i18n-bugs May 2013

i18n-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org

1 participants
350 discussions

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 827516] New: [kn_IN] Vowel Signs U and UU do not correctly attach to many consonants in Lohit Kannada
by Red Hat Bugzilla 12 Dec '17

12 Dec '17

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827516 Bug ID: 827516 QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org Severity: unspecified Version: 16 Priority: unspecified CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, psatpute(a)redhat.com Assignee: psatpute(a)redhat.com Summary: [kn_IN] Vowel Signs U and UU do not correctly attach to many consonants in Lohit Kannada Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Unspecified Reporter: samjnaa(a)gmail.com Type: Bug Documentation: --- Hardware: Unspecified Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: lohit-kannada-fonts Product: Fedora Created attachment 588536 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=588536&action=edit ODT and PDF for test-case Description of problem: While most other CONSONANT + VOWEL SIGN combinations in Lohit Kannada are mapped to precomposed glyphs, there are no pre-composed glyphs for vowel signs U and UU except for the consonants PA, PHA and VA (where the stroke for U/UU needs to come from below the consonant rather than the normal right side of the consonant). While in most cases, by virtue of appropriate RSB and LSB values of the consonant glyph and vowel sign glyph, the simple sequence of the two glyphs creates an appropriate appearance, this leaves out several instances where the glyphs do not overlap at all and hence appear disjointed. For a professional appearance of the font, this should be fixed. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 2.5.1 How reproducible: Input all possible sequences of Kannada consonants with vowel signs U and UU. (See attached ODT for text. Use BabelMap [http://www.babelstone.co.uk/software/babelmap.html] if you want the codepoints.) Actual results: You can see (as in the attached PDF) that some consonants do not properly get attached to the vowel signs U and UU. Expected results: All consonants should properly get attached to the vowel signs U and UU. Additional info: Consonants which are not properly joined with vowel sign U: KA* NYA DDA DA BA RA SSA** RRA LLLA*** * = see at high magnification ** = may need separate precomposed glyph with some adjustment to shape of left side of vowel sign *** = so-called FA of Kannada Unicode Consonants which are not properly joined with vowel sign UU: Those already listed above for U, plus GHA and LLA, due to the shorter height of the left-side ending node of this vowel sign. I think in most cases appropriate kerning should solve the problem, except for SSA + -U/-UU, GHA + -UU and LLA + -UU where separate glyphs would be advisable. It is curious to note that DDA DA and BA are all disjointed whereas their aspirated counterparts DDHA DHA and BHA which all have only an additional notch-like stroke at the bottom are correctly joined with the vowel sign. I think the LSB RSB values are carelessly allotted in some cases, unfortunately. Other problems: CU JU -- the pointed part on the left of the vowel sign U passes through the consonants and comes out above (see carefully) -- actually *negative* kerning is needed here so that the pointed part should only enter the consonant and not again exit it. (It seems this problem does not occur for vowel sign UU due to the shorter height of the left-side ending node of this vowel sign which causes a problem with GHA and LLA instead -- see above!) Note: Unfortunately I will not be able to provide a TTF patch for this as I am already short of time on my official projects. Please take care of it. Thank you! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 11

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 839303] New: [ta_IN] Submission of glyphs for Tamil fractions/symbols to be included in the Lohit Tamil fonts
by Red Hat Bugzilla 12 Dec '17

