i18n-bugs February 2013

i18n-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org

1 participants
279 discussions

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 598277] New: [Indic] Rendering broken on 'Benchmark' Window
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Jun '15

10 Jun '15

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [Indic] Rendering broken on 'Benchmark' Window https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598277 Summary: [Indic] Rendering broken on 'Benchmark' Window Product: Fedora Version: 13 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: medium Priority: low Component: gnome-disk-utility AssignedTo: davidz(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: aalam(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: davidz(a)redhat.com, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Created an attachment (id=418426) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=418426) Rendering Problem on Benchmark window Description of problem: While using application in Punjabi (pa_IN), I found some square box, which is most probably i18n issue (translation is ok as render ok other places in application). Bug seems similar to Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): gnome-disk-utility-2.30.1-1.fc13.x86_64 How reproducible: 100% Steps to Reproduce: 1. run application in Indic locale (pa_IN/hi_IN) 2. select disk and click on Benchmark 3. Actual results: Rendering Broken on both side of graph (check screenshot for detail) Expected results: should work as in english locale Additional info: same as Bug #560336 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 20

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 812207] New: La (=?UTF-8?Q?=E0=A4=B2?=) and Sha (=?UTF-8?Q?=E0=A4=B6?=) half shape required modifications
by Red Hat Bugzilla 02 Jun '15

02 Jun '15

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: La (ल) and Sha (श) half shape required modifications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812207 Summary: La (ल) and Sha (श) half shape required modifications Product: Fedora Version: 17 Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: lohit-marathi-fonts AssignedTo: psatpute(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: psatpute(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, psatpute(a)redhat.com, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: Bug Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Created attachment 577228 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=577228 pdf explaining problem Description of problem: Mail from Sushant Devlekar, Half La (ल) and Sha (श) shape required modifications as done by Base shape of La (ल) and Sha (श) Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): lohit-marathi-fonts-2.5.1-1 How reproducible: everytime Steps to Reproduce: 1. Type ल्ल and श्क 2. 3. Actual results: half shape of sha and la not matching with full shape of la and sha Expected results: both full and half shape should match. Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 10

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 624158] New: Idea for setting individual fallback language
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 Feb '15

18 Feb '15

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Idea for setting individual fallback language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=624158 Summary: Idea for setting individual fallback language Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: system-config-language AssignedTo: psatpute(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: ncfiedler(a)fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: psatpute(a)redhat.com, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, nkumar(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Description of problem: system-config-language only sets one language, but does not give the user the possibility to set an individual fallback language. But this would be appreciated not to fall back to English per default. In the case of Low German (nds) for example it does not make any sense to fallback to English but to German (de). An example for this functionality could be ubuntus language-selector for GNOME desktops. (https://launchpad.net/language-selector) Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: It would be nice, if system-config-language would be able to set individual fallback languages. (compare ubuntus language-selector) Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 28

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 882267] New: Warning about /etc/fonts/conf.d/50-user.conf
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 Feb '15

18 Feb '15

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882267 Bug ID: 882267 Summary: Warning about /etc/fonts/conf.d/50-user.conf Product: Fedora Version: 18 Component: fontconfig Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Reporter: mefoster(a)gmail.com Description of problem: Running appes such as gvim under KDE results in a warning to STDERR like this: Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/50-user.conf", line 9: reading configurations from ~/.fonts.conf is deprecated. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): fontconfig-2.10.2-1.fc18.x86_64 How reproducible: Every time Steps to Reproduce: 1. Run "gvim" Actual results: Warning Expected results: No warning Additional info: I don't know if it's relevant that I use KDE as a desktop environment and that this error comes up with gvim, but that's where I specifically noticed it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 18

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 842568] New: Bad spacing in Liberation Mono with BCI-hinting
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 Feb '15

