i18n-bugs July 2014

i18n-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org

1 participants
321 discussions

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1114578] New: [abrt] ibus: __alloc_dir(): ibus-daemon killed by SIGSEGV
by Red Hat Bugzilla 30 Nov '14

30 Nov '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1114578 Bug ID: 1114578 Summary: [abrt] ibus: __alloc_dir(): ibus-daemon killed by SIGSEGV Product: Fedora Version: 20 Component: ibus Assignee: tfujiwar(a)redhat.com Reporter: lproven(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, shawn.p.huang(a)gmail.com, tfujiwar(a)redhat.com Version-Release number of selected component: ibus-1.5.7-1.fc20 Additional info: reporter: libreport-2.2.2 backtrace_rating: 4 cmdline: /usr/bin/ibus-daemon --replace --xim --panel disable crash_function: __alloc_dir executable: /usr/bin/ibus-daemon kernel: 3.14.2-200.fc20.x86_64 runlevel: N 5 type: CCpp uid: 42 Truncated backtrace: Thread no. 1 (10 frames) #3 __alloc_dir at ../sysdeps/posix/opendir.c:207 #4 fdwalk at gspawn.c:1046 #5 do_exec at gspawn.c:1161 #6 fork_exec_with_pipes at gspawn.c:1429 #7 g_spawn_async_with_pipes at gspawn.c:661 #8 g_spawn_async at gspawn.c:139 #9 bus_component_start at component.c:372 #10 _ibus_set_global_engine at ibusimpl.c:1471 #11 call_in_idle_cb at gdbusconnection.c:4868 #16 bus_server_run at server.c:143 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=6rLgBe4yth&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 2

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1009350] New: generated output looks not correct
by Red Hat Bugzilla 13 Nov '14

13 Nov '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009350 Bug ID: 1009350 Summary: generated output looks not correct Product: Fedora Version: 19 Component: ttmkfdir Keywords: i18n Assignee: psatpute(a)redhat.com Reporter: tagoh(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, psatpute(a)redhat.com Blocks: 1007493 Description of problem: This is output with sazanami fonts: sazanami-gothic.ttf -misc-Sazanami Gothic-medium-r-normal--0-0-0-0-c-0-ascii-0 sazanami-gothic.ttf -misc-Sazanami Gothic-medium-r-normal--0-0-0-0-c-0-iso10646-1 sazanami-gothic.ttf -misc-Sazanami Gothic-medium-r-normal--0-0-0-0-c-0-iso8859-1 sazanami-gothic.ttf -misc-Sazanami Gothic-medium-r-normal--0-0-0-0-c-0-iso8859-15 sazanami-gothic.ttf -misc-Sazanami Gothic-medium-r-normal--0-0-0-0-c-0-iso8859-9 sazanami-gothic.ttf -misc-Sazanami Gothic-medium-r-normal--0-0-0-0-c-0-jisx0208.1983-0 sazanami-gothic.ttf -misc-Sazanami Gothic-medium-r-normal--0-0-0-0-c-0-jisx0208.1990-0 Apparently there are no jisx0201.1976-0 for that. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): ttmkfdir-3.0.9-39.fc19.x86_64 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.ttmkfdir -d /path/to/sazanami/font 2.see the generated fonts.scale 3. Actual results: no jisx0201.1976-0 Expected results: should be there Additional info: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JIS_X_0201 for more details of JIS X 0201 1976 is a revision number for this spec. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=z7O9EydZoW&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 17

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 843331] New: [ta_IN] Please add glyphs for minority orthographies in Tamil
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Nov '14