12 Dec '17

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839303 Bug ID: 839303 QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org Severity: unspecified Version: rawhide Priority: unspecified CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, psatpute(a)redhat.com Assignee: psatpute(a)redhat.com Summary: [ta_IN] Submission of glyphs for Tamil fractions/symbols to be included in the Lohit Tamil fonts Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Unspecified Reporter: samjnaa(a)gmail.com Type: Bug Documentation: --- Hardware: Unspecified Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: lohit-tamil-fonts Product: Fedora Created attachment 597580 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=597580&action=edit Lohit Tamil, Lohit Tamil Classical and Lohit Tamil Chart fonts with new characters Contributing new Tamil glyphs to Lohit Tamil family: ---------------------------------------------------- I have prepared a proposal to encode 62 characters for old Tamil fractions and symbols to be encoded in Unicode. Seven of these are being proposed for the Tamil BMP block and rest for a new Tamil Supplement block in the SMP. For the glyphs required for the code chart I have largely devised new glyphs based on existing Lohit Tamil glyphs under the derivative rights granted by the OFL. Some glyphs which could not be derived, I created myself using Inkscape and other tools. I would like to donate all these glyphs to the Lohit project under the OFL for eventual inclusion into the Lohit Tamil/Tamil Classical fonts. For now they may be included in the PUA of an unofficial fork of the Lohit Tamil fonts. When they are eventually encoded in Unicode, they may be officially mapped to the new codepoints and included in the official distribution of the Lohit Tamil/Tamil Classical fonts. Using Lohit Tamil glyphs for Unicode code chart: ------------------------------------------------ In the proposal, I am also requesting the Unicode / ISO 10646 project editors to use the Lohit Tamil font for the Unicode Tamil code charts (Tamil block, and newly proposed Tamil Supplement block) because: 1) When the new characters are encoded and my glyphs used for the code chart, it would look good to maintain stylistic uniformity in the code chart, and my designed glyphs are stylistically like the Lohit Tamil glyphs as they are mostly derived from them. So it would be good to use Lohit Tamil glyphs throughout. 2) There are currently 72 Tamil characters in Unicode 6.1.0. The present proposal almost doubles the number with 62 new characters. It would be a significant and unnecessary effort for anyone else to duplicate my glyph design work for so many characters to keep in with the current Tamil code chart font style. So switching to Lohit Tamil for all glyphs is easier and advisable. 3) Personally I think the glyphs of Lohit Tamil are much "cleaner" than the existing Tamil code chart font, and more representative of the nature and beauty of the Tamil script. 4) The OFL already permits the use of the Lohit Tamil font (and its derivatives) for any purpose, so there are (hopefully) no legal issues pertaining which need to be cleared between Unicode and Red Hat (but of course, IANAL). I also sincerely request the cooperation of the Lohit / Fedora / Red Hat people in permitting the Lohit Tamil glyphs to be used for the Unicode Tamil code charts (i.e. for two blocks). Fonts with new glyphs: ---------------------- I attach herewith a ZIP file containing three font files: 1) Lohit Tamil font, with newly proposed character glyphs mapped to the PUA. 2) Lohit Tamil Classical font, likewise. 3) Lohit Tamil Chart font, containing only glyphs required for the code chart (for existing and new characters, totalling 134 in number, across two blocks Tamil and Tamil Supplement) mapped to the existing and proposed characters for convenience of Unicode / ISO 10646 editors. Behaviour of new characters and requirement from the fonts' side: ----------------------------------------------------------------- None of the newly proposed characters are combining characters in the sense of combining marks. However, most of them are proposed for a new SMP Tamil block and care might need to be taken for proper mapping so that on all platforms the SMP characters are accessible. There is only one sequence of characters which needs to ligate: TAMIL DIGIT ONE ௧ + TAMIL SIGN KALAM (which looks like TAMIL LETTER LLA ள) should always ligate. I have also provided the ligature glyph after the glyphs for the individual characters (mapped to PUA E03F) in the fonts 1 and 2 above. I have not added any substitution mapping however as it is for now only temporarily in the PUA. Etcetera: --------- It is my intention to submit the proposal within a week or so and I will upload/link here a copy of the proposal. If at all any changes are required to the set of glyphs as a result of any feedback from scholars or other sources, I will upload fresh TTF font files. I thank everyone, especially Pravin Satpute, for their support regarding this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 19

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 841947] New: [te_IN] Add support for Telugu nakaarapollu and repha to Lohit Telugu font
by Red Hat Bugzilla 12 Dec '17