18 Feb '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842568 Bug ID: 842568 QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org Severity: unspecified Version: rawhide Priority: unspecified CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, petersen(a)redhat.com, psatpute(a)redhat.com Assignee: psatpute(a)redhat.com Summary: Bad spacing in Liberation Mono with BCI-hinting Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Linux Reporter: xously(a)gmail.com Type: Bug Documentation: --- Hardware: x86_64 Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: liberation-fonts Product: Fedora Created attachment 599962 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=599962&action=edit Spacing of "s" Description of problem: Applies to Liberation Mono with BCI-hinting. "s" is too far to the right or left, depending on the font size. E.g. "users" looks like "user s" at size 11. (See first attachment for font sizes 8-16.) "ow" is merging in bold font, at least at size 11. E.g. in "downloads". (See second attachment.) Version-Release number of selected component: 2.00.0 How reproducible: Always with this ".fonts.conf": <?xml version="1.0"?> <!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "fonts.dtd"> <fontconfig> <match target="font"> <edit name="antialias" mode="assign"> <bool>true</bool> </edit> </match> <match target="font"> <edit name="hinting" mode="assign"> <bool>true</bool> </edit> </match> <match target="font"> <edit name="hintstyle" mode="assign"> <const>hintfull</const> </edit> </match> <match target="font"> <edit name="rgba" mode="assign"> <const>rgb</const> </edit> </match> <match target="font"> <edit mode="assign" name="lcdfilter"> <const>lcddefault</const> </edit> </match> </fontconfig> With auto-hinting enabled instead, these problems do not occur: <match target="pattern" name="family"> <test name="family" qual="any"> <string>Liberation Mono</string> </test> <edit name="autohint" mode="assign"> <bool>true</bool> </edit> </match> -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 26

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 623411] New: transifex may need to be rebuilt against Python 2.7 in F14 and rawhide
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 Feb '15

18 Feb '15

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: transifex may need to be rebuilt against Python 2.7 in F14 and rawhide https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=623411 Summary: transifex may need to be rebuilt against Python 2.7 in F14 and rawhide Product: Fedora Version: 14 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: transifex AssignedTo: ivazqueznet(a)gmail.com ReportedBy: dmalcolm(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: ivazqueznet(a)gmail.com, diegobz(a)gmail.com, rpandit(a)redhat.com, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Depends on: 623233 Blocks: 619913 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- This is an automatically-filed bug. transifex-0.8.0-0.1.alpha.fc13 contains one or more .pyc files, but has not been rebuilt since Python 2.7 was built for Fedora, and thus the .pyc files presumably are for Python 2.6. Python 2.7 changed the bytecode format, so usage of those files will typically fail (see e.g. bug 621726). The package needs to be rebuilt against python 2.7 in both F14 and devel. Information on the new "dist-git" system can be seen here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Using_Fedora_GIT Information on common difficulties with Python 2.7 rebuilds can be seen here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Python_2.7 Once it's been successfully rebuilt for F14, an update needs to be filed to get the rebuild into F14: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/new/ Please add this bug to the update, to make it easy to track what's been done, and what's left to do. I'm sorry that this component was not handled by the mass rebuild. (This may be due to bug 623233) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 8

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 623321] New: ibus-xkbc may need to be rebuilt against Python 2.7 in F14 and rawhide
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 Feb '15

18 Feb '15

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: ibus-xkbc may need to be rebuilt against Python 2.7 in F14 and rawhide https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=623321 Summary: ibus-xkbc may need to be rebuilt against Python 2.7 in F14 and rawhide Product: Fedora Version: 14 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: ibus-xkbc AssignedTo: pwu(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: dmalcolm(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, pwu(a)redhat.com, shawn.p.huang(a)gmail.com Depends on: 623233 Blocks: 619913 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- This is an automatically-filed bug. ibus-xkbc-1.2.0.20100115-3.fc13 contains one or more .pyc files, but has not been rebuilt since Python 2.7 was built for Fedora, and thus the .pyc files presumably are for Python 2.6. Python 2.7 changed the bytecode format, so usage of those files will typically fail (see e.g. bug 621726). The package needs to be rebuilt against python 2.7 in both F14 and devel. Information on the new "dist-git" system can be seen here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Using_Fedora_GIT Information on common difficulties with Python 2.7 rebuilds can be seen here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Python_2.7 Once it's been successfully rebuilt for F14, an update needs to be filed to get the rebuild into F14: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/new/ Please add this bug to the update, to make it easy to track what's been done, and what's left to do. I'm sorry that this component was not handled by the mass rebuild. (This may be due to bug 623233) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 13

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 623320] New: ibus-table may need to be rebuilt against Python 2.7 in F14 and rawhide
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 Feb '15