10 Nov '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=843331 Bug ID: 843331 QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org Severity: unspecified Version: rawhide Priority: unspecified CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, psatpute(a)redhat.com Assignee: psatpute(a)redhat.com Summary: [ta_IN] Please add glyphs for minority orthographies in Tamil Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Unspecified Reporter: samjnaa(a)gmail.com Type: Bug Documentation: --- Hardware: Unspecified Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: lohit-tamil-fonts Product: Fedora Created attachment 600434 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=600434&action=edit Glyphs required for minority orthographies in Tamil While the Tamil script is mainly used for writing Tamil language text, it is also attested to be used for other language text such as Sanskrit, Saurashtra, Hindi, Marathi, Telugu and Kannada in the form of transliteration. For these minority orthography usecases, some characters from script-neutral blocks are required: 1) The superscript digits ¹²³⁴ would be used for representing the varga consonants (actually ¹ is only used very rarely). The Unicode chapter on Tamil script documents this and recommends the characters (0xb9) 0xb2 0xb3 0x2074. 2) Not only the superscript digits but their corresponding subscript digits ₁₂₃₄ (0x2081-0x2084) are also attested as a stylistic variant choice. 3) The modifier letter apostrophe 02BC ʼ is also seen. 4) Further, sometimes the candrabindu is also seen for nasality. Since there is no Tamil candrabindu character, the generic candrabindu ◌̐ at 0310 can be used. 5) The visarga is commonly seen but the Tamil visarga code point 0B83 is mapped to the Tamil special letter aytam ஃ (which has three dots against the visarga's two dots), so we will have to place the two-dot visarga in the PUA. (Not ideal I know, but it is unlikely to encode a Tamil-specific two-dot visarga. It is not possible to use the Devanagari visarga codepoint 0903 since rendering engines will produce dotted circles as it is not correct to combine Devanagari codepoints with Tamil codepoints.) Attestations for these usages and required glyphs are attached. Please add them with the appropriate script-neutral codepoints shown in the patch TTF so Lohit Tamil (and Lohit Tamil Classical) is also useful for these minority orthographies. BTW it would be good font design policy to make the modifier apostrophe a composite glyph of the regular apostrophe and subscript digits as composites of superscript digits. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 15

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1078661] New: Deprecate the usage of U+0BB8 U+0BCD U+0BB0 U+0BC0 for SRII per latest unicode standard
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Nov '14

10 Nov '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1078661 Bug ID: 1078661 Summary: Deprecate the usage of U+0BB8 U+0BCD U+0BB0 U+0BC0 for SRII per latest unicode standard Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: lohit-tamil-fonts Severity: medium Assignee: psatpute(a)redhat.com Reporter: srik.lak+public(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, psatpute(a)redhat.com Description of problem: Complex glyph SRI was changed from U+0BB8 U+0BCD U+0BB0 U+0BC0 to U+0BB6 U+0BCD U+0BB0 U+0BC0 in Unicode 4.1. Lohit-Tamil displays the complex glyph for both forms for backward compatibility. However this also prevents migration to latest standard as some input tools too offer same functionality leading to more content created with U+0BB8 U+0BCD U+0BB0 U+0BC0 as SRI which increases the need for backward compatibility. To break this vicious cycle, I propose U+0BB8 U+0BCD U+0BB0 U+0BC0 should not be substituted with complex glyph SRI and should be displayed normally. Apple / iOS fonts already do this complying with latest unicode standard. Failing to move to single consistent representation in line with latest unicode leads to fragmentation within unicode text, a greater cause for worry than backward compatibility. I understand the larger problem of standardization cannot happen only by changing this font, but its a start and Lohit being the only maintained free Tamil font, can help in the process. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 2.5.3 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. ஸ்ரீ (U+0BB8 U+0BCD U+0BB0 U+0BC0) should be displayed as ஸ்(U+0BB8 U+0BCD) ரீ(U+0BB0 U+0BC0) without a space in middle and not compounded form. Actual results: U+0BB8 U+0BCD U+0BB0 U+0BC0 giving complex glyph SRI Expected results: U+0BB8 U+0BCD U+0BB0 U+0BC0 should not give complex glyph SRI, should give U+0BB8 U+0BCD and U+0BB0 U+0BC0 seperately. Change Required: The line Ligature2: "'abvs' Above Base Substitutions in Tamil lookup 0 subtable" u0BB8_u0BCD.half u0BB0 u0BC0 in Lohit-Tamil.sfd should be removed. Additional info: See also bug 450699 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=D75hFGPezF&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 8

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1024071] New: ibus-m17n is enabled in the password entry field of the lock screen
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Nov '14

10 Nov '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1024071 Bug ID: 1024071 Summary: ibus-m17n is enabled in the password entry field of the lock screen Product: Fedora Version: 20 Component: ibus-m17n Assignee: dueno(a)redhat.com Reporter: mfabian(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: dueno(a)redhat.com, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, shawn.p.huang(a)gmail.com Created attachment 816871 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=816871&action=edit ibus-m17n-latn-post-enabled-in-password-entry-field-of-lockscreen.png Fedora 20 Beta TC6. See screen shot. Apparently, ibus-m17n does not check for IBUS_INPUT_PURPOSE_PASSWORD yet, therefore it is enabled in the password field. ibus-anthy, ibus-libpinyin, and ibus-typing-booster do not show this problem (they already check input purpose). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=w63kBcccZE&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 7