12 Dec '17

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841947 Bug ID: 841947 QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org Severity: unspecified Version: rawhide Priority: unspecified CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, psatpute(a)redhat.com Assignee: psatpute(a)redhat.com Summary: [te_IN] Add support for Telugu nakaarapollu and repha to Lohit Telugu font Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Unspecified Reporter: samjnaa(a)gmail.com Type: Bug Documentation: --- Hardware: Unspecified Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: lohit-telugu-fonts Product: Fedora Created attachment 599423 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=599423&action=edit Glyphs for Telugu nakaarapollu and repha Telugu script has special form of vowelless NA called four-pronged nakaarapollu. Strictly speaking nakaarapollu means nakaara + pollu=virama so regular form of vowelless-NA న్ is also nakaarapollu but Telugu old grammarian Brown has specifically called a distinct form as nakaarapollu. The recommended model for getting Telugu nakaarapollu is NA + ZWJ + VIRAMA. Please find more details in the document: https://sites.google.com/site/jamadagni/files/utcsubmissions/11409-telugu-n… Likewise Telugu script has old repha form which is not found in common usage in current Telugu script. A modern-style Telugu font can allow user to select old-style reph by using the sequence RA + VIRAMA + ZWJ + CONSONANT because the plain RA + VIRAMA + CONSONANT would be presented as RA with sub-base form of CONSONANT. Please find more details in the document: https://sites.google.com/site/jamadagni/files/utcsubmissions/12017-telugu-r… These two documents have been approved by the UTC in the Feb 2012 meeting: http://www.unicode.org/L2/L2012/12007.htm <quote> [130-A15] Action Item for Deborah Anderson, Editorial Committee: Update the core specification text on Telugu nakaara-pollu based on input in document L2/11-409. [130-A16] Action Item for Deborah Anderson: Incorporate text on Telugu Reph from L2/12-017 into the Telugu block description. </quote> It is requested to: 1) add the glyphs for nakaarapollu and repha to the Lohit Telugu font: 2) add substitution mapping of NA + ZWJ + VIRAMA to the nakaarapollu glyph 3) add requisite OT markups for repha glyph so that a compliant OT system can recognize the repha glyph and render sequence of RA + VIRAMA + ZWJ + CONS using that glyph. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 10

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 851950] New: Latin ligatures need 'liga' standard ligature lookups
by Red Hat Bugzilla 22 Jun '17

22 Jun '17

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851950 Bug ID: 851950 QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org Severity: low Version: 17 Priority: unspecified CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, petersen(a)redhat.com, psatpute(a)redhat.com Assignee: psatpute(a)redhat.com Summary: Latin ligatures need 'liga' standard ligature lookups Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: All Reporter: deron.meranda(a)gmail.com Type: Bug Documentation: --- Hardware: All Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: liberation-fonts Product: Fedora Description of problem: Glyphs in the Latin Ligature block (U+FB00 .. U+FB06), such as "fi" and "fl", should have the OpenType 'liga' lookup features defined. That will allow text renderers to automatically apply the ligature glyph. Additionally, for completeness, the ligature caret horizontal positions should be appropriately set for these glyphs. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): liberation-fonts-2.00.0 Additional info: You may need to solve bug #851790 first. Also the "fi" (and "ffi" if existing) should exclude dotless-i scripts/languages, e.g., Turkish. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 4

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 887384] New: [abrt] WritRecogn-0.1.9-5.fc17: Process /usr/bin/WritRecogn was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 20 Dec '16