18 Feb '15

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: ibus-table may need to be rebuilt against Python 2.7 in F14 and rawhide https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=623320 Summary: ibus-table may need to be rebuilt against Python 2.7 in F14 and rawhide Product: Fedora Version: 14 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: ibus-table AssignedTo: dchen(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: dmalcolm(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: dchen(a)redhat.com, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, shawn.p.huang(a)gmail.com Depends on: 623233 Blocks: 619913 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- This is an automatically-filed bug. ibus-table-1.3.0.20100621-1.fc14 contains one or more .pyc files, but has not been rebuilt since Python 2.7 was built for Fedora, and thus the .pyc files presumably are for Python 2.6. Python 2.7 changed the bytecode format, so usage of those files will typically fail (see e.g. bug 621726). The package needs to be rebuilt against python 2.7 in both F14 and devel. Information on the new "dist-git" system can be seen here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Using_Fedora_GIT Information on common difficulties with Python 2.7 rebuilds can be seen here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Python_2.7 Once it's been successfully rebuilt for F14, an update needs to be filed to get the rebuild into F14: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/new/ Please add this bug to the update, to make it easy to track what's been done, and what's left to do. I'm sorry that this component was not handled by the mass rebuild. (This may be due to bug 623233) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 8

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 623319] New: ibus-pinyin may need to be rebuilt against Python 2.7 in F14 and rawhide
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 Feb '15

18 Feb '15

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: ibus-pinyin may need to be rebuilt against Python 2.7 in F14 and rawhide https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=623319 Summary: ibus-pinyin may need to be rebuilt against Python 2.7 in F14 and rawhide Product: Fedora Version: 14 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: ibus-pinyin AssignedTo: pwu(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: dmalcolm(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, pwu(a)redhat.com, shawn.p.huang(a)gmail.com Depends on: 623233 Blocks: 619913 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- This is an automatically-filed bug. ibus-pinyin-1.3.9-1.fc14 contains one or more .pyc files, but has not been rebuilt since Python 2.7 was built for Fedora, and thus the .pyc files presumably are for Python 2.6. Python 2.7 changed the bytecode format, so usage of those files will typically fail (see e.g. bug 621726). The package needs to be rebuilt against python 2.7 in both F14 and devel. Information on the new "dist-git" system can be seen here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Using_Fedora_GIT Information on common difficulties with Python 2.7 rebuilds can be seen here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Python_2.7 Once it's been successfully rebuilt for F14, an update needs to be filed to get the rebuild into F14: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/new/ Please add this bug to the update, to make it easy to track what's been done, and what's left to do. I'm sorry that this component was not handled by the mass rebuild. (This may be due to bug 623233) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 15

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 462412] New: JTextArea & JTextField do not send XIM_SET_IC_FOCUS & XIM_UNSET_IC_FOCUS events to XIM server
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 Feb '15

18 Feb '15

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: JTextArea & JTextField do not send XIM_SET_IC_FOCUS & XIM_UNSET_IC_FOCUS events to XIM server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462412 Summary: JTextArea & JTextField do not send XIM_SET_IC_FOCUS & XIM_UNSET_IC_FOCUS events to XIM server Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: high Priority: high Component: java-1.6.0-openjdk AssignedTo: langel(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: shawn.p.huang(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: mark(a)klomp.org, langel(a)redhat.com, lkundrak(a)v3.sk, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: JTextArea & JTextField do not send XIM_SET_IC_FOCUS & XIM_UNSET_IC_FOCUS to XIM server. When JTextArea & JTextField work with XIM input methods, it do not set or unset ic focus via XIM protocol. So XIM server can not handle focus for Java application properly. I did not try other java widgets, maybe they have this problem too. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): java-1.6.0-openjdk-demo-1.6.0.0-0.20.b11.fc10.i386 java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-0.20.b11.fc10.i386 java-1.6.0-openjdk-plugin-1.6.0.0-0.20.b11.fc10.i386 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: JTextArea & JTextField do not send XIM_SET_IC_FOCUS & XIM_UNSET_IC_FOCUS events to XIM server. Expected results: JTextArea & JTextField send XIM_SET_IC_FOCUS & XIM_UNSET_IC_FOCUS events to XIM server, when they get or lose focus. Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 13

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
...
28
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

i18n-bugs February 2013