November 2017 - i18n-bugs - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1509973] fonts/ everything profile installation fails because of missing dependencies

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1509973 Irina Gulina <igulina(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |VERIFIED QA Contact|extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org |igulina(a)redhat.com --- Comment #10 from Irina Gulina <igulina(a)redhat.com> --- >> sudo docker run bikeshed bash -l -c "dnf --allowerasing install coreutils -y && dnf module install fonts/everything -y ; dnf module list" successfully installs fonts/everything on Fedora-Modular-27-20171113.n.0: <...> urw-base35-z003-fonts.noarch 20170801-2.module_bedbd3b3 xorg-x11-server-utils.x86_64 7.7-23.module_fa1f7807 Complete! Last metadata expiration check: 0:12:51 ago on Mon 13 Nov 2017 03:29:41 PM UTC. Fedora Modular Server 27 - x86_64 Name Stream Version Profiles 389-ds 1.3 [d] 20171102233352 default X11-base f27 [d][e] 20171103131108 default apache-commons f27 [d] 20171018085030 default autotools f27 [d] 20171018090442 default bind 9 [d] 20171018084824 client, default, ... cloud-init f27 [d] 20171017101923 default fonts f27 [d][e] 20171109145641 default, everything [i] freeipa 4.6 [d] 20171104182858 default <...> Hint: [d]efault, [e]nabled, [i]nstalled, [l]ocked -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

6 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1509973] fonts/ everything profile installation fails because of missing dependencies

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1509973 Parag Nemade <pnemade(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproje | |ct.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

6 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1504433] New: thai-arundina-fonts-0.2.2 is available

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1504433 Bug ID: 1504433 Summary: thai-arundina-fonts-0.2.2 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: thai-arundina-fonts Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: pwu(a)redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, pwu(a)redhat.com Latest upstream release: 0.2.2 Current version/release in rawhide: 0.2.1-3.fc27 URL: http://linux.thai.net/pub/thailinux/software/fonts-sipa-arundina/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/4964/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

6 years, 5 months

1
8
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1387825] The default keyboard layout for zh_TW (traditional Chinese) should be "us" instead of "cn"

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387825 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> --- langtable-0.0.38-2.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-16ed516ab2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

6 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1387825] The default keyboard layout for zh_TW (traditional Chinese) should be "us" instead of "cn"

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387825 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

6 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1387825] The default keyboard layout for zh_TW (traditional Chinese) should be "us" instead of "cn"

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387825 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> --- langtable-0.0.38-2.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-16ed516ab2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

6 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1496761] "Noto Color Emoji" would be a better default emoji font than "Emoji One"

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1496761 --- Comment #17 from Bastien Nocera <bnocera(a)redhat.com> --- (In reply to Jeremy Bicha from comment #16) > (In reply to Bastien Nocera from comment #15) > > We know all this, but decided that it was the best solution for this purpose > > already. There should be discussions about this on the Fedora Workstation > > list, as well as in the GNOME bugzilla and/or wiki. If in doubt about any of > > those, I'd be happy repeating those arguments on the fontconfig list, if you > > send an email there and CC: me. > > 1. I don't think you've had these conversations as broadly as you remember. <snip> > To summarize your position since you didn't mention it here: You don't want > to use the same emoji as Android because you see the emoji choice as a brand > recognition opportunity. I'm not sure our users will see it the same way. Again, not the place to discuss this. I discussed this with Allan and Jakub, who agreed with this choice, Behdad and Akira, who both agreed to give EmojiTwo time to be built for our purposes, which we hope would happen within the next year. Most of those discussions happened nearly a year ago, with much shorter discussions around GUADEC this year to re-affirm that EmojiOne would be chosen. Some of the discussions which I thought happened on the public fontconfig list actually happened in private. I'm not sure why the fontconfig maintainer CC:ed folks instead of making the discussion happen on the list. In any case, that ship has sailed. If you want to ship something else in Ubuntu, or Debian, it's easy enough to do. If you want to have a discussion about the default choice, again, here is not the place. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

6 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1496761] "Noto Color Emoji" would be a better default emoji font than "Emoji One"