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 915448] New: Spell check problem (UTF8 conversion?) with Hunspell
by Red Hat Bugzilla 16 Oct '14

16 Oct '14

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=915448 Bug ID: 915448 Summary: Spell check problem (UTF8 conversion?) with Hunspell Product: Fedora Version: 18 Component: emacs Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Reporter: igor.redhat(a)gmail.com +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #725235 +++ Created attachment 514921 Sample text with accents (md5sum f91f52b0ae84fd91aa25e0d671228a23) Description of problem: When using emacs / hunspell to spell-check a UTF-8 encoded text file, emacs chokes on some accented letters, with the error message: Ispell error: UTF-8 encoding error. Missing continuation byte in 0. character position: Spell-checking testtext.txt using hunspell with default dictionary...done ispell-process-line: Wrong type argument: number-or-marker-p, nil Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): emacs-23.2-19.fc15.i686 using hunspell-1.2.15-2.fc15.i686 hunspell-en-0.20110112-4.fc15.noarch How reproducible: Always on my netbook with Fedora 15 for i686. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Open a text file with accented characters, e.g. the attached test case. 2. Start spell-check in emacs (after making sure that aspell is not installed, so that emacs will use hunspell.) 3. Actual results: Error message as above. Expected results: Correct spell-checking session... Additional info: This does not happen with aspell. It also does not happen when spell-checking files using hunspell on the command line. For some other files, the error message was: "this UTF-8 encoding can't convert to UTF-16" Using "enter debugger on error" on the text file, the following appears in *Backtrace* (with byte code removed): Debugger entered--Lisp error: (wrong-type-argument number-or-marker-p nil) ispell-parse-output(#("ël!" 0 3 (charset iso-8859-1)) nil 0) ispell-process-line("^Titre: noël!\n" nil) byte-code("....310\311!\210)\312\313....") ispell-region(1 38) ispell-buffer() call-interactively(ispell-buffer nil nil) --- Additional comment from Akira TAGOH on 2012-06-29 07:00:33 EDT --- ispell.el has the code to find the spell checker program out though, it doesn't update ispell-dictionary-base-alist according to the result. it should be optimized against it. Here is what my .emacs has and I want English spell checker only: (setq ispell-dictionary-base-alist '((nil "[[:alpha:]]" "[^[:alpha:]]" "[']" nil ("-d" "en_US") nil utf-8))) (eval-after-load "ispell" (progn (setq ispell-extra-args '("-a" "-i" "utf-8") ispell-silently-savep t))) It work well here. --- Additional comment from Fedora End Of Life on 2013-01-16 09:39:38 EST --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 16 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 4 (four) weeks from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 16. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '16'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 16's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 16 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora, you are encouraged to click on "Clone This Bug" and open it against that version of Fedora. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping --- Additional comment from Fedora End Of Life on 2013-02-13 10:55:37 EST --- Fedora 16 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2013-02-12. Fedora 16 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ubqA30ShKa&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 17

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 880494] New: French Keyboard layout not following PC105 (physically same as USA English), and Cannot allocate Eurosymbol as altchar-E or altchar-5
by Red Hat Bugzilla 02 Oct '14

02 Oct '14

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880494 Bug ID: 880494 Summary: French Keyboard layout not following PC105 (physically same as USA English), and Cannot allocate Eurosymbol as altchar-E or altchar-5 Product: Fedora Version: 18 Component: xkeyboard-config Severity: low Priority: unspecified Reporter: lsatenstein(a)yahoo.com Description of problem: There is an annaconda problem, and a keyboard layout definition problem and a physical keyboard layout problem. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Fedora 18 RC1 32bit How reproducible: F18 RC1 is being installed with default as English language. But I need the Canadian French Keyboard, as I write both English and French I added the Canadian French keyboard and placed it first in the list. Anaconda continues to ignore the CF keyboard mapping. Only way to force a switch from the US default was is to delete the USA keyboard, which activates the Cdn French version and then i added back the USA English. The USA English physical layout is correct. The Canadian French Keyboard must look like the USA English (PC105 layout). Missing is what configuration we could do in the past (F16,F17), which was to allow one to assign the Euro symbol to the alt-char E, or alt-char 5 So, Anaconda needs some correction to fix what I described, and the keyboard selection physical layout needs to match the physical layout of the USA English Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 37

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1074489] New: outdated ubin_table in charset.c
by Red Hat Bugzilla 29 Sep '14