20 Dec '16

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=887384 Bug ID: 887384 Summary: [abrt] WritRecogn-0.1.9-5.fc17: Process /usr/bin/WritRecogn was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT) Product: Fedora Version: 17 Component: WritRecogn Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Reporter: christianvanbrauner(a)gmail.com Version-Release number of selected component: WritRecogn-0.1.9-5.fc17 Additional info: libreport version: 2.0.18 abrt_version: 2.0.18 backtrace_rating: 4 cmdline: WritRecogn crash_function: ___3_writrecogn_radical_recognizer_libsvm_recognize kernel: 3.6.9-2.fc17.x86_64 truncated backtrace: :Thread no. 1 (10 frames) : #4 ___3_writrecogn_radical_recognizer_libsvm_recognize at /usr/lib64/WritRecogn/libWritRecogn.so : #5 writrecogn_radical_recognizer_recognize at /usr/lib64/WritRecogn/libWritRecogn.so : #6 on_recognizeButton_clicked : #7 _g_closure_invoke_va at gclosure.c:840 : #10 gtk_real_button_released at gtkbutton.c:1725 : #16 gtk_button_button_release at gtkbutton.c:1617 : #18 _gtk_marshal_BOOLEAN__BOXED at gtkmarshalers.c:86 : #23 gtk_widget_event_internal at gtkwidget.c:5017 : #24 gtk_widget_event at gtkwidget.c:4814 : #25 gtk_propagate_event at gtkmain.c:2490 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=3TgbXPdPTr&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 5

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 650205] New: [abrt] WritRecogn-0.1.9-1.fc11: raise: Process /usr/bin/WritRecogn was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 20 Dec '16

20 Dec '16

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [abrt] WritRecogn-0.1.9-1.fc11: raise: Process /usr/bin/WritRecogn was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=650205 Summary: [abrt] WritRecogn-0.1.9-1.fc11: raise: Process /usr/bin/WritRecogn was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT) Product: Fedora Version: 13 Platform: i686 OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Status Whiteboard: abrt_hash:caf37a5446d0db49e10a286017b489bb0ae4f38b Severity: medium Priority: low Component: WritRecogn AssignedTo: dchen(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: martin(a)martindengler.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, dchen(a)redhat.com, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora abrt version: 1.1.13 architecture: i686 Attached file: backtrace cmdline: WritRecogn component: WritRecogn crash_function: raise executable: /usr/bin/WritRecogn kernel: 2.6.34.7-61.fc13.i686.PAE package: WritRecogn-0.1.9-1.fc11 rating: 4 reason: Process /usr/bin/WritRecogn was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT) release: Fedora release 13 (Goddard) time: 1288965718 uid: 500 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 10

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 798871] New: Please add Vedic Extensions to Lohit fonts
by Red Hat Bugzilla 20 Dec '16

20 Dec '16

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please add Vedic Extensions to Lohit fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=798871 Summary: Please add Vedic Extensions to Lohit fonts Product: Fedora Version: 16 Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: lohit-fonts AssignedTo: extras-orphan(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: samjnaa(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, extras-orphan(a)fedoraproject.org, pnemade(a)redhat.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, psatpute(a)redhat.com, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Description of problem: It is very good that Red Hat / Fedora takes steps to update Lohit fonts with latest encoded Indic characters, especially Vedic characters included in Devanagari Extended block. (See https://www.redhat.com/archives/lohit-devel-list/2012-February/msg00011.html) As a Sanskrit/Vedic scholar I very much welcome this. However, it would be even greater if the separate Vedic characters that are encoded in the Vedic Extensions block (http://www.unicode.org/charts/PDF/U1CD0.pdf) created in Unicode 5.2 along with Devanagari Extended were also supported. As Devanagari is the script mainly used for Sanskrit and especially Vedic printings nowadays, it would be best to add the characters initially to the Lohit Devanagari font so that it can combine properly with the Devanagari characters. If at all there is future demand for the glyphs to be added to the font of another script (like Telugu etc which are also often used for Vedic texts in those areas) the glyphs can easily be copied to those fonts in the future. OpenType normally cannot join base characters from one font with combining marks from a different font. So a separate Lohit Vedic font with purely Vedic characters is not possible. As the glyphs from the Vedic Extensions block have very simple shapes, it would hopefully be easy to design those glyphs and add them to the fonts. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 2.5.1 How reproducible: Install Lohit Devanagari 2.5.1 font. Actual results: The Devanagari-specific Vedic characters especially from the Devanagari Extended block are available. The generic Vedic characters from the Vedic Extensions block are not available. Expected results: It is desirable to have the generic Vedic characters from the Vedic Extensions block also. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 18

