June 2010 - i18n-bugs - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 596659] Review Request: ofl-sorts-mill-goudy-fonts - Goudy Oldstyle and Italic fonts

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596659 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2010-06-01 14:26:14 EDT --- ofl-sorts-mill-goudy-fonts-3.0-1.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update ofl-sorts-mill-goudy-fonts'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ofl-sorts-mill-goudy-fonts-3.0-1.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

13 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 598289] Unicode character input not available by default

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598289 Joe Smith <jes(a)martnet.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproje | |ct.org, phuang(a)redhat.com Component|gtk2 |ibus --- Comment #1 from Joe Smith <jes(a)martnet.com> 2010-06-01 09:00:37 EDT --- Changing component from "gtk+" to "ibus" on recommendation here: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.general/8656 I'm not sure what the right component is here; it's really more of a configuration/integration issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

13 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 570731] Review Request: ibus-handwrite - IBus handwrite project

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=570731 --- Comment #20 from Chen Lei <supercyper1(a)gmail.com> 2010-06-01 06:35:15 EDT --- Some issue unrelated to package review need attention: 1.patch0 should send to upstram 2.The debuginfo package for zinnia is incorrect, you should use make CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" CXXFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" %{?_smp_mflags} instead of make %{?_smp_mflags}. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

13 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 570731] Review Request: ibus-handwrite - IBus handwrite project

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=570731 Chen Lei <supercyper1(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |supercyper1(a)gmail.com Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #19 from Chen Lei <supercyper1(a)gmail.com> 2010-06-01 06:22:36 EDT --- +:ok, =:needs attention, -:needs fixing MUST Items: [+] MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. ibus-handwrite.src: W: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install ibus-handwrite.src: W: no-buildroot-tag ibus-handwrite.src: W: invalid-url Source0: http://ibus-handwrite.googlecode.com/files/ibus-handwrite-2.1.0.tar.bz2 HTTP Error 404: Not Found [+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name} [+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. [FIXME?: covers this list and more] [+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. [+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [+] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. 8802882e535f825713088db12569f103 [+] MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. [+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires [+] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. [+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. [+] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. [+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. [+] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. [+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. The package is approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

13 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 597967] Review Request: emacs-ibus - IBus client for GNU Emacs

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597967 Daiki Ueno <dueno(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Daiki Ueno <dueno(a)redhat.com> 2010-06-01 04:18:49 EDT --- Thanks for the review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: emacs-ibus Short Description: IBus client for GNU Emacs Owners: ueno Branches: F-13 F-12 InitialCC: i18n-team -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

13 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 597967] Review Request: emacs-ibus - IBus client for GNU Emacs

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597967 --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(पराग) <panemade(a)gmail.com> 2010-06-01 02:22:23 EDT --- Also if you are planning only to build for F-13 and above you can ignore writing buildroot and %clean sections. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines#BuildRoot_tag and http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines#.25clean -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

13 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 597967] Review Request: emacs-ibus - IBus client for GNU Emacs

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597967 Parag AN(पराग) <panemade(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

13 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 597967] Review Request: emacs-ibus - IBus client for GNU Emacs

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597967 --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) <panemade(a)gmail.com> 2010-06-01 02:15:19 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i686). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2221510 + rpmlint output for SRPM and for RPM. emacs-ibus.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US el -> e, l, eel emacs-ibus.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency python-xlib emacs-ibus.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US el -> e, l, eel emacs-ibus-el.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Elisp -> Lisp, Elise, Elisa emacs-ibus-el.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US elisp -> lisp, e lisp, Elise emacs-ibus-el.noarch: W: no-documentation ==> All are ok to be ignored. + source files match upstream url (sha1sum) c066f17640d51b91d39bffbc991f946a73469499 ibus-el-0.1.0.tar.gz c066f17640d51b91d39bffbc991f946a73469499 ibus-el-0.1.0.tar.gz.srpm ( I see that when tried to download using wget, I get 2010-06-01 11:33:52 ERROR 403: Forbidden. Not sure why its happening but I can download it using browser) + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + no headers or static libraries. + emacs-ibus-el subpackage exists. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI application + Other than requires on emacs missing, this package follows emacs addon packaging guidelines. Suggestions: 1) As per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Emacs#Package_Requires_and_Build..., emacs-ibus must have Requires: emacs(bin) >= %{_emacs_version} 2) Good if timestamps are preserved as per http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines#Timestamps APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

13 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 597967] Review Request: emacs-ibus - IBus client for GNU Emacs

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597967 Parag AN(पराग) <panemade(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade(a)gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |panemade(a)gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

13 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 570731] Review Request: ibus-handwrite - IBus handwrite project

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=570731 --- Comment #18 from Peng Wu <pwu(a)redhat.com> 2010-06-01 01:52:52 EDT --- The updated srpm and spec is here: Spec URL: http://pwu.fedorapeople.org/ibus-handwrite/ibus-handwrite.spec SRPM URL: http://pwu.fedorapeople.org/ibus-handwrite/ibus-handwrite-2.1.0-2.fc13.sr... Please review it, thanks in advance. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

13 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

i18n-bugs June 2010