29 Sep '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1074489 Bug ID: 1074489 Summary: outdated ubin_table in charset.c Product: Fedora Version: 20 Component: less Keywords: i18n Assignee: jmlich(a)redhat.com Reporter: tagoh(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, jmlich(a)redhat.com Created attachment 872630 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=872630&action=edit proposed patch Description of problem: less considers the characters in the range between U+20B6 and U+20BA as the "Not Assigned" and show with $LESSUTFBINFMT. but those were assigned in Unicode 5.2, 6.0 and 6.2. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): less-458-6.fc20 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.echo $'\u20ba' | less 2. 3. Actual results: <U+20BA> Expected results: ₺ Additional info: You can see more details what they are by gucharmap say. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=HlfCHNRzDF&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 6

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1084743] New: [abrt] ibus: _g_log_abort(): ibus-daemon killed by SIGABRT
by Red Hat Bugzilla 25 Sep '14

25 Sep '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1084743 Bug ID: 1084743 Summary: [abrt] ibus: _g_log_abort(): ibus-daemon killed by SIGABRT Product: Fedora Version: 20 Component: ibus Assignee: tfujiwar(a)redhat.com Reporter: mothlight(a)fastmail.fm QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, shawn.p.huang(a)gmail.com, tfujiwar(a)redhat.com Version-Release number of selected component: ibus-1.5.6-1.fc20 Additional info: reporter: libreport-2.2.0 backtrace_rating: 4 cmdline: /usr/bin/ibus-daemon -r --xim crash_function: _g_log_abort executable: /usr/bin/ibus-daemon kernel: 3.13.4-200.fc20.x86_64 runlevel: N 3 type: CCpp uid: 500 Truncated backtrace: Thread no. 1 (10 frames) #2 _g_log_abort at gmessages.c:255 #5 bus_dbus_impl_connection_filter_cb at dbusimpl.c:1473 #6 on_worker_message_received at gdbusconnection.c:2328 #7 _g_dbus_worker_emit_message_received at gdbusprivate.c:493 #8 _g_dbus_worker_queue_or_deliver_received_message at gdbusprivate.c:521 #9 _g_dbus_worker_do_read_cb at gdbusprivate.c:805 #10 g_simple_async_result_complete at gsimpleasyncresult.c:777 #11 complete_in_idle_cb at gsimpleasyncresult.c:789 #16 gdbus_shared_thread_func at gdbusprivate.c:278 #17 g_thread_proxy at gthread.c:798 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=3RGSO4AjOo&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 4

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1114580] New: [abrt] ibus: _gdk_x11_display_error_event(): ibus-ui-gtk3 killed by SIGTRAP
by Red Hat Bugzilla 25 Sep '14

25 Sep '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1114580 Bug ID: 1114580 Summary: [abrt] ibus: _gdk_x11_display_error_event(): ibus-ui-gtk3 killed by SIGTRAP Product: Fedora Version: 19 Component: ibus Assignee: tfujiwar(a)redhat.com Reporter: m.k.wadee(a)ex.ac.uk QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, shawn.p.huang(a)gmail.com, tfujiwar(a)redhat.com Version-Release number of selected component: ibus-1.5.7-1.fc19 Additional info: reporter: libreport-2.2.2 backtrace_rating: 4 cmdline: /usr/libexec/ibus-ui-gtk3 crash_function: _gdk_x11_display_error_event executable: /usr/libexec/ibus-ui-gtk3 kernel: 3.14.4-100.fc19.x86_64 runlevel: N 5 type: CCpp uid: 1000 Truncated backtrace: Thread no. 1 (10 frames) #2 _gdk_x11_display_error_event at gdkdisplay-x11.c:2557 #5 handle_error at xcb_io.c:213 #6 handle_response at xcb_io.c:325 #8 XGetWindowProperty at GetProp.c:69 #9 get_net_supporting_wm_check at gdkscreen-x11.c:1401 #10 fetch_net_wm_check_window at gdkscreen-x11.c:1438 #11 gdk_x11_screen_get_window_manager_name at gdkscreen-x11.c:1590 #12 adwaita_engine_wm_changed at adwaita_engine.c:127 #13 _g_closure_invoke_va at gclosure.c:840 #16 _gdk_x11_screen_window_manager_changed at gdkscreen-x11.c:1201 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=9Qdv36d3AD&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 2

← Newer
1
...
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
...
33
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

i18n-bugs July 2014