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1496761 --- Comment #16 from Jeremy Bicha <jbicha(a)ubuntu.com> --- (In reply to Bastien Nocera from comment #15) > We know all this, but decided that it was the best solution for this purpose > already. There should be discussions about this on the Fedora Workstation > list, as well as in the GNOME bugzilla and/or wiki. If in doubt about any of > those, I'd be happy repeating those arguments on the fontconfig list, if you > send an email there and CC: me. 1. I don't think you've had these conversations as broadly as you remember. a. https://wiki.gnome.org/Design/OS/Emoji says nothing about preferring a particular emoji font. b. You shut this thread down immediately: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/desktop@lists.fedoraproject... c. I haven't been able to find any fontconfig list discussion of this issue. d. This bug has been closed without hardly any discussion, and they were closed by a fix that appears to me to be side-stepping the actual bug report and title. e. There was an October 23 Fedora Workstation meeting. Based on my reading of the logs, I think it's fair to say that if it wasn't for your opinion, the team would have decided the other direction (Noto instead of EmojiOne). 2. As far as Fedora 27 goes, it looks like the Emoji One decision is final. Ok. I understand freezes and Fedora is welcome to make its own decisions. 3. Here are my objections: a. You have said repeatedly (in the fontconfig commit and the October 23 meeting) that Emoji One/Two is GNOME's preferred emoji font. b. EmojiTwo in its current form is unpackagable. Comment #14 here gives hope, but currently that is vaporware. Therefore, I expect many GNOME distros to be choosing Noto Color Emoji and so I object to the characterization that this is GNOME's decision because I believe you didn't actually talk to other GNOME distros about this. To summarize your position since you didn't mention it here: You don't want to use the same emoji as Android because you see the emoji choice as a brand recognition opportunity. I'm not sure our users will see it the same way. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

6 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1496761] "Noto Color Emoji" would be a better default emoji font than "Emoji One"

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1496761 Bastien Nocera <bnocera(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproj | |ect.org, | |i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproje | |ct.org, mclasen(a)redhat.com, | |pnemade(a)redhat.com Component|gnome-themes-standard |fontconfig Fixed In Version| |fontconfig-2.12.6-3.fc27 | |fontconfig-2.12.6-3.fc26 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Assignee|ignatenko(a)redhat.com |tagoh(a)redhat.com Last Closed|2017-10-09 16:00:01 |2017-11-06 10:56:55 --- Comment #15 from Bastien Nocera <bnocera(a)redhat.com> --- (In reply to Jeremy Bicha from comment #9) > (In reply to Bastien Nocera from comment #2) > > I sent an upstream patch to the list about this: > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/fontconfig/2017-October/thread.html > > Really? Where? https://cgit.freedesktop.org/fontconfig/commit/?id=c41c9220181b203d1cf1f6... > I hope you don't mind me reopening this for discussion for Fedora 28, > especially since as far as I can tell Fedora 27 doesn't include a color > emoji font by default. That's a bug in gnome-themes-standard, not the bug we're discussing here about fontconfig. > As I'm sure you're aware, newer version of the emojione font are not > redistributable. We already know, it's written as such in the package spec file: http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/eosrei-emojione-fonts.git/tree/eo... > I looked at emojitwo today and it looks like it requires > several grunt/node packages in order to build from source, but the emojitwo > build documentation is non-existent so I may be wrong. > > So it's awkward for distros to package a dead font (emojione) and it's > difficult for them to package emojitwo. We know all this, but decided that it was the best solution for this purpose already. There should be discussions about this on the Fedora Workstation list, as well as in the GNOME bugzilla and/or wiki. If in doubt about any of those, I'd be happy repeating those arguments on the fontconfig list, if you send an email there and CC: me. Resetting the status of the bug, as the problem in question was already fixed in an errata. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

6 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1508201] New: harfbuzz-1.6.3 is available

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1508201 Bug ID: 1508201 Summary: harfbuzz-1.6.3 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: harfbuzz Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: pnemade(a)redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, klember(a)redhat.com, moceap(a)hotmail.com, pnemade(a)redhat.com, psatpute(a)redhat.com Latest upstream release: 1.6.3 Current version/release in rawhide: 1.6.1-1.fc28 URL: http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/HarfBuzz Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/1299/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

6 years, 5 months

1
3
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

i18n-bugs November 2017