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 768067] New: Lowercase U, V, W, X and Y too thin at 18px bold
by Red Hat Bugzilla 20 Dec '16

20 Dec '16

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Lowercase U, V, W, X and Y too thin at 18px bold https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=768067 Summary: Lowercase U, V, W, X and Y too thin at 18px bold Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: liberation-fonts AssignedTo: psatpute(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: cantabile.desu(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, psatpute(a)redhat.com, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Description of problem: The lowercase U, V, W, X and Y in liberation sans at 18px and bold are noticeably thinner than the other letters of the alphabet. It's quite distracting. There is a screenshot attached. It appears to happen only at 18px (bold). Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 1.07.1 Additional info: I'm using arch linux. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 10

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 795465] New: Historical regressions (+persistent issues) found using fontlint (accompanying FontForge tool)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Dec '16

14 Dec '16

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Historical regressions (+persistent issues) found using fontlint (accompanying FontForge tool) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=795465 Summary: Historical regressions (+persistent issues) found using fontlint (accompanying FontForge tool) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: liberation-fonts AssignedTo: psatpute(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: jpokorny(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, psatpute(a)redhat.com, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 11

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 591556] New: Font artifact with number 4
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Dec '16

14 Dec '16

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Font artifact with number 4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591556 Summary: Font artifact with number 4 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: liberation-fonts AssignedTo: cchance(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: cchance(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, cchance(a)redhat.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: (Quoted from zayzayats(a)yandex.ru) In the Russian «б», the ascender is blurry. http://shnurapet.fedorapeople.org/rus-b.png freetype-freeworld-debuginfo-2.3.11-1.fc12.x86_64 freetype-2.3.11-3.fc12.x86_64 freetype-freeworld-2.3.11-1.fc12.x86_64 freetype-devel-2.3.11-3.fc12.x86_64 freetype-debuginfo-2.3.11-3.fc12.x86_64 $ ls /etc/yum.repos.d/ fedora-rawhide.repo rpmfusion-free.repo fedora.repo rpmfusion-free-updates.repo fedora-updates.repo rpmfusion-free-updates-testing.repo fedora-updates-testing.repo rpmfusion-nonfree-rawhide.repo infinality.repo rpmfusion-nonfree.repo remi.repo rpmfusion-nonfree-updates.repo rpmfusion-free-rawhide.repo rpmfusion-nonfree-updates-testing.repo $ cat /etc/yum.repos.d/infinality.repo [infinality] name=Infinality baseurl=http://www.infinality.net/fedora/linux/$releasever/$basearch/ enabled=1 gpgcheck=0 [infinality-noarch] name=Infinality - noarch baseurl=http://www.infinality.net/fedora/linux/$releasever/noarch/ enabled=1 gpgcheck=0 $ cat ~/.fonts.conf <?xml version='1.0'?> <!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM 'fonts.dtd'> <fontconfig> <match target="font" > <edit mode="assign" name="rgba" > <const>rgb</const> </edit> <edit mode="assign" name="hinting" > <bool>true</bool> </edit> <edit mode="assign" name="autohint" > <bool>true</bool> </edit> <edit mode="assign" name="antialias" > <bool>true</bool> </edit> <edit mode="assign" name="hintstyle" > <const>hintfull</const> </edit> <edit name="lcdfilter" mode="assign"> <const>lcddefault</const> </edit> </match> </fontconfig> Size 8. I set 98 dpi for proper kerning. http://shnurapet.fedorapeople.org/last-line.png (It's in the center of the last line.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 29

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

i18n-bugs May 2013