https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040278
--- Comment #5 from lnie <lnie(a)redhat.com> ---
(In reply to fujiwara from comment #4)
> AFAIK, the bug happened in KDE but not GNOME while I don't see it.
I also saw this bug in Gnome,the screenshot will attached later.
If ibus-daemon is supposed run in current user,then it seems that there is
nothing to do dconf.Also,I tested im-chooser,it works fine with current user,
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=UhO9gvuVwh&a=cc_unsubscribe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040278
fujiwara <tfujiwar(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproje
| |ct.org, tfujiwar(a)redhat.com
--- Comment #4 from fujiwara <tfujiwar(a)redhat.com> ---
AFAIK, the bug happened in KDE but not GNOME while I don't see it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=3htCDY98aq&a=cc_unsubscribe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1025711
Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |khaledhosny(a)eglug.org
--- Comment #4 from Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> ---
Added Khaled to bug list.
Bhushan can you report this to upstream as well
@https://bugs.freedesktop.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=LibreOffice&bug_status=UNCONFIRMED?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=fstVZe3ZLJ&a=cc_unsubscribe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1038128
Parag AN(पराग) <panemade(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |panemade(a)gmail.com
Flags| |fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from Parag AN(पराग) <panemade(a)gmail.com> ---
Review:
+ mock build for rawhide is successful
+ rpmlint on generated rpms
libeot-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
libeot-tools.x86_64: W: no-documentation
libeot-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary eot2ttf
5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.
+ source verified with upstream as sha256sum
srpm tarball :
cf5091fa8e7dcdbe667335eb90a2cfdd0a3fe8f8c7c8d1ece44d9d055736a06a
upstream tarball :
cf5091fa8e7dcdbe667335eb90a2cfdd0a3fe8f8c7c8d1ece44d9d055736a06a
+ License is valid and included in LICENSE file
suggestion:
1) header file timestamp can be preserved if used
make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} INSTALL="install -p"
2) build.log showing
configure: WARNING: unrecognized options: --disable-werror
so remove that option to ./configure
APPROVED.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=XKxmeiB8dR&a=cc_unsubscribe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036754
T.C. Hollingsworth <tchollingsworth(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from T.C. Hollingsworth <tchollingsworth(a)gmail.com> ---
In the future, please increment the Release and add a changelog entry for all
updates during the review process.
This package is APPROVED. You will be sponsored into the packager group
momentarily.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=WRSkV7cWrE&a=cc_unsubscribe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036754
Petr Vobornik <pvoborni(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags|needinfo?(pvoborni(a)redhat.c |
|om) |
--- Comment #2 from Petr Vobornik <pvoborni(a)redhat.com> ---
Thank you for the review.
Spec and srpm updated:
* man page included
* %{?_smp_mflags} macro added
* simple smoke test added - The only functionality tested is detection of not a
font file because it has the most distinctive output. Other use cases are very
similar to each other (exit code 0 with no output). Using Buildrequires with
font with incorrect fsType is not used because the test will become incorrect
when the font is fixed. More comprehensive tests should be implemented upstream
and then the %check section should be replaced by simple `make test`.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=m3IpYQT2GY&a=cc_unsubscribe