred to make a font package or
subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines
requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a
font family is given on
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family
The new
templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe.
The
following packages have already been converted and can serve as examples: -
andika-fonts - apanov-heuristica-fonts - bitstream-vera-fonts - charis-fonts -
dejavu-fonts - ecolier-court-fonts - edrip-fonts - gfs-ambrosia-fonts -
gfs-artemisia-fonts - gfs-baskerville-fonts - gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts -
gfs-bodoni-fonts - gfs-complutum-fonts - gfs-didot-classic-fonts -
gfs-didot-fonts - gfs-eustace-fonts - gfs-fleischman-fonts - gfs-garaldus-fonts
- gfs-gazis-fonts - gfs-jackson-fonts - gfs-neohellenic-fonts -
gfs-nicefore-fonts - gfs-olga-fonts - gfs-porson-fonts - gfs-solomos-fonts -
gfs-theokritos-fonts - stix-fonts - yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts
If you have any remaining
questions about the new guidelines please ask them on fedora-fonts-list at
redhat.com
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551949
Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2010-05-21 21:49:38 EDT ---
emacs-23.1-22.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
If you want to test the update, you can install it with
su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update emacs'. You can provide
feedback for this update here:
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/emacs-23.1-22.fc12
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.