https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=862470
Bug ID: 862470
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
Severity: unspecified
Version: 18
Priority: unspecified
CC: i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
shawn.p.huang(a)gmail.com, tfujiwar(a)redhat.com
Assignee: tfujiwar(a)redhat.com
Summary: please drop the patch that turns off preedit in
gnome-shell
Regression: ---
Story Points: ---
Classification: Fedora
OS: Unspecified
Reporter: mclasen(a)redhat.com
Type: Bug
Documentation: ---
Hardware: Unspecified
Mount Type: ---
Status: NEW
Component: ibus
Product: Fedora
Preedit has been fixed in gnome-shell entries, so ibus should make use of it.
See https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=684453
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879140
Bug ID: 879140
Summary: No icons displayed on non-GNOME desktops
Product: Fedora
Version: 18
Component: fonts-tweak-tool
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Reporter: tagoh(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
Summary says it all, no icons for +,- say.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
fonts-tweak-tool-0.1.1-3.fc18
How reproducible:
always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.just run fonts-tweak-tool on non-GNOME desktop
2.
3.
Actual results:
No icons (broken icon) displayed
Expected results:
expected icons should be displayed
Additional info:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882529
Bill Nottingham <notting(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproje
| |ct.org,
| |peter.hutterer(a)redhat.com
Component|distribution |xkeyboard-config
Assignee|notting(a)redhat.com |peter.hutterer(a)redhat.com
QA Contact|notting(a)redhat.com |extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856239
--- Comment #129 from Mike FABIAN <mfabian(a)redhat.com> ---
Created attachment 656902
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=656902&action=edit
fedora-18-firefox-liberation-2-1-comparision.png
comment#125 Kamil> I very much prefer Fedora 17 way of rendering. If
comment#125 Kamil> there is any way of switching to it, I'll do it, no
comment#125 Kamil> matter the effort. But I hope it won't be needed
comment#125 Kamil> and blurry fonts won't be the default. I don't
comment#125 Kamil> really care that the fonts scale better (there is
comment#125 Kamil> no big jump between 13pt and 14pt) or whatnot,
comment#125 Kamil> because that's not important to me. The purpose of
comment#125 Kamil> the font is to be nicely readable. That's all I
comment#125 Kamil> want and expect. Fedora 17 is much better in this
comment#125 Kamil> regard.
comment#127 Ilya> Install package with Liberation fonts from Fedora-17.
This screenshot shows a comparison how fedora 18 firefox
font rendering changes when installing the liberation fonts 1.07.
Left side: Fedora 18 default, Liberation fonts 2.00, similar to
Kevins screenshot.
Right side: Liberation fonts 2.00 removed and Liberation fonts 1.07
installed instead, no other changes.
The right side shows the very sharp byte code rendering which
cannot be achieved with Liberation fonts 2.00, no matter what settings
are used.
Kevin and Ilya prefer this very much. I prefer it as well.
But it seems to be a matter of taste. And the trend seems to go
to fuzzier rendering, many new fonts do not have such high-quality
byte code anymore.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856239
--- Comment #128 from Mike FABIAN <mfabian(a)redhat.com> ---
(In reply to comment #126)
>
> > Of course it is much less obvious then with the other options
> > (hintmedium, hintslight, hintnone). But is still visible.
> >
> > For me, even this little bit of colours is too much already, I prefer
> > the result in the screenshot in comment#115 on the left, i.e. sharp
> > byte code hinting without subpixel hinting, only gray-scale.
>
> Do you notice any colouring in this screenshot (left side)?:
>
> http://storage1.static.itmages.ru/i/12/1109/h_1352416963_1081608_4a4c6af4c4.
> png
yes.
It is obvious when you magnify it with some tool, but I see it even with the
naked eye from 1 metre distance form the monitor.
Of course it is more extreme on the right side but it is visible on
the left side as well.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856239
--- Comment #127 from Ilya <neptunia(a)mail.ru> ---
> I very much prefer Fedora 17 way of rendering. If there is any way of
> switching to it, I'll do it, no matter the effort. But I hope it won't be
> needed and blurry fonts won't be the default. I don't really care that the
> fonts scale better (there is no big jump between 13pt and 14pt) or whatnot,
> because that's not important to me. The purpose of the font is to be nicely
> readable. That's all I want and expect. Fedora 17 is much better in this
> regard.
Install package with Liberation fonts from Fedora-17.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856239
--- Comment #126 from Ilya <neptunia(a)mail.ru> ---
> Of course it is much less obvious then with the other options
> (hintmedium, hintslight, hintnone). But is still visible.
>
> For me, even this little bit of colours is too much already, I prefer
> the result in the screenshot in comment#115 on the left, i.e. sharp
> byte code hinting without subpixel hinting, only gray-scale.
Do you notice any colouring in this screenshot (left side)?:
http://storage1.static.itmages.ru/i/12/1109/h_1352416963_1081608_4a4c6af4c4…
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856239
--- Comment #125 from Kamil Páral <kparal(a)redhat.com> ---
Hello guys. You are all super-smart and I know zero about fonts, so I can't
really join the conversation. But I was plagued by the horrible fonts since I
upgraded to Fedora 18 Beta and found this bugzilla yesterday after quite some
effort.
See screenshots below, this is how it looks for me. Everything is taken with
Hinting:Full and Antialiasing:Rgba set it gnome-tweak-tool, because those
settings give the best output to me. The web page is twice enlarged with
Ctrl++, because that's the way I usually read it.
Fedora 17 default:
http://i.imgur.com/4GSAJ.png
Perfect fonts, very clear, crisp and readable.
Fedora 18 default:
http://i.imgur.com/MLU9N.png
Very blurry fonts, hardly readable for a longer period. My eyes bleed. After
seeing this I wanted to switch the OS, but I decided to search for the source
of the problem instead and arrived here.
Fedora 18 with freetype-freeworld:
http://i.imgur.com/TuGWA.png
A bit better than the default, but I still see rainbows in the text, which
makes me subconsciously annoyed.
I very much prefer Fedora 17 way of rendering. If there is any way of switching
to it, I'll do it, no matter the effort. But I hope it won't be needed and
blurry fonts won't be the default. I don't really care that the fonts scale
better (there is no big jump between 13pt and 14pt) or whatnot, because that's
not important to me. The purpose of the font is to be nicely readable. That's
all I want and expect. Fedora 17 is much better in this regard.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.