June 2014 - i18n-bugs - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 921706] ghostscript: /invalidfont in /findfont, --nostringval-- Helvetica

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=921706 --- Comment #58 from Jerry James <loganjerry(a)gmail.com> --- I have done 4 good builds of zenon in a row so far with this test build, so it is looking good so far. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=2SEz7Q7nZS&a=cc_unsubscribe

9 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 921706] ghostscript: /invalidfont in /findfont, --nostringval-- Helvetica

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=921706 --- Comment #57 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh(a)redhat.com> --- Okay. just made a testing package for this issue. the patch may needs to be polished more but please let me know if it works for all of your mock build. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6920997 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Nt4Grrgze1&a=cc_unsubscribe

9 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1097985] Rename Request: naver-nanum-fonts - Nanum family of Korean TrueType fonts

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1097985 --- Comment #2 from Daiki Ueno <dueno(a)redhat.com> --- >From the reaction on the fonts list, I got an impression that we will eventually need this change. Here are the updated SRPM and spec file: Spec URL: http://ueno.fedorapeople.org/naver-nanum-fonts/naver-nanum-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://ueno.fedorapeople.org/naver-nanum-fonts/naver-nanum-fonts-3.020-10... On versioning, I chose the "post-release" versioning to avoid epoch in Provides/Obsoletes (note that the current nhn-nanum-fonts is 3.020-9). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=cIjqpxddm2&a=cc_unsubscribe

9 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1103640] New: iso-codes-3.54 is available

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103640 Bug ID: 1103640 Summary: iso-codes-3.54 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: iso-codes Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, pnemade(a)redhat.com Latest upstream release: 3.54 Current version/release in Fedora Rawhide: 3.53-1.fc21 URL: http://pkg-isocodes.alioth.debian.org/downloads/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=JiM3oguecd&a=cc_unsubscribe

9 years, 10 months

1
1
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1103147] New: harfbuzz-0.9.29 is available

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103147 Bug ID: 1103147 Summary: harfbuzz-0.9.29 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: harfbuzz Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: pnemade(a)redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, pnemade(a)redhat.com, psatpute(a)redhat.com Latest upstream release: 0.9.29 Current version/release in Fedora Rawhide: 0.9.28-1.fc21 URL: http://www.freedesktop.org/software/harfbuzz/release/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=BxwK2gjikR&a=cc_unsubscribe

9 years, 10 months

1
1
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 921706] ghostscript: /invalidfont in /findfont, --nostringval-- Helvetica

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=921706 --- Comment #56 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh(a)redhat.com> --- (In reply to Jerry James from comment #52) > Sorry to be slow replying. That does not help. I just did a mock build > with the lines switch as indicated (in a custom fontconfig package build; > that was the only change). The zenon build still failed with the > ghostscript complaint recorded above. Now I see this inside the mock root: That was a suggestion for a workaround in case both system cache dir and user cache dir contains different caches. not for this broken cache issue. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=gO7FdVLkpe&a=cc_unsubscribe

9 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 921706] ghostscript: /invalidfont in /findfont, --nostringval-- Helvetica

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=921706 --- Comment #55 from Jaroslav Škarvada <jskarvad(a)redhat.com> --- (In reply to Jerry James from comment #53) > But if the guesses in comment 40 through comment 46 are correct, that only > worked because the -v slowed fc-cache down enough to let something else > happen first. If we can figure out what that mysterious something else is, > we'll finally have a clue how to solve this bug for good. No, I ran it in the buildroot which is "in the wrong state" after failed: $ mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 ./sendmail-8.14.9-2.fc21.src.rpm I am not changing the urw-fonts scriptlets. If fc-cache is ran in such buildroot (by entering it by e.g. mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 --shell), it seems there is no difference if using '-v' or not. The following command fixes the cache: # fc-cache /usr/share/fonts/default and then the ps2pdf works, but the: # fc-cache /usr/share/fonts/default/Type1 doesn't fix the cache (this is the same path as used in the urw-fonts scriptlets) which seems suspicious to me. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=AvJjIFYwol&a=cc_unsubscribe

9 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 921706] ghostscript: /invalidfont in /findfont, --nostringval-- Helvetica

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=921706 --- Comment #54 from Jerry James <loganjerry(a)gmail.com> --- Running fc-cache -v inside the urw-fonts %post script yields this output on a failing zenon build: /usr/share/fonts/default/Type1: caching, new cache contents: 35 fonts, 0 dirs /var/cache/fontconfig: cleaning cache directory /builddir/.cache/fontconfig: not cleaning non-existent cache directory /builddir/.fontconfig: not cleaning non-existent cache directory fc-cache: succeeded as opposed to this output on a successful build: /usr/share/fonts/default/Type1: skipping, existing cache is valid: 35 fonts, 0 dirs /var/cache/fontconfig: cleaning cache directory /builddir/.cache/fontconfig: not cleaning non-existent cache directory /builddir/.fontconfig: not cleaning non-existent cache directory fc-cache: succeeded Does that give a clue as to what is going wrong? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=i7BLENi0jV&a=cc_unsubscribe

9 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 465553] Language selection should affect keyboard layout too

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465553 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Last Closed| |2014-06-02 15:34:33 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=FuZiSTQG0m&a=cc_unsubscribe

9 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 921706] ghostscript: /invalidfont in /findfont, --nostringval-- Helvetica

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=921706 --- Comment #53 from Jerry James <loganjerry(a)gmail.com> --- (In reply to Jaroslav Škarvada from comment #51) > # fc-cache -v /usr/share/fonts/default > /usr/share/fonts/default: skipping, existing cache is valid: 0 fonts, 1 dirs > /usr/share/fonts/default/ghostscript: skipping, existing cache is valid: 4 > fonts, 0 dirs > Re-scanning /usr/share/fonts/default: caching, new cache contents: 0 fonts, > 2 dirs > /var/cache/fontconfig: cleaning cache directory > /builddir/.cache/fontconfig: not cleaning non-existent cache directory > /builddir/.fontconfig: not cleaning non-existent cache directory > fc-cache: succeeded > > And then everything work as expected. But if the guesses in comment 40 through comment 46 are correct, that only worked because the -v slowed fc-cache down enough to let something else happen first. If we can figure out what that mysterious something else is, we'll finally have a clue how to solve this bug for good. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Dj4KPkRzkr&a=cc_unsubscribe

9 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

i18n-bugs June